Hal 9000

The democrats make racist comments every day and never get called out.

Prices ending in 7 is Walmart's thing. Maybe we should invent the .07c coin.

I just wonder if we should introduce her to Jim Benning?

Listening to what AOC will say, how utterly dense she is, how confident she is in her beliefs and the amount of people either in love with her or in fear of her, I gotta admit, I think she is the the most dangerous person in the USA right now.

Now i want to party with her and Elizabeth May.

She introduced herself, that was nice..

Disgruntled fan - she says she gave him some "feedback" and seemed to be talking as a fan. She does seem to be speaking for her constituents...so there's that.

It's not the racking up of the score that is offensive, the system almost demands that teams do that, It's the goal celebrations that were in poor taste. I've seen coaches coaching 8/9yo kids tell their players to stop celebrating when the score is way out of hand, yet these adults cheered the 13th goal just the same as the first goal. It was an appalling display.

Have you apologized for the wrongdoing of other men?

I didn't know how many people were fine with teen suicide until now. Personally, I think the system failed this young girl.

That's the problem...and we all saw it coming. I generally have supported euthanasia in the past, but it is a slippery slope. Everyone is for it, scoffs at the idea that it will turn into this, but when you cant legally distinguish "pain", this is where it inevitably ends.

I heard one pundit on MSNBC, and I quote "the democratic field is an embarrassment of riches"....I laughed and laughed!

Let me guess, they went into a spiel about how those other socialist countries just didn't do it right.

Good grief, that's actually shocking. On one hand Trump is doing a good job, but part of me really wants to see the US try out socialism.

And Trump didn't stick a stogie where stogies should go.

The same way I know whether to trust a used car salesman or not. You can, with near certainty know whats true or not true based on the sales pitch, what has Mueller said and especially not said that tells the truth. If there was any evidence at all, rest assured we'd all know it by now. Muller wanted to throw Trump into the fire, but instead of a testimony, he has a press conference and takes no questions. The Democrats don't want to read the unredacted report, why? Well, that's simple, they know there's nothing there, but if they read it and tell the public that they read it, the jig is up (Schrodinger's cat). Without reading it, they can still stomp their feet and call "cover-up". If they try to impeach Trump, it will simply be to try a perjury trap. This will go from Collusion to obstruction and eventually to perjury if the Dems have their way. This isn't about breaking the law, never was, it's about getting Trump at any cost. BTW - With all Trumps international connections, the fact is; I actually thought Mueller would get something, some minor contact or conversation with some foreign power. The fact that Trump is as clean as he is, is actually a little surprising.

Oh, the redacted stuff eh? Well, why then have the Democrats NOT read the redacted parts, even though they given permission to do so? Ever heard of Schrodinger's cat? You simply have no idea of the game being played here do you?

I've answered that already, so lets go at from another angle; What is the evidence that Mueller found?

When Nancy Pelosi looks like the only sane Democrat, you really have to wonder just how far down the rabbit hole everyone else has traveled. Yikes!

That's complete bull! An ounce of common sense would tell you that if there was evidence, he'd say there was evidence. Instead he plays the whole "I can't say for sure that he's not guilty". Are all lefties really this gullible?

There is no evidence of obstruction, just 10 different incidences that they investigated. Simple speculation and Mueller's own hypothesis, that's all. I'm saying that Mueller could've said that there is no evidence and left it at that - which is what a neutral investigator should do, but he chose to stoke the Democrats fire with statements like "we can't prove he's innocent" and "we don't have authority to lay charges". Both comments are technically factual, but none of it matters because there is no evidence. If there was evidence, Mueller would say "there is evidence for a criminal charge but..." The Dems wanted Mueller to testify, and instead he went around that and had a defacto testimony without questions - very shady. I would've been content will Mueller writing his report and riding off into the sunset, but after his performance the other day, he has changed from "neutral investigator" to witness. Now I think he needs to be questioned by congress.

You have completely put away the thought that there is no evidence of guilt and are now buying into the "can't prosecute" narrative. Wow, you're pretty malleable, but I guess that's what Mueller and the Dems expect.

Don't you think that if they had any evidence against Trump, any evidence at all, they'd all be shouting it from every news tower. After 2 years and countless investigators, they have nothing, and instead of just saying that, Mueller says we cant charge a sitting president. Here's the plan; Start Impeachment proceeding regardless of evidence, when Trump testifies and says something different than Cohen, McGahn...whoever, lay charges of perjury.