CdnFox

Never happened. Sorry. The 1200 did. But your whole point was that they do. I do appreciate you admitting you were wrong tho, although i'm pretty sure you did it by accident LOL every now and then when you're not paying attention the truth slips out

The fact that it wasn't any day so far proves that you're wrong Let's just keep it real, you're a severe jew-hater and you support the Palestinian efforts to wipe the Jews out and anything they do is justified in your eyes as a result. Your position is pretty clear

Oh look! You've learned to parrot your betters! I believe parrots have about the intellect of a 3 year old, so that tracks "Palestine" wasn't "defending" itself when it slaughered over 1000 innocent civilians many of which were women and children, no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

Almost every accusation you make is actually an admission on your part. You accuse others of what you do to hide the fact that you do it

Exactly. We might be less broke if we were giving them that money based on their credentials, or they're possible value to our economy, or something like that. But instead we're literally paying people for being gay. And not just any people, people that didn't belong here in the first place but we went out into the world and offered them to come here with the promise of free money for a year because they're gay Meanwhile people regularly die in Canada because there's not enough funding to keep ER's open. But most of those a straight and some are even men (icky!!) so that's no loss.

Nobody ever made that claim. I see you've gotten caught in your lies again In fact that's what makes this even more egregious. The government funds 12 months of income for these people because 'gay'. In addition to that income Private groups may add additional money on top of it. That was said right at the very beginning so you just lied about what was claimed My very first reply to you: The Government of Canada, under the Liberal Party, is encouraging “LGBTQI+” refugees to move to Canada by offering them taxpayer-funded income for up to 12 months in addition to various other programs. Nobody anywhere said all the money they every get came from the gov't and the story itself notes that other groups give them money ON TOP of the gov't income. But they do get 12 months of income. LOLOL,once again you've made yourself look stupid and painted yourself into a corner It was never my argument. From the first post i was quite clear, they get 12 months of income from the gov't and get support ON TOP of that from other groups or programs. LOL you just got caught lying again little guy

The taxpayers ARE footing the WHOLE COST of the money the gov't gives gays for 12 months. Every nickel On TOP of that allowance, they are ALSO receiving money from OTHER people and OTHER gov't programs. So once again..... by 'implant the impression' you mean 'telling the truth'. The gov't website posted DID say the same thing. Here's more if you like The GAR Program for LGBTQI+ Refugees The Government of Canada has a long-standing commitment to providing a safe haven for LGBTQI+ people who face violence and persecution in their home countries. Identification and Referral: The key component is the partnership with trusted non-governmental organizations, primarily Rainbow Railroad and the Rainbow Refugee Society. These organizations are responsible for identifying at-risk LGBTQI+ individuals and referring them directly to the Canadian government for resettlement. Support Services: Refugees resettled through the GAR program receive comprehensive support for their first 12 months in Canada through the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP). This support includes: Direct financial assistance, including a one-time start-up payment and monthly income support. Immediate and essential services like temporary and permanent housing assistance. Orientation to life in Canada, language training, and help with job searches. Connection with local community services, including those specifically for the 2SLGBTQI+ community. gar program lesbians and gays - Google Search Rap is 100 percent taxpayer funded. 100 percent. LOL You lose again little guy. Is there EVER a time when you're not lying.?

But i don't pretend to have you on 'ignore'. Every now and then you'll decide it's 'safe" to quit pretending and comment on something. The rest of the time 'ignore' (which you don't as you've noted ) is just a convenient little lie for you to tell to justify why you can't respond to points raised. It's just dishonesty mike. And the fact i call you out on that behavior is why you have me on pretend 'ignore' so you feel less badly about yourself. That's UNPOSSIBLE!!! You're on ignore!

Honestly, i don't think that particular floor crossing is going as well for the liberals as they thought. It feels oily and scummy, far more so than the previous crossing where there was a history of dissent and unhappyness, although that still felt 'opportunistic'. But this one looks like a complete scam and political shenannigans, and Canadians often react badly to that. His explanation didn't help either - "I was 100 percent conservative the night before and had no idea i'd be crossing, but then i had a 20 minute conversation with the PM the next day and it completely changed my fundimental values and belief system so i had to cross". Uh huh. Was the conversation "what if i were to offer you...."? They've got a lot of negative press about it, even though it's legal a lot of Canadians are concerned and not happy about the idea of obtaining a majority through shady means and scams and I think if anything it's actually hurt his brand more than it hurt Pierre. The circumstances may very well impact anyone else thinking about floor crossing and may cause the liberals to think twice about being aggressive and trying to talk people into it. The fact is having a majority of one person is not actually all that great

So ..... wouldn't that require him to cheer when a liberal crosses the floor? And has one crossed recently that he cheered about? LOLOLOL - one of the funniest things about you is how often you provide your own proof that you're wrong, and not just wrong but usually stupidly so You realize the governor in council is not the conservatives right?

And yet you reply and read my posts LOLOL Despite me being in the 'cat box' or whatever else your tiny little mind likes to call it to pretend it's not just you with your head in the sand because you can't cope emotionally "ignore". You keep using this word, i do not think it means what you think it means.

Oh please, he came up with that over 3 years ago Since then he admits many times that he does read my posts even though I'm supposedly on ignore. Basically telling people that they're on ignore is his way of trying to save face when he can't emotionally cope with whatever fact you brought up that he doesn't like. Mike I'll bring up this thing without taking a position on it in a way the suggests how i feel but allows me to deny it later if i'm cornered!!! You: Ok, But these facts here show you're wrong and that entire argument is based on fallacy and hate mongering. Mike: Uhhhh... umm... what was that? Can't hear you, you're on ignore! You: "but how did you know to reply if..." Mike: IGNORE IGNORE IGNOREIGNOREIGNORE!!! (sticks fingers in ears) LALLALALALALALALALALAAL CAN"T HEAR YOU LLALALALAL!!!!" It's entirely childish. Mike likes to pretend he's intellectual, but in reality he's weak minded and only appears intellectual because he avoids any real discussion

By telling the truth? The gov't website said exactly the same thing. That's a lie, and you've been provided links to prove it. Does the gov't of canada website that 100 percent backs him up that User posted also reflect the author's bias? You get 12 months of gov't paid support if you're gay. Which is a horrible thing. And you must agree that it's a horrible thing or you wouldn't be lying so hard trying to deny it

Nothing intelligent to add, just attack and dehumanize the person you disagree with. You couldn't even offer a reason why. There's not much to you is there Mike?

There's plenty of other threads on plenty of topics. Your problem is you can't read Maybe lay off the NyQuil and calm down a little The very fact you can't address the points and have to attack the author instead shows that you know there's a problem here that hasn't been resolved They're thinking he may pull a spring election but I really doubt it. If you try something before the leadership race for the conservatives he will probably get punished for it. And right afterwards the conservative leader will probably have a popularity bounce as that's common with new leaders. I don't think we're going to get rid of them in the immediate future but there can be no doubt that he has been the absolute worst premier in our provincial history. Vote woke go broke

But they don't get any extra benefits, just the gays and lesbians. So if they're giving gays and lesbians extra benefits it's not because of oppression. And all we need to do to prevent excessive refugees is to stop bribing gays to come here and tighted up the rules on everyone else so that only the most desperate of people qualify. Everyone else can stay at home and figure things the eff out. Nope. Literally everybody recognizes that you're lying at this point. The government provides 12 months of income. That's taxpayer dollars. Others provide money as well but that doesn't make things any better As per the gov't website, they provide taxpayer funded income for 12 months.

Are you mumbling to yourself again?

It's true. If the NDP isn't gone it will create property rates issues throughout British Columbia

Nonsense. That's the kind of childish dribble we expect from the left but the reality is that in order to function assumptions must be made literally every day. So the only ass here would be you, and you were that way when you got here so I don't think we can blame the verb I did but if all you posted was hers then that doesn't mean she's not a Dei hire. Her qualifications would only be relevant if we had the qualifications of the other people involved. What if there was a white male who was even more qualified but was passed over for her because of Dei? That's the biggest problem with Dei hiring. Even if someone is qualified they look like they're not and that they were only hired because of their skin color or what's between their legs or their partners legs. D e I hiring is extremely common in that area and all levels of government so there's no reason to believe she actually was properly qualified for the job or that there wasn't somebody who was far more qualified. Sadly even if she is the very best any of her achievements will be brushed off because she's d e i

Honestly @eyeball Is well aware of that. It was quite obvious from the get-go that the government paid them 12 months. When he faces something that he realizes makes his left-wing friends look terrible and that he can't defend he likes to lie about what was said or about what he said to try and deflect the issue. They are basically paying days to come here and probably because they think gays are more likely to vote liberal considering that a lot of the migrants they brought in hoping for their vote wound up going conservative

He's referring to the voices in his head. And in fairness they probably are unanimous Democrats can say what they like and cry to their hearts content but at the end of the day everyone knew that trump frequently lies and they still thought he was a far better choice than the democrat option. Almost universally everywhere, And where they thought the democrat was better they did so at much lower rates than normal

A corrupt person on the left? Shocked! Shocked I am! I will now take 18 hours to reevaluate my life. It takes 2 seconds looking at that guy to realize he isn't in it for the people

Well then if they are the only ones getting the benefit and they are not the only ones being repressed then you are admitting that it's got nothing to do with the repression. If it was about repression then everyone who was repressed would get it An absolute lie. Private donors give additional money but the government pays for the 12 months. Let's read it again "by offering them taxpayer-funded income for up to 12 months in addition to various other programs. Taxpayer funded. 12 months. In ADDITION to other programs." The taxpayer pays for the 12 months That's not trying to give the impression, that's stating it out and out.

No it isn't. In the absence of evidence one way or another he's just as the correct to assume they are as they aren't, especially an environment where Dei hiring is a common practice If you wish to dispute that then the burden is on you. Go do your research

Is there proof she's not?