Goddess

No. They want rapists and pedos out on the streets. Just like you do. That's why you vote for the party that makes policies to release them on to the streets. This has always been a major deal-breaker policy for me. I am unable to wrap my head around why you guys feel the opposite and continue to vote for rapists and pedos to go free.

I told you. Liberal supporters love rapists and pedos out on the streets. They're very open about it. They keep voting for it. They believe it shows their great "compassion" for criminals. It's virtue-signaling. They really believe they are better than you because they believe, very strongly, that rapists and pedos should be released and let free. Normal people have compassion for the children who are victims. Liberal supporters have a very, very sick and psychopathic mindset. You will never convince them that rapists and pedos should be in jail. Never. It's why they downvote and argue about it.

No you're not.

No, I don't.

Ya, we know. You get your boomer slop from CBC 🤣

I wouldn't believe it because I know that figure came from a Liberal Party paid-for report. I'm going to go with multiple economists who say it does. Also, it's just common sense - tax everything upstream of the food supply and it increases food prices. You're a Liberal. You vote for sending money to transgender bean farmers in the Congo, while 25% of our own people can't afford to eat. You vote for rapists and pedos to be out on the street. You hold the Liberal government accountable for nothing. Poor and vulnerable people don't even make it onto your radar.

To recap: In the last week, the US has thwarted 2 mass shootings at Canadian schools sent USAF fighter planes to escort 2 flights bound for Montreal, due to security concerns DOJ seized Iranian intelligence websites, revealing they had a $250,000 bounty on Goldie Ghamari, to have her literally beheaded at her Ottawa home. Ghamari is a former Ontario politician, fired by Doug Ford in 2024 for being "Islamophobic" because she was warning about the presence of IRGC in Canada. Three instances where, if it weren't for Canada's mortal enemy (according to Carney and Lib supporters) averted potential tragedy in Canada.

I doubt you are capable of understanding how or even of assimilating any information other than what is already in your brain, but basically - the tax exerts influence upstream of the supply chain and is passed down to consumers at the grocery store. It affects mainly poor people and vulnerable communities, so who gives a sh!t, amiright?

It's sick. Psychopathic.

Net zero is dead. Why is Mark Carney still pushing it? | Financial Post Now we have a new prime minister who is trying to appear less committed to the net-zero mission. But the transformation of the UN Secretary General’s “special envoy on climate action and finance” has been less than biblical. True, one of his first actions on taking power was to remove the despised consumer carbon tax. But that was largely sleight-of-hand, moving the tax out of public view onto beleaguered businesses already struggling with Trump tariffs. Net-zero fatigued Canadians should be asking their prime minister, “Why are you weakening our already struggling economy with carbon taxes and wasting taxpayer money subsidizing wind farms when it will make no perceptible difference to the global climate?” He owes them an answer.

2 teens, 14 and 15 yrs old, arrested for planning coordinated attacks on their schools in Nova Scotia and Manitoba. Great work by Canadian authorities, right? Nope. They're busy taking guns away from legal, trained gun owners and searching for memes on the internet they don't like. Thank the FBI and Interpol. N.S., Manitoba teens accused of planning co-ordinated school attacks | CBC News They're teens, so.....you know they'll be out on the streets again shortly.

$94 billion in spending that Carney lists as "capital spending" does not meet the internationally approved definition of capital spending. It's all operational spending. And if you had watched the committee meetings with the PBO, you would understand how this fancy accounting trick is designed to hide spending from Canadians and fool them into thinking things are better than they really are. Breaking down Prime Minister Mark Carney's budget plan | Opinion | winnipegsun.com What used to be considered operating costs is now being recast as capital investment. That includes corporate tax expenditures, investment credits and subsidies. These are not bridges, ports or trade corridors. They are policy choices that affect annual spending. When those costs are shifted out of the operating column, the books appear to improve. But nothing has actually changed. The money is still being spent. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has already raised concerns. Roughly $94 billion in spending labeled as “capital” does not meet standard definitions. That is about 30 percent of what the government is counting as investment. If those items were classified properly, the operating budget would still be in deficit. That matters. Investors, credit agencies and taxpayers rely on clear financial reporting. When definitions are stretched, confidence erodes. The Fraser Institute has called this approach misleading.

When Rogan asked Poilievre about Mark Carney, Poilievre replied, "I'm not going to criticize our Prime Minister on foreign soil." When Jon Stewart asked Carney about Pierre Poilievre, Carney goes off on a smug, arrogant, condescending rant. https://x.com/braedencaley/status/2034483130413850672?s=20

Judge Cathaline Heinrichs put all Kelowna girls in danger by granting bail to a 9-time rapist on March 13. His 3rd bail release on this matter. He assaulted 2 girls in February, while out on bail. So, he's out on bail again now. B.C. repeat offender granted bail again despite nine child sex assault charges A 28-year-old B.C. man, Dylan Hartley-Gulliford, was granted bail last week despite facing nine criminal charges for allegedly sexually assaulting four separate teenagers, according to local Kelowna news outlet Castanet. The charges date back to 2024. 9 criminal charges relate back to alleged assaults against 4 separate teenage victims, all underage girls, some charges involving girls under 16.

Polio has not been eradicated. As you can see from the literature links above, the original vaccines had severe limitations. I notice you do not acknowledge that information. Yet, polio pretty much died down. Experts at the time did not attribute it to the vaccine. That is a myth that has developed over time, a narrative. The disease appears to be dependent on some factor or factors that we don't understand yet, and until we do, we won't know what makes it come and go. It was the US that took the lead in polio research and developed the vaccine, so that's why I focused on that country. I haven't looked, so I'm not aware if there are other countries that led studies specific to their country. And since we only know polio outbreaks are dependent on some unknown outside factor or factors, those studies would be specific to each country. Identifying those factors in the US may assist in identifying them in other countries. We do know that for someone to be infected with polio, the virus must come out of someone's bottom and into someone else's mouth. Lovely image aside, India is not known for its.....cleanliness.

Typo. Sorry.

The red arrow is the introduction of the vax. The disease was trending down.

"User has a bed-wetting problem and has to wear diapers at night." It's a fact. 😉

Just because you say something, doesn't make it a fact.

Don't forget the almost a billion dollar trip for a meeting he wasn't invited to when he had to rent a private jumbo jet. No planes available: PM Carney charters private jet to Egypt for historic Mideast peace summit

Well, they all stood up in court, so..... I provided all the facts and the links to all the literature to prove them. You refute with a bunch of propaganda statements. It's ok if you don't want to accept the facts and links, but I think that says more about you than me.

He reminds me of Mr. Burns, from the Simpsons.

POLIO The only disease for which a vaccine was introduced in the 1950's. Every other disease had sharp declines in mortality before & after 1900, but polio had almost no deaths in 1900. It was fairly innocuous until 1890, then gradually increasing rates of mortality until a few years before 1952, when there was a sharp increase in morality. It then declined sharply ON ITS OWN in the few years before a vaccine was introduced in 1955 (the Salk polio vax) and in 1961 (the Sabin polio vax). Experts believe there was one or more outside factors that made the polio virus more lethal in the first half of the 1900's and as those outside factors declined, so did the mortality of polio. However, talk of polio generally elicits extremely strong emotional responses and conjure up images of children in iron lungs, paralyzed children, which makes it hard to discuss the topic of polio objectively. The popular belief is that millions would have been paralyzed with polio, but the truth is, it was already in steep decline before the vaccine was introduced. Even paralytic polio was considered so rare that the efficacy trials for it in 1954 required over 1 million children to determine efficacy. Medical researchers at the time even complained about the attention being given to polio, since many of them were working on solutions for other diseases that, while also rare, were far more prevalent than polio. The polio virus had been endemic and benign for millennia, infecting generation after generation of humans and causing almost no harm with the exception of a few, very rare cases. The epidemiology of poliomyelitis; problems at home and among the Armed Forces abroad - PubMed Sabin, in 1947, explained "paralytic polio became an epidemic disease only about 50 years ago, and the epidemic outbursts in the last 30-40 years are events that could NOT have been readily missed in the past." Polio, like many other viruses, silently circulated for millennia, causing only rare individual harm. Until 1890. For a few decades, polio cases increased, accelerating in the 19040's, peaking around 1952, with around 3000 deaths and an estimated multiple of that number paralyzed. While almost every other disease was becoming LESS harmful around this time, polio was moving in the opposite direction. Researchers at the time could not explain this, and it was unique to industrialized nations with no outbreaks in developing nations. Sabin explained, "One of the problems with the epidemiology of polio is determination of the factors related to the virus, host and environment. Large cities (NYC, Chicago, Denver, LA) have histories of large outbreaks, while bigger cities in China on the same latitude experience only rare, sporadic cases." As you can see from the study above, there were outbreaks amongst US military stationed overseas, while no cases in the surrounding population. Further details in the above paper. Another puzzle was - why polio cases clustered in the summer months, dormant during about 2/3 of each year. What exposure or differential was causing an otherwise innocuous virus to only harm individuals in developed nations and only during the summer months? Another oddity - The only natural hosts for the polio virus are humans. Not animals. Yet domestic animals experienced the same outbreaks, at the same time as their human counterparts in developed countries. Medical Times 1912-05: Vol 40 Iss 5 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Why would animals who cannot be infected with the po9lio virus become paralyzed? Was there a common exposure? These facts all point to a potential unknown factor or factors. The virus appeared to be lethal only when this unknown factor or factors was present. Scientists, including Sabin, were at a loss. Improved hygiene theory was examined and rejected. Even Sabin called the theory "untenable." Following the Salk vaccine, the definition of what constituted a case of paralytic polio was changed to a more strict criteria. But if the same criteria was used for both before (1953, 1954) & after (1955-1959) the vaccine, the data shows that the Salk vaccine had a negligible impact on the disease. (Confirmed by experts later on. Keep reading before you react emotionally to that statement.) In what would be considered blasphemy today, but were uncontested facts in 1960: "The low incidence of disease complicates evaluation of the vaccine.....Because of the low incidence of polio, neither the private, nor local public health physician is in a position to judge the value of the vaccine." You should really read his reasoning in the below paper. True in 1950 and still true today, vaccine believers will credit the vaccine when cases decline and when they increase, will blame those who did not get vaccinated, even when the overall vaccination rate increased. This illogical belief has long been the lore of vaccine mythology, but at least in the 1950's, respected academics were willing and able to chastise such false beliefs. Professor Greenberg explains the reduction in polio cases as mostly an artifact of: changing the definition of what constituted a case the post-1955 requirement of lab confirmation of a case, which resulted in identification of other conditions that cause paralysis (Coxsackie, ECHO viruses, meningitis, etc.) the lack of incentive to the patient to be diagnosed post-1955 and a strong bias to not find polio among the vaccinated The PRESENT status of polio vaccine - PubMed Thus, according to respected researchers of the day, the significant decline in paralytic polio was an artifact of these factors and not the result of an effective vaccine. In addition, countries that only used the Salk vaccine - Sweden, Iceland, the Netherlands - which did not stop transmission, polio still disappeared nonetheless, even amongst the unvaccinated. Dr. Kleinman, epidemiologist from the Minnesota Department of Health and US Public Health Service delegate concurred: "If polio antibodies mean anything in relation to protection, then I am forced to conclude that much of the Salk vaccine we have been using is useless. for 2 years now we have done antibody titrations on vaccinated children (3 or more doses). These titrations show 50% do not have antibodies. That is a very disturbing fact." Dr. Cox: "Type II polio represents only 3% of paralytic cases throughout the world. The Salk vaccine does a poor job on Type I which is 85% of paralytic cases and Type III, which is 12% of cases. In other words, the vaccine is doing its best job against the least important type of polio. With low concentrates of antigen, you may do more harm than good." Professor Meier, biostatistician from the U of Chicago: "How is that today we hear from the members of this panel that the Salk vaccine questions are confused, and yet what everybody knows from the newspapers is that the situation was and is marvelous? The reason for this discrepancy lies, I think, in the attitudes of many public health and publicity men. It's hard to convince the public that something is good, so the best way to push forward a new program is to decide what you think is best and then not question it thereafter and not raise questions before the public or openly discuss the issues.....the attitude that dissent and public discussion are unwelcome." Sound familiar? Dr. Ratner, Director of Public Health & Professor of Preventative Medicine and Public Health at the Stritch School of medicine in Chicago, addressed the question of whether a state health department would recommend against children getting the Salk vaccine: "They would be in a position of opposing mass propaganda and the public opinion formed by it." Sound familiar? Dr. Meier agreed, stating: "The great pressure of publicity has been exerted. It would be a health officer of great self-confidence that would be prepared to make a judgement different than that of the USPHS. On the other hand, I don't consider it convincing evidence of the efficacy of the Salk vaccine that all, or almost all, health officers have gone along with it." Dr Ratner then concludes: "It should also be stressed that safety testing was inadequate with the Salk vaccine." The objective facts are: something made the innocuous polio virus pathogenic in 1890 paralysis was relatively rare, even at its peak in the US the vaccine had very limited efficacy the number of cases dropped precipitously due to factors other than the vaccine's effectiveness Misinformation drove a fearful public to rally around the vaccine individuals were "clinging" to the vaccine for "sentimental or personal reasons" ThePresentStatusOfPolioVaccines-1960-Chicago.pdf This is just a small sample of the facts from 1890-1960, which likely differs greatly from what you've heard about polio mythology. That "fake controversy" - there is now a black box warning on covid vaccines for myocarditis.

You did. I posted that before you did.

I wonder who will have the biggest meltdown over Poilievre doing Rogan? I think it will be LinkSoul. 🤣