Goddess

I do admire your ability to come with an external excuse for every Liberal failure and an explanation why it should all be ignored, but your ability to step back and see the pattern reflect cognitive and emotional mechanisms at work. Your meta-cognition needs a lot of work. 🙃

Poilievre believes the gov't should support the free market by not over-regulating and over-taxing, but not manage the free market or pick winners and losers. They're clearly bad at it. It's not just the auto industry the Liberals lost investments in. It's been every far-left radical idea that's come along, including a cricket factory where 10s of millions went down the toilet, because they were sure we all wanted to eat crickets. Poilievre believes the government needs to stick to doing its job - managing the economy, managing the budget - and get the hell out of every minute detail of our lives.

Liberals announce Bill C-22, one of 4 censorship Bills the Liberals have prioritized, and here's what it will do: Anandsagaree can issue a secret order to install devices, equipment and software to spy on you. Warrants are no longer needed. Electronic service providers are forced to hand over all your data. Allows the government to use illegal hacks and leaks to get information. (Like they did during the Convoy) No judicial oversight. In the committee meetings on this Bill, concerns were raised that there is nothing in the Bill preventing them from using this on ordinary citizens, like is being done in the UK under similar legislation, arresting and jailing people for posting memes or opinions the government doesn't like. Not to worry. The party that used our Charter to wipe their a$$es with, subjected citizens to years-long lawfare (and lost), got banks to hand over lists of people who donated $5 to a cause they didn't like and then froze their bank accounts, got the media to lie for them about what was going on, the same people who want their own texts evaporated after 15 days.......they promise they won't do that.

I always know that you know you've lost when you can't post anything but insults. 🤣

Didn't read the article or quote, I see. Or maybe inability to comprehend? the word used in the title of the article is "distress". To the point that it is affecting their plans for the future. For many this means they don't want to have children if we're gonna die in a climate disaster "soon" or live like cave-dwellers. Almost 40% report it negatively affects their life. I would call this effect "fear". Radical leftists only give lip service to caring about children, so I'm not surprised you dismiss this as nothing. I DID think you were smart enough to comprehend that it isn't right wingers that fomented this distress amongst young people. I stand corrected.

Paid for by George Soros - King of Chaos.

I always thought it was sad how the climate fanatics used her. She is on the autism spectrum. Asperger's to be exact. My kids grew up with a friend who has this, but it wasn't as well known about at the time. They tend to obsess about things. And then it's all they will think about, all they will talk about, it takes over their brains. There are techniques for pulling them out of their obsessions. Her's were encouraged and exploited. It made me sad at the time, but if you pointed any of this out to people.....OMG. You were evil for "attacking" her.

Thank you for pointing this out. I've read a lot of papers on this and I've become more convinced that CO2 levels FOLLOW warming, not the other way around, as traditionally thought. And earth is warming naturally because we are coming out of a little ice age. This is why CO2 levels should go up. I have confidence we will adapt without shoveling all our money to billionaires.

One thing that makes me question the whole "climate change is mainly because of human activity" narrative is earth's volcanic activity. It's ignored by climate fanatics and rejected because, like MH, they reject science from volcanologists because they are not "climate scientists". I posted on here about the Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption when it happened in 2022 and it was largely ignored by the climate fanatics on here. That was a major climate event. It released the equivalent of 58,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools of water vapor into the air and there was an article from NASA that I posted, indicating exactly how it would affect the climate on earth, what we could expect climactically from that massive amount of water vapor suddenly being injected into the atmosphere. For the next few years, as I watched those predictions play out accurately - every news report explained those climate effects as being because of human activity. No mention of the volcanic eruption. As of today, there are 46 volcanoes erupting on earth. It's estimated that each volcano emits as much CO2 in 2 seconds, as the human race does in a year. You can't tax volcanoes. That's why climate fanatics ignore their effect on climate.

Overwhelming Majority of US Youth Worried About Climate Change

Baloney. You all have your head so far up Liberal a$$, there would never be an alternative that would be acceptable to you. How do I know? 11 years of Liberal failure. And they're acceptable to you.

Yes, yes. I'm sure the huge raises, fancy new titles, world travel and unlimited expense accounts with zero accountability had nothing to do with their decisions. That's what they're saying, for sure. It's a bold claim. I'm not sure the Net Zero and Central Banking agendas will "help" Canadians, though. And the voters who elected them clearly didn't want those agendas or they would have voted Liberal in the first place.

Another difference: Podcasters and especially Rogan interviews people they don't necessarily agree with and gives them hours to speak. CBC banned Conservative voices.

I think we all know that Carney is desperate to get a majority government, by any means necessary. And he'll get it. A majority will give him free rein to implement his life-long wet dreams of Net Zero agenda and Central Banker agenda. He's the architect of both. I don't think Canadians know what's coming. And when they get the final bill......they ain't gonna like it. Are you going to give the Liberals another decade of chances? Do you think Canada has that much time economically?

Dang. If only you had this conviction a decade ago. We wouldn't be in this mess.

This information will be quickly ignored. Libbies are hard-wired now. Everything wrong with Canada is Trump's fault. The Conservatives have a solution to that. HINT: The solution isn't blaming Trump.

I'm sure you will.

Citing the slowdown in the EV market in Canada and uncertainty in trade, Honda has "postponed" plans to establish EV production in Canada. Down the drain: Honda - $15.7 billion Stellantis - $26 billion Ford - $19.5 billion GM - $6 billion Collectively: $67 billion dollars torched in Liberal "investments" Liberals: "Yes, we know Poilievre was right on everything, but he was 'distasteful' so we voted for complete economic and societal collapse instead." They don't care. It doesn't matter the massive record of failure in every government portfolio, it means nothing to them. They're on the "winning" team. That's all that matters.

Hmmmm. Yet you support the party that is adamant about passing it out to Canadians for free. Including children.

Mining hurts the climate and the local environment and yet is critical for both solar panels and wind turbines. Turbine blades need to be replaced every 20 years and are buried in the ground, along with all the chemicals that went into producing them. Is that good for the environment, do you think? Off-shore wind farms harm the earth's natural weather patterns and also interfere with ocean creatures, particularly whales. The blades kill untold millions of birds every year. The energy produced by them is intermittent, so backup fossil fuels are needed. Unless you're okay with your grama freezing to death when it's -45. Commercial fishing harms the environment. Forestry and pulp mills harm the environment. Agriculture harms the environment with fertilizers and pesticides. All industry harms the environment. Auto manufacturing harms the environment and fossil fuels are needed for that industry. I bet you are against coal mining, yes? You would be one of the people protesting the coal mine right now, in Alberta. You likely don't know that the coal mine being protested is for a special kind of coal - metallurgical coal that is necessary for steel production - which you are likely against the steel industry as well. So if your criteria for rejecting an industry is based on it harms the environment, you most decidedly ARE anti-industry. Which explains your support of the Liberal anti-industry strategy for the last 11 years.

On what basis?

So, if Carney had gotten this $300 billion deal for Canada, you would protest it?

Thank you for proving my point. I knew it would be you that wouldn't disappoint. 😎

I notice none of the Liberal cheerleaders want to answer these questions. The reason they won't is because they would rather see Canada burn to the ground than admit their own stupidity in continually voting in the most corrupt gov't in Canadian history. There is nothing the Liberal party can do to destroy Canada that will change their vote.

Does he? Carney was just in India and actually met with the head of Reliance - at his personal home - and got nothing for Canada. But Trump just did. He got a $300 billion deal to build a refinery in Texas. And he didn't even travel to India. Brookfield is partnered with Reliance, so this US deal benefits Carney. But does nothing for Canada. So when Carney met with the guy from Reliance, was he doing a deal for Canada? Or for Brookfield? So maybe you are someone who gets easily twitterpated by Carney's vague tweet about Canada being an energy superpower and being positioned for opportunity, but those words don't put money in citizen's pockets. You know what does? A $300 billion deal to build a refinery. Unfortunately those citizens are Americans. Canadians get bupkis. Again. Carney is accomplishing fuque all for us. But lots of deals that improve his own investments.