Goddess

I didn't say ventilators kill people. Obviously they have a use. But they are very complicated pieces of machinery to learn and operate, it's only respiratory therapists that operate them. It's very, very hard on a patient's body to be hooked up to a vent (as I'm sure you know from your family's experience, sorry to hear that, BTW). Frontline docs & nurses were appalled at how indiscriminately they were used during covid and recognized that people were being killed by them. The machines were often left in the hallway (so no one had to go near the patient and risk the virus), and a shortage of respiratory therapists to run them meant they were left to nurses to operate, without being able to see or evaluate a patient before making adjustments. Vents are generally the "last-ditch" effort to keep people alive but during covid, docs/hospitals received bonuses for each patient they vented - up to $40,000 - so they were used much more often than necessary. They were often used on patients who didn't need them, but were convinced to let the docs vent them and they had to actually sign waivers for them to be used. It was also believed, in the beginning, that placing patients on vents was also a protection for doctors to avoid getting the virus. If you're interested, you can read this book: ......or go to their website: whatthenursessaw.com.

I think the tragic part is that there did not need to be that many deaths. Over-use of ventilators contributed to US excess deaths, as well as suppression of early treatments. Thank gawd our PM is an id-ee-ot - by the time he finally procured vents, the US had already figured out that it was the vents that were killing people, so our's didn't get used. We lost like $2 billion and had to sell them for scrap for $6 each or donated them to poorer countries.

I probably posted some in other threads, too - when everyone was into the "horsepaste" disinformation. I find the take-down by Pharma of both IVM and HCQ to be especially egregious - thousands of people died because of it. Fauci, the CDC, the FDA, the "experts" who falsified studies and used hoaxed data - they all have blood on their hands. Why anyone would trust them again or not question their motives, is baffling to me.

I'm sure I posted some on the Trickle thread...... They included stats from countries that used IVM for both early and preventative therapy, which reduced covid deaths by over 80%. I believe it was Peru that was the country that used it, then stopped using it, then went back to it because deaths skyrocketed when they quit using it.

For instance: Over 80 studies on the effectiveness of Ivermectin Pharma-paid for studies on IVM have been shown to be fraudulent CDC and FDA just got sued by frontline doctors over their disinformation about IVM and were forced to take down all their posts on social media and websites And these two are still: "DEEEERRRRRRPPPPPP!!! Horthepasthte!" It's a level of stupidity that is just unfathomable.

The only personal stake for these ones is EGO. They've been wrong about literally - everything. Either they get humble and start impartially examining the science/data/studies or they double down on the stupidity. They've obviously chosen the latter, because I never see them posting anything in rebuttal other than personal attacks.

I post studies, datasets and explanations of the mechanisms involved, and these two VIP members of the Mutton Crew post personal insults, cliches from 3 years ago and long debunked nonsense in response. 🙄 I used to find it annoying and sometimes frustrating, but now I just pity you guys. Your level of stupid is just.....pathetic, really.

You support continuous jabbing of children and youth, who receive zero benefit and all the risk, so......... Have a lovely day.

This paper shows that adverse events related to clotting occur many months or a year after the last shot was taken: Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis - Jessica Rose, Nicolas Hulscher, Peter A. McCullough, 2024 (sagepub.com) It includes examples of individuals who had succumbed to myocarditis many months after their last injection of COVID-19 injectable product, as per their reports to VAERS. In both cases included in this paper, the product was Pfizer. As you can see in Figure 1 below, a 15-year-old boy had a diagnosis of idiopathic myocarditis that resulted in death 358 days after his first, and last, Pfizer injection. Figure 1: Details of two cases of COVID-19 injection-induced myocarditis associated with sudden death. Source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20420986241226566?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed This is shocking enough, and these are only two late occurring examples. We should be thinking about the long-term effects of these modified mRNA COVID-19 products and stop expecting an adverse event to happen immediately - although those instances are also denied as being vaccine induced deaths, even when they occur at a pharmacy within minutes of injection. Examining clot-related adverse events (AEs) in VAERS: the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are suspected to be - along with the spike protein - a root cause of hemagglutination. They disrupt the zeta potential of red blood cells, as does the spike protein. Figure 2: LNP degradation and gloopy fats. Source: Damages from the modified mRNA-containing LNPs - from vessels to brain - a numbers game. Doctors for COVID Ethics We all know by now, that the COVID-19 shots are associated with thrombotic events and clotting in human beings. It is widely accepted now also, that SARS-2 itself is not a respiratory pathogen, but one that can induce these same clotting issues in people, and thus these ‘symptoms’ are certainly spike-related. But again, the LNPs don’t help and without them, the modified mRNA would likely get degraded way before it could ever be translated into ‘spike’ protein if not protected by the LNP trojan horse. Charts below are from pulling out clot-related AEs reported to VAERS in the domestic data associated with the modified mRNA shots reported from 2021 through to 2023. Same thing for all vaccines through 2018-2020. And similarly, for the Janssen and Novavax products for 2021-2023 in order to compare modified mRNA products and non-modified mRNA products. For each group, the reports are separated out into those that were made 60 days or more from the last injection. It is suspected that in the context of the modified mRNA shots that there would be many more reports post 60 days than for ‘regular’ vaccines, and maybe for the non-modified mRNA products, since they do not employ this non-limiting, self-producing spike technology wrapped in these likely-degraded fat bubbles. Below is a comparison between all vaccines and the modified mRNA COVID-19 products. Figure 3: Clot-related AEs reported in VAERS domestic data for all vaccines (left) and modified mRNA products (right) post 60 days. Source: https://vaers.hhs.gov. It is quite striking isn’t it? Indeed, the number of shots administered for all vaccines combined is HIGHER than for the number of modified mRNA COVID-19 shots for these 3 year periods, yet, the clot-related AEs differ in absolute count quite a bit. It seems like the ‘traditional’ vaccines don’t induce clotting in quite the same way as the LNP-spike-based products. So is it the LNPs? Or is it the spike? Let’s look at the J&J and Novavax shots compared to the modified mRNA shots. Nota bene: the Novavax shots represent only 0.6% of all the reports when clumping the non-modified mRNA shots together (ie: Janssen and Novavax), so basically only referring to Janssen. Figure 4: Clot-related AEs reported in VAERS domestic data for all vaccines (left), modified mRNA products (middle) and Janssen/Novavax products (right) post 60 days. Source: https://vaers.hhs.gov. Approximately 14% of all clot-related reports in the context of the modified mRNA products were made 60 days out whereby only ~5 and ~7% of reports made for all vaccines and the non-modified mRNA products were made 60 days out, respectively. There were far fewer Janssen/Novavax shots doled out all-in-all, and interestingly, relative to the total AE count per manufacturer, Janssen is the worst for clotting. But… When does the clotting take place? Figure 5: Clot-related AEs reported in VAERS domestic data per 100,000 total AE reports for all vaccines (left), modified mRNA products (middle) and Janssen/Novavax products (right) Source: https://vaers.hhs.gov. When the post-60-day data is normalized per 100,000 clot reports as per manufacturing type (modmRNA vs non-modmRNA), it is clear that "Houston, we have a clotting problem" with the modified mRNA products when it comes to a delayed reporting effect. Therefore, even though the Janssen (and Novavax) products may induce clotting with immediate effects, the modified mRNA products appear to induce reportable clotting effects months after the last dose. Figure 6: Percentages of all clot-related AEs reported in VAERS domestic data filed 60 days out from last shot for all vaccines (left), modified mRNA products (middle) and Janssen/Novavax products (right) Source: https://vaers.hhs.gov. The difference between the percentages of clot-related 60-day-out reports is notable when comparing the modified mRNA and non-modified mRNA shots. 13.7% of the modified mRNA clot-related reports occurred 60 days out from the last shot, and in the case of all vaccines combined and the Janssen/Novavax products, they stand somewhat equal at 5.2% and 7.6% - far below the percentage reported for their modified mRNA colleagues. Conclusion The modified mRNA injectable COVID-19 products appear to induce clotting months after a ‘last’ shot, according to VAERS reports. It is notable that of these post-60-day reports, 69% were filed by medical professionals, so it was the opinion of these medical professionals that it was worth filing these clot-related reports months after their patient’s last COVID shot and therefore, they likely suspected a causal relationship.

Because there are still too many people like you supporting him.

Because there are still too many people like you supporting him.

Fauci refused to divulge at the Senate hearings what his bonuses and raises were and apparently, he doesn't legally have to. Sen. Rand Paul's point is that the laws should be changed so that the public can be made aware of where these people's loyalties lie. Fauci owns large amounts of shares in Moderna. He's also the head of the NIH, which owns the patent on the Moderna vax, so.......of course he gets a cut of all that. He just refuses to reveal how much it is.

Ya, he did. Are you really THAT uninformed? I can't take you seriously at all. If you think any of these people are doing what they're doing out of the goodness of their hearts, you're a fool.

You're adorable. Tuskegee Experiments. Medical experimentation on Jews during WW2. Check out what Gates and Fauci have been doing in Africa. Ring any bells?

These kind of explain the Mutton Crew: Frontiers | New-onset psychosis following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review (frontiersin.org) Vaccine-Induced Psychosis as an Etiology to Consider in the Age of COVID-19 | Psychiatrist.com Conclusion: Studies on psychiatric side effects post-COVID-19 vaccination are limited, and making conclusions on vaccine advantages or disadvantages is challenging. Vaccination is generally safe, but data suggest a potential link between young age, mRNA, and viral vector vaccines with new-onset psychosis within 7 days post-vaccination. Collecting data on vaccine-related psychiatric effects is crucial for prevention, and an algorithm for monitoring and treating mental health reactions post-vaccination is necessary for comprehensive management.

What part of it isn't true? From the Senate hearings in the US (verified by other US organizations), they know it came from the Wuhan lab, headed by Daszak, funded by Fauci, Fauci tried to downplay the lab leak thing (whether it was released on purpose or accidently is up for grabs), Fauci is on record lying to Congress about it and then he made millions on selling the genetic therapy injections. He should be in jail.

Yes. "Nothing happened". Nothing except Daszak creating SARS-Cov2 in the Wuhan lab, paid for by Fauci, then they both called the lab leak a "conspiracy theory", lied to Congress about the whole thing and raked in billions of dollars selling the "cure" for the virus they created. This is you:

Yesterday, the US Select Subcommittee on The Coronavirus Pandemic released a staff-level report recommending EcoHealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak be formally debarred and criminally investigated as a result of his actions prior to, and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The report also exposes serious, systemic weaknesses at the NIH that enabled EcoHealth to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. Evidence shows that Dr. Daszak was aware of this potentially dangerous research, yet he failed to inform the NIH. When criminal activity is shown in this investigation it will uncover a web of intimidation, cover-up and collusion that will make Nuremberg look like OJ's playpen. It's a start, but will there be justice or just more reports written? 2024.05.01-SSCP-Report_FINAL.pdf (house.gov)

GUNTER: Liberals and their 'experts' are leading this country astray (msn.com) I remember when all the shadowy, nameless "experts" were trotted out for this program in BC. (Same thing with covid....) Who are these "experts"? What studies and data are they basing their views on? "Experts say..... blah blah blah" Should these "experts" be held accountable for their bad advice?

Justice Mosley said it was.

I said people are "apathetic about the gov't doing illegal and unconstitutional things". Which is why we have a gov't right now that is highly corrupt and scandal-riddled. I know, haha. It's a CTV poll, so CTV-watchers are the ones replying to it.

It's actually disappointing if these polls are correct, and shows why our gov't is in the state it is with very little accountability required by apathetic voters. It means too large a portion of the public is okay with the government doing illegal and unconstitutional things. At least when the gov't is doing it to OTHER people they don't like. 😉

Of the inquiries and committees. There a quite a few channels on YouTube that livestream them or show parts of them. You can also follow the actual politicians who are assigned to the committees - Larry Brock is on quite a few of them and he gives lots of updates. I also have gotten to quite like Kelly Block - she asks really good questions in the committees.

According to MSM, yes. The reality they didn't show you was the amount of SUPPORT they had. And it inspired similar convoys all over the world. But that wasn't in the MSM, either. I get it though - people who only rely on the CBC often have zero idea of what's really going on.

I know it seems like that, in hindsight, to people who heavily bought into the hysteria. Think though: When the Jews first started getting persecuted - shops vandalized, hate graffiti, businesses boycotted, children getting beaten up at school, wear this star of david when out in public .......anyone who said "This is leading to very bad places" would also have been accused of being "hyperbolic." Seriously, the only thing that stopped all you guys from going to very bad places....was the Freedom Convoy.