Leaderboard

So far the only people I read unfairly stereotyping people are the terrorist apologists on this thread claiming the shooter should be reframed as mentally ill with no mention of his Muslim extremist views being made because that would automatically paint all Muslims as extremist terrorist. The fact remains, the shooter's terrorist actions were fuelled by his Muslim extremist views he was taught and learned. To state this in no way suggests all Muslims are extremist. If someone uses this idiot's actions to smeer all Muslims they are also idiots. Furthermore the attempts to reframe references to the motivation behind these shootings as not being Muslim extremism but mental illness is an intellectually dishonest deflection that tries to white wash Muslim extremist terrorism as mental illness. Bullshit. Muslim extremist inspired terrorism is just that. To smeer all persons with mental illness by equating Muslim extremist terrorism as a mental illness unfairly stigmatizes all mental patients. Enough with this bullshit. The vast majority of persons with mental illness are not violent nor do they engage in terrorism and it is insipid to couch terrorism by relabelling it as mental illness. I remind all of you the shooter indicated to police at the time of his arrest he was fully aware of what he did. He had no psychotic break, i.e., a psychotic episode as some have intimated he did at the time of his shootings in responses on this thread. In fact he showed before, during and after his shootings, demonstrated, premeditated and deliberate planning let alone presence of mind...the exact opposite indications of a psychotic episode or disconnect from reality He did this by calmly sitting and waiting at the site where he commenced the attack, and further, by bringing a knapsack with weapons, by dressing in a specific manner and then during the attack calmly explaining to a brown person his actions were targetting white people. There is also further evidence of presence of mind and deliberation based on what his brother said after the shooting, from what the brother told police and from eye witnesses who indicated he also appears to have targetted women. As well if he truly was disconnected he would have been placed in hospital under psychiatric hold until the episode was over after his arrest. However he was non violent and at all times coherent after his arrest displaying full awareness and no impairment of any kind so can we stop with this bullshit use of the word psychotic. In fact the term is not even used anymore in psychiatry and hasn't been used in conjunction with a psychiatric diagnosis for many years. Furthermore and in fact, most multiple murderers and in particular terrorists have to be very sane, i.e. focused in and on the here and now, because they must plan and be deliberately focused to be able to target who they attack and kill and how and when they will carry it out. If anything this makes them deliberately hateful and deliberately focused on how they will express that hatred, not mentally ill. Can we stop white washing Muslim extremist terrorism as mental illness. It insults and stigmatizes all mentally ill people who do not kill or engage in violence. The very same people who claim all Muslims are stigmatized unjustly if we point out these terrorists were motivated by Islamic extremist beliefs , stigmatize all mentally ill people when they white wash Muslim extremism as mentally ill. Enough with the double standard and attempt to whitewash their hatred. In fact a true rage killer who is disassociated from their killings is very rare. An example would be someone high on drugs or suffering schizophrenic paranoia... but less than 5 percent of schizophrenics actually engage in violence and when they do it's usually because they stopped taking medication. The vast majority of persons with mental illness are not violent and if they are it is usually to themselves not others. Killers high on drugs engage in random chaos which is immediate but usually of short duration and seldom meticulous as was the m.o. of this shooter. Nothing in what this terrorist individual did suggests a mental illness let alone one that can explain what he did and ignore the cause and effect connection between his Muslim extremist views and his terrorist shootings. If we can use mental illness the way Ghost or Eye, Dialamah, Mr. Harder, et al intimate in this thread to avoid admitting his Muslim extremist views fulled his actions then why not just re-define all criminals as mentally ill, send them to healing lodges or Trudeau camp for terrorists and pay them each 10 million. Too bad he was not shot dead before he could kill anyone and this coward gets more sympathy from his apologists on this thread then the people he killed, families he has destroyed, innocent people he has traumatized. Not one of my words targets Muslims unfairly. If you want to whitewash this scum of a human as a victim, i.e., unfortunate sufferer of mental illness, I say bullshit. Stop misappropriating mental illness to apologize for what this scum did and why.

Personally, I think that we are all just a little bit mental. Just saying.

No. And neither do you. I don't have to "imagine" there is a difference medically and legally. There is.

Reality doesn't matter to the Trump haters on either side of the border...they have never accepted the historic defeat of Hillary Clinton and political rejection of near and dear liberal, globalist policies. They were not mentally prepared for a possible presidential election loss, and remain defiant to the "alt-right" shift that started during Obama's first term blue/red blowouts. So as Trump enters his third year in office, Mueller remains their comfort "blanky", with perhaps a sliver of hope for impeachment in the House, the same fate that met their hero Bill Clinton.

Trump is clean. Those two mentioned just cannot seem to get that thru their liberal skulls. One would probably have a better conversation with a horse than with a liberal. They are always an exercise in futility.

Religion + valium = hari krishna Religion + LSD = cults Religion + alcohol = Christianity Religion + overeating = Judaism Religion + singing from towers and eating binges = Islam Religion + steroids = terrorism Political correctness + guilt over being rich = leftist Hangover + drug withdrawal = rightist Sexual dysfunction + penis size anxiety = facist anyone who claims to know the truth = Satanist women = pagan witches + illuminati transsexuals + apple eaters therefore humans = affected

My personal favourite was the person who stated the belief that all terrorists are mentally ill because why else would someone want to kill random people? Like killing for money or in a fit of jealous rage or for religious zealotry has never happened in the history of the world before..... It doesn't get much more apologetic than that.

I think Trump did remarkably well during the first two years, given the huge animosity he faced in the media, intense partisanship, and problems with politicized courts among other things. Interestingly, he could have done more but for the fact that republicans didn't have their own show together enough to take advantage of the power they held. The 2018 election loss by Republicans was not that severe. Really it says that Trump is just a normal president. There is no national crisis as far as voters are concerned, and perhaps all of this media turmoil is just mere show and tell. The fact that the GOP didn't completely tank in the face of intense criticism from mainstream media outlets is actually quite surprising! CNN has been foreshadowing Trump's demise for years. "Rumours of my death... " etc. Way I see it, the crap CNN is selling is getting cold, and the more shrill they get, the more ridiculous they, and thus the left, look. Moving forward, this can only help Trump. So Dems would be wise to tread a bit more softly, show that they can govern and get things done, by making use of the president. It's a bit of a fine line to walk, and the problem is, they've portrayed themselves at complete odds with anything Trump is involved in. So, expect to hear some double-talk around that issue.

Yes, a criminal. The bridge to becoming a police state is crossed when a bogus investigation is opened on an individual just to find evidence of some sort of crime. To this point there’s no evidence that the “crime of colluding with Russians” was ever committed, yet a FISA warrant has been issued and then renewed 3 times. The warrant isn’t even supposed to be renewed unless more evidence of the crime under investigation has been found. No new evidence was ever submitted to the FISA court on subsequent renewals. So, it’s going to be obvious that the FISA court was mislead at some point. Iznogoud you keep referring to all these indictments that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP OR RUSSIAN COLLUSION! It just reeks of a deep ignorance and an inability to process iformation that’s being force-fed into your brain. Think about this: if the FBI opens an investigation into your son, and they arrest some of his associates for things that they did ten years before they ever knew him, and they offer those people reduced sentences to testify against your son, do you count that as evidence that your son committed a crime? Will their testimony in court seem fair to you? Is that what the police are really supposed to do? If they arrest Michael Cohen for fraud that’s got nothing to do with your son, and offer to take twenty years off his sentence for his testimony, do you think a guy as sleazy as Cohen won’t make shit up to get two decades of his life back? This isn’t the same as arresting a guy in a crime family for something that they all did together, and reducing his sentence for that crime just to get the whole group. It’s giving someone a break on unrelated crimes for what could possibly amount to false testimony on a crime that never happened. This is still at the level of “ most likely bullshit” and you’re portraying it as gospel truth. Theres still absolutely nothing to relate what all those random people did with Russian collusion. The fact that you say it did means nothing. Not even Mueller himself has ever said that there is evidence of Trump/Russian collusion. He just says that people are cooperating with his “investigation”. His investigation is just into whatever he can find, or get his stoolies to fabricate.

More from the insanity movement. Transgender wrestler wins second straight Texas girls' high school title. Apparently a guy choking out a girl is the new “progress.”

The Climate Change scam is only a piece of the puzzle - albeit a major piece. It's all part of the elitist undertaking for that one-world government (AKA Globalism).....one that used to be laughed at as a conspiracy dreamed up by the "looney Right" - but now is coming into rather clear focus. The UN has morphed (been manipulated) into the major impetus for the Globalist agenda. The advent of Trump has thrown a monkey wrench into their plans - as evidenced by the shrill cries of Armageddon (AKA extreme weather). But.......in speeding up their plans, they've rather exposed themselves with their "Migrant Compact" - geared to open-borders and the destruction of nationalist pride and values. It's pernicious. must be exposed, and with the knowledge of their agenda, must be taken from the shadows, presented to the people - and let democracy take it's course. That's the problem with elitism and unelected bodies like the UN - they REALLY think that they know better than The People - that they can't TRUST The People to "understand" what's best for them. Not a conspiracy theory. It's out there.

He has a point… CNN ran a segment on how Trump's use of "witch hunt" offends witches… so.. I can’t wait until Trump says something negative about Adolph Hitler only to see CNN do a 30 minute episode of “How Hitler was a great man”. CNN TDS is off the wall

The happy couple have been happily soaking up some sun in Sicily. So, I guess climate change and lowering carbon footprints is really only for low income pensioners in Sudbury who need to pay more to heat their homes, but political elites like Elizabeth May can still jet set, right? https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/green-party-leader-elizabeth-may-is-getting-married-1.4193493

The would also quit flying around the world spewing out pollution. They only want your money, because they are filthy greedy scum.

If they actually prove Trump colluded with Russia then good on Mueller. If they don’t then Mueller is a criminal because the FISA court was misled, among other things. Not to mention the fact that this crap has gone on too long with too little evidence and too many grand accusations have been made. Not one person has been indicted on a single charge that has anything to do with collusion. The only person known to have colluded with Russians at this stage is Hillary Clinton. Mueller needs to shit or get off the pot.

I think you could include almost every western country in that statement, Scandinavian women are not the only retards to go hiking in a hostile Muslim country, Not sure what convinces them that it would be a great idea....but we in the west are way to trusting overall, just look at the all the liberal government platforms and you'll get what I mean...

No. I realize your definition of rational is rather different from mine, though. My point was that antipathy towards Muslims is based on the behaviour of Muslims. I am not justifying illegal acts or even rude acts against individual Muslims. But to suggest the antipathy and ill-feeling towards Muslims, as a group, is not the result of behaviour of Muslims, as a group is utterly blind. Again, you appear intent on using a word which you clearly misunderstand. I asked why there wasn't the same antipathy towards Hindus or Budhists and your response was that it's probably because I like to blame victims. This is truly strange, Trumpian level logic. So if I'm reading you correctly your position is that all antipathy towards Muslims is the responsibility of a newspaper chain a tiny percentage of the population reads and a web site virtually no one has even heard of. Have I got that correctly? So the victims of violence or even rudeness (most Canadian hate crimes amount to rudeness) are never responsible for provoking it in any way?