Jump to content

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,868
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Everything posted by Infidel Dog

  1. Stull waiting to see your video of the dead people you claim were moving, BTW. That's a better question. How do we know it's real if we don't see any evidence of it at all?
  2. How can you be sure it isn't? Which makes the most sense? A government photo, expert assessment of it and mainstream investigation or what you would prefer to believe? I know your answer and good luck getting the average Canadian on board with it. Papa Vlad is going to be so disappointed in you. There's a few conspiracy hounds that might join you in your delusion of 'nothing's real expect when I want to believe it' but you already had them.
  3. I saw an interesting polling stat on one of the cable stations. Apparently gallup shows Americans support legalizing abortion in general 60 to 40. But once you start separating it by trimester it flips. Something like 20% pro abortion, 80% against by the third trimester.
  4. And I think you're over-simplifying Azov shelling in Donbas. One can see it as counter attack of shelling from Russian separatist militia. Look up Battle of Shyrokyne for instance.
  5. I don't know if the "neo nazi" label still applies to the Azov battalion. Depends on who you believe. They and Ukrainian officialdom claim they've changed. "Since 2017, the official position of the Ukrainian government is that the unit has depoliticized itself. The then Minister of Internal Affairs Arsen Avakov claimed that "The shameful information campaign about the alleged spread of Nazi ideology (among Azov members) is a deliberate attempt to discredit the 'Azov' unit and the National Guard of Ukraine."[179] In March 2022, in an open letter to Russia published through Russian journalist Alexander Nevzorov, Azov Battalion strongly denounced allegations of its neo-Nazi orientation, defining Nazism as a "tireless need to exterminate those who dared to be free" and noting that the Battalion incorporated people of many ethnicities and religions, including Ukrainians, Russians, Jews, Greeks, Georgians, Crimean Tatars and Belarusians. According to the letter, Nazism, as well Stalinism, were "despised" by the Battalion, since Ukraine greatly suffered from both.[180]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion#Ideology
  6. The Jewish diaspora is a complicated thing that happened over centuries for varied reasons. It began before the first Milennia in Babylon and Assyria and continued through Roman and Holy Roman times. Around the middle ages a coalescence of wandering Jews appeared in Northern Europe identifying as Ashkenazi. DNA evidence shows the larger evidence begins in the Levant (middle east.) Good for them. The ones in China better be careful. No. The first archeological mention of them confirms the captivity in Egypt mentioned in the Bible. The Bible also tells of a history that happened long before that.
  7. They take a private vote as kind of a first draft, I think. That's what leaked. So if it's just the 9 justices in the room. One of them must be the rat, right? They say a leak like this has never happened before.
  8. I think if you want to get into ethnicity, religion and such there's a little more to the story. There's a large section on Ashkenazi genetics at the Wikipedia Ashkenazi page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews The science starts to get a little gobbledy gooky but this paragraph will give you the gist: So tell me then. How would that differ from a race. Why would say Arabs be a race but Ashkenazi Jews not be? Let's try some definitions: Show me why Ashkenazi Jews would not apply to those.
  9. I'll play the game. How many Jews were slaughtered then? 5,999,999? 4,765,223? 50? None? When does it start or stop mattering? What is your actual point? If the number is different it's no big deal?
  10. Only by historians and other rational investigators. There are some conspiracy style theories with a lot of 'may haves' but no smoking gun evidence.
  11. Did you hear the one about how the Khazarian Jewish mafia forced Putin to invade the Ukraine? If you're wondering what the Khazarian Jewish mafia is you could ask that Russian Propaganda guy that hangs out here lately but here's one from a different tin foil stylist. I'm pretty sure it's not the onion: Khazarian Jewish Mafia will Eliminate All the Human Beings
  12. How is it I offer up 7 paragraphs explaining how the sky is blue and you come back with. Yeah, you're right. The sky is pink polka dots. You're joking, right? Good one, if that's the case.
  13. The Babylon Bee has been spoofing the left's hysteria over the matter. AOC is always a convenient foil for satire: AOC Says She Got Killed From Elon Buying Twitter And Is Now Dead Then there's this one from the BB:
  14. Here ya go.. My accompanying OP comment says: "There seems to be a burst of new popularity in Jew-hater conspiracy myths lately. And not just from Russians." Close enough?
  15. " Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made the startling suggestion that Nazi Germany leader Adolf Hitler had Jewish roots — prompting Israel’s prime minister to issue a rebuke accusing the official of using the Holocaust as a “battering ram.” Lavrov made the comments Sunday when he was questioned by Italian media about how Russia could claim it intended to “denazify” Ukraine when President Volodymyr Zelensky is Jewish. “When they say, ‘What sort of nazification is this if we are Jews,’ well, I think that Hitler also had Jewish origins, so it means nothing,” Lavrov said. “For a long time now, we’ve been hearing the wise Jewish people say that the biggest anti-Semites are the Jews themselves,” the Russian foreign minister said. Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett blasted Lavrov’s claims as “lies” Monday." There seems to be a burst of new popularity in Jew-hater conspiracy myths lately. And not just from Russians.
  16. Yeah I'm like a dog with a bone with a point when I think I've got one. There is no evidence any Rothschild owns the AP or Reuters. It's an up the conspiracy butthole myth some want to believe. I think I know where it comes from in your case though. The American Firsters think America should wash its hands of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. That's a legitimate argument. The problem is the issue attracted an unsavory bunch of Jew hating believers in proven nonsense like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or because some Ashkenazis became Jews way back in history all modern Jews are Ashkenazis and have no connection to the original settlers of Judah. Unfortunately the claptrap of those infiltrators influenced some unfortunates too willing to follow the conspiracy angle. Not to worry Nationalist. I'm here to help. We'll start with trying to open your eyes to the obvious. That says there is no legitimate evidence any Rothschild owns Reuters or the Ap. Yet it seems very important to you that you believe there is. Why is that, do you think?
  17. Just repeating the thing over and over like it's a fact convinces nobody of anything. You appear to believe you have evidence the Rothchilds own the AP and Reuters. Produce it then. I still bet you can"t.
  18. I personally think you should have stopped there and saved the rest (although factual) for later. Watered down the truth of the important facts above.
  19. Except there is no actual evidence the Rothschilds do own the AP and Reuters. That one only exists up the butthole of foiler central with some fringe foiler websites and other anti Semites pushing it. And the idea they run the media is central to the larger conspiracy theory that the Rothchilds run the world - with the Rothchilds representing a cabal of Ashkenazi Jews running the world.
  20. I did a quick search myself. All I could find on the Examiner and the Rothschilds was stuff like this from the W E: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/dc-council-member-who-claimed-rothschilds-control-the-weather-also-said-they-control-the-federal-government They don't sound like they're on board with this 'Rothschilds run the world' tin foil theory to me.
  21. No. It was not. Not even close. It was some far out looney fringe thing that quoted the Protocols of the Elders of Zion like it was established fact. I have nothing against the Examiner other than the caution I would express with any media but go ahead, if you found it once there you can find it again. Bet you can't. Let's be clear on what you were claiming though. You claimed the Rothschilds owned Reuters and the Associated Press. I think one of the Rothschilds may have traded correspondence with the guy who started up the associated press or something. He may have even given him a couple bucks, but as far owning the AP and Reuters that's foiler nonsense.
  22. I'll give you another chance to prove that without linking to a foiler site then. Bet you still can't. I know they don't run the Washington Post because Jeff Bezos of Amazon owns that. Look into it deeper and you'll find all kinds non-Jewish conspiracy types in the news media. Although...apparently George Soros owns a lot of New York Times stock. He's kind of a Jew. Although he was more a Kapo during the Nazi period in Germany, if you know what a Kapo is. The one-time Conservative mag The Atlantic is interesting. Steve Jobs ex wife took control of that one with her inherited fortune and swung the editorial policy Prog.
  23. I don't think the Republicans can afford to get over confident with the midterms. When things look too rosy is when Conservatives in general tend to screw up. We tend to lay back and let the nasties sneak in under cover. Republicans still have RINO, Neo Con and progressive infiltrator infestations to worry about. I don't know how far they can trust the 'walk away' NeoLibs that are pretending to be "one of us" now either. The Deep State or Swamp is a problem too. I know they and theirs tell us they don't exist, and we should be despised and ignored for noticing the obvious fact they do exist and they're a problem. A big problem. Also you can always tell a Prog by the twisted, or ill defined lie labels they use. When they tell us they're concerned about "election integrity" or the "death of democracy" what they really mean it they plan to cheat. Republicans need to remember when whoever it was said 'It doesn't matter who votes. It's who counts the votes" he knew what he was talking about. Zuckerbucks style election time scams need to be dealt with before the midterms and the Republicans are acting like they don't think they happen. They do and they're a big problem for the integrity of the midterms. Now is the time Republicans need to attack like a Prog would. They need to clear the battle field. They need to get scared like if they don't click it into gear the end of the world is coming. Now when things look rosy more than ever . Because it just might be.
  24. I know...I scanned that posturing, string of non sequitur illogic and thought to myself, "WTF...is he serious?" Kind of reminded me of people that follow conspiracy theories like oh, for example the Rothchild's run a cabal of Jews that aren't actually Jews that run the world and they somehow got Putin to invade the Ukraine. We know this cause, Protocols of the Elders of Zion. As far as the issue of this thread goes though it's real simple to me. Disney had a sweet deal in Florida. The smart play would have been to shut up and enjoy it. Instead they thought it would be a good idea to interfere with Floridian politics. They messed with the wrong bull. They got the horn. Too bad, so sad, Dummies.
×
×
  • Create New...