CdnFox

It's actually been a few now, of trans or gays shooting up other trans and gays. Or occasionally christian churches. The left wing media likes to seriously downplay that and avoid it whenever possible but yeah, it's a thing. You really don't think before you talk do you.

Who knows - they're flopping it in the public streets so they might flop it anywhere. Remember - Children LIKE to see nudity and kink. You wouldn't want to disappoint the children would you? Anyway you tell us - virtually everything you say turns out to be entirely wrong so whatever your opinion is we'll know the opposite is going to be the case. An is that all you've got to say for yourself AFTER YOU"VE BEEN PROVEN TO BE LYING?!?! - that wasn't a mistake on your part, that was a 1 second google search so i know you knew children went to pride parades and organizers encouraged it.

That would be ANYBODY'S argument. Is covid even going to be an issue half a decade from now? The AVERAGE age in the next range is 7 years older than her. The boosters only last months, so are any of the other people signing that they'll GUARANTEE to take the boosters for the next 7 years? Will covid treatments improve between now and then? It is IDIOCY to claim that SOME HOW the results of an age group that averages 7 years older than she is somehow means HER age group, which has ZERO cases, is relevant. And here you are yet again tripling down on the retarded. You screwed up and proved MY case instead of proving your own, and i get that makes you angry but it's hardly my fault. Good thing she's already got the antibodies then isn't it. As proven by her medical tests. As attested to by immunologists (TWO of them) specifically in her case. So once again - there's NO MEDICAL REASON FOR DENYING HER. This is petty and political. As your chart helps prove.

Where's the proof the community encourages bringing kids to pride parades? https://meaww.com/should-pride-events-be-kink-free-internet-divided-over-children-friendly-marches Ren emphasized that Pride, from kink to nakedness, could be an excellent opportunity for parents to engage their kids in unbiased sex education. Ren said, “children benefit from seeing people loving one another, from seeing diversity and inclusion. Children suffer from seeing violence and fear, hatred and divisiveness. https://gaycitynews.com/family-friendly-pride-events-nationwide/ Go to a Pride Parade Most Pride parades are back in person this summer. So plan a fun outfit, lather up on sunscreen, and go watch a Pride parade! You can find a list of Pride parades across the world here. Depending on the parade, you may only be able to march for a fee, but watching from the sidelines is generally free. Check the route of the parade so you can find appropriate parking and stake out a good spot to watch. Search for a family-focused area — many of these events have a designated place with activities for children. https://www.fatherly.com/entertainment/how-celebrate-pride-month-with-your-kids LGBT ‘pride’ parade advocates say children like to see ‘nakedness’ and ‘kink’ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lgbt-pride-parade-advocates-say-children-like-to-see-nakedness-and-kink/ Do you need more? Is that enough? There's more if you need it.

Makes their chances of bouncing back even more dubious.

A quick google search reveals hundreds of people and orgs who argue they are child friendly. Turns out there's a lot of !diots on the left. Moronic exaggerations? Is that what you're calling the truth these days

THe only reason you try to make that claim instead of addressing the specifics of their decision is because you don't like the idea that it's political. But your dislike doesn't change the facts. The person has presented proof she's as immune as anyone vaxxed. She's had two experts back that up, She's otherwise absolutely qualified to receive the transplant. And when the gov't said 'maybe we should look at this' they threatened to take her off the list permanently, basically killing her There is no medical basis for this, according to several medical experts and the doctors and policy makers responsible have not offered ANY defense against that in the slightest. They have simply replied 'We get to pick and we can do what we like". Of course it is. Of course you did. It's painfully obvious You posted quickly and didn't double check the facts. Now your chart shows you were WRONG and you're trying desperately to twist it into some half assed argument that by showing that you're wrong it actually shows you were right. I get it. we all sometimes go a little fast and post something without thinking about it, But it is BEYOND PATHETIC that you're trying to claim that because there is NO DIFFERENCE for her age range that proves she's vunerable because COMPLETELY DIFFERENT age ranges have other results. Beyond. Pathetic. Own your mistakes in life and move on. It robs you of ANY credibility when you behave like this. There is no medical reason to deny her, they're not even putting that forward as a n argument. This is about people who've decided she should suffer and die because they think she's "Stupid", etc.

Fair point.

Pot , meet kettle. Kettle, pot.

My own creation? Look - if you're trying to claim i'm your father then i'm gonna definitely need to see a blood test. And a therapist. I think you're a little of all three but it's REALLY hard to be sure. Your english is so poor it's often very difficult to follow you. Honestly it's horrible. You speak in sentence fragments, you are unable to clearly articulate your views, you frequently don't even let us know what you're talking about. You're like this small angry little random word generator

I doubt they'll go belly up but i'm not so sure about the rebound. Carlson was a HUGE slice of their success. Depending on what happens viewers may well land somewhere else. Remember, its not just about 'news', it's about the entertainment, and it's hard to find really good entertainers like that. Well -assuming you consider fox to be mainstream media... I think you might be surprised there.

In 300 some odd years all i can think of is nixon. Who else had charges brought against them? And that still doesn't hold the 'gov't' in check. At best that means that one guy who broke the law got caught but the gov't itself was largely unaffected. It's about the same. There have been investigations by the RCMP before during adscam and also an investigation of the finance minister and his staff for insider trading back in paul martin's day, so it has happened but it's really really rare and the police DO usually say 'meh, we can't do anything even if there is a crime here". Well check the settings you used for google translate, that should tell you

Of course it's correct. The selling of goods produces wealth. If that gets cut off then there is less wealth and less prosperity. Don't make me explain how capitalism works That might be true if you were a communist country satisfied with the bare minimum necessary to support life. But that's absolutely not the case think of it like this. A guy with the right hunk of land could absolutely be self sufficient and live off that land and never 'need' anyone else. But that guy is NOT browsing the internet, he's not wearing modern cloathes, he's not reading the latest books. He's living a minimal life. it's much the same when you scale it up. A minimalist country could SURVIVE provided it followed a communal market model with only a little capitalism perhaps but americans want far more than that. Not how it works No, canada would still have you beat by a landslide in that department. Our psychotically abundant hydro power takes care of a lot of our electricity needs and we sell tonnes to the states as it is. But - america could be self sufficient in the short term. But probably only in the short term. It wouldn't be very long till america's energy resourecs were starting to get tapped unless a new form of energy emerges. Manufacturing for whom? You just cut off trillions of dollars worth of customers. Sorry but the US is just as dependant now. If that trade stopped, the us would suffer horribly. Well the last time americans 'viewed' things that way we kicked their asses back across the border and burned down the white house . I see you've rebuilt it. It's very nice. But joking aside You're talking about economics rather than sovereignty. And the bigger your economic area of influence the more prosperous you're going to be. This is true going back 3000 years. That's why cultures and civilzations built roads, developed naval tech. Those who didn't tended not to advance. There's a reason all roads led to rome, or why china invested fortuntes of treasure into the silk road. Isolation is stagnation. America could survive - but it would be much reduced and over time would become less and less. Simple facts.

BWAAAAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Careful kiddos - he might declare the emergency act and sieze your unions bank accounts Sorry but this is funny They were all demanding firm action when it was the truckers, now that the police are taking firm action they're horrified at the injustice of it all

He didn't say you said they did. You called someone an !diot and then did exactly what you called him an !diot for doing So that'd make you an !diot squared i guess:)

Sure kid Why don't we have some fun. Explain what you felt was wrong or inaccurate about the dr who quote from the point of view of physics. Betcha can't Betcha didn't even really get it

Kid, we've been over this. Trump did nothing wrong or illegal and there was no collusion. Clinton did far worse and you claim her actions were angelic. For three years the dems claimed that trump illegally conspired with the russians and that turned out to be absolutely false. You might as well try to argue the earth is flat. You're going to have to find some other witch to burn i'm afraid.

and they've chosen to make this political instead of medical. Which is wrong. The premier absolutely can. If the premier says 'that requirement is gone", it's gone. So as soon as she said she'd look into it they made the demand. They don't. You screwed up and assumed she was older. The stats show there's no difference at her age AND WORSE for your case they show the chances of dying either way are almost zero. There's no debate here - that's what the charts say. So your charts proved that there is no medical basis for this. Next time do your homework before throwing up the first thing google gives you without thinking it through. Of course you do. If her age bracket is not at risk then it's not at risk. You effed up and now you're trying to spin it but we both know that's beyond stupid. Clearly there is NO risk of being unvaxxed based on the latest data you kindly provided. But instead you posted one showing 57 year olds aren't at risk. Thanks. That's all we needed to know. Anything else would be pure conjecture and smoke and mirrors on your part. People her age are safe. Holy crap guys - i think i broke him.

You trade with almost everyone. You do about 4.7 trillion dollars in trade. That's out of a 21 trillion dollar gdp. You do a LOT of business with the world. And if you're going to include canada and mexico then that's still not the US - so the best you could say is that north america is fairly independent -but that would mean the US is dependant on canada and mexico. Especially canada. Yet your title is canada is screwed. But your whole independence concept requires canada. And as we can see here you actually do a lot outside of north america https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_the_United_States Remember that bad recessions involve a drop in gdp of only a few points. So blowing that off as nothing is simply not reasonable. Further a lot of those goods are ones you can't really get without tradiing. Yup, it do. Sorry. About 5/6ths of that is incorrect. Mexico is not a viable replacement for china for about a dozen reasons. China actually produces a pretty high quality of product, that's why the us buys so much. And while i'm sure there's going to be more investmet closer to home att the end of the day companies aren't doing that. Minor investments only. China is still the main supplier of many critical components. The car industry shut down until china could start selling them chips again. Sorry - America is still very dependent on the rest of the world. And it always will be. You're about 600 years too late for an america that doesn't reuqire a bit of trade to get by

You guys went into a major tail spin the moment china couldn't supply computer chips. and you do an aweful lot of business with the rest of the world for someone who's "independent". Sorry the us is anything but these days. That was clear during covid. that's a discussion that really needs to be had. It's cheaper ot have a decentralized supply chain like we do, but a global hiccup can put the economy in a really bad place. For everyone.

The thing is we've had all that in canada for decades, yet routinely get better voter turn out that the states federally. The idea that this is suppression is just ridiculous.

Well no. All else being equal doctors should be the same - not infallable but of equal credibility. However - in this case one group of doctors is ignoring medical evidence and appears to be pursuing an agenda, to the point where when it looked like they might be overruled by other doctors they threatened the woman unless she immediately caved to their wishes. So I have reason to question the motives of one set. YOU on the other hand simply pick the ones you like because you think the woman deserves to be punished for her stupidity. Ahhhh so you ARE a medical doctor now. There is absolutely no reason to believe that is true in the slightest. Further - she's already had it 2 times with no serious effects. AND as a result, as the medical information shows she's as immune as she would be if vaxxed. No it doesn't. Not in that age bracket. That was a 100 percent swing and a miss on your part and i think we both know it. Ther's no salvaging that What? When was I in the military? I don't think i've ever suggested that? I do understand triage fine having done some time in a health care environment but again - there is NO MEDICAL BASIS FOR THIS DECISION. She's got immunity such as there is from this variant, she was already cleared, and they are playing games. This is punative. It's just that simple.

Some even less than others it would seem

Denial is the first sign you have a mental health issue. Mind you so is thinking you're a girl when you're a boy, but i digress..... IKIDDING! I kid! ) It's everywhere. Every day there's a story about trans people picking fights over something. Trans story time for toddlers, or trans demanding various washrooms be changed, or trans competing in sports for women, or trans teachers with massive fake breasts, or trans wanting to shower with members of the opposite sex, or trans laws and such being debated and passed in the house, and of course... trans beer drinking. Look at this board - there's not many days when there hasn't been a thread about trans people or issues on the go since i came here. No other topic has such constant coverage other than the war. And we've contained that to one thread. Lying to yourself wont change anything.

the doctors who did the analysis she provided do. Any other questions?