Infidel Dog

This one might interest you GA: Sheriff of Arizona county featured in '2000 Mules' announces 2020 voting fraud investigations

Just watch the last couple of minutes of her 2000 Mules review on the previous page. You'll be surprised to discover she's actually a fan. What about Jordan Petersen? Have you heard of him? Here he is telling you a story about Lauren: And here she is herself - in action in the old days.

I'm assuming you know who Andrew Breitbart is, GA. Lauren was big on YouTube in the Breitbart days. Then she disappeared to do documentaries One of her points in consideration of 2000 Mules from a documentarian's perspective was if she was making the film she would have followed a specific mule showing his trail of drop boxes then identified him or her as the ballot box stuffer we saw on film. Lauren suggests we still might see that.

Lauren Southern is Canadian but she's well known world wide. She got big as a YouTuber back in the day when "alt-right" simply meant anti-woke. Then she started making documentaries. If you watch her critique above she's not putting down the film 2000 mule. It's more like she's pointing out stuff she'd do different and why. She likes Dinesh. Her critique on the film is in answer to requests from fans. I think one would be more likely to attach credibility to what it examines than less. It didn't waver my support for 2000 mules. I'm still more convinced than ever the fix was in for the 2020 election. I'm with Lauren though on the idea it will be more waterproof from attack when all the evidence is revealed in the upcoming weeks. 2000 mules is an hour and 27 minutes and those who don't want to rip Dinesh off are being asked to pay a fee. The critique is 27 minutes. It's free on YouTube to anybody.

They want to gift us with Charest. Just say no.

I didn't say "propagandist." I said "Progagandist." Meaning the faithful of the ideology of Prog. And although it was me who asked the question, I know the answer. Why do the followers of Prog want to infiltrate and pretend they have the solution to the problems they create? Because it's what they do. We need to watch out for that.

I find this pretty watch-worthy. Lauren Southern is a Conservative Documentary film maker among other things. What's above is a critique of 2000 Mules largely on the grounds of how she would have done it differently. There are valid critiques of 2000 Mules but those who made the film claim there going to do the ol' Breitbart trick and release the totality of the evidence (most likely in bits) in the upcoming weeks as the criticisms appear. In this way you get more mileage plus you discredit critics. Lauren acknowledges that, however she considers the consequences if the upcoming evidence doesn't plug the holes she sees in the film. She does all this scene by scene so if you want to know what's in the film but can't find the time or money to watch the whole original product this is a way to get a pretty good idea of what exactly is in there. Bookmark it and come back if you just want to watch in chunks.

Just scanning this thread and I have a couple of questions. First, why are the progagandists from the left so interested in a Conservative leadership campaign? They seem to like Charest so there's another reason to vote against him. They hate, double-hate, Poilievre so if you're an actual Conservative Pierre has to be your guy. Second and this is more a question on all the candidates. Why aren't any of them supporting a ban of media bailouts? They should be. Why aren't they? It's understandable that the media is being so quiet about it though. Oh and an observation from reading the last 2 pages. That business of thinking they've found Pierre's kryptonite by attacking his support of crypto and willingness to fire the Bank of Canada head seems to have come out of the last debate. They all piled on about that one and Canada's liberal paid media is salivating and joining the attack. I think they're wasting their bullets. The average guy isn't scared of that.

Pierre promises to axe the carbon tax. Go Pierre.

Trudeau/Charest... Looking more and more like a distinction without a difference, all right.

2 days after the pee stick turns blue would be my guess. He gave her 2 days to make up her mind. And you want to give her 20 weeks. Many in Europe give them 12. On Prince Edward Island they don't want you killing babies after 12 weeks either. Texas gives them 6. Florida gives them 15. Different strokes, I guess but depending on which state you were in you might all be content with Alito's bill. He just wants to let the states decide. Not sure what you're unhappy with. Is it that you want everybody to think like you and give them a full 20 weeks to get the abortion done?

Yeah I'm in line with countries in Europe, right now. I think most of them are 12 weeks. I keep going down the more I study though. I'll be in line with Texas soon. Texas has the heartbeat law. Remember that one? "The Law prohibits abortions in Texas after the detection of the child’s heartbeat, which is currently 6 weeks gestation" I don't think a lot of people answering polls pro or against killing Roe understand how confusing it's going to be if it comes to pass. States will all have different laws. People who think they're firm on what's right at this time will change their minds when they get to know all the details. Here's an example of that:

I'm still glad you're pro-choice on time limits but you remind me of that old joke...you know the one. This guy asks his date, "Would you have sex with me for a million dollars?" And she says, "For a million bucks? Hell yeah." So he asks, "Would you do it for 50?" Naturally she gets upset and says, "What kind of girl do you think I am?" To which he replies, "We've established that. We're just trying to settle on the price." I think it's 15 weeks in Florida and a lot of Europe has 12 as the end point for an abortion. Abortionly speaking you tell me you're pro life at "late term." The foetus can be viable outside the womb at 20 weeks, so I'm guessing your price would be around there. I used to be there but now I'm no baby killing after the first term.

It appears to be more a regional decision of a province's providers: https://www.actioncanadashr.org/resources/factsheets-guidelines/2019-09-19-access-glance-abortion-services-canada#:~:text=No providers in Canada offer,or support from their governments However, ultimately it can be pretty much the same thing the Alito draft proposes. Different regions (in America it will be the states) make the decision.

And that's the same or similar to what many of the states on the left's shit list want. So one gets the feeling you're pro life on the time limit thing at least, then. Good for you. Or do you oppose Canadian law?

Not so sure about Tusk yet myself. The below is a clip from their homepage. That's what they're proud of. Since when is Amazon or The Hill Conservative? The Hill at least sometimes tries to be independent but the guy who own Amazon owns The Washington Post.

Somebody built a browser specifically for the right. It's called Tusk. https://tuskbrowser.com/ Seems fair. The others pretty much favor the left. Tusk says it has a conservative news feed.

There's a lot on this subject, of course, but here's a couple I've found useful in helping me understand what's going on over there. You two both might want to check them out. Just a suggestion as you both seem to be missing stuff. How Joe Biden Helped Create The Crisis Over Ukraine Ukraine’s history and its centuries-long road to independence

I was just watching Biden addressing the media on TV this morning. Apparently the economy is wonderful. Might be a bit of an inflation problem but Trump did that and sniffy Joe has it under control. He's got a crackerjack team in the Fed working on it. Putin is driving up the price of oil, but Joe released the oil reserve. He's going to raise taxes on oil producers and take their leases away. Good thinking Joe. That'll fix em'. Cheap gas is right around the corner now. You're such a wizard, Joe. It's the same with the Democrats in general though. BS, diversion and finger pointing is all they've got but I worry that it might be enough.

I'm hoping those NGOs can be linked to Zuckerbucks.

The AP, naturally, did what the left calls a "fact check" on the movie but that BS has been easily debunked by fact checks of the "fact checkers." You can see some in the article linked above. Or don't read it and wait for this:

That's what I was thinking too... But now there's this: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/05/true_the_vote_is_about_to_drop_an_information_bomb_regarding_election_fraud.html

What global warming problem? At this time proposed crises of global warming that can't be adapted to are modeled myths. But, I get it. The resetters are running out of steam with their 'you'll die if you don't wear our useless masks and take endless jabs of our vaccines that aren't actually vaccines' myth, so break out the nice weather is killing you all myth.

I wonder who these weirdos thought they were convincing with this stunt: Whatever they thought they were up to all they accomplished was getting the bum's rush. Way to go Catholics.

Took me awhile to make sense of all those verbal acrobatics above but I think I've got it. Near as I can figure you're telling us when Lavrov claimed "Hitler also had Jewish origins," he was not talking biological as most seem to have assumed. He was talking ideological. Therefore there is nothing confusing about wanting to walk into the Ukraine and "denazify" it even though their President is a Jew. Because we can put all that Apocalypse nonsense to the side for a minute and when it might be more convenient to think of Nazis as simple fascists or national socialists with modified definitions. And those need to apply more to the democracy of Israel than Russia. Is that about it? There's some heavy duty mental gymnastics required there, Bud, but thanks for the entertainment.