CdnFox

He didn't. It was to one side of the vehicle until she backed up and turned and pointed her vehicle at him, Once again you have to try and lie to make your point it's just a little sad

Pretty much all of that is untrue The left is so desperate for another George Floyd But all they're getting is Laverne and Shirley

it most certainly is. For example, they investigated the killing of George Floyd. George floyd was not shot you 1diot LOLOLOL Wow, apparently trump controls virtually everybody! Amazing! You absolutely can. Beating someone in nearly torturing them to that is vastly more excessive. Running over to the car after it had crashed and doing a MAG dump would have been more excessive. In fact as far as police shootings go this one was pretty damn tame Actually what I said is if it was politically motivated they would have sent the person you mentioned. The fact that they didn't prove it wasn't politically motivated. You got this weird habit recently where if somebody says something to you you reply claiming that they claim the exact opposite of what they claimed. Pay attention Of course not. She was shot before she got the chance. But she did hit him.

Oh and just for MORE fun.... No 'business case' for pipelines because Liberals want it that way | National Post LOL 😜

You mean that illegal immigrants whom the democrats let in are being forced to leave? Yep. Interesting. So you can't read. He equated hate with being unmanly. And yet you are unable to understand that and said the opposite Tell me, what drugs did your mother take during pregnancy?

Yeah but we ALL have days like that

Sorry, but those are opinions. The last time we did this you said pick any one and prove that I'm wrong. And I picked one and proved you were wrong You're just big mad because you were wrong about the pipeline thing Nothing actually changed. Trade figures are expected to be the same or worse for the final quarter of 2025 as they were before. Carney is failed and you are aware of that. That's why you're trying to post massive long word salads Desperately nobody actually reads them and everybody thinks there must be something to them. Carney is failing hard and if he wasn't you would be able to present specific things that had gotten better and you can't.

Enbridge CEO urges tanker ban end, says no company will build 'pipeline to nowhere' - Business in Vancouver Release Details - Enbridge Inc. Google AI Enbridge's CEO, Greg Ebel, has clearly stated the company will not build a new major export pipeline to the West Coast under current Canadian regulatory conditions. Key barriers cited by Enbridge include: The Federal Tanker Ban: The current federal ban on oil tanker traffic on the northern coast of British Columbia makes building an export pipeline to that region unfeasible (a "pipeline to nowhere"), as the oil cannot be legally exported via that route. Regulatory Uncertainty/Delays: Ebel points to the "competitiveness disaster" of the last decade for Canadian projects, referencing significant financial losses incurred when the previous Northern Gateway project was initially approved, then later canceled by the federal government after years of regulatory and legal challenges. Investment Climate: The company is hesitant to commit the substantial private capital required for such projects without significant changes to the regulatory environment, preferring to invest in opportunities within the United States where conditions are perceived as more favorable. LOL whoooops!!! Wasn't that long a wait after all LOLOL Sorry kid, you were wrong. And the funny thing is I posted all this stuff here before. And there's more where that came from Enbridge was in the last stages of starting construction on a pipeline to the west coast when trudeau cancelled it. Carne kept those cancellations in place. Pretty simple.

So in other words the CPC has your vote provided they're as strongly left-wing party That's pure genius

Because you were voting liberal anyway

Those words don't really mean anything to you. You're saying that because you think it's hard for people to argue with things being fair without defining what fair actually means. Same with justice Sure. They probably refuse to investigate cases of tax fraud as well. That is not the body that investigates police shootings. The group that does that would be the FBI. Guess who's investigating? The FBI. This isn't a case of excessive force. Either he was justified in firing the shot or he wasn't and the group that investigates that is the FBI You just blew your own argument out of the water. This guy's controlled by trump then he is exactly who they would want doing the investigation. If what you're saying is true this guy would be the first guy trump would send in and make sure that the report favored him and what he wanted There are tons of protections for civil rights in America. It is not a civil right to run over police officers with your car

We know. If we do you'll just demand the liberals freeze our accounts LOL

because you extend the definition of 'civil rights' to mean 'criminals should be allowed in whenever they want'. Which is deeply disturbing, Your version of 'civil rights' is that there must be no law and order. Except in severe cases like if someone assumes a pronoun.

We already know that. There's no need to state the obvious Kid, we're all about 5 steps ahead of you here You're so far behind you THINK you're in front, but in reality we lapped you

Being able to run over a cop is not a basic human right.

But was prepared to bulid one and invested hundreds of millions in it before the liberals passed laws cancelling it. So there are absolutely oil pipeline companies that go to the west coast. Just no pipelines. Because the liberals shut it down. And are still doing so. Further your question was: Embridge absolutely has pipelines servicing the west coast, They just don't supply it to a port. You did NOT specify oil pipelines until AFTER you realized you're wrong And they're not the only ones operating pipelines that go to the coast. But embridge is the one that has actually said previously they would build an oil pipeline Sigh, no matter how stupid you are or how wrong you are, we can always count on you to double down and find a way to be MOAR stupid.

well your imagination is pretty limited i'm sure, what with your mental health problems and all

More 'university of facebook' stuff from you i see

Now most of the time you run away crying like a baby because I show you facts that you can't dispute And here's a hint kiddo, but your moral support section is Robo Smith, you're probably dealing with the wrong side of the argument But you hate accountability. I've suggested many times that the public should hold governments accountable for their actions and choices and you say that's a terrible idea.

Like what. Which country are we now doing more trade with than we were? What new trade deals has he actually brought home? Investment is fleeing the country at record rates, where's all this investment? He hasn't made any strides That's only true if he signed new deals. Which new deals has he signed? Then show me the real activity. What deal has he signed? What trade has increased? Where is this investment money? If what you were saying was true there would be tangible things you could throw in my face and say here's a trade deal where we are now going to make more money trading blah blah blah to these people. We have absolutely nothing in the way of new trade deals and there's no new investment. Where's this magical hidden benefit?

I don't really think that's why he does it. And it's not likely to produce anything. And in fact it hasn't produced anything despite the fact he's been doing that for almost a year. Investment in Canada is still at an all-time low and in fact we're bleeding investment money at this time. The Venezuela situation isn't going to make it any better, nobody was interested in building a pipeline before with the regulations in place and they sure as hell aren't going to be now. Nor have we got any new trade deals. That's like saying tennis equals golf. It's just not true. On a very high level they're both econmic topics but they have no relation to each other directly. We can attract investment without increasing trade, and for the most part we can increase trade without additional investment Which would be an exercise in semantics but for the fact that they require completely different actions and efforts to secure and promote. Nonsense. If he'd dropped the tanker ban and anti pipeline bill the moment he got in we'd be looking at getting our first proposals right now. Instead investment went elsewhere If he'd cut spending and business tax and signaled that canada was open for business he'd have stopped capital fleeing the country. At his current rate of success we will still be severely underperforming economically and sinking in world standing 3 years from now. Not only are things not getting better, they're getting worse. Generally speaking governments attract investment by making changes to regulation and taxation that make it worthwhile for businesses to come and spend money. And that isn't happening at all You can sometimes create trade opportunity with high level government to government discussions but the reality is the work is actually done behind the scenes by bureaucrats and Business Leaders. Not by flying around and spending taxpayer money on lavish dinners generally speaking Harper did more trade deals than any prime minister in living memory and he did the vast majority of them without leaving Canada. He did go on a few international trips but for the most part they were to create hype in those countries for deals that had already been negotiated. If what he's doing worked, by this point we'd be seeing results and we're just not

There's not much indication that that's what he's actually doing. He's been doing that for almost a year now and he has brought home no new investment, no new trade deals, nothing of any value. To be honest if feels more like he's promoting his own personal brand to other countries rather than bringing home any benefits for Canadians

Foreign investment is not trade. It's investment. Trade is something different. As a country we need to definitely attract far more investment and we also need to expand our trade opportunities but they are two very very different things

Robo, you're such an ultracrepidarian (am taking bets on how long it takes before he uses that himself incorrectly )

No she didn't, and she drove her car into a police officer. She hit him.