CdnFox

No, I'm reduced to having to act like I'm smarter than you, which is something so easy a grade 3 drama student could pull it off

No, and I've never said it was So you picked something at random that I've never commented on or even seem to be honest and try and use that as an excuse for your own bad behavior. That's pathetic. And as we've proven a million times over it is the left who is all about violence and hatred in this day and age. You already look like a mega twat in this thread. Don't compound it by doubling down on your own stupidity and defense of violence.

I dunno... Robo has said several times that he pays to get his zucchini picked by illegal immigrants, and I've always been somewhat horrified by the prospect that it MIGHT be a euphemism.

Soooo... your argument is that i was correct and this is evidence that i'm not in touch with reality Whooo kaaaay... you're really not helping your case that you're not mentally unhinged you know They're factual because they're factual. Sorry kid. If i say the sun rose in the east it's simply factual. Unless you can provide evidence otherwise that's just something you're going to have to live with Your throwing a hissy fit (and i notice not even denying that i'm right LOL) does not change that or make me wrong. Nonsense. First there's no projection. Second i can point to your behavior and note specifically that it's not the behavior of a rational or composed person. You become angry and slightly unhinged and make ridiculous statements that are easily refuted out of anger. 'Hissy fit'. Just as I can point to your constant obsession with my postcount. That's an observable demonstrable fact, it's not an opinion or something you can claim is false. I don't need to. It's been black and white right there Everybody can see it and others have commented on it number of times. Everyone here knows the truth kid. Everybody can see that you only come here to derail threads, attack people, 90% of the time those people are me and that every single time you obsess about my post account and go off the rails on these little hissy fits Nobody takes you seriously. People laugh at you the same way they laugh at X flyer and robo smith. He's kind of sad because you have enough smarts that if you really applied yourself you could probably be a decent contributor but that's not why you're here. Hope you feel better

This is where I kind of sit as well. Historically these things are done with consultation and agreement of the allies and they go much smoother that way. This FEELS with the information we actually have like it may have been unnecessary right now and kind of ill planned. However there is obviously a tonne of information the public does not have and it's quite possible that there were factors that necessitated doing it this way and right now. All we can do is hope it's over soon and that the resolution benefits the world and the US instead of harming it.

For you, sure uh huh. Let me guess, you forgot what we were talking about again. That's pretty hilarious

I'd already given you what you'd originally asked, you whined about it and i pointed out it was entirely factually accurate. this isn't the first time we've done this. You lie like a cheap rug. You are one messed up person. And you obsessing over my post count is observation. That's something everyone can see. You can't go a single 'encounter' without falling back on that. You mention it every single time you start to lose an argument. You're textbook obsessive. It borders on compulsive, like you can't even help it. AS for hissy fits, no matter what similar language i use to accurately describe your weird little emotional melt downs the results are the same. I didn't even mention to it that you can't do math without stomping your foot and whinnying like a horse LOLOL

Einstein said that israel was great and needed and that it would do well And by the way, we've kind of figured out that every time you feel stupid you try and invoke Einstein. If you would learn to be smarter you wouldn't need to misquote Einstein so much

Nobody has said palestinians don't exist. They said the state of palestine doesn't' exist. Black people exist but there's no 'blackistan' nation. Mennonites exist but there's no Mennonopia. (i would totally visit if there was, the food would be amazing ) Just because there's a group of people doesn't mean there's a soverign nation. I get you feel the need to deflect the discussion because your original premise was stupid but .. c'mon you can do better than THAT cant you? LOL talking to the voices in your head again?

Oh everyone here knew all of that about you long before i went to the ai And again, this was YOUR brilliant idea. And the prompts are right there, hell i even put a link in. So once again you claim not to have been given info that people can see i gave you on the same page. Insecurities, desperate need for validation, jealousy and fixation, self identity issues.. yeah honestly kid, we really didn't need the ai (It is little surprising how accurate it was tho)

That would be you. It's literally all you do here. You never start a thread, you never contribute to the discussion. You jumped in here when you weren't participating and distracted the conversation, Now you look like a twat because your own behavior suggests a host of mental illnesses. whereas i got called "compulsive". LOL woooooooooo Yeah, that's a game you started kiddo. I simply put your behavior into the ai engine and then post what comes out. You were the one who started that and now, as always, you're crying like a baby when that didn't work out for you Honestly I'm starting to think you have some weird fetish that makes you like looking like a retarded donkey

No you can't partition something that doesn't exist. Which means what they partitioned was something else other than what you're referring to. And at the end of the day had the Palestinians respected the partitions rather than trying to slaughter all Jews they would have the original territories and probably a very prosperous relationship with Israel. They had the choice of living in Partnership They chose otherwise and paid a price. Again Israel reached out and gave them the opportunity to choose peace, again that was refused. So the world took a region, partitioned it and gave legitimacy to both parties and one of them squandered it through violence and bad decisions. I can wish that they chose something different but in the end they didn't and this is the result

Hoping to distract the conversation. This sounds like your insecurities flaring up Have before and posted the new ones directly above your last message or so So why do you keep insisting that I haven't when you can literally see me having done so on the same page you're applying to? More of your mental health issues. Let's run that one through the AI. What does it think of someone who denies evidence already presented to them? what does it mean when a person repetatively demands information that's already been given to them on a forum - Google Search When a person repetitively demands information that has already been provided, it is often a tactic known as sealioning. They disguise their behavior as a sincere quest for information, but they actually intend to exhaust, frustrate, or troll you by making you do all the labor. [1, 2] This behavior generally stems from one of four main motivations: Trolling or Bad Faith: They are not looking to learn; they just want to argue or force you into a loop so they can dominate the conversation. Searching for Validation: They might secretly disagree with the facts and keep asking, hoping that someone eventually gives them an answer that aligns with their personal opinion. Selective Reading: They are only skimming the thread, missing context, or relying on cognitive biases that prevent them from absorbing answers they don't like. Compulsive Behavior: In some cases, it can be a form of compulsive reassurance-seeking, where the person struggles with anxiety and continuously demands confirmation to feel a false sense of certainty. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Well that does seem to suit you to a tee God you're a mess.

So you can't invade something and never existed. That should have been obvious Yes it was. But now there is. But there's still no state of Palestine.

LOL - stay classy Herbie

Ohhh dear.... sounds like you're having an emotional hissy fit again. That's pretty common with you. Lets look that up. Regularly throwing "emotional hissy fits" (or flaming) on online forums is generally a reflection of poor emotional regulation, a lack of healthy coping mechanisms, and an over-reliance on digital spaces for ego validation. [1, 2] Specific psychological and behavioral traits often drive this pattern: The Online Disinhibition Effect: Without physical, face-to-face cues or the immediate fear of real-world consequences, people lose their natural filters. The digital shield makes it incredibly easy to lash out in ways they never would in person. Low Frustration Tolerance: These individuals often struggle to process minor annoyances or contradictory opinions constructively. They view challenges to their worldview as personal attacks and interpret their immediate negative feelings as an objective "truth" that justifies an explosive reaction. Maladaptive Venting: People who regularly rant on the internet mistakenly believe it provides a healthy, cathartic release. Psychological research shows the opposite: digital venting actually reinforces anger and makes users more likely to engage in ongoing, aggressive behavior. Attention-Seeking: For some, negative attention feels preferable to being ignored. A hostile argument or a thread full of people reacting to their outrage establishes a form of connection and power they may lack in their offline lives. Entitlement and Ego: They may feel a strong need to always be "right". When an argument proves them wrong or challenges their perspective, they react with hostility to protect their ego and avoid the shame of accountability. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11] For further reading on the behavioral science behind digital aggression, check out Psychology Today Canada or Harvard Health for in-depth insights into managing or navigating online rage. Hmm. Always feels the need to be right. Maladaptive. Entitlement. Maybe you should read psychology today more?

I've shared it and the link many times As you well know. Your obsession with my post count is easily a mental health issue Compulsive habit maybe. I'd say there's some truth to that, i'm always popping in to see what you losers are up to now It's an "addiciton" like watching your favorite tv show and wanting to see what the next episode will bring That's pretty harmless tho. You on the other hand, as i've noted MANY times, exhibit serious mental health issues according to the same AI's But lets look at a few more You never show up to participate, you just show up to attack people. A person who exclusively targets others with personal attacks on a single forum is typically driven by a mix of anonymity, a sense of powerlessness in their real life, and a specific fixation on the community in question. These individuals often fall into several psychological and behavioral categories: The Frustrated Gatekeeper: Often an older or highly "invested" member of a niche community, this person feels entitled to dictate who belongs. They use hostility to "police" the forum and drive away newcomers or differing viewpoints. The "Keyboard Warrior": Protected by a screen name, this person acts out aggressively in ways they never would in person. They lack empathy for the human on the receiving end and derive a sense of thrill or self-importance from the conflict. The Displaced Aggression / Lonely User: Many online trolls or bullies struggle with real-life insecurity, loneliness, or unhappiness. They use personal attacks as a way to vent frustration, seeking a brief sense of control or validation by dragging others down. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] Oh dear. And lets try your post count question another way: what does obsessing about another user's post count on a forum say about someonee - Google Search Obsessing over another user’s post count usually stems from insecurity, a desire to gatekeep community status, or the use of ad hominem tactics in an argument. Rather than reflecting on the user's actual behavior, it often highlights the observer's own need for control, validation, or social comparison online. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Specific behavioral and psychological reasons for this fixation include: 1. The Ad Hominem Fallacy When an argument gets heated, users often search profiles to find "dirt" or irrelevant metrics. By attacking a post count—labeling someone as "obsessed with the internet" or a "newbie"—the observer tries to invalidate the user’s arguments without having to address the actual topic. [1, 2] 2. Status Anxiety and Gatekeeping Traditional forums historically relied on post counts (or forum titles like "Senior Member") to denote rank or community seniority. Someone obsessing over these numbers may be: [1, 2] Suspicious of newcomers: They view low post counts as a red flag for spam or bots. Resentful of high counts: They might view massive post counts as a sign of someone being "too online" or lacking real-world experience. [1, 2, 3, 4] 3. Projecting Insecurity In many cases, the obsession is a projection of a person's own social anxieties. People who feel they don't matter or lack influence in the community may obsess over numbers as a way to quantify worth, judging both themselves and others strictly by algorithmic or profile-based metrics. [1, 2, 3] 4. Curiosity and Context-Seeking Not all observation is malicious. Some forum users check post counts simply to understand who they are talking to. If a user is giving advice or making controversial statements, checking their history is a common way to gauge their expertise, establish a baseline of their typical behavior, or verify that they are a genuine member of the community Do you notice a pattern? When i input your behavior, no matter how i phrase it or which behavior of yours i specify it tends to come back with the same general mental health issues. Severe insecurity Hyper fixation. Envy. That's what you're coping with Sure i'm slightly addicted to watching you make an ass of yourself, it's hilarious! But you're a broken little man with serious issues We are not the same.

He's been very vocal, he says Aberta belongs in Canada. Uhhhh.... yeah so Oklahoma is in the us. They don't have mp's, and if they did they wouldn't be involved in canada's politics. Sigh. Why is it the right is always having to explain the basics to the left? And also non existent. Many mp's have spoken out that they want to see Alberta stay in confederation and that a pipeline would help with that so they hope carney is serious about building one and isn't just screwing around. (spoiler alert: He's probably just screwing around) So as you can see, when you base your entire argument in position on lies as you have chosen to do, you frequently wind up looking like a complete twat when somebody shows up with the truth

You already proved nicely you have no idea what science is (other than what google can teach you in 2 minutes). And you also have shown you're unable to produce any actual science on the subect. But we all appreciate you showing up, it's nice to start the week with a laugh

Why not? I own my house (not even an apartment or townhome) and my mom complains constantly i don't visit her enough Let me guess, you've been sitting in your bed at night obsessing about me again and having weird fantasies about me living in a basement, right? LOLOL God kid, youj're a mess . Why not? After watching you and the others on Team Bozo i've become an expert in observing others mental health issues especially with you and my post count. Here's a sample that AI came up with about you: Insecurity and Envy: Tracking a user's frequency or high volume of posts is often a projection of the observer's own lack of self-esteem. They may feel threatened by the other person's visibility or assume the frequent poster is desperate for attention. Hyper-fixation: Obsessively checking exact numbers can be tied to compulsive traits or arithmomania. It indicates an inability to disconnect from digital noise, often acting as a coping mechanism to avoid confronting issues in their immediate, offline life.

In other words you know I'm right and you can't refute it so now your big mad and crying and want it to be my fault Sigh. We were talking about Canada, I know how much Carney loves trump and keeps praising him when they're together in public but the countries are two different entities. But if you want to talk about your worship in the states I'm sorry but Obama was worshiped as much or more than trump was Again, talking about Canada here. So obviously you realize I'm correct and you're desperately trying to make this about America instead of Canada. Nobody mentioned America other than you. And in the states the democrats are vastly more cult-like and their leaders tend to be the object of hero worship much more than the republicans. Although trump is definitely getting close to democrat status in that respect But in Canada everything I said is true and obviously you know it which is why you wanted to start talking about America

There's plenty of others. Take your pick. Like I said one guy got banned over it because everybody knew what he was saying. And democrats around the world cheered like crazy as well. here's some democrats singing about killing charlie and talking about who's next (62) The other side of America on Charlie Kirk being killed - YouTube You got burned by your own bullshit kiddo and now you're big mad because it turned out i was telling the truth. Kid... you should have learned by now. I don't open my mouth unless i know i'm right.

Actually I do. Which is why I'm calling you on your bullshit. Like I said, Kathy tried the same stick you did. It's easy to blow off that kind of thing by pretending it's a joke. But when you're a joke is reliant on the idea that the president should be dead then you have walked over the line into an area where you are advocating or normalizing the death of the president and not through natural means. You're a 100% complete hypocritical twat. he crossed the line he shouldn't have crossed and democrats like you once again rise up to defend the idea of calling for the death of the president because you don't like him

The nato charter huh. Doesn't look like the US is buying it either Canada military board: U.S. hitting pause WASHINGTON -- The U.S. undersecretary of defence said Monday that the United States is pausing a long-standing military board, claiming “Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defense commitments.” At the end of the day it doesn't matter what the NATO agreement says, or whether we're allowed to count tactical Chipmunks or not, is the money isn't going to actually improve the military it's meaningless. Yeah, and we make some of the best lavs in the world. The Americans model their strikers after ours. But we gave the ones we were making to the Ukraine and never replaced them so now our people have none but we can claim that we met our commitments for NATO spending and Ukraine. Meanwhile our combat troops are dependent on uber. This is what I'm talking about. We need to force the politicians to agree with us, not NATO, as to what represents a reasonable amount of military spending and hold them to it. As it is each government realizes that they're only in power for 4 years so all they have to do is make announcements that won't take effect for 4 - 8 years and they'll never have to worry about it. Not a single person is holding the Liberals to account for their years of mismanagement, carney is a 'new' gov't and he's doing the same crap but he's making a better show of it. Yeah it's frikkin' terrible. I get that. I've got a cousin in the military (career) and i hear stories. It's bad. And carney just gave them a raise,,,, then cancelled the foreign deployment bonus. So. The guys closest to harms way just got a massive pay cut. Canadian military personnel face cuts in overseas allowances | Ottawa Citizen for those who don't know what we're talking about. Canadians believe Carney when he says they're massively increasing spending. They believe you guys went from 1.6% of GDP all the way up to a full five and will soon be rolling in new tanks and submarines and planes etc. They have no idea of the shell game that's gone on Even the headlines like the ones above. When carney announces new military spending the headline is always liberals increase spending or Carney hits 5% spending target, But the headlines for the negative stuff never actually include mention of the government or Carney. Notice the headline above does not say that the government cut spending. And people often don't read the story they just skimmed the headlines. If we believe the news carney is personally pouring over pamphlets for new submarines and is just about to click place your order on the Amazon version of military hardware to upgrade all our gear. They have no idea that most of the money is going to things that we wouldn't normally consider to be military and that most of these purchases aren't happening or will happen in decades. I'm very frustrated, I'm sure you are too. I know exactly what's happening and I know why it's working. A significant portion of Canadians, not all but enough to keep the liberals in power, will believe any lie they are told and don't look past the announcements. Military spending will go up but only by a very small amount and I doubt we'll be seeing any substantial new gear anytime during this current administration. Even the stuff we make here