Infidel Dog

In fact, ask Obama: Sheesh...I almost can't believe the lefties at Snopes are admitting it. Guess they think it 's cool.

Ask Floyd Lee Corkins about the leftist influences to commit violence in the Obama era: " The Family Research Council shooter, who pleaded guilty today to a terrorism charge, picked his target off a "hate map" on the website of the ultra-liberal Southern Poverty Law Center which is upset with the conservative group's opposition to gay rights. Floyd Lee Corkins II pleaded guilty to three charges including a charge of committing an act of terrorism related to the August 15, 2012 injuring of FRC's guard. He told the FBI that he wanted to kill anti-gay targets and went to the law center's website for ideas."

Started what? The factionalizing of America and pitting groups against political rivals as a noticeable phenomena started under the Obama regime. BLM, Antifa, and the list of violent leftists or allies of the left pointed at the right rooted in the Obama era goes on and on So if it's not a series of conflicts but just one long one, you're still wrong. It was the left that started it and they still nurture it. Ask Maxine Waters. Ask Joy Behar. Ask Payton Gendron. He says he came out of the left.

You sure about that? Would you like to take this back then?

No. They weren't lefties. Just non-affiliated anti-government, pychos. Same as this Payton Gendron guy who shot up the super market in Buffalo. Although he claimed he was a leftist. Happened under Democrat regimes though. So where is Eyeball getting the idea it's always sparked by Republicans then?

Bullshit. Try something that isn't Google. You're so wrong I'm not even going to waste my time trying to show you how wrong you are. Unless you insist.

Actually the Crusades also goes back to Mohammed. He believed his followers needed to attack and take the lands of what he called "Rome." So they did. The Christians countered.

Ok, one more time then... This tangential spin-off discussion from the thread began with Eyeball claiming American sectarian violence was a thing of the right. Much to your disappointment, I bet, that didn't necessarily have anything to do with Muslims.

Mohammed started it all with the Muslims. If you're talking about this round though you could maybe go back to the creation of Israel. That would be their story anyway, I think. It would at least go back to the creation of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Happened in Yemen. Wasn't American Domestic sectarian violence, like say the Oklahoma bombing, Waco, or Ruby Ridge. For that matter all the series of Islamo-fascist sectarian violence that happened under Obama following Fort Hood. They were a distinctive phenomena.

I'll give you that one. I forgot about it. But even it didn't appear as part of a years long unbroken series of American attacks identifiable as sectarian violence. You could maybe group it with 9/11 though, now that I think about it. Also the Oklahoma City bombing, both of which happened under Clinton. Not to mention Waco and Ruby Ridge speaking of sectarian violence. And again, as I recall, Clinton was a Democrat.

9/11 was an aberration. Beirut was in Beirut. Islamic terrorism as a systemic phenomena of sectarian violence in America began and ended in the Obama era. Eyeball and you both seem to have forgotten this tangential discussion concerned Eyeball's claim sectarian violence was a distinctive thing to Republicans. It wasn't. They didn't even start it. It had its roots in the Obama era and there was much more to it than the American sect of Islamo-Fascism. I went into some of what that entailed. You both seem to want to ignore that so you can make it solely about the Muslims. I feel a squeal and a point coming on... Rac-i-i-i-ist!!! Right? You guys are hilarious in your predictability.

Cut the crap you lived through it. You know what I'm talking about. Obama was inaugurated in January of 2009. Islamic terrorist Major Nidal Hasan shot up Fort Hood in November 2009. Don't pretend you didn't notice all the Islamo-fascist terror that followed until Trump took over and ended it.

Yet it only appeared distinctively as Islamic terrorism during the Obama era and mysteriously stopped shortly after he left office. Wonder why that was. I know who was president when it stopped.

Cool. You kept your language and culture of English, did you? Good on you. Not everybody would admit that. Do you have problems fitting in? J/K.

That's kind of fascinating. Which one? " The stylized maple leaf design was created by Jacques Saint-Cyr, the flag proportions and layout were designed by George M Bist, and the colour selection was designed by Gunter Wyszchi. Member of Parliament John Matheson steered the project and later contributed to the decision to reduce the proposed maple leaf design from 13 points to 11. "

Prog logic. A term for a non-issue is inflated to encompass all of Christianity and from there we leap to a claim that the huge threat to religious freedom is religious freedom. Like I said, Prog logic.

Nonsense. Neo-Marxism is rising. See its face in organizations like BLM or Antifa. Cultural Marxism is more evident now than it's ever been. The reason people use such compound words is because their evidence is blatant in front of what you would call their lying eyes.

You forgot "mostly peaceful." Actually Progressives and their cult of gullibles have a lexicon of what I call "lie labels" that could fill a small book. I've been thinking of offering a separate thread on it. If I get some spare time I just might. People have started to notice what they do with lie labels, so they're doing that thing they do where they accuse the other side of their crime. They're the kid with cookie crumbs all over his shirt and face pointing at his little brother when mom rushes in to the sound of a shattering cookie jar.

So when you tell us Trump is responsible for sectarian violence you're saying he inspired the sect of all of America to get violent? That's ridiculous, of course, but just for the fun of it tell me why there were so many societal splits of sects that inspired violence such as BLM, Neo-Communist revolutionary types inspired out of institutions of higher learning, and religious extremist violence such as Muslim terrorism taking root under Obama? Before Trump.

Concerning the subject of mass shootings though, did you hear Sniffy flew to Buffalo today hoping to exploit the tragedy? Tucker went into it on his show tonight. He also puts the lie to the claim he's the one pushing "replacement theory" by showing Democrats and leftist media personalities confirming what he actually is talking about. Ever notice how much Joe is starting to look like marionette?

Took a bit to figure out why you would be referencing some TDS sufferer's opinion Trump was like the Democrat George Wallace hoping to make the point Republicans were responsible for the creation of sectarian violence in America. What's the sect? That's what I was wondering. How is Trump supposed to have created sectarian violence where the Democrat, Wallace didn't. I think I figured out what you're hoping to suggest when the guy started talking about how both Trump and the Democrat Wallace were both populists. Not sure how populism is supposed to have created sectarian violence though. I can trace BLM, American Antifa, Democrat rejection of the Tea Party while having a love fest with The Occupy Movement, the activation of cultural marxism, SJWs, the Progressive Stack and other societal splitters to the Obama era. Did you know Obama studied under and fanboyed one of the original critical race theorists? You appear to be referencing The Fairness Doctrine and the Facebook created legend that Reagan abolished it. The issue is much more complex than you're making it out and it wasn't Reagan that abolished it. It was the FCC. "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the United States federal government " Reagan vetoed a Democrat bill to codify it into federal law. It had been around since the 40s.

Prove it. I believe I can make a good case for sectarian conflict taking the final step into real problem during the Obama period. But go ahead. You first.

Guilty. Kinda made me smile though. The better answer is nobody objects to legal immigration. Trying to conflate it with illegal and hoping that will just slip by is a little desperate though.

I'm not surprised at all. I'm a little curious why you would think I'd let you get away with claiming it's just one way.