?Impact

Yet 40 pages later, you have not even provide a single link to media that backs up your allegation.

The bulk of the costs were real-estate and legal fees. Here are the rules, established back in the 70's and last updated in 2009. Time to fix this, perhaps setting a ceiling.

That question has been answered, again and again and again. There is a difference between adapting (through evolution) to fit the environment and adapting the environment (through technology) to fit your needs.

Normal? You mean reminiscent of a brain injury?

That is why am going to take up drugs and alcohol, best way to turn my life around.

If those homes were sold for about $1 million each, that would make real-estate fees around $50k for each. When were real-estate fees included in reimbursable relocation expenses, that rule needs to be changed.

Actually she is 68, Trump is the 70 year old.

Something I noticed after this afternoon, ie. perhaps related to ay upgrade, is that many icons (eg. avatars) do not display. At first I thought it might be the computer I was using earlier this evening but I just returned to my MacBook and am getting the same thing.

Drama, and thanks to skittles the gong show is now even more entertaining.

Adapting for life at polar regions. We didn`t evolve to live there, we created technology that allowed us to. Fire, or at least the ability to kindle a fire at will, is one of the basic ones we discussed at length already. This is not to discount that the human species has evolved, but we are far from understanding that evolution although there are several proposed theories like the Out of Africa theory, or the Multi regional origin theory.

Agreed, additionally why is the crown attorney/prosecutor bringing the case forward?

and the latest poll has Clinton with a 6 point lead with only 8% citing recent health concerns an issue.

Yes, our juries are not made of professionals in the science of evidence gathering. Do you suggest that we try people based on their knowledge of television shows? I bet if you asked the common man on the street questions about chain of custody, they would fail miserably.

Yes, Trudeau holds Q&A sessions with students, but also with a wide range of others as well. Unfortunately for the previous 9 years our Prime Minister woulnd`t answer any questions.

Ignorance of the law is not, nor never has been, a defense. I dare say that 100% of lawyers and justices in this land are ignorant of a large part of the law.

Says who? I see a big problem with the huge expenses, how did we develop a system that allows it? Rules were set in 2008, who was responsible?

People adapted to living at the pole through technology, not evolution. Blatantly ignoring this does not magically make you right, just like ignorance in general does not make a magic God.

Gotta go, my skittles are getting cold.

Why did God create lactose intolerance?

Where did I make any denial? You are making the allegation, so demonstrate the proof. If you have (real) proof then I will accept it.

Your propensity to make linkages that are convenient to your narrative. Now suddenly I am a supporter of the Muslim Brothers, because that supports your narrative. I don't support Muslim Brotherhood, I don't support the International Union for Muslim Scholars, I don't support this Ottawa mosque, I don't support Islam, I don't support religion. I am being very clear, yet you will ignore it and make up anything. Perhaps you can illustrate your argument with a bowl of skittles.

It seems that the mostly bullshit some of you are reading needs some balance.

Yes, PEW is acceptable to me. It is not them that is a liar.

Just like Canada is Saudi Arabia