Goddess

I asked this question on another thread. If there was anything the Liberals could do that would make the die-hard cheerleaders stop supporting them. I don't think most Canadians know how bad the economy is and how much power they just handed over. Carney could finally say, Yes, Canada is in dire financial straights. So we are increasing income taxes 20%. We are eliminating OAP. Home equity will now be taxed yearly. We are still increasing carbon taxes yearly to save the planet. We are still keeping our yearly raises and our unlimited expense accounts. We're going to bring in 20 million from India to jack up our GDP. There's nothing they can't do now. And there's nothing Canadians can do about any of it.

You keep accusing me of this like if you say it often enough, others will believe you. I have always linked to articles from both the right and left news, rarely from Facebook, unless it was a post made directly by the person under discussion. and that is rare. You are lying. I'm stating a fact. You get your thoughts, opinions and news from CBC. I doubt you are even interested or care about in what just came out in committee meeting yesterday about the CBC. You're an NPC. You believe what you're told to believe.

I mean, really - they propped up the Liberals for years, they voted for every Liberal policy. They are basically Liberals already. I don't see any difference in policy between the NDP and the Libs.

I think even that hope is gone. Realistically, there's only 6 of them. It would make sense for them all to cross over to the Liberals and claim "We can change things from the inside." It's their only hope to stay alive. As individuals, of course, not as a party. I think they will be at the point of "I need to save my own a$$ now so I don't lose my place at the taxpayer money trough."

I know the Liberal cheerleaders will be saying, "Floor crossing is allowed, there's always been floor crossing." But it has never been weaponized against the voting electorate like it is now. It means the Liberals can now do whatever they want. We can never vote our way out of this because anyone we elect can be bought for a fancy title, a hefty raise, promise of world travel and an unlimited expense account with zero accountability. There will never be anything but a Liberal gov't in power in Canada and they know they can do anything they want now. There's nothing stopping them.

He also testified that there were many allegations of the Liberal party controlling the messaging of the CBC, but they were never investigated.

Ya, everything that's going wrong in Canada is Trump's fault. What a good little NPC you are. Looks like the NDP can be bought now, too. The guy you voted for in your riding could be next, so your whole, "I voted NDP, you should all be thanking me" rings a bit hollow and naive. Realistically, the only hope for the remaining 6 NDP is to negotiate for fancy titles, big raises, world travel and unlimited expense accounts, to cross to the Liberals. And pretend they're doing it for their constituents.

Questions for the die-hard Liberal supporters here: 1. Is there anything the Liberal party could do that would make you withdraw support for them? 2. If there is, what would you do about it? Here is the situation in Canada now, the Liberals have been rewarded by voters for everything they've done. They know what they can get away with. They know they can crap all over the Charter and Canadians will do nothing, in fact a large amount will cheer it on. So our Charter means nothing. Even if the courts decide it was a violation, nothing happens. Maybe you're thinking you can vote your way out? You can't. Floor-crossing has now been weaponized against the citizens. Anyone you vote in can cross to the Libs for a fancy title, a big raise, world travel and an unlimited expense account with no accountability. Maybe you're thinking we can all protest? Nope. Nothing happened the last time they shut a large protest down, they know they can shut it down again, whether it violates the Charter or not. They know they have all the legal and political power now to do anything they want. There's nothing holding them back now. So: 1. Is there anything the Liberal party could do that would make you withdraw support for them? 2. If there is, what would you do about it?

You believe what you're told to believe. You're an NPC. Controlled by the algorithm.

I agree with astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon: "It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world—that CO₂, the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison." "What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interest groups to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO₂ from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin."

They created the environment. Before Trump, the Libs were losing because they have a terrible track record. The main concern was the economy, jobs, housing, healthcare. But Carney told you to poop your pants over Trump tweets instead. And you did it! 🤣 Good boy! Good boy! **scratches you behind the ears ** Ya. Because now we have all those same problems and a government that doesn't give a crap about any of them. If you're going to obey every time you're told to poop your pants, I hope you at least wear a clean pair of Depends next election and vote with whatever brain cells you have left.

Well, our Liberal gov't and their bought-and-paid-for MSM has brainwashed Canadians with so much hate for the Us that this has happened: Shots fired at US consulate in Canada days after embassy attack Liberals hate whoever the CBC tells them to hate. You really need to watch Travis Dhanraj's testimony at committee today. CBC is Canada's Pravda.

I will back West up on this. You did it repeatedly. The cite was given to you every time you denied it. At least 4 or 5 times. You'd disappear for a few weeks and then come back again repeating that Justin never said that. I remember it because I had always thought of you as a fair person, but you were being willfully ignorant by denying something that had been repeatedly shown to you as true. I remember when you finally let it go, you didn't really "retract " it. You just said it didn't really matter to you and we were all making a big deal about nothing.

I don't know how anyone can watch Travis Dhanraj's testimony in committee today and come up with anything other than the CBC is total Liberal government propaganda. He was ran out of the CBC for wanting there to be more diversity of thought and opinion. He was expressly told he could not interview Poilievre. He was expressly told they did not want Conservatives on the show. There was a list of between 40-45 people he was told to NEVER have on the show. He had Mellissa Lantzman on and was threatened to be pulled off the air. Rosemary Barton & David Cochrane bully and intimidate their coworkers. He read a bunch of other testimonies from other whistleblowers who are afraid to step forward. It's no wonder so many here say the Conservatives have no plan, everyone hates Poilievre, etc. You were never allowed to hear the plan. The CBC gets paid $1.4 billion (with a $150 million additional funds given to them by Carney right before the election) to campaign for the Liberals.

There are two visions for Canada and they are both very different: Poilievre: Approve energy projects in 6 months Export energy globally Remove energy taxes Carney: More taxes, More sacrifice More immigration More Net Zero restrictions

They receive healthcare, life insurance, housing, transportation, child care costs and disability income Temporary foreign workers: Your rights are protected - Canada.ca Even the government has expressed concern about the misuse of the system, by both employers and the TFWs themselves. If you watched the committee meetings you would see that most of them don't go home, they claim asylum or refugee status and reap all the benefits. Canada's new rules on Temporary Foreign Worker Program explained; its impact on employers & jobseekers - The Economic Times The government has cited concerns over the misuse of the TFW Program to bypass hiring Canadian talent, especially in the low-wage stream.

And we know most of them don't go home. Why should they? We pay their rent, their food, their healthcare, X number of dollars for each kid they have......

Calling people CHUDS who don't agree with him, loudly announcing various posters as being "ignored" and demanding others leave the forum.......YUP. The covid years will go down in history as the widescale rejection of science in favour of industry bureaucrats, most of whom hadn't touched a patient or written a paper in decades.

I also will point out that you filter out a LOT of information that isn't entertainment or trolling. I recall you saying that you reject any science from anyone that is NOT a "climate scientist". To me, the study of climate dynamics involves a wide array of scientific fields - physics, earth science, meteorology, chemistry, mathematics, data science, geology and oceanography, just to name a few. Many "climate scientists" are failed physicists or other mathematicians who couldn't find work in their own field of study, so they applied for jobs in academia or federal employees with jobs that have broad prerequisites. And they know where the money is right now. I think "climate scientist" is a stupid term that no one should use without air quotes. It's the same with the issues with vaccines. There is a broad range of science to consider - vaccinology, immunology, biology, molecular biology, data scientists and also scientists who are experts in their individual anatomy fields - cardiology, neurology, hematology. When you outright reject a large body of related sciences - you will not be getting the full picture.

Annual finance for climate action surpasses USD 1 trillion, but far from levels needed to avoid devastating future losses - CPI Climate change: What we will need to spend, and what we will need to change, to reach net zero | McKinsey Climate proposal would see rich countries pay $250B a year - POLITICO Climate Finance and the USD 100 billion goal | OECD Climate change: Reaching net zero will require real costs and real changes | Fortune Apparently we are going to solve the "crisis" by throwing massive amounts of money at it and turning the whole world into the 3rd world.

I filter out information based on who is paying for the study, for one. Do you disagree that "climate crisis" information has a monetary backing? Or that just doesn't bother you? It seems like you're okay with these types of scams, as long as they make you feel morally superior.

The "99% of scientists consensus" study by Lynas et al. that has been loudly touted, is based on a flawed study. Here is a critique of the paper: (Not the article I was looking for but still good.) Ninety-Nine Percent? Re-Examining the Consensus on the Anthropogenic Contribution to Climate Change Basically, the majority of papers looked at in the Lynas study were actually NEUTRAL in regard to the effect of man-made climate change, but were included in the PRO group. It also highlights the existence of "mellow abstract bias." And the fact that scientists who disagree with the "It's all caused by man" narrative often are censored, don't receive grants and blacklisted. So they either are directly censored or self-censor themselves. There is less of a consensus than you think.

It's an interview. Yes, it's an opinion, but you seem to reject outright, with no thought or investigation, any opinion that differs from your own. It seems very difficult for you to consider that others may have some good points, even when their overall opinion differs from yours.

If you read any of posts, you would know that is not my stand. I have issues with most of the policies the Liberals have brought in. This topic happens to be "immigration", so don't make out like I'm saying immigrations is the only problem I have. You frequently accuse people of the opposite extreme. In this case, I'm unhappy with the levels of immigration (and don't act like I'm the only one). I have never once taken the position you suggest - that immigration in itself is a bad idea. It irritates me that you leftists do this all the time.