CdnFox

Sure thing little guy Well of course you are - you HAVE to lie to yourself to maintain your point of view. If you were being HONEST then you woudn't be able to maintain your fantasies. Clinton hired someone to go to the russians and get dirt on trump. End of story. The russians provided info that turned out to be made up, but that's what happens when you deal with russians and clinton didn't care. These are facts. Well established. So - you appear to be a bit of a liar when you claim otherwise. It's a lot more kosher than hiring someone to come up with fake dirt from russia and then sending it to the FBI KNOWING that it's bullcrap. And there was never any evidence that the russians wanted the trump data for the purpose of spreading misinformation. Sorry. Yes - lying sack of shit is next on the agenda if you keep up with your hypocrisy and lies. I'm a big fan of truth. You should try it. It is in the US. If what you're claiming is that Trump did nothing illegal, then fine. we agree. Hillary DID do something illegal. That was proven. So... there you go.

That's not what he said at all. And once again the left has to lie to make its point. When hetero people are in a commercial they don't announce it - it's not "Hi i'm steve, i'm a hetero guy who likes boinking women" . Nobody rubs it in your face. But when it's a gay/trans/whatever then it's got to be about that. And THAT is what he means by 'nonsense'. Turning a commercial into a political discussion. "we'd like to talk to you about our product eventually but first we demand you consider this issue you probably dont' want to think about right now and that you've been forced to consider 3 times already today". It's bothering EVERYONE. People are getting SICK of it. THat's why the backlash is so large now. First you don't understand what the word 'viable' means. Second - yes there is! For the reasons i mentioned. I don't have a problem with religion but if every day i have to listen to " pardon me sir, do you have a moment to consider our lord and savior", then pretty soon i'm going to get fed up and want to belt the next one who says it This isn't complex. Oh well now i'm sure he'll listen to your wisdom and change his ways. What a turd you are.

If my AR self identifies as a ruger 10-22, can i keep it?

Hogwash. First off he hasn't said he won't support back to work legislation. He's said he won't commit to it and trudeau has to clean up his own mess. Which is fair. Second - the only thing it would confirm if he didn't is that he IS a politician not what kind. Politicians aren't there to boost the opposing parties without a good reason. He's under no obligation as the opposition to ride to the aid of the liberals. THey have refused to co-operate or work together on DOZENS of issues. Not helping them here means that they learn WHY it's important to co-operate with others and not treat your deal with the NDP as if you have a majority. If the libs want help then they should learn to cooperate once in a while. So far they've done the opposite. And the contract will be up again in the near future, so all pierre has to do is win the next election and then refuse to give them any more raises for a while. At the rate he's going he'll win an actual majority and that shouldn't be a problem. In the meantime justin can wear it. This is his mess to clean up, he's created the toxic enviornment in the house that exists today, now he's going to have to deal with it and defend his decisions.

I said it looks like it was scratched on with a protractor. They didn't. Well time will tell i guess. It COULD be.

You literally call jews nazis. In SEVERAL threads. Directly. You also call the isreali gov't nazis. You also call many people here nazis. And conservatives in general. And nobody buys your pathetic "nazi conspiracy" theroy bullcrap where you say "Now, i'm not technically saying YOU'RE a nazi, but everything you think is nazi propaganda" bullshit. This kind of violence is on you and your kind, spreading hatred of jews and claiming everyone is a nazi. I hope you're enjoying your handiwork

It's still looking like a UCP victory at this point . 71 percent chance of a majority https://338canada.com/alberta/

They've admitted they did. In fact it was her democrats who did it. It kind of sounds like you have a habit of 'not hearing' that which doesn't appeal to you. A campaign manager working for trumps campaign talked to a russian that was well known to republicans and democrats - and for you that 's clear proof. You admit clinton's people acted on behalf of her campaign and suddenly that's zero evidence Your hypocrisy is epic Clinton knew where the document came from, she knew how it was obtained, and she knew it had been forwarded to the fbi, and seeing as she allowed all of that to happen and paid the lawyers for their efforts she very obviously approved. Swing and a miss kiddo. It's quite correct. Pretending it isn't just makes you look desperate. But it does. 3 years and 69 agents worth of work and in his own words - "no evidence" of collusion. Sorry but in this world if there is NO evidence of a crime then that does exhonorate you. I can't just say "oh - you committed murder. I have zero evidence but i've decided that's the case". Presumably. Sorry ,kiddo, the fbi knew about that. And it's not collusion. Collusion is when it's a two way exchange and the parties plot to do something illegal. That never happened. This is just the democrats being DESPERATE beyond belief to try to justify lying for 3 years. Nope. In fact it's been verified it never happened. Which is why he was never charged. Complete swing and a miss kiddo. No collusion. Meanwhile - nancy DID illegally use a mail server to conduct business illegally while in office. That actually did happen.

No? You believe politicians SHOULD use illegal mail servers to conduct illegal business? And then put it on Anthony weiner's laptop? We found a bunch mpre emails in another location and there's so many it'll take us ages to see if they're new or not" is entirely press-worthy. The very fact he had them on that laptop is pressworthy even if they were the same emails. Oh - you mean where they repressed the information about hunter's notebook till after the election and then admitted it was all true? Yeah, that's REALLY helped put those rumours that the election was 'stolen' to bed. Great job.

I know right - the other day there was this person who was really inconveniencing me and i thought "boy if i could just kill them then I woudln't have to put up with this inconvenience", but the stupid state says "No, murder is illegal". Man - whatever happened to freedom in this country, amirite?

So you're saying you sold your mirrors. Well, there you go.

No, nobody had a problem with football players , and most don't have a problem with transgender people. BOTH of those examples are examples of the same thing - people are sick of the left wing's culture wars. They want to watch sports to relax and unwind - not to deal with political issues. When they're forced to - they get mad. They want to enjoy their beer and relax without dealing with political issues. So when that's shoved in their face, there's a backlash. They go to disney movies to entertain their children and listen to a good story, not to deal with complex sexual issues. So if disney shoves that down their throats they get pissed. Its the same thing. Identity politics and the culture wars/woke agenda are pissing people off. Not the gays, not the trans, not the football players. Swing and a miss there.

No, Antifa is. That's why i laughed when she demanded i name one.

Then all of his decisions go to appeal. Do you have any evidence that THIS judge has screwed every other decision? No? So you're just full of crap. Ok - thanks.

The fact that someone is not charged for something doesn't mean that they haven't done something. And it definitely meets the dictionary definition even if it doesn't meet the canadian legal bar. It's silly to pretend that only that which a person is charged for actually happenes.

Are you a bot? That makes zero sense. It's like you're trying to look retarded.

Nobody mentioned the scripture. None of that made sense. clearly English is not your first language. Keep practicing.

Oh i think you're 'woke' enough And in your case the term is 'reboot'. not wake. ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!

Well no, i didn't I never said he educated me in the slightest. I actually only quoted his description of how time is not linear. I never said i learned a thing from him, much less defended it. So ... is that the problem here? You had some comprehension problmes and didn't understand what was being said? LOL - well next time i'll try to use even smaller words for you If Dr Who was too much for you to understand, i'll see if Dr Seuss has something that might help, perhaps that's more your comprehension level LOL - boy did you screw that one up Why would i take a pay cut?

Doesn't matter. While the legal requirement in canada to be charged with it may require that, the common definition does not, and that's still what it is even if he cannot be charged under the code. It's a serious matter. it is not just 'an opinion' it is a statement as part of a legal defense that canada's gov't is illegitimate and has no authority.

Oh - i'm sorry. I didn't realize you couldn't read. You're probably unaware but a judge must submit a detailed decision in writing. That's why it's called a decision. At least pretend to know what you're talking about. What were you expecting? 40 foot letters of fire carved into the side of a mountain? perhaps a little dance routine to accompany it? Of course they're words, just like his LEGAL SUBMISSION of defense. And the details of the case are available on canlii if you want to see them. You haven't offered a single thing to explain why this is excessive. In fact, you barely make sense. And the judge did not say 'we have a democracy or we don't" . Which is good - because that's stupid. You can have a partial democracy - which is precisely what we have. We have a constitutional representative democracy. Clearly you don't understand what that is. Which is a shame.

Oh look boys, she's being dishonest again. In a moment she'll ask you to name ONE trans person. Dishonest in the extreme. This is why the left can't be trusted on the issue.

Everybody is quite aware I am in very good faith. You're the one who's arguing in bad faith, demanding to have examples when you know there are plenty, and then trying to change the tune when i point that out. It's not just politicians either, it's academics, media personalities, you name it. The only reason the left tippytoes around it at all is because of the political backlash of saying they want to ban ALL guns. So they start with "Most" guns or this "class" of guns. Hell, even Biden does it. He'll say nobody needs 'assault' guns and then define that as anything that isn't for hunting. So - any gun that isn't a hunting gun, for now. That's most of the guns in the US. You lied from the get go. You know perfectly well the left does NOT support firearms ownership. Which is why they can't be trusted. IF anything, you've proven here that they are dishonest in the extreme. ROFLMAO!!!!!!! You already said you didn't want them - now you're back to wanting them again Ok - like i said, joe biden. There you go Now i can't wait to hear you twist and turn as to why he doesn't count, or what he said doesn't count Every single person who's reading this knows you're a liar of course most knew before hand.

ROFLMAO - What's that phrase of yours? "Get back here with those goalposts!" LOL!!!!! So you admit that there's liberals and lefties who say that well good. It's hilarious watching you make excuses like that before you even get the name that you demanded "Give me a name!" are you sure? i can do that. "Oh ... ummm - I HAVEN"T SEEN THE NAME BUT I ALREADY KNOW IT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND I MEANT GIVE ME A NAME FROM A SPECIFIC GROUP !!!!""" You're so predictable Now that we're done pretending the left doesn't want to ban guns, or that there's any chance of them being rational about it, we're left with the same problem. The right can't trust the left on the firearms issues and the only thing the left cares about is banning the guns so there will never be any discussions around the real problems or solutions even though everyone knows guns aren' t the issue.

LOL - well at the end of the day she knows i'm right and she's just angry about it. The left wants to ban guns, period. They don't believe people "need' Guns, with the exception of law enforcement and MAAAAYBE hunters - but most of them aren't big on hunting either.