Hal 9000

Stay home, you mean like avoiding New years in hamburg, easter mass, christmas shopping, Ariana Grande concerts and such....well, that would help save us from terror attacks, but does little to help relations. Why though when that question is asked, you immediately went to "what we could do", not what they could do? It is after all, them coming to our country. Some of the onus should be on them too.

No, seriously.

We are a melting pot of people from all over the world, why can the Chinese, African Americans, Vietnamese and East Indians (among many others) get on in Canada and yet the Muslims seem to struggle? What can be done to better the relations with Muslims? Can you name 3 things?

Wow, what a patronizing, backhanded compliment. You might as well say "she's nice, but a little dim". At least we're challenging her beliefs like a grown up.

Jacee quite often talks in cliches and platitudes without ever thinking abut what she's saying..or why.

Why would you assume that it's a hate crime?

So, I assume you're against the bombings in Sri Lanka...right?

Bill Clinton.

So, is that a no to shooting them with paintball guns?

I see you've reemerged, have you finally found something illegal to discuss...or is it just more crazy hand wringing?

Yes, it's not actually about real estate, it's just an opportunity to take a shot at Christians. That's what I thought.

I don't know why, but I all of a sudden have an urge to destroy America.

How so?

Yeah, that's what I thought!!!

I'll tell you what Realitycheck, you read the report (oh, you already have) and come back with a illegality from Trump, then we can discuss further.

Oh, you don't take orders...Bull! You've got nothing...exactly nothing because you haven't been told yet. You're whole "did you read the report" crap is a deflection. You haven't read anything and if you did, you can't find anything. You don't even know what to you're supposed to be outraged about... wow, must be unsettling.

No, tell me what exactly you're holding on to.

Ok, so why don't you tell us what you're still following? Is it still collusion, has it changed to obstruction (as the media wants) or is it something new? What are we all missing that you've read in the report?

We all know that Mueller looked under every stone, including Roger Stone. He investigated nearly every page including Carter Page...but not Lisa Page..hmmm. There is nothing, nada, zip and zilch. Nobody in the media or democratic party actually believe that Trump is guilty...no there there. What they have is a hope that they can manipulate and anger voters into voting Democrat - that's all - division. Anyone in the public, who is still buying into this "collusion/obstruction" crap is being manipulated - plain and simple.

Trump is exonerated, that happened by default when the prosecutor ends his 2 year 25$ million investigation with zero evidence. The fact that Mueller refused to say as much and Barr had to step forward to remind us of that fact is truly disgraceful. Mueller's "I can't exonerate Trump" routine is a political tactic so people like Realitycheck can still be divisive Trump haters.

No, It's actually not. Mueller or the police don't exonerate, they press charges or they don't. The Police aren't there to say that they think you're guilty, but cant prove it.

Why did he need to insert that comment at all? You know why! All you have to is watch the Dems and Media cling to that sliver of hope to see why that comment was made. It's not up to Mueller to say anything except "there is no evidence that would support an indictment". Just look at how you people are grasping at those very few and insignificant words. Like I said, if you went through what Trump and others have (Carter Page), only to have the prosecutor suggest that you still might be guilty, I'm sure you'd be pretty angry too. I'd be livid, maybe hire a defamation lawyer.

It's actually pretty irresponsible to have as big of an investigation as this was and at the end say "we're not saying he didn't do it". I mean really, if a government spent this amount of time and money to investigate anyone and left that kind of caveat without ever processing an indictment...c'mon, there is no limbo area here, either you found evidence or you didn't, just man up and say that there is no evidence to indict, let alone impeach or convict. Mueller seems content to suggest that Trump may still be guilty, but his team is too dumb to find evidence. Mueller would rather admit defeat, admit that Trump is smarter than him, instead of just saying they were all wrong - whatever. Mueller is a douche bag.

I can't establish a case that Realitycheck beats his wife, but I can't exonerate him either.

Suspicious!