OftenWrong

Because the establishment/ deep state despises, and fears, Donald Trump's return. They tried to exile him to Elba, but somehow he has escaped and is back. And this time with even more power... Gonna be a dictator just for one day...

He's an expert on population studies, in other words how to brain-wash you people into being obedient little sheep. Stay in your pen, little fella! Might be coyotes out there...

Says 'Center for Population Studies'. Is that where they do research on how to make lemmings all go off a cliff? Because hella yes Watchin you people get taken for a long ride...

Well covids still out there, so you are in the party now in a way. The trick is to get just a little bit, but every day. Anyway whether you agree or not, it is these issues and the associated politicing that make people distrust government-appointed health advisors.

Technically the constant daily exposure to low levels of virus in the environment gives sustained immunity, better than the vaccines that wear out. The immune system reacts within 5 days. We can't develop new vaccines that quickly. Therefore, natural health is best. As wvidences now in my workplace, the younger lads are all bleating and sneezing. Old pappy oftenwrong was there every day. Now Instand resolute. My blood is like serum. - Charleton Heston

These vaccine technologies if you will are a dead end. Their efficacy is limited, always was and still is, for these classes of viruses. Hence the paper concludes a new approach is urgently needed. At one point alludes to developing innate immunity, by inhaling a vapour of low amounts of the pathogen. You get it? Like Gramma said, go outside you ldiot and eat a peck of dirt. Or like my pappy used to say, every night you need a little of what kills ya.

Of course I read it. I was asking you. Then I said that none of those three points are actually controversial. It's been common knowledge that respiratory viruses evolve too quickly for vaccines to work. Faste than the flu. The war on viruses has been a race to try and pre-empt the next virus, before it mutates again. Antibiotics is the same problem, and we are losing the war. The protozoans will win. Which is what the paper says, but it's not new knowledge. It simply appeals for a new approach to vaccines. As to #3, can the vaccine make it worse, the paper states: it seems likely that respiratory vaccines that fail to elicit robust cell-mediated immunity may be suboptimal for the elderly—but also that vaccines that elicit stronger cell-mediated responses could also increase the risk of immunopathogenic effects. I bolded the relevant part. Immunopathogenic means, an inappropriate immune response to an infection, can cause harm to the host in different ways. If the response is weak, immunopathology could take the form of pathogen proliferation. In other words, the vaccine made you weak. You gonna die.

Nobody in their right mind wants a pandemic. That is not even the question. You don't understand the actual issue, but who cares. At no time should government be able to give such an edict under those circumstances. The experimental vaccine helped, but it also presented its own risks, some of which are just coming out now. See #3 to get a glimpse of one of those. This became a political issue, IE poison. Those on the left cheered for more authoritatian control, holding the opinion that the individual is too stupid to make an informed decision.

We all want that, so let's put that part aside. I appreciate you looking into it. Does Fauci's paper say those things in the summary? I'm no expert either, but I am a bit familiar with it. Actually those things mentioned aren't terribly controversial at all. The problems listed as 1,2,3. At least Fauci et al are being honest. We all want progress. You know how progressive I am. But there's progress and regress. As in, stumbling. Like going down the stairs too fast, when you've had a few. Ultimately this results in anti-progress.

Ah-so. Now you understand what the real cover-up is. Federalis at work. At least I'll give you credit for that. Always happy to elucidate on complex issues like this, for the benefit of the cognitively less-abled.

It begs the question, is Dr. Fauci, the left's "patron-saint of Covid 19" now peddling fake science propaganda from 'anti-vaxxers'? Will he now be labelled as political chandala? How many people does he want to kill anyway?

You psudeo-scientific propeller heads are so sure of what you don't know, you're almost ready to attack anyone who might dare question the party line. "Lock them up! Lock them up!" Well it turns out that it's not as black and white as your simple understanding leads you to believe. Fauci himself has co-authored a paper, published in 2023, that points to problematic issues with the mrna vaccine. Some of this says the very same thing so-called 'anti-vaxxers' claimed during the outbreak, even to the point that getting the vaccine could put you MORE at risk. First, some exerpts from an online article describing the paper. Then I'll link to the paper itself so you can read it and weep. In January 2023, Fauci, and two colleagues, outlined concerns rooted in the interplay between respiratory viruses and the human immune system. Here are the key arguments underpinning Fauci et al.’s reversed position: 1. Mucosal vs. Systemic Immunity: mRNA vaccines are designed to elicit systemic immune responses, primarily through the generation of neutralizing antibodies. However, respiratory viruses require a robust mucosal immune response for effective neutralization and clearance. Fauci and colleagues argue that mRNA vaccines, in their current form, do not adequately stimulate mucosal immunity, potentially limiting their effectiveness against respiratory pathogens. 2. Durability of Protection: Another concern they point to involves the duration of protection offered by mRNA vaccines. Respiratory viruses, including influenza and coronaviruses, exhibit high mutation rates, leading to the emergence of new variants. The implication is that mRNA vaccines may not provide long-lasting immunity against these ever-evolving threats, requiring frequent updates and booster shots. 3. Immune Imprinting: The phenomenon of “original antigenic sin” or immune imprinting is also highlighted as a potential issue. This concept suggests that exposure to a specific viral strain via vaccination could bias the immune system’s response to future infections, making it less effective against different strains. While mRNA vaccines can be quickly updated, repeated vaccinations might reinforce this imprinting, potentially complicating responses to new variants. Link to the paper: Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses Hopefully you government-affirming bobbleheads will have the time and mental prowess to read it? But nahh...

The scandal is that THE SYSTEM is going after Trump while Biden gets a pass for the same things. And the voting public takes note of that. Well, those who are not rabidly partisan. In other words, normal human beings unlike yourself...

The real travesty here that will come out is Canada has very poor security and safety at this lab, having highly dangerous and weaponized microbes that these propeller heads goof around with, at the behest of the military industrial complex. Will be another black mark on Canada's reputation once the full truth comes out.

Yep. Good old Exflier babbling away from a position of grotesque ignorance. As usual...

Oh "we knew, we knew". Someone was at great pains to protect a secret of the first magnitude. The right question to ask is why? I'll wager 50 cents, they shipped the coronavirus samples from Winnipeg to Wuhan just before the outbreak started. In other words the virus came from Canada. 1 + 1 = 2

Not to speak ill of those who died, lest ye all cry in your morning porridge, but he decimated the Progressive Conservative party to the point they lost official party status, having only two seats in the house. Result we have the Conservative party today, initiated and run by a buncha western bible thumping preacher-men. As Joe Clark said at the time, "They dropped the 'progressive' part".

Keeping the classified documents in a non-secured location? Shhh... None, none, none!

That's why we'll eventually reach a point where the system is no longer legitimate where there is no more democracy justice subverted then it's torches by night then people themselves must rise to arms, to arms

Perhaps 'Sydney' was just messin with ya.

Biden's upcoming physical exam will not include a cognitive test, White House says That was the plan all along. Is just a body now...

Owwee. Rug pulled out from under him. Eviscerated. Discombubberated, even. Yet somehow, the comparison is apt. Next the left will put lipstick on a pig, and try to convince us it's no longer a pig, as long as it self-identifies...

The point of my latest diatribe against EV's is that they do not work well at low temperatures. Which I think we all understand. This is in Edmonton. You're in Ottawa, aren't you? The land of heated underground garages,where federalis have groomed and maintained the streets to the finest level to impress visiting dignitaries on how clean and well-developed Canadian cities are. Meanwhile just 100 km in any direction, that's where the real Canada begins. The main issue for places outside of big cities is a lack of infrastructure, resources, remote locations when you do breakdown, and cold winters. All challenges to the government's plan to force-feed Canadians on EV's, whether they like it or not. Hence, thead title. But really, who in their right mind would order EV schoobuses, especially somewhere way out there in bum-f*ck Alberta? I mean, such massive heavy vehicles, and cold cold winters. Both a limiting factor in EV design, for which it makes sense to use lightweight vehicles. They must have really bought some EV salesman's song and dance routine. Probably went to one of them auto shows, I bet. 🕺 🕺 🕺

Keep the faith, friend. As the saying goes, tis always darkest before the dawn. And although it may be dark now, something tells me we haven't reached maximum darkness yet. Therefore we must remain stalwart in the face of tyranny knowing full well fully completely that evil must finally defeat itself the snake eats its own tail for it cannot endure if we but hold the line 💂‍♀️💂‍♀️💂‍♀️

"The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. "There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices - to be found only in the minds of men. "For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all of its own for the children...the children yet unborn." -Rod Serling