Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/02/2017 in all areas

  1. Just received another one today, thanks chuck,keep them coming.
    2 points
  2. And we have a terrible reputation of treating First Nation aboriginals like dog doodoo. Blame game is a child's game.
    2 points
  3. I am so conservative, I wanted to know so I can rip them a new one and tell them not to do it again. That is why I love my warning pts, with your amount of posts and such a little warnings tells me you are more liberal.
    2 points
  4. Funny how people were upset that muslims being picked on, but the universities ''Israeli apartheid week'' and ''punch a zionist'' hardly received any media attention.
    1 point
  5. Agreed...Trudeau needs Trump a lot more than Trump needs Trudeau. American networks do not provide live coverage of Trudeau speeches in Canada.
    1 point
  6. That last one is a rebuttal to your nanothermite! I'd given a rebuttal quite a while back to your molten metal!
    1 point
  7. Our immigration minister just said he will allow convicted dual citizenship terrorist to keep thier canadian citizenship even if they were trying to kill canadians and the toronto 18 guy that lost his ,it will be given back. That is not looking after the interest of canadians, it is all political. Time to get old stock canadians back into running this country before it is too late..
    1 point
  8. Your previous posts dealing with these non-issues have been deleted and here you are back with the same. Where did the fuels required to melt metals requiring temps far above the melting point of steel come from? How would you like it if your brother was framed, if your country and people were framed?
    1 point
  9. No complaints from you about your partners in subterfuge. Oh wait, here comes one now.
    1 point
  10. I couldn't begin to know. Do you? Danny Jowenko - WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 1 of 3
    1 point
  11. Why do you have time for tangents that, while they talk about science, they don't address the science involved surrounding the events of 911? Nero fiddled while Rome burned. How did US, military scientist invented, US patented, non-commercially available nanothermite come to be at WTC on 9-11-2001? A material that CAN produce the temperatures that were needed to melt the steel, Mo, vaporize the lead, vaporize the steel.
    1 point
  12. Wilber, twice you have said that you are going to flee and now you are back, AGAIN. Making all sorts of silly sounds about science. Do you want to try again, Wilber? Ot will you run away again?
    1 point
  13. Hahahahaha. You're the one who brought up Trump! And Trump negated what you imply! He was thinking of a different theory.
    1 point
  14. Becasue he sounds like one. To soft for me. And of cousre he has been sucked into the CC scandals with his carbon tax.
    1 point
  15. Not even close to being as conservative as myself, I have over a yrs worth of bans, that my friend is real conservatism.
    1 point
  16. Billy was a mountain. Ethel was a tree growing out of his shoulder.
    1 point
  17. Such a simple straight forward question that is fundamental to what happened that day and all you can do is dance around it spewing manure.
    1 point
  18. Does the thing tell you at all if you get a down-vote? I'd like to know if I get a down vote, same as for upvotes. The heart's kinda ... there is no appropriate metaphor. Just a thumbs up is fine
    1 point
  19. Pretty frickin weird if you ask me.
    1 point
  20. Some messages are not so much offensive as simply nuisance value. An example would be a person who persistently creates conflict without contributing anything useful. In newsgroup circles, such a person is known as a "troll". We define "trolling" as a message that serves no constructive purpose and is likely to cause offence or arguments. We define "annoying" as any message that results in a complaint from a registered user -- we will then decide whether to take action.
    1 point
  21. Who the heck IS doing all the voting? It's a little creepy to log on and find I've had twenty new reputations added to my score. I would have expected 20 deductions.
    1 point
  22. He should be running for the liberals.
    1 point
  23. Exterminating folks with nerve gas is many factors greater than ANYTHING done in Canada. Yes.
    1 point
  24. I'm now leaning towards Bernier. He is a Conservative.
    1 point
  25. There's some BS. The US supplied Saddam with the chemical thiodiglycol as part of some program...forget exactly and can't be bothered to look. It has many peaceful uses and one particularly nasty one: the manufacture of mustard 'gas'. That's what Saddam used it for: not newspaper ink or whatever BS he claimed it was used for. Mustard gas isn't VX or Sarin...which Saddam got the precursors from via Arab Gulf-State holding companies in Singapore as well as various European nations with no scruples when it comes to trade. India and Egypt also provided nerve agent precursors...just so as to not let them off the hook.
    1 point
  26. You fail to mention those same Kurds that the US let, actually arranged for Saddam Hussein to use chemical weapons made with materiel supplied by the USA. After Bush the elder had told the Kurds and the ShiiteIraqis that the US would support them in a revolt against Saddam. http://www.alternet.org/story/49864/how_george_h.w._bush_helped_saddam_hussein_prevent_an_iraqi_uprising/
    1 point
  27. They will be detained and get fined not beheaded or stoned. i hear your country Turkey has a terrible reputation in treating their own muslim citizens like Kurds. So don't go and blame us infidels.
    1 point
  28. No, if anything he just rigged it.
    1 point
  29. An empty promise of security and prosperity for all. Oh well,m it's not like the bar for yet another Trump speech was very high going in and Congress sounded like a typical crowd of cheering rubes. The widows and orphans were a nice touch.
    1 point
  30. You don't even understand. You can't grasp what many write. Or you are just playing. Neither is nice.
    1 point
  31. I am free to pretend you say, but you want to believe that the alleged hijackers vaporized steel, 5,000+F, with jet fuel?
    1 point
  32. Always long on uninformed opinion, short on facts.
    1 point
  33. Do their dam job. Stop them before they can cross the border. Tell them that they cannot come into Canada. They don't have to stand there like a bunch of dummies and watch people break the laws of Canada. That is what I expect my police force to do. Enforce the laws of Canada. And if they do make it across, arrest them and ship them back from whence they came. This feeling sorry for everyone who crosses our Canadian borders and shouts refugee, and then are allowed to stay, and then forced on the Canadian taxpayer to accept them, and take care of them for the rest of their life needs to stop. They are not even real refugees. They are coming from a safe and secure country where there is no war going on. This is one big farce being foisted on the taxpayer's of Canada. Shocking.
    1 point
  34. Trump is the smartest man in the world, he is the most importantest man in the world, he got the hugest majority in world history, everyone adores Trump, the media can't help but continually talk about him - even the Canadian media. ... I also remember another train wreck that even the American media couldn't help but continually talk about from Toronto city hall a few years back.
    1 point
  35. Interesting as to how you have apparently risen yourself to the position of being able to speak for world leaders. Is that some sort of inbred American trait?
    1 point
  36. Oh yes, a master once again of the dangling participle.
    1 point
  37. Perfectly ok to rant and rave all you like. Your moronic country clearly crossed a line in Iran though - a line that was recognized way back in Westphalia.
    1 point
  38. Because Trump's a complete asshole that's why.
    1 point
  39. It's good to see that the law as it pertains to mental illness is still trumped by medical experts. Patients belong where their doctors prescribe, not where politicians or the mob they often cater too want.
    1 point
  40. Then there's the uber-sensitivity of the defenders of right-wing concernism. No, they're extreme centrists
    1 point
  41. Anyone know how to increase the text size in the mobile version? Changing my phone settings doesn't do it and there doesn't appear to be a setting that does this in the forum/account. Thanks.
    1 point
  42. Get in line. I've been saying stuff for years now online that I'm quite certain ruling classes of all stripes would cast their stink-eye at.
    1 point
  43. Hey at least the US is giving Iran a heads up this time. More than they got back in '53 when they first destabilized the region by practicing democracy. Launching missiles seems pretty tame in comparison really.
    1 point
  44. That's hilarious.
    1 point
  45. Well, at least they're all Earthlings. No it isn't.
    1 point
  46. Those differences are almost completely moot in this globalized world we now live in.
    1 point
  47. Hmmm, 22 views....I'm guessing these folks also have no problem reading pill bottle labels.
    1 point
  48. So because some few idiots want to justify the horrible actions of some catholic priests, we can't talk about a separate issue that is now happening on a much larger scale and is in the process of being made much worse? Literally no one here is defending Catholic priests raping people in Churches. They are evil. horrible people and should be punished to the fullest extent possible under the law. They should get no special consideration because they belong to the Church, nor for any "good works" they may have done. In fact, their punishment should be made more severe if possible in consideration of how they abused their position of trust and power. Any religious organization that attempts to interfere with the proper course of justice in such cases should also be sanctioned to the maximum extent possible. On the other hand, there are posters here who agree or partially agree with the statements made by the person in the link in the OP. That's why the latter is being discussed, and the former is not. As I already explained, the revolution against the Church and its evil practices has, very fortunately, been in progress in the West for centuries. The Church is a pale shadow of its former self. Sadly, just as we were finally laying to rest most of the fanaticism and suffering caused by one religion, we decided to let in millions of followers of a new religion, younger and as yet untamed, as fanatical and violent as Christianity was in its darkest days. Why are we doing this? Why, as triumph over religion and an embrace of rationality and secularism is so close (in most western countries except the US), must we snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? Do people want to fight the battle that has been fought since the dark ages against the tyranny and violence of religion all over again for the next thousand years?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...