Boges

So because she was hired by the government of Canada means she's only doing this for the money, and marrying Minister McKay is simply her showing gratitude for her current employment. Of course you'd have no evidence to support this.

No as for Older women go Belinda is very attractive. No Rona Ambrose or that chick that got elected for the NDP while partying in Vegas though.

He's ugly? Never heard that attributed to Peter Mackay before. He had a thing with Belinda Stronach for awhile. I find her very hot.

Are heard that on the radio. Can't verify it or anything.

When it involved uniting the right, yes, yes I do.

I'm not shocked you think breaking his promise with that myopic D-Bag was a bad thing. Peter McKay did the best thing for Canadian Conservatives by breaking his promise there. Had David Orchard had his way the Liberals would still be in power.

Good for Peter McKay! Are people really criticizing him for not having the wedding in Canada?

According to this link http://www.fannation.com/blogs/post/1299408-nfl-strength-of-schedule-after-week-17-2011 Detroit, Chicago and Minny get very high strength of schedules while Green Bay gets a very low one. Or even more perplexing the Niners get the second worse strength of schedule while the Rams get the top figure. They only two games different from each other.

Well obviously because you're playing to top 6 teams in your conference and the best team in the other conference. In the AFC you have 3 playoff teams from the North. Cincy got a two last place games outside of the games they played in common with their division. (Buffalo and Denver) They went 1-1. They also got to play the AFC South and NFC West. So you have Jville, Indy, Zona, St. Louis and Seattle. They also got to play the Browns twice. They never beat the Steelers or the Ravens and also lost to the Niners and Texans. All playoff teams. So is that schedule easy or hard? 6 of their games were against playoff teams and 10 of there games were against non-playoff teams. I'm betting your ratings system has Jville having a moderately difficult schedule with 2 games against Houston, a game against the Saints, Falcons, Steelers, Ravens and Bengals. But by that same schedule all those teams get fairly easy schedules.

Ranking difficulty of schedules Who had the most difficult schedule? Perhaps they had a difficult schedule because they played teams that had good records, perhaps because they had an easy schedule. KC beating the Packers makes their schedule tougher but it makes Green Bay's softer. It's also based on certain divisions. Recent history would say that the AFC West and NFC West are bad divisions. This year the AFC South is a pretty cruddy division. Just keep in mind that every team that won a division played almost an identical schedule as the other teams in their conference minus 2 games.

I would never get adopt a dog. Too many variables I have no control over. I'd rather have a dog I can train and create a pack with from Day One. But I guess even puppies have baggage. When my dog is sleeping she occasionally wimpers as if she's being beaten or something. I can only assume she's having a nightmare.

Nothing beats Pecan Pie.

How do you really determine which breeds don't cross well with eachother? I've seen Poodles crossed with Pugs, Yorkies, Maltese etc. The most popular hybrid dogs are the Cockapoo, Goldiepoo, and Labradoodle. Taking popular dogs that do shed and crossing them with a smart dog that doesn't shed.

I think this applies in this thread. http://graphjam.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/song-chart-memes-have-girlfriend.jpg?w=504&h=343

What's wrong with wanting a dog that doesn't shed? Poodles don't shed. They are the second most intelligent dog. Why do you think just about every breed of dog gets cross-bred with them. Designer Dogs are mutts. They're mutts that have a standard in mind without having to inbred. Then again some in the Cockapoo community want a Cockapoo to be a breed.

I've always wanted to have a lively debate about dogs on a messageboard. If you watch recent documentaries about dogs you'd find out that making pedigrees and standards for dogs have done them a great disservice. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZNVewvFm4M Dogs like Pugs, French/English Bulldogs, Boxers, Basset Hounds, Rodesian Ridgebacks, Cavalier King Charles Spanial, Pekanese, Chiauhas, etc etc are all bred for a certain look, the dog's health be damned. I own a designer dog, Poodle and Cocker Spanial cross. I seeked out this dog on purpose because I didn't want a dog that shed and I didn't want a dog that was genetically inbred to the point of just being a walking vet bill. People who pay multiple thousand dollars for a pedigree french bulldog or a pug are mentally deranged. I personally welcome the trend towards mutts and designer dogs, I believe dog health in the future will benefit from it. Thoughts on the Pedigree debate?

I could buy a bottle of rum for $24, no thanks. I was at a friends house and he cracked open a bottle of icewine that he won at an event. He said it would have cost $100. $100 for a wine that has a bit of sweetness!! It's like paying $50-$100 for a cigar. Sure a Monte Cristo is measurably better but it's not worth the extra price sometimes. I guess if you have money you can choose to only have the best. But they aren't sensible purchasing practice. That being said, I can really tell the difference between good single-malt scotches over the blended variety. So maybe everyone has their tastes.

Don't get me started on coffee. Who's to say that discount brand retailers can't make good quality beer? As said earlier, it's about marketing. A 6-pack of Camerons Ale is $18. You telling me they can't make that beer for a similar price to Lakeport? Sleemans, a Beer made up the street from me in Guelph, is relatively cheap. Molson Canadian is actually offensively priced in Ontario at $40 for a case. That's ridiculous when you consider Laker and James Ready are indy beers made in Ontario. Lakeport used to be, but was bought out by Labatts. Then you have something like Corona which is imported, beer flavoured water, but people pay good money for that beer because it's seen as a cool party beer.

Yet they somehow went 15-1. I would bet on the Saints if it wasn't for the fact they'd have to play in Lambeau. When the Saints won the Super Bowl, every playoff game they won was inside.

Or the Patriots with their pathetic defense? Or the Saints with their Pathetic defense? Or the Niners with Alex Smith? Or the Lions who's defense got schooled by a backup? Or Pittsburgh who's QB is hurt and Running back is out for the season? Or Baltimore who lost to Jacksonville and Seattle? Or the Texans with TJ Yates, Jake Delhomme and Jeff Garcia? Or the Giants who lost to the Redskins twice? Or Cincy with their rookie QB and the fact they haven't beaten a quality team this year. So I guess Atlanta is winning the Super Bowl this year.

Causation or Correlation. Does poverty cause lawlessness or does religon cause it? Saudi Arabia and UAE are both wealthy nations.

I'd say driving tired is far more dangerous than driving with 2 drinks within an hour in your system. Zero Tolerance is a certainly a terrible idea. Most responsible drinkers can have a drink or two with a dinner and successfully drive home as long as they stay below a drink an hour.

Well it's just to prove that saying everything made in China is poorly made is of folly. For all you know the people making your iPod are next door and making the same wage as someone making shoes from Wal-Mart. And what does it say about a company like Apple that has a militant following that they don't employ Americans to make their over-priced products. At least a company like Wal-Mart passes on the savings of having product made in China on to the consumer. Two big purchases were made at my home in the last month. Our first Christmas Tree. Cost about $400 at Canadian Tire and a Liqour/Wine Cabinet $250 at Home Outfitters. Both were good quality products and both were made in China.

St Ambroise Apricot Ale is very good.

NERDS!!!!!!!