CdnFox

the doctors who did the analysis she provided do. Any other questions?

OF course i did. But i can understand english. So i probably understood it better than you. Also, you dumb. So there's that.

It's valuable when i repurpose it OF course you didn't get the refreence because you don't understand any of this. Next time i'll talk about something more your speed. LIke lego or something. LOL - it's a perfect representation and it's hilarious And the fact you would say that very clearly demonstrates you have zero understanding of it Which would be fair, most people don't. Physics isn't something that interests most people. Most people think schrodeinger was just some guy who hated cats. But - you felt STUPID not knowing it for whatever - and are desperately trying to google it to figure it out And now you're making statements that prove you didn't know anything but are the kind of person who'd try to fake it Kid - you's dumb. LOLOL - aww you poor little guy you TRIED to look smart and you blew it There's an old saying about it being better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and confirm it for everyone

Actually that was better than you have been

"think" might be a strong word for you to be throwing around

So has bud. Both have long histories of it. It's not the issue. As i've said it's foolish to think given the scope of the backlash that this is really about people disliking trans people. It just isn't for the most part. The majority of people just don't give a crap if some he/she drinks a beer. This is about wokeism and throwing this crap in people's face night and day. You can't go 5 mins without hearing about the poor trans people. For YEARS now. And now you can't even have a beer without it being political. That's the backlash. If you talked that much about kittens people would be fed up about kittens. The trans political movement has gone too far and now there's a backlash.

Awwww muffin - it's always adorable when children throw a tantrum when they don't get what they want Sorry little guy, maybe try facts or reason next time.

Sure, but it shoudln't be political. What makes it so is the facts. Denying it over and over again doesn't make it false. There is no medical basis for her exclusion. It proved her argument. So there is no medical reason why she should be denied. Based on her age - the chart you posted says there's no difference. Did you MEAN to prove me right? And if the doctors decide you don't deserve help because of your political views, you'll be fine with that right? Here's a little extra tidbit. They told her that if her name came up and she hadn't been vaccinated they wouldn't proceed. Danielle smith heard about the policy and said that she will seek a second medical opinion on whether or not this policy is necessary or useful. TEN DAYS after that announcement she gets a letter saying if she doesn't get the shot immediately she'll be dropped from the program, which means she dies. They did not want to give her time for Smith to look into this. Sorry - 100 percent political. And that's a bad reason to kill someone.

Yeah but we probably won't notice any immediate dif,345oq82349 0w9847 q308q0w98 qwy yqw[w [CENSORED]

At this point yes. And widening the gap https://338canada.com/alberta/ Campaigns matter and they haven't really started yet - but notley is REALLY underperforming in that regard right now. I'm honestly disappointed, i thought all things considered she'd be out of the gate like a bat out of hell building momentum. Instead she's almost invisible. Election day is may 29 - the official race has to start soon. Obviously Smith is going to go for a short election cycle as that favors her, so right now notley and her friends should be blowing out the doors with media and advertising while it's still off the official books - but they're not. I was kind of looking for an interesting fight and i'm not sure i'm going to get it. What i thought might be Van Dam vs Stallone is shaping up to be Chuck Norris vs Urkle.

LOL - awww you're so cute when you get all flustered like that "could" lead to pregnancy doesn't mean "did" . And they can't find out till at LEAST after their period is missed. Do some reading. HAAHHAAHAHA - Tell me you know i'm right without telling me Nobody said you claimed a human being is created at conception. I said "IF YOU ARE GOING TO...." . It's right there in your quote. If you don't feel like a complete retard right now, you should If you're NOT going to claim that then as i noted previously you've got no case. Life is meaningless. We kill life all the time. Cancer meets the definition of life. If the fetus is not a human being it has no human rights and it cannot be said to be murder. Ahem... from the first line in your own link: based on the right to privacy contained in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Exactly as i said. ANd if you read the case you'll see it even more. The question was whether or not abortion is constitutional. it was not commenting on abortion itself. You are totally begging me And you do this every time you realize you've blown it You become irrational and then beg and whine that i should admit you won Sorry kiddo. I think everyone can see who blew this one lol Apparently It's my place to be correct and yours to be the village !diot But i really didn't need you to put me there, i was there from the get go

Well in fairness that would keep the media going.

There's no doubt that fox is NOT the winner here. The settlement was bad enough but if the initial ratings loss after carleson left are to be believed it may turn out to be the cheaper of the two. We'll see if the ratings thing is permanent but Its clear Carlson was a large part of Fox's success. True - but the stats would suggest he has the ability to pretty much create the next fox news just by showing up. Where he lands and what they want to use him for could actually be a major influence on the states.

Agreed - it PROVED there was no russian collusion.

You realize all of those things you mentioned actually really happened

https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/advice/dogs-understand-mathematics/

China and russia are still there and still aggressive. We certainly haven't 'won' anything from them yet

Actually those conditions didn't exist when she went on the list as i understand it But regardless the point is the conditions are not based on medical science, They're political. She's provided proof she already has the same level of protection There's no proof of that being true anymore, The evidence would suggest otherwise . At this point almost NOBODY is vaxxed, their last boosters would have worn off and only a small percent are keeping up with them. So in your mind she deserves death because she's stupid and pig headed. Better hope YOU never get anything terminal And as noted she's provided medical proof she's already got the antibodies. So we get to the meat of it. You think she deserves to be 'left to die' because she's, in your opinion, pig headed and stupid. so it's political. Well - at least you stopped pretending it was anything else.

Russsia for a start. They claim they own a significant hunk of the waterway to the north that is canada's domain. There very easily could be an armed confrontation over that. China. There is a number of scenarios where a military crisis with china could unfold. THere's many countries which may harm us and for which we'd want to retaliate. If Iran blew up the parlaiment building we might want to hit back. You'd need a military for that. Now - admit it, your first thought was "the americans wouldn't stand for that they'd help". Yeah. Nato. A country that cannot provide for it's defense is no country. Right now we do so with the US. Hell we needed to call them to come shoot down a balloon that was bugging us that we coudln't handle. If we get rid of them that would be a bad thing unless we were prepared to spend a LOT of our defense.

You're wrong. Even more sorry. Many feel that the differences are minor in the big picture but ALL note there IS a biological difference. in fact there's a large body of research looking at ailments from the point of view of which 'race' is more susceptible. In canada we treated the first nations with covid vaccines earlier because as a RACE they are more physically at risk of serious consequence. They certainly were with small pox and were and still are with tuberculosis. Your claim that there is no biological difference is simply not accurate. There is, and tho it may be small it's still significant. Swing and a miss. They're not perceived as a race. Not by intelligent people. They are often referred to as an ethnic group, and ethnicity can include race, but jews come from all over and all kinds of backgrounds. They're not a race. The only time they come close is when their community seeks to have the same sort of benefits that being a distict race sometimes has. Sure, people slightly misuse words all the time. Irony is constantly abused But if someone like AA above says that claiming the persecution of the jews was not anti sematic but rather racist, then it's worth noting that no, the gassing of the jews was an anti semetic act, not a racial one.

Well, this one does seem to be true in this case. There's no doubt she's his grandaughter: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wheres-hunter-biden-on-monday-hell-be-in-court/ar-AA1as0YC Hunter's definitely the daddy. And there's no doubt that he often leaves her out, many news outlets seem to have reported this over time. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-have-six-grandchildren-biden-leaves-out-hunter-s-illegitimate-child-while-speaking-to-kids-at-white-house/ar-AA1armmL https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8937993/Meet-Joe-Bidens-seventh-grandchild-Navy-Joan-Roberts.html And it would seem that he has left her out again as the fox story suggests. So - verified. I guess 'granpa' doesn't really like the kid or want anything to do with the kid. It's not the kids fault, i kind of feel like they could have handled that better.

Really. Which other ones don't?

That might be true for the US but not for Canada - we'd have to start paying for our own military!

That does appear to be the case. And not really a serious attempt to get her fired either but more of a strong reaction to what she did, which was negatively impacting the company. Other communcation shows that clearly Carlson knew that the claims were probably not true, but while he complained about sticking with it privately none of that made it to the public. And obviously he feels that's how it should be, don't air your dirty laundry in public.

Right. Right That makes sense. I' m going to let you get a good nights sleep and ignore this.