Infidel Dog

" Netflix's recent axing of 290 staff targeted many of the firm's wokest workers who are prolific social justice warriors on social media, it has been claimed. The struggling streaming service has pulled the plug on several projects that were aimed at discussing race and LGBTQ issues, Variety reported, and axed the diverse employees working on and promoting them. A total of 150 recruitment workers were fired, as well as another 70 animators, and 70 contractors working on promotional materials for the firm including social media and publishing. Those promotional workers were assigned to work on Netflix projects Strong Black Lead, the Asian American-focused Golden, the Latino-focused Con Todo, and the LGBTQ-focused Most. Netflix claimed its latest layoffs were due to 'a slow down in revenue and decline in subscribers.' But critics online say many of those given the boot were from minority groups - and others have speculated that the firings were part of a woke clear-out." https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10837347/Netflix-layoffs-hit-staff-working-original-content-marginalized-communities.html

That's the Russian story. Here's a Ukrainian explaining to us how that video is faked:

To me revealing the names of the NGOs they say were issuing the ballots to the mules is vital. When they do this whole can of worms opens up in a way it hasn't yet. If they don't you have to wonder why not. The claim is they have the names.

Oops. Let's try that again below.

The crisis didn't happen during the Trump era. It happened under this administration where a long string of government fuck-ups seem to be happening. I'd mention a few of them but you'd happily divert to one of them to distract from how the administration cocked up another one here. (Pssst...Afghanistan.) But go ahead, try to blame Trump for the incompetence that seems to regularly happen under the Biden administration. That's always good for a laugh.

I have no objection to quoting leftist sources on the occasions they get something right. It's useful. Lefties can't just point at it and scree, or quote the leftist mediabiasfactcheck to damn it as something they call "far right." They have to choke it down, or try to divert from the fact it supports my argument by telling me the source belongs to them. Which only makes them look petty and a little silly if you ask me. Hell I'll quote Wikipedia, Snopes, the Guardian and even the CBC when they get something right. The one I like to quote the most is Orwell because one of you dummies will almost always want to tell me how Orwell was a socialist. I could simply say, "so what, sometimes he got something right" but what fun would that be? But wait...what were we actually talking about? Oh yeah, the WIC program that supported Tucker's argument a government fabricated baby formula crisis was instituted through WIC whose incompetence created a baby formula monopoly that sparked the chain of events that created the baby formula shortage crisis. And I'm glad NPR had enough integrity to admit there was a monopoly problem and WIC at least helped to create it. As to the government program being started by Nixon. So what? Tucker's point was it was government. However it was at that time under Biden administration. Doesn't matter if there was a Biden connection though because it's still government and government has a tendency to screw up. Come to think of it the FDA can take some blame here too.

Then explain this: "Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors said in a newly surfaced video from 2015 that she and her fellow organizers are “trained Marxists” – making clear their movement’s ideological foundation, according to a report." https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ I already linked you to an ex-KGB agent that not only told you how the soviets planned to infiltrate and corrupt western society but told you of his personal part in the strategy. Obama began his political career in far left bomber group founder, Bill Ayers' kitchen. And it goes on and on. The Marxist infection is supported by massive amounts of evidence. Your claim of "nothing to see here" has none. And the current varieties of Marxists are as free of violence as the Bill Ayers, Weather Underground's bombs or an Antifa riot. And if you're suggesting what you called "sectarian violence" such as that perpetrated by neo-anarcho or other flavors of Marxists are what you claimed were "nurtured and created" by Republicans which you now seem to be saying happened after Republicans bothered to notice them, don't be ridiculous.

The one I worry about is Zuckerbucks style election maneuvering where massive amounts of leftist bucks are funneled through NGOs to ultimately organize a leftist control of the count, information and security. That one I do expect them to try again.

Antifa and BLM are only the examples of Domestic sectarian that immediately jump to mind. They were created out of a foreign infection of neo-marxism. They were not created by Republicans and are not nurtured by it. By Democrats possibly but not Republicans. Your original contention was a phenomena of sectarian violence was created in America by Republicans. You've yet to give a single example of that being the case. You keep wanting to talk about foreign policy which has nothing to do with what I was taking issue with. Foreign policy has no connection to mass shootings in America. And because you have no support for your actual point I'm going to say you don't have one. You're wrong. If there is a problem with sectarian violence in America it was created by and is being nurtured by the left.

In reaction to a Russian Communist instigated culture attack as described in the video in your quote, you mean? Which specific violence are you talking about and how would that have been "created and nurtured" by Republicans, as you claim? Could be I'm not sure how that would connect to this current phenomena you tell us exists of what you call "sectarian violence." Don't just infer, explain. How exactly does whatever connection Eisenhower may have had to the Shah's coup lead to say BLM riots or Antifa attacks in the street. Because to me it has no connection whatsoever.

You could have just watched the Tucker Carlson video. He told the same story. Although... Tucker stressed this part: And from that he concluded WIC created the Abbot monopoly. Kind of, maybe...but although Abbot is the largest baby formula provider I'm pretty sure I heard there are 3 other providers in the WIC program.

Hey, this is fun...not Tucker but the ladies of Fox give you their view on how the Biden administration has been handling the Baby Formula crisis. I mean if you're curious why Republicans might vote against more mismanagement of public funds they'll offer up a few clues.

Why? You don't think he could, if you asked him to? He could link you to NPR where they verify everything he says. How the U.S. got into this baby formula mess Or did you want first sources. Be specific what you want. What Tucker stated is no secret.

Try these 2 if you don't want to believe there was communist infiltration: Former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov exposes the four stages of a Communist takeover of a country in rare 1984 interview Like I said, McCarthy was right. The only violence initiated by McCarthy was the violence that came of not believing him.

Did it? Wasn't Lincoln heavily demonized? Remember that actor jumping onto the theatre balcony with a pistol, screaming "Sic semper tyrannis?" Speaking of McCarthy though, and if you'd like to get way out there in the weeds, progressive socialists always want to forget McCarthy was right. Later documents proved there were Russian Communist operatives infiltrating the Government. Doesn't really matter though because your original premise of the right initiating and nurturing violence doesn't follow. Although...kind of, maybe. Demonizing MacArthur and discrediting the factual occurrence of Communist infiltration did allow the Allinskyites and Cultural Marxists to make further inroads into American society and today we do see violent chaos out of neo-Marxist organizations like BLM and Antifa. But that's kind of circuitous and doesn't really lead us to the instigator(s) behind your proposal of a perp or perps creating and nurturing the current sectarian violence phenomena. For that we have to go back to the Obama era.

Or you could prove him wrong. No wait...you can't.

It was but if you want to get wound up in a technicality I'll say Sean Connery wasn't the Democrat Candidate for President of the United States like Obama was when he was suggesting violent solutions against political enemies. There, happy?

Except that isn't what he said and there were companies that later offered solutions similar to what he was asking about. He was curious if it was possible. Apparently it was.

If he was he's been massively dethroned by Dementia Joe and his court of jesters like Jen Psaki.

Saying dumb things encouraging violence and law breaking continues to this day from Dems. It's against the law to protest in front of Justice's homes. There's a reason for that. When asked why officials seemed to be allowing angry rioter types protesting in front of Supreme Court justices homes Biden mouthpiece, Jen Psaki more or less shrugged and said, "Oh well, people are understandably upset." Remember those mobs bashing on the doors while they decided on selecting Kavanaugh as Supreme court justice. Come to think of it, wasn't a Democrat congress woman part of that? During the BLM "protests" rioters were attacking Government offices like it was an authorized playbook of the Democrat party.

Sean Connery wasn't the President of the United States. Obama wasn't in a movie. He was speaking at a Democrat fund raiser.

So basically what happened is the ol' chestnut of government causes a problem then offers a solution of more government. Tucker says the problem began before that when the Biden administration created a monopoly in Abbot with its agency WIC taking control of the market to feed Abbot. So now Biden has a $28 million dollar solution and Republicans voted against it. Good for them. They saw what happens with Biden's "solutions" when he released the federal oil reserves to stop the rising price of oil. The price of gas doubled. More or less.

Really? You sure jumped to his defense in a hurry. In reaction to a joke, I might add.

Trudeau has pilfered the Alberta kitty so hard it can't afford Dem style election rigging. Wait for the federal.