Goddess

You have posted agreement with everything the Liberals have done in the last 10 years. The fact that you support and cheer for failed policies, tells us you don't give a crap about them. The vast majority of your posts are slamming Poilievre on-camera appearance and stating nobody likes him. when it's pointed out to you that he has good policies, you say it doesn't matter. Because no one likes him. That's it. Oh, and thousands of posts like this: LOLLLL LOLLLL LLOOOOOOSESESRRESERSR LLOL LOL LOL LOOOOOOSSSSEERR LOL LOL LOOOOOOOOLLLLLLL LOOOOSER LOL LOL LOOOOSER LOOOOOOOSSSSSSEEETRTTTT LOL LOOOOOLL LLOOLLLL Sorrynotsorry, but thousands of posts like that - not a sign of intelligence.

A reporter asked Carney what his response is to Japanese automaker stating that CUSMA is critical to them making any deals with Canada. Hi response: "Uhhhhh, we'll have discussions.....uhhhhh, I should say these discussions.....uhhhhh, follow up on......uhhhhhh, discussions." This is political excellence to Liberal voters. This looks good to them. 🙄 This is how little they care about Canada. This is why Canada is fuqued.

No you don't. You've all said many times, you don't care about policies. You care about Poilievres' physical appearance. You state it multiple times every day. Ya, we get it. You're pooping your pants every time Trump tweets. That's your priority. Not the economy, not jobs, not healthcare, not housing, not resource development, not budgeting, not skyrocketing deficits, not 25% of Canadians who can no longer afford to feed themselves. Your only focus is on the US president and not your own country. Trump. That's it. That's all.

What facts? You, and a few others on here, are here every day posting that you don't care about deficits, you don't care about budgets, you don't care about policies, you don't care about scandals, corruption and millions going directly into Liberal pockets. You're going to vote Liberal no matter what they do. Because Poilievre is ugly. And you all think this makes you look like intelligent, well-informed voters?

Of course you cheer no limits on spending and no parliamentary approvals. I wouldn't expect you to do otherwise. You realize this post just proves you're an id10t, right?

They're both being scammed by Carney. Just like the Canadian people. Under the Liberals, our resources will never be developed. Our taxes will never benefit Canadians at home. We will continue to crumble. Canada is lost.

Not gonna happen. We will never see any other government in Canada besides Liberal. Canada is toast. It's why Alberta's best bet is......get out. It will be the only thing left of what Canada once was.

This is not being done. I posted on this recently. There was basically such a backlog of refugees and asylum seekers that immigration was told to just let everyone in. As a result, I believe it was like 80% in the last year were admitted without ever seeing a live person in immigration. And all that did was tell the world that Canada was an easy mark, they let anyone and everyone in, and the backlogs never decreased. That's how we ended up with Khalistani gangs, 700 IRGC members, people who hate Jews and entire cities that are now Bangladesh. If you watched the actual committee meetings on this, you'd know this.

I can only go by the things and policies they support. Wanting rapists and pedos released as soon as possible back onto our streets, yes - it's loathsome. Yet you keep voting for it. Unvetted, mass immigration that is crashing our economy, letting foreign criminals into the country, crashing our healthcare, housing, jobs, education systems, and social fabric, yes - it's loathsome. Yet you keep voting for it. Giving away all our tax dollars to gender-sensitive rice farmers and bean farmers in the Congo and Vietnam while our own infrastructure crumbles, yes - it's loathsome. Yet you keep voting for it. Do I want you all to die? Of course not. I just hope you wake up before some of this has gone so far that it can't be fixed. You're loathsome. What else am I supposed to think?

Sounds like a lot of could, maybe, might, possibly, potentially..... Yet we've thrown trillions of dollars at this, with no measurable results. And they want that amount of money to go up 5X. Annual finance for climate action surpasses USD 1 trillion, but far from levels needed to avoid devastating future losses - CPI A new study shows that annual climate finance flows surpassed USD 1 trillion for the first time in 2021, six years after the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015. However, flows must increase by at least five-fold annually by 2030 to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. And you think this has no effect on economies? As Bill Gates emailed to J. Epstein: "How do we get rid of poor people?" This is how. And they know it.

We officially have a globalist banker for PM, no budget officer, no banking fail safes, no limits on spending, no parliamentary approvals on moving money. And that's with a minority government. Imagine what he'll do with a majority. Canada voted in a criminal cartel, not a political party.

There is no incentive to raise wages. Carney said he has consulted with businesses in Canada and they want more TFWs, so that's not going to change. Businesses in Canada are addicted to having government subsidized workers. Their business model relies on it. Wages will not be going up as long as businesses can rely on government subsidized worker wages and the government is happy to provide that.

Why are they pi$$ed? I'm wondering: 1. Do you think there is anything that is not going well in Canada right now? I ask because it seems no matter the topic - immigration, housing, jobs, the justice system, whether vaccine injury exists - your argument is that there is no problem an anybody who thinks otherwise is a CHUD. 2. On the off-chance that you DO think something in Canada is not going well, do you think any blame can be put on the Liberal gov't and their policies of the last 11 years? I ask because you seem to always argue that there is no blame to the Liberals for anything and anyone who thinks otherwise is a CHUD. I had to look up CHUD, had never heard it before you. It means someone who is a far-right extremist, and originates from a movie where CHUDs are grotesque creatures who live underground, who only emerge to attack humans. 3. This is what you visualize a Conservative to be and look like?

** waiting for the usual suspects to show up and explain how this has nothing at all to do with the Liberals and is solely the fault of Trump **

By "better", I suspect you mean an opposition that will rubber-stamp anything the Liberal gov't does. I don't believe you want any opposition to the Liberal gov't. Period.

I suspect that most Canadians are too dumb to realize that Carney didn't kill the carbon tax.

I saw a video the other day on X of a gang of about 15 foreigners that beat the crap out of a Dollarstore security guard for confronting them. They filmed it and posted the video. The security guard was an elderly man, looked like in his mid-late 70's. Likely still working, or had to go back to work to make ends meet to support these foreigners who beat the crap out of him. I think this is happening more than we know. Most of it never makes the news. Why are we doing this? Canada (and the US, although they are pulling away from this) has fallen into a bad habit. We borrow these theories on psychology, economics, behavioural science and put them into law before they've even been tested. Thomas Sowell said that these intellectuals often operate within institutions with very weak feedback loops. when a grocer makes a bad decision, the store loses money that same week. But when a government policy fails, the people who designed it rarely face direct consequences. And when a policy fails, they often double-down, blame the public, deny the results and throw more money at it. The writer, Rob Henderson, calls these "luxury beliefs". They sound morally impressive among the elites, but carry dire costs for ordinary people.

The lefties have created this narrative that it is more important that we virtue-signal how empathetic WE are, by showing compassion for the sad upbringing of these men. The seniors that have been robbed, beaten, stabbed, killed in Canada in the last couple years? Irrelevant. The women being raped, harassed and assaulted? Who cares? The children being groomed into rape gangs? Not as important. My gawd, people. These are YOUR elderly parents. YOUR daughters and wives and sisters and nieces. YOUR children and grandchildren.

Been thinking about this a lot. This is not just to you, MH. The thing is....you don't have any evidence otherwise. And the sad part is, you aren't asking for evidence. Just content to be spoon-fed garbage and propaganda. Canada has just sealed all of its vaccine injury records for 15 years. And most of you aren't even asking why. Like you didn't ask why Pfizer wanted their trial documentation sealed for 75 years. (That didn't work out for them, BTW, thanks to the efforts of attorney Aaron Siri.) Ya, I know, the excuse is - "We are overwhelmed with requests and cannot get to them all." But you don't even think about that. I mean, in the last few years, our public service has BALLOONED. There's more people in public service than ever. Yet, they "don't have time" to do this? And there's SO MANY REQUESTS for information on vaccine injuries, that they are overwhelmed. Shouldn't that tell you something? Both the Canadian and US governments were found to be heavily censoring reports of vaccine injuries. That means you were not allowed to hear about them. Citizens were censored. doctors were censored. Most of you don't ask why. Too many are docile and subservient, controllable, to a government that has repeatedly been shown to be incompetent to the point of malfeasance, unethical and seems not to give a hoot about the citizenry. If you come into my car dealership and I try to sell you a car and you ask me "Is it safe?" and I reply "You prove to me that it isn't safe!", surely you see the absurdity in that. The onus is on the people who mandated these jabs to prove it is safe. And they hide the data. Go to court so you can't see the trial documents (Hell, your grandchildren would have been lucky to see it, had they got their way). Refuse requests for information. And you're all fine with that. It's just astonishing to me. That's all.

New party, same as the old party.

Poilievre isn't saying anything new here. This is the plan he ran on. He talked about how Germany got an LNG plant running in 6 months. We can do this! We could have been a whole YEAR into this by now. Can we please stop pooping our pants every time Trump tweets and get on with building an economy in Canada? What if we promise a free lifetime supply of Depends for all the Liberal voters? Wubbie blankets, maybe? Is there anything that will get them to stop focusing on orangemanbad & MOUs that sound more like "Do you like me? Check Yes or No." notes passed in Grade 5 math class and start actually doing something?

These MOUs and vague promises are worth less than the paper they're on. This is barely even a letter of intention, let alone an actual commitment. With "the right policy settings" COULD lead to $10 billion in investment. Over 10 years. That's ALMOST enough to pay the CBC's annual $1.4 billion subsidy. We'll only be $4 billion short at the end of the decade. Meanwhile, Canada has had a capital flight outflow of $1 TRILLION in the last 10 years. A trillion-dollar gap: 12 charts highlighting Canada’s capital flight crisis - The Hub BONUS!! If you hold the above chart upside down, it's a visual of Carney's Brookfield stock portfolio investments.

Well, we have now read 1.39 million DOJ documents in the Epstein case. Every one. We have built investigation dossiers on eight people: Bill Gates (2,265 documents), Woody Allen (2,613), Reid Hoffman (1,976), Bill Clinton (1,586), Larry Summers (739), Leon Black (667), Elon Musk (55), and Donald Trump. For Donald Trump, across the entire corpus, we found 40 documents. Not 40 damning documents. 40 documents total -- every sworn deposition, every FBI interview, every civil complaint, every flight log entry, every media reference of any kind linking Trump to Epstein in the largest document production in DOJ history. As with Elon, the number is the story. And as with Elon, the documents themselves tell that story even better. Every quote below is verbatim. Every citation is a DOJ document number you can verify. Click the links. This post comes from those links. There are just 40. You can read them yourself. THE FRIENDSHIP It must be made clear: Trump and Epstein were friends. This must be stated plainly, because everything that follows only makes sense if you understand that. They were Palm Beach neighbors in the 1990s. Both owned waterfront estates. Both moved in the same Manhattan social circles -- the dinner-party circuit that included Mort Zuckerman, Leon Black, Ronald Perelman, and a dozen other New York billionaires. In March 2003, Vanity Fair profiled Epstein as "The Talented Mr. Epstein" and named Trump as one of seven businessmen who dined at his 71st Street townhouse [187-11]. Juan Alessi, Epstein's house manager, named Trump among many prominent visitors to the Palm Beach property [055-12]. A 1993 photograph shows Trump and Marla Maples with Epstein and Maxwell at a New York party [EFTA00787056]. This was before Epstein's convictions. In 2002, reached by phone for a New York Magazine profile, Trump gave the currently most weaponized quote in the entire archive: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." [EFTA00013640] That quote has been cited thousands of times. It was given on speakerphone, before any public allegations, before any investigation, before any reason to be cautious. "It is even said that" is hearsay framing -- Trump reporting what others say. "On the younger side" is ambiguous. But the quote exists, and it reflects a social warmth that post-Epstein scandal Trump would prefer to erase. In 2003, Ghislaine Maxwell assembled a leather-bound album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump's contribution: a card with "several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker," signed below the waist [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. These are the facts, and the facts must be stated openly. The friendship was real. But what happened next matters more. THE FALLING OUT Around 2004, that friendship ended. Trump outbid Epstein at auction for the Maison de L'Amitie estate in Palm Beach. In Michael Wolff's 2017 recordings, Epstein himself confirmed the real estate dispute as the breaking point [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. But the real estate dispute was simply the excuse that Epstein made for something darker. Brad Edwards, the attorney who represented Epstein's victims, established under oath that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club [773-04]. There is no documented contact between Trump and Epstein after the falling out in 2004. Not one email. Not one phone call. Not one schedule entry. Not one reference of any kind in 1.39 million documents. After 2004, the relationship was over. Trump had drawn a hard line. THE GIRL IN THE SPA Virginia Roberts was sixteen years old, earning nine dollars an hour as a locker room attendant at Mar-a-Lago [1218-11]. In her memoir, she described the club in awestruck terms -- "sheer awe at the gold arches." Ghislaine Maxwell approached her while she was reading a book about massage [EFTA01689026]. "I was working at Donald Trump's spa in Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey's mansion in Palm Beach that afternoon after work." [1090-16] Roberts names many powerful men in her testimony. Clinton. Prince Andrew. Dershowitz. Wexner. She does not name Trump. He was the property owner. But Maxwell did the recruiting. An FBI interview of a different victim's mother captures how this worked: she "heard that a prince and DONALD TRUMP visited EPSTEIN's house and this made [her] think that if they are there then how could EPSTEIN be a criminal" [EFTA00089603]. That is what Epstein did with famous names. He wore used them as bait. As camouflage. If Epstein was associated with so-and-so, then how could he be a predator? Trump, unlike others, immediately put a stop to that. THE ACCUSATIONS Three allegations against Trump exist in the corpus. A Jane Doe civil lawsuit against Epstein's estate alleges that Epstein introduced her to Trump when she was fourteen, "allegedly elbowing Trump and saying, 'This is a good one, right?' Trump smiled and nodded in agreement" [1078-5]. At the Maxwell trial, a victim testified under oath that Epstein introduced her to Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she was fourteen [120-cr-00330/745]. That testimony confirmed the social introduction. It contained no allegation of misconduct by Trump. Defense counsel used Trump's name to establish Epstein's social reach, not to implicate Trump. In 2016, during the presidential campaign, a civil complaint alleged the rape of a thirteen-year-old at Epstein's 71st Street house in the summer of 1994 -- Katie Johnson v. Trump & Epstein [EFTA01386393]. It was filed pro se, dismissed for improper filing, refiled with an attorney, and dropped before trial. It was never proven, never tested under cross-examination, never corroborated by any other witness in the criminal investigation. In August 2017, Epstein told Michael Wolff on tape: "I was Donald's closest friend for 10 years" [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. He claimed Trump liked to "f--- the wives of his best friends" and that Melania first slept with Trump on Epstein's plane. These recordings were released days before the 2024 election. They are unsworn claims by a convicted pedophile and serial liar to an author -- a man who told the same journalist his week included "woody allen, elon musk, frank gehri... bill gates" [EFTA02561193]. And that pedophile and liar had an axe to grind. A big one. Those are the allegations. What follows is what happened when they were investigated. THE INVESTIGATION The FBI investigated Donald Trump in connection with the Epstein case. The master case index lists him as a "positive case hit" with "salacious information": "Donald Trump (one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate)" [EFTA00161528]. One allegation. One victim who refused to cooperate. No prosecution. The FBI's National Threat Operations Center received four separate complaints naming Trump [EFTA01660679]. A hearsay oral sex claim via a friend-of-friend chain. An anonymous party guest list. A claim about "big orgy parties" from a sixteen-year-old model. A Trump Golf Course allegation "deemed not credible." All anonymous. None corroborated. The Senate Judiciary Committee -- bipartisan, Grassley and Durbin -- reported that FBI personnel were specifically instructed to "flag" any records in which President Trump was mentioned across all 1.39 million documents. The result: no incriminating "client list." No evidence of criminal conduct [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. The Southern District of New York, which prosecuted the Epstein case, had Trump's phone records in their evidence. Their grand jury presentation includes a message slip showing Trump called Epstein on November 1, 2000 -- a routine call, no message content [EFTA00008599]. The same presentation, same pages, includes message slips reading "She has females for Mr. J.E." Prosecutors had Trump's innocuous call alongside explicit trafficking procurement. They found nothing to charge. Attorney General William Barr, under oath before the House Oversight Committee: "I was never informed of the evidence, and I'm skeptical there is any... if they had evidence, this would've been low-hanging fruit." [oversight_republican_staff_memo] THE ATTORNEY WHO WOULD KNOW Brad Edwards represented Epstein's victims for years. He investigated every lead. He subpoenaed records, deposed witnesses, and built the case that led to federal prosecution. He was the attorney most motivated to find evidence against anyone connected to Epstein. In April 2010, Edwards filed a sworn affidavit: "While research by other plaintiffs' attorneys and myself has uncovered other persons that were acquaintances of Mr. Epstein, specifically Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mottola, and David Copperfield, we have no information that any of those people (other than Mr. Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victims of Mr. Epstein's molestation." [560-03] Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola: "There is no evidence the President was involved in Epstein's schemes" [773-04]. Edwards filed a notice to depose Trump in September 2009 [701]. As a witness. Not as a suspect. He sought Trump's testimony to help the victim's case. And there is this: when Edwards was investigating Epstein, reaching out to the powerful men in Epstein's orbit for cooperation, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and returned his call [50-2009-CA-040800/549]. The attorney who spent years investigating on behalf of Epstein's victims -- who had every reason to find evidence, every incentive to implicate the powerful -- swore under oath that his investigation found nothing linking Trump to the abuse. When he called, Trump answered. Readily. Trump knew what Epstein was and wanted to talk about it. WHAT THE DOCUMENTS DON'T SHOW Pilot David Rodgers flew Epstein's planes for twenty-eight years. He sat for a seventeen-page FBI interview and reviewed his flight logs covering 1991 through 2007 [EFTA00159180]. Trump appears once: Flight 934, January 5, 1997. Passengers: Epstein, Maxwell, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, and Didier, a chef. Route: Palm Beach to Newark. No flight in the corpus shows Trump traveling to Little Saint James, to Zorro Ranch, or to any international destination on Epstein's aircraft. Epstein's famous ninety-two-page personal contact book does not contain a "Donald Trump" entry [black-book-redacted]. It lists Robert and Blaine Trump, Ivana Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Trump Management Inc. -- the socialite channel, not Donald. There are zero financial transactions between Trump and Epstein in any direction. No donations. No investments. No advisory fees. No foundation grants. Even Epstein's own defense lawyers, in a motion to pare down a 169-person witness list, argued that Trump had "no connection at all" to the case [1338]. And Epstein himself, in a draft letter, grouped Trump among "friends and other innocent bystanders" whose names had been dragged in by "abusive discovery" [EFTA01128737]. THE COMPARISON The Epstein documents reveal concentric circles of association. At the center: people who were financially entangled, who visited the island repeatedly, who maintained the relationship through and after Epstein's conviction. Trump was not in any of these circles. Woody Allen: 2,613 documents. Nine years of regular contact. Dinner companion. Epstein attended his film shoots. Bill Gates: 2,265 documents. Multiple confirmed meetings. Donations routed through Epstein. Boris Nikolic named in Epstein's will. Reid Hoffman: 1,976 documents. 36 documented gift exchanges. Slept at Epstein's 71st Street mansion. Bill Clinton: 1,586 documents. 147 sexually explicit messages with Maxwell. Multiple confirmed island visits. Flights on Epstein's plane confirmed by his pilot ("ten or twenty times"). Active participation in the post-arrest denial campaign. Larry Summers: 739 documents. Regular dinner companion. Island visits with family. Harvard Program for Evolutionary Dynamics funded through Epstein. Leon Black: 667 documents. $158 million paid to Epstein across a decades-long financial relationship. Elon Musk: 55 documents. Zero financial transactions. Twenty-two months of sporadic, taciturn emails with Epstein chasing Musk, but leaving Epstein little to grab onto. Donald Trump: 40 documents. Zero financial transactions. Zero island visits. One commuter flight. A friendship that ended in 2004, eleven years before the first federal prosecution, after Trump drew the line and Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago for his behavior. The only person in Epstein's orbit who returned the victim's attorney's call. Trump's entire file is 1.8% the size of Gates's. WHAT REMAINS These documents show a man who was part of an early social world he did not yet completely understand, who called a predator "terrific" before anyone knew what that predator was, who sent a crude birthday card before there was any reason not to, whose property was used as a hunting ground without his knowledge or permission -- and who, when the investigation came, banned the predator from his club, picked up the phone for the victim's attorney, and was cleared by every investigative body that looked. 40 documents. Every quote verbatim. Every citation verifiable. Full compendium (40 docs): THE_DONALD_TRUMP_FILES.pdf - Google Drive AI-optimized compendium (upload to any LLM and ask it anything): trump_gold_complete.md - Google Drive

Carney does seem to prefer the softballs. Like when the CBC gal asked him if he would still buy strawberries from the US and he laughed and said he hasn't bought his own groceries in years. He gets really snarky & snippy when he's asked something he doesn't like. Like how trade talks with the US are going.