CdnFox

I think this is the first thread he's ever started that I'm aware of. Mike generally doesn't contribute much to the conversation, he just shows up to complain about how crappy everybody else's contributions are.

LOL back to your lying i see Here's the quote you quoted from me: "Where are you seeing that? I haven't seen that reported at all" That's right after you made your claim. I hadn't seen anything. Later someone provided the cite but you still hadn't You refused to provide your cite. So i read what they provided. You are NOW selecting a quote AFTER THAT instead of the one you quoted originally OOOOOPS!! Got caught lying again did ja? lOLOLO Well I always appreciate you proving you're a liar , but honestly you don't have to work so hard at it Nope, you didn't. Someone else provided it. AND it turns out you lied about what was said as well. Which is why you didn't provide it So you lied about what was said, you lied about providing the quote, you lied about what i said in reply and you wonder why nobody takes you seriously. You're hilarious Anyway, he didn't say what you claimed, and obviously was just brutally unhappy with the damage done to the country by biden and fearful that the democrats would not give up control lawfully, and wanted to draw attention to his concerns with his suicide due to mental illnesses he suffered thanks to biden's lack of care for vetrans. Pretty sad situation.

You actually were the one that stole my idea. But i get it, you're like a liberal who'd lie about stealing other people's ideas and then pretending it's theirs And lets face it, you've never had a good idea so I couldn't steal any of yours ???? It's only 4:30, it's a little early in the day for your brain to shut down already isn't it? (i thought you were solar powered?)

They have zero interest in getting it done by next week That point was never made. i'm sorry but that's just in your head. If that was his point he certainly never expressed that in any way. So seeing as it was never mentioned being angry that it was never addressed seems kind of silly

And has he? Is Greenland part of the united states right now? No? So what you're saying is you enjoy looking like a tard and want to lean into it 🙄 *STAMP!* . You are now officially dumber than trump.

????? Uhhh she led the conservatives? She was premier under the liberal party banner not the conservative one. And it would have been the right wing voters who supported her sooooo.... You don't really know anything at all about politics do you.

FFS dude he's trolling you and everyone else who's too dumb to realize he doesnt' mean it for a second and the LAST thing he'd want is for Canada to join the states! Could you PLEASE try to be smarter than trump for gods' sake.

I actually didn't claim to read it. That quote of mine you just quoted was me literally asking for it because i hadn't seen it yet. nobody had provided it yet including yourself, so you just made the claim out of nowhere and i asked where you saw it. And it's hilarious that as usual the guy who cries to the heavens if others don't provide a cite didn't provide a cite and is now angry that i asked for a cite So as we saw, once again you completely lied about what was said, refused to provide not only a cite but even where the quote was from, and now you're butthurt when someone else provided the information and you got caught fibbing At least you're consistent! LOLOLOL

You didn't prove it even tho it turns out you were absoltuely right as always!!!! LOL yeah you really got me there kiddo Only to a crazy person. You made a claim. The claim is untrue, as i have demonstrated. Now you're butthurt. LOL Never change big guy Nope. No more than people who coudln't afford the boat trip were 'restricted'. Not being able to afford it is not a restriction. That's still not half of a 150 year history. Sigh. Do we need to buy you a pocket calculator? It's 100% correct. This is simple. You made a claim that people who were not European were not allowed to come to Canada for most of its history. I have proven that they were allowed to come to Canada and in fact came in fairly large numbers. We're not talking about a few hundred people here or there were talking about tens of thousands. So you were wrong and now you're cranky about it and having a hissy fit. Yawn.

That's not true. He also consulted with all of the voices in his head and gave careful consideration to their opinions as well.

Easiest thing in the world. Fix the woke, fix the broke. He'll ride for a short time and correcting a bunch of the problems created by the Woke, and will be relevant for years to come fixing the financial and structural problems the woke created. Housing isn't going to go away this week. Businesses aren't going to flock to Canada just because Poilievre was elected. So on In the states but even vastly more so in Canada the place has been left in such a mess that it's almost impossible not to stay relevant for at least the next eight years. After that they'll have to look at new ways but they've got a bit of time LOL You basically just took what I said and said it in a slightly different fashion. People realize that the woke is a terrible idea. Worrying about it and following their agenda leads to poverty and a breakdown of your country. Now they want people who are focused on real issues such as creating business, housing, someone and so forth. People are done with the woke. They don't want to talk anymore about who's using what bathroom, they don't want to give any more rights to people who want to trans the kids or whatever, They aren't interested in wealth redistribution. What they want is a good economy, with good opportunity low inflation low interest rates and lots of investment where everybody goes stronger like they had under harper before Justin took over and ruined it. They want to have a future and they know that they weren't getting there with the left

Of course they do. And they'll hear it in an election as is appropriate. In the meantime they know his policy priorities he's been very clear about it. And they seem satisfied with that if the polls are to be believed Liberals and other opponents are the only ones that think he might possibly be stupid enough to release it before an election The majority of Canadians understand that platforms are released during an election. Hell, you don't even know what the circumstances are going to be before an election how can you possibly release a platform? If he'd released his platform last January it would have been before trump was elected and threatened 25% tariffs. That changes everything. The liberals haven't released their platforms and neither have the NDP. What did you expect I think if they release that information without releasing the names of the liberals who have been compromised that it would go very badly for them 🙂 He said a great deal. And he gave a great deal of indication how you would resolve the issues. At the end of the day I know you don't want to believe the truth because you're a left-wing advocate and you are less interested in the truth than you are in the welfare of your tribe. But people who are less tribal and live outside of an echo chamber watch that and they get a pretty solid idea of where he's coming from and where his priorities are going to be. That was a very timely interview, and it's been reviewed by more than 30 million people so far and counting. Napoleon indicates the confidence in Poilievre's ability to run the country well is strong. He's by far and away the favorite for dealing with trump. People are comfortable with Polievre being prime minister. They've had over a year to get used to the idea with the polls saying that's what's going to happen. Changing leaders isn't going to change the party and people's frustration with it. The election campaign will be eliminating the biggest source of disinflation there is, trudeau and his liberals

Trump and Poilievre are already relevant. But you're correct that people are already turning against the woke and realize what a terrible idea it was to begin with. That was one of the things that made trump and Poilievre relevant

Well of course this has been this subject is speculation, books and such, all kinds of "what ifs" for many decades now. I suspect that if he had then japan would not have fallen and there would have been a time of 'digestion', but i think that the kind of market socialism that he preferred with a limited and restricted free market would have become strong and lead to a strong germany for a period of time and been seen as successful in other parts of the world. Communism would have likely died but socialistic models that were similar to germany may have prevailed in europe and other places. I think the asias would have retained the more imperialistic model and in the end china would have been fully conquered. But i think that would have driven even more fierce freedom beliefs in north america. Who can say how things would have evolved after that.

Sure kid.

I would imagine the liberals would agree, they would have wished severely for Poilievre to release his platform before the election. That way they could create one that basically mimicked it. That's why nobody in their right mind ever releases a platform before the election. The liberals haven't and the NDP haven't but I noticed you didn't mention that. However Poilievre did say his priorities pretty clearly in that interview with peterson and he has done so many times in the past.

Kid.

Well he's a redundant guy Anyway as you say it's not a question mark any more, it's the reality and the next issue is the leadership race, who's going to be in it and win it, and will it make any difference They'll probably take today to say goodbye to good ole unicorn farts first but they'll be announcing their intentions to run starting tomorow i would think

But sure? kid?

Of course. Trudeau is gone And the CPC will be getting in So obviously immigration will return to sane levels.

You literally posted it was 1 percent earlier. Seems you can't decide which lie you prefer. Tens of thousands of people is a significant amount of people. You can pretend otherwise to your heart's content but that won't change the facts. And none were turned away, if they wanted to come they could come. Not really. And again 40 years isn't all of canada's history up to recent times as was previously claimed. All you're doing is proving I was right. The statement was made that only europeans were allowed and I have absolutely proven and you have absolutely demonstrated that this was not true and that large numbers of other people came to Canada. You can argue about whether they represented a large or small part of the overall population but it doesn't matter, they came and they were absolutely allowed to stay here. And yes the liberals under Laurier and others did pass some pretty racist policies that persisted for a time involving blacks Asians and Jews but even then many were allowed in and those policies were rescinded. So to suggest that Canada had never allowed other people's in was wrong which is what I said and you have proven to be true

Because his tribe told him so.

Trudeau to resign as prime minister after Liberal leadership race | CBC News So he's had to admit his failure and has been forced to resign. LOL So now the leadership race is going to have to shape up. THe house is only prorogued till end of march. They have to finish the race by then and they're almost certain to go to an election immediately after that. That means one of the shortest leadership races in Canadian history. Basically slightly less than 3 months. First the liberal party will have to set the rules, that will include how much it'll cost to run (expect it to be hIgh), how they'll vote and if there's any debates etc. That will be interesting. Then people will have to decide who will run. Likely conteders are: Carney, Freeland Leblanc Cristie Clarke amazingly enough, she's shown a lot of interest Jolie There's a couple of maybes such as champaign but those are the ones most likely to toss their hats. The real question will be, can any of them actually improve the liberals chances? The PC party thought swapping in a new leader last minute in the form of kim campbell would help, and that destroyed the party. The dems though swapping in a new leader in the form of kamala would help and they got slaughtered. Will swapping horses midstream work for the liberals this time?

Did you have a point or something? Or were you just showing off you could count to 9