OftenWrong

You haven't heard a lot of things, apparently. Far be it for me to educate a so-called American about his country's president. But, here you go little fella.- https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2021/01/20/biden-executive-order-overturns-trump-diversity-training-ban/4236891001/ “In the weeks ahead, I will be reaffirming the federal government’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion and accessibility, building on the work we started in the Obama-Biden administration. That’s why I’m rescinding the previous administration’s harmful ban on diversity and sensitivity training,” Biden said in remarks delivered Tuesday. “Unity and healing must begin with understanding and truth, not ignorance and lies.” The stated objective of Donald Trump's executive order issued in late September was "to combat offensive and anti-American race and sex stereotyping and SCAPEGIOTING." Yeah scapegoating... we saw what happened to a principal in Toronto when he was scape-goated to death for simply speaking out on a relatively minor issue. THAT is what you people are bringing to the dialogue.

So your saying, you approve of Biden promoting CRT but not Trump when he ditched it for federal workers. "Because Trunp" ?

In some significant ways it is. Please see "Canada's standard of living is lagging behind its peers", for one. Other things he's done bringing discontent and division are more cultural-impact related. Cultural marxism.

He is the PM of Canada. Those others you are trying to use as deflection, havenothing to do with us. Part of the role of being the top dog is to also be the fall guy, when the system you rule over collapses into a sheisser-gebaude. And that's Canada. .... "To bury Caesar, ..."

I know it's challenging to question things. Easier to just consume the info at face value, and stay comfortable.

I blame Justin Trudeau for the division he's created in this country. It really became obvious by his comments during Covid. His finance minister is inept as well. Get her out of here.

@Michael Hardner, just funnin ya, moderator-boy.

I can still see the warning points given me by MH. One was for "image trolling", whatever that is. I posted a picture and he doesn't like the use of images, so he invented that word. The other was for my use of the phrase "these brown people are fools". He was offended by that. "You cannot call all brown people fools." Every time I see those points they remind me to say, thanks god, he is no longer moderator.

Looks like a long line of trucks to me. Do those young men fleeing conscription all drive 18-wheelers?

Yeah that's what I thought, he's having a stroke. Oh well. Boges is simply displaying his liberal contempt for the elderly (IE ageism) once again.

He ain't the president.

That has always been the case. What I indicated is the problem was made even worse by irresponsible comments and actions which mainly left-leaning officials piled on. Even here in Canada, where we now have reports of much higher understaffing. It's not so much an extra burden on the taxpayer if they cannot fill the roster.

No kidding. Problem was only worsened by Dem leaders calling out the "Defund the police" meme, an anti-cop message coming from the very top that would make most young potential recruits dicks curl in...

You have a cite or reference for what Tory tried?

The family doctor was not involved in these decisions and the drug was distributed by government directly to pharmacies. Your doctor never even received a brochure. And now we're finding out that the conspiracists were right, whom you people poo-pooed whenever they raised the question. There were people who rightfully required a medical exemption, but all we heard from Trudeau and the establishment was denials and screaming, screaming. Don't expect me to believe them.

It depends on the will of religious parents. My kids are already grown up. What I've seen of muslims and sikhs, they have their own leadership and don't depend purely on government to make their own accommodations. This will bolster their need for another seperate system. Which is allowed, as long as it meets the academic cirriculum. Question is will it be eligable for government funding if they don't allow/ promote the gender disphoria being taught in the public systems now. That is what they are teaching, imo. They are making kids more confused. Answer is probably NO. The government already demands that employers who want to tap into funding for part-time students who work during the off-season need to be onboard with the so-called inclusivity. (Really a form of exclusivity. But with government, what else should we expect).

She wants everyone to join her 100% pure shit-show, because that's all she really wants. /ignore until they learn to get real.

Indoctrination of ideas goes both ways in this regard, which is why all of it should be removed from the government/ education system's sphere. Stick to the 3 r's, etc.

I have no explanation for how that came about. Blame Soros. But my hunch is that most parents and religious leaders would oppose the separate school boards stance. Although "celebrating pride" does not necessarily mean bringing in drag queens to reading hour, or offering hardcore gay porn in the library. If the separate board intends to follow the public one, it raises the demand for another separate school system. Those who are religious will seek an alternative from state-sanctioned porn being taught in the public.

Not a bad suggestion. The "Separate School Board" should be remodelled to be more inclusive toward other religions. No longer just for catholics, it should welcome muslims as well. Then they can put up a banner at the front that says "we don't teach little kids about trannies here."

You may have been telling the truth there. You have got that sarcastic tone again, like your doing it on purpose. Double-whammy... ==== Ain't it funny how no one will fess up to being a Trudeau supporter, yet the man was re-elected.

I find I disagree with pretty much everything you say. Does that help? Didn't say your values, I said whatever you call yourself. Meaning when you call yourself conservative. So I must be a liberal. And lo and behold, indeed I am, in a land full of illiberals.

Then allow me to put it more eloquently, "The government has no business in the bedrooms of Canadians." Trudeau senior's quote has a wider meaning than for just gay marriage, which he may have been referring to at the time. Today there are people, Canadians, who want to raise their kids according to their own cultural beliefs. Many immigrants and new Canadians are devout religious types. They want to protect their six-year-olds from being exposed to adult content while they are so young. The conflict between liberal "progressives" and multiculturalism now rears its ugly head. The best position is for the government to be disarmed and they must remain neutral. They provide the framework and the laws, services, run the economy. There needs to be sharp borders where government authority and /or influence is cut off. Censor the government.

But then you give snowflake appreciation for when she does the same thing, which is insults. Is that because of political bias, or part of the constructive, objective debate? Which is it going to be, impartialobserver. Time to shit, or get off the f*ckin commode. ?

The state is prone to overreach and needs to be kept limited in power. If there's one thing guaranteed to goof things up, it's government. All good conservatives know that.