Infidel Dog

OK, I've seen enough. That election was fixed. If you're calling that the "big lie" you have your head up your ass. You don't know what you're talking about. Refusing to acknowledge the evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And your "nothing to see here" judges need to learn that lesson too.

Thanks for the link. I was just watching the movie. They say they have 4 million minutes of surveillance video. So it isn't just geotracking.

I've been paying attention to the Progaganda (misspelled on purpose) on this one and they've all been pulling a Michael Hardner by claiming expertise on something they hadn't seen yet. Their big proposed gotcha was Geotracking wasn't accurate enough to say for sure that the phones approaching the polling stations could be tracked accurate enough to know for sure that, that particular person was stuffing the ballot boxes. But I saw the True the vote girl with her partner being interviewed and they were showing video clips from the movie of actual people actually stuffing the ballot boxes. Over and over again. They said they had many more.

I want a guy that can put them back on their heels when they attack. I want a Canadian DeSantis. Poilievre is the best we've got for that now. Better than Max even. He showed that with the lame duck, lib, Charest in the debate.

Khazarians died off a thousand years ago.

Because your guy lost, right. I'll give Charest credit for trying though. Too bad he's so lame when he meets somebody who can counter though.

I believe he was talking about how remarkable an ultrasound can appear and sound. What you have above is what? About a 5 week foetus? A foetus can be viable at 20 weeks. Meaning it can exist outside the womb. Meaning it's a baby by any reasonable definition. (In New York they celebrated a law allowing them to kill such a child by bathing their government buildings in pink lights.) Here's a better graphic of what Shady was actually talking about: You're welcome. Do better.

So can lock step climate crisis acceptance to the point you're following a teenage Swede and a bunch activist wackos. Not really the point of the thread but I just couldn't let you get away with that "climate change" crap. Climate Changes. Nobody denies that. That's not where the doubt is. Wanna a talk about the big lie that actually is a lie. Climate Change denier. There ya go. Sorry for the interruption. Continue.

I often hear "Progressives" referred to as "the regressive left."

The earliest I can find any mention of that picture in Tiny Eye Image Search is 2015. 7 years ago. That lines up with the Ukrainian government's explanation of the Azov militia. The official story is they first appeared during the Crimean conflict when Russia grabbed that region. At that time the leaders claimed sympathy with Nazi ideology. It was a small militia separate from the Ukrainian army. Since that time the Ukrainian government and the Azov (battalion now) have joined and officially rejected any connection to Nazism.

I watched the debate. Just happened to be channel surfing past it halfway through. Poilievre kicked ass. Charest looked out of his league - fumbling and fuming calling names and accusing everybody of calling names as he called them names. You know...like a prog. Seriously if that guy wins I'm done with the Progressive Conservatives forever. Poilievre put up calm fire guard burns to the one-time Libs hysterical flames with easy counters and Charest responded by appearing to be losing it. Poilievre knows how to to counter liberal attacks and that's why he's my guy. That and he wants to defund the CBC. I didn't mind what that guy, Roman Baber was saying but he's a bit of a wet noodle. He doesn't have the charisma to take on Little Potato. Poilievre does.

Kind of magical how so many more millions of babies have already died mangled in abortions than any will ever die from the Chi Com flu then. No. I get it. The magic is in the word "contagious," right? The babies all still died though. At one time not many babies died. Then many millions more died. Same difference. The Texas abortion law allows people to sue abortion providers. The Covid law you like tells people they can't work. or commune in public as others can. Different forms of coercion but still coercion.

I don't know, Beave. I would expect somebody as smart as you seem to think you are to have a better critique to a scientific polling study than you don't like what it says. Actually it's too bad you won't read anything that seems to oppose the "Progressive" narrative. The back story behind that paper by Steven Andrew Jacobs, Phd is pretty fascinating. https://www.thecollegefix.com/uchicago-scholar-proves-biologists-believe-life-begins-at-conception-it-took-five-years-and-cost-him-a-career/ Whatever...the fact remains. He polled thousands of biologists and got this:

So you give me a hard time about giving a right wing source then you give me a leftist one and want us to believe it's different this time when you do it. "Rules for thee but not for me" again, is it, Beave? Hell, yours didn't even link to a scientific study. Mine did. All BS aside, here's the question from the committee on whether to approve Kathy Trans Bill legalizing abortion in the third trimester. "Where it's obvious that a woman is about to give birth...she has physical signs she's about to give birth, would that be a point at which she could request an abortion if she was so certified? She's dilating... Kathy Tran: Blah, blah, blah. Questioner: I understand that. I'm asking if your bill allows that. Kathy Tran: It would allow that. Yes. " Now after that Kathy may very well have figured out she opened up a can of worms she'd prefer people didn't stress on and maybe there would have been better diversionary, bibble babble ways to answer that question. But the fact remains that's the way she answered in front of the committee. And it's not like Kathy's bill was revolutionary. Remember this happened shortly after New York had been celebrating the passing of their 3rd trimester bill. Remember? Cuomo's gang illuminated the New York state government buildings in pink lights in celebration of the passing of their third trimester abortion bill.

And once more the king of wrong claims his throne by refusing to read the text he claims expertise on. PJ Media was only quoting this poll study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3211703 where the following is stated in the abstract: " The majority selected biologists (81%), which suggested Americans primarily hold a descriptive view. Indeed, the majority justified their selection by describing biologists as objective scientists that can use their biological expertise to determine when a human's life begins. Academic biologists were recruited to participate in a study on their descriptive view of when life begins. A sample of 5,502 biologists from 1,058 academic institutions assessed statements representing the biological view ‘a human’s life begins at fertilization’. This view was used because previous polls and surveys suggest many Americans and medical experts hold this view. Each of the three statements representing that view was affirmed by a consensus of biologists (75-91%). The participants were separated into 60 groups and each statement was affirmed by a consensus of each group, including biologists that identified as very pro-choice (69-90%), very pro-life (92-97%), very liberal (70-91%), very conservative (94-96%), strong Democrats (74-91%), and strong Republicans (89-94%). Overall, 95% of all biologists affirmed the biological view that a human's life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502)."

Why? Who said that...exactly. I think if you want to suggest men should bare some responsibility you could talk most pro-life supporters into supporting that. Or are you just suggesting poor people should be put out of their misery? That would be too stupid though. I wouldn't expect even you to suggest that. It's not allowed by 'the narrative'...yet. You seem to be saying babies in the womb aren't babies yet so you can kill them before they get out and become poor. That's kind of dumb too, but 'the narrative' allows that. It just puts it different. But basically yeah, I think that's what you're selling, right?

" Conservatives on Twitter had a field day Wednesday bashing Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., for getting his far left talking points all mixed up. At an abortion rally, he denied that men can get pregnant, which goes against current woke ideology. On Wednesday, Newsom posted a video of himself speaking to abortion and Planned Parenthood supporters about his commitment to defend the "reproductive rights" of women and girls in California in a rebuke of the potential Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v Wade that was leaked in a court draft opinion on Monday. Newsom’s speech consisted of the typical boilerplate pro-abortion talking points, but the caption for his video made one assertion conservatives thought the left had abandoned some time ago. "If men could get pregnant, this wouldn’t even be a conversation," Newsom tweeted. "This decision isn’t about strengthening families - it’s about extremism. It’s about control. We will fight for the right to choose." Conservative commentators were quick to point out that Newsom’s claim about men not being able to get pregnant is inconsistent with the current far left narrative on gender and sex, which now insists that men (trans men) can become pregnant. https://www.foxnews.com/media/gavin-newsom-mocked-disgusting-transphobe-men-cant-get-pregnant-abortion

I imagine you were on board with Virginia delegate Cathy Tran's proposed bill to allow abortion even at the point the mother is dilating and ready to give birth, were you, Beave? After all it's just like boiling an egg, right Beave? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9KkAqPv_AI I'm always amazed by the flexibility of a Prog's moral compass. South becomes North or more precisely Evil becomes Good whenever convenient.

You're wrong, as usual. Study: 95 Percent of Biologists Say Life Begins at Conception Run your 'baby in the womb = a fried egg sandwich' by this guy:

Yeah and once you fully convince yourself that's the eugenic criteria for disallowing life, why just in the womb?

Commie Bonnie, you mean? Remember her trying to cancel Christmas. Last Christmas. She became irrelevant in a hurry.

On the other hand and to be fair let's listen to the side of the argument Eyeball seems to prefer. So rational...

Killing babies is about killing babies. PJW introduces some sanity to that one with angry humor:

I believe in God. You believe in the power of an autocratic state. Different strokes and all that. But you asked for the right I believe I have to equal treatment and I gave it to you.

The god given equal right to the pursuit of happiness. Pandemic of the unvaccinated was a lie.