CdnFox

That does seem to be true, the democrats really are still sticking behind Bill Clinton

It says to. Go back and read what I said again and then go back and read the chart again. I mean I know math is hard for you but surely to Christ you could count to two without screwing it up

That's because nobody recognizes the Venezuelan government is being legitimate. Most decent countries including Canada have never recognized that government in the first place You can't call a government a state sponsor of terrorism when the government doesn't exist.

If he ever becomes one sure. Defending Your Homeland against an aggressor who attacked without warning and slotted your civilians is not mass murder no matter how much the left wishes it wasn't true. You want to blame someone for the death of civilians and children in Gaza then you need look no further than Hamas.

It's not a brilliant political move in the slightest. Conning people and then not delivering is not a good look. It buys him time right now but already the polls and pollsters are quite clear the people are getting fed up with his inaction. And it's just been a year If he winds up going to the polls is April or May, which is a very real possibility if he can't get another 2 floor crossers, he may very well have a tough time holding on to his minority. At the very least it'll be worse. And he'll be extremely vunerable due to a very long list of broken promises where things simply aren't happening, Moving forward it won't be very long before alberta realizes he's been playing them. To be honest i think smith knows and is setting him up for this. When albertans figure it out all the 'western alienation' sentiment is going to come back 10 fold. Just in time for the proposed referendum. You have to be a little more subtle in your lies and spread them out over a little longer time. "Hey we can just lie to everyone" is not political brilliance.

Nope. US announces $25m reward for arrest of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro - BBC News Sorry but that was biden. Not trump. Trump raised it again later in August. Once again you're proving yourself to be a liar.

Are you trying to claim that a secret mission designed to go in and get somebody as quietly as possible with his few casualties as possible should have been openly voted on in the congress?

Bill c69 is the big one. The oil Industries have come flat out and said if you remove the restrictive legislation will play ball but we're not interested in your magic fairy zones or even putting the money into a proposal while there's a tanker ban. He knows that. He knows there isn't going to be a proponent. He knows that excluding the first nations when he was talking to Alberta he's going to infuriate them and when they will never agree to it. He's deliberately sabotaged it, and now they're not even supposed to finish working out the details of the memorandum until April. Then he'll poison pill the thing again and drag things out till next year. All he has to do is keep doing that and he'll be able to find a time to have a next election and hopefully win a majority There will be no Pipeline with him in power, it will just look like there's about to be one at any minute

I'm sure you consider yourself property of the united states, I'm sure you think trump owns you. We don't have that problem Be sure to make certain your caller isn't on too tight before bedtime, you wouldn't want chafing

The chart says exactly what I did. Your problem yet again is an inability to cope with math. I even let you off the hook for the fact that there's a pretty major countries that aren't on that list, which doesn't really make it world opinion. Here's the problem you run into All the time. You come to a conclusion that you like, and then desperately try and justify if I working your way back to a question. That's always bad thinking. I have such an easy time making you look silly because I start with questions and then work my way forward through the evidence to a conclusion. That means a lot fewer mistakes, a lot less painting myself into a corner and a lot less logical dead ends that you run into If you want to do better you have to start with questions and then come to a conclusion not listen to your echo chamber and decide to try and defend whatever they like

None of that means what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting that it was against the law for israel to defend itself when attacked by Gaza for example? You're taking laws out of context and out of where they were intended to be applied and trying to pretend that they apply to a situation that they don't And no. Everything that maduro did was not legal by any stretch of the imagination. Nor were his actions in assisting to help drugs being smuggled into the united states. No more the crimes he committed well in the united states. That is why there is in fact currently in arrest warrant out for him in the united states So your argument falls apart on the face of it. It is been held by most countries that Maduro was not the legal leader of that country, that he illegally came to power, it is well known he is a major player in the smuggling of drugs to the united states and has facilitated it many times and benefits from it financially and that does make him a clear and present danger to the united states the safety of its citizens So they went and got him. I'm not sure that that can be seen as a violation of the UN charter. Was it a violation when Obama blew up bin Laden? I noticed you guys keep dodging that question. Which kind of tells me all I need to know, you know you're wrong you just mad because it's trump

Not what i say, what the chart says Now you're mad at me because you didn't read your own 'source' again LOLOL

Of course it is, consider the audience I'm writing for Anything more complicated than that and you start bleeding from the ears and have a hissy fit No, that would be the other guys. You guys are the ones who lie to yourselves almost as hard as you lie to others and ignore simple facts and truths. Are you talking about when Obama killed Bin Laden? I mean what you're saying is true but it was generally accepted at the time that it was a good idea. What's happening currently is the arrest of a criminal who has an actual warrant. They didn't kill him or anything and now he'll have a chance to face trial. More than we can say for what Obama did It MIGHT if Every word that you just said wasn't a lie He actually did mention democracy quite a bit. He didn't belittle anyone and said that as soon as it was practical they would turn over control to the people's representative. And that's absolutely 100% standard each circumstances like this. I'm taking responsibility and running the country until that time is again, 100% what you're expected to do in a case like this. So the intent that we can see is that he intended to arrest one of the highest members of the drug cartel letter basically funding themselves by selling literally tons and tons of illegal drugs inside America, and then take care of the country until democracy could be restored Sounds terrible 🙄🙄🙄 You on the other hand appear to be siding with the guy who's known to be a mass murderer, extortionist, kidnapper, drug cartel leader, and who repressed his own people and ran fake elections that most countries don't recognize is legit. That's the side you're on Did you want to think about that some more for a minute?

There will be no proponent as long as the current regulations are in place. They don't trust the liberals they don't trust Carney and they all agree that if carney was serious he pulled the tanker band and the no pipeline law. Carney knows this. All of his dancing and prancing pretending that there will be a pipeline it's just for show. It's not hard to make it undesirable for businesses

oil companies, including canadian ones, are currently launching major pipeline projects in the states. And oil isn't expected to peak for another 25 years, and 'peak' doesn't mean that suddenly people stop wanting it So no, it has nothing to do with that.

Political ambitions are not evil in and of themselves. It would appear that trump genuinely wants to cripple the venezuelan drug trade. Unlike his fake canada concerns, venezuela genuinely is funding it's gov't with billions of dollars in drugs being smuggled up and Maduro's gov't was a big player in that. I also have no doubt that trump wants to secure access to the oil, and possibly deny it to his enemies such as russia and china. Aside from Canada Venezuela is the closest major reserves. And it has also be raised by 3rd party experts that military bases were begin built in venezuela that would have allowed for long range missiles and icbm's. They were not operational yet and no missiles are thought to be in place but given the ties to russia and china he may have wanted to nip that in the bud. And i don't think trump liked the guy at all. Which is pretty much reason enough for trump to go after someone All of those things are plausible and have been thoroughly explored in the media but you are contention is the only possible reason he could be interested was to make Corporate America rich. Once again very dishonest of you

Oh Robo.... don't tell me you ate that dictionary i gave you AGAIN? LOL And your use of caps and bolds tells me you KNOW i'm right

Can't be a cultist, to be a cultist you have to be brainwashed. It's pretty clear he has no brain. Probably doesn't wash much either.

I suspect you only trust her because you agree with her bias. And it takes two sentences to realize there's an incredible amount of bias there. It's like asking Hitler if he thinks Judaism is a good religion or not. At this point in time trump hasn't done anything that most other presidents haven't done and they're certainly no end of precedent for what he did. I do believe that he probably was motivated by oil at least in part although two things can be true. But as to whether or not it's a good idea only time will tell. Regime change has worked both well and very badly for the united states. A particular concern here is that the US has no boots on the ground the way it did in Panama so controlling the cartels who are now running amok and who sound like they're prepared to fight may not be all that easy.

well that's cleared that right up for us i think. Ya know, egg nog goes bad about 5 days after xmas. Just thought i'd point that out

No it wasn't lawfully rescinded and the equipment was seized. There's no doubt that that's an active theft Some reparations were eventually paid but it's always been said it was nowhere near enough I think saying it's their oil is probably a gross exaggeration but it's not wrong either

There is absolutely nothing in that rather lengthy story about him claiming he's taking back their oil. In fact the story specifically says that oil doesn't seem to be his motive, but it's personal dislike of the guy and a return to the Monroe doctorine Once again you post evidence that you yourself are wrong 🙄🙄🙄🙄 Do you even read this stuff before you post it

Not really but it's the kind of stupid thing uninformed Lefty's say to try and make other people feel bad for having their own opinion . Venezuela's oil production is extremely low. It has huge reserves that could potentially be tapped but it is always been said that it will take between 10 and 15 years i've investment and development for that to happen. And at that point it would just start to begin to produce more. And that assumes that the investment starts tomorrow which is probably pretty unlikely. The head honcho was captured but it's going to take a little time to get rid of his supporters and minions we're going to be pretty desperate right now knowing that they committed all kinds of crimes. There will be civil unrest there for a little while and probably it will require a significant American troop presence There's no doubt that it's going to eventually impact oil sales and any oil selling country around the world is going to be affected. But it will be a long time off And Alberta was never going to get another pipeline. Carney is just playing games so that he looks like he's being reasonable while still keeping his environmental core happy

If it was obama, he would have just killed him Or did you forget about that. And this guy wasn't the president. Very few countries ever recognized that election as legit. You mean the drug traffickers? True.... not sure anyone who's not a left wing nutbar is really unhappy about that. That is traditional if a country takes over another country. That's how it worked with japan and germany and iraq and every other country. Sorry, you guys lowered the bar SO low with trudeau and biden that it's really hard to care about this. Blowing up a few drug boats and arresting a drug kingpin who terrorizes the citizens is a welcome change from the afghanistan withdrawal and declaring the emergency act on inncoent protesters and illegally seizing people's bank accounts at home.

Arguably true, but that doesn't mean he was wrong to yank the guy. So basically the same as biden then Yeah well, that's american politics for you ????? So what you're saying is that ONE sentence is about how long your sanity can last for before you go nuttier than a fruitcake again.