Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/11/2026 in Posts

  1. She's not eloquent. In fact, she's stunningly ignorant when it comes to virtually every subject. I'm simply amazed people fall for her nonsense. It doesn't speak highly of our education system when people get suckered into listening to her and believe anything she says. She was a bartender and should have remained one.
    4 points
  2. AOC is nothing more than a walking Maybelline advertisement. Only a complete dope would put any credibility in her words. AOC: "The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time," Yes Dear. Now be a good little girl and go see if you and a box of Viagra can get Berinie hard.
    3 points
  3. 😅😂🤣😭😅😂🤣😭
    3 points
  4. 2 points
  5. Sure, I'm brain dead and you're an âsshole. An amber alert is triggered because two children are abducted and you're concerned about losing 10 minutes sleep. Get a life...
    2 points
  6. Yep. These guys are serious. It's a bizarre time these days...
    2 points
  7. Are you serious.... Really? Do you suggest they broadcast amber alerts only when people are typically not sleeping... Two children were abducted and the broadcast alert system worked the way it's supposed to. You losing 10 minutes sleep is of zero concern to anyone... especially to the children and parents involved.
    2 points
  8. Shooting fish in a barrel is my favorite pass-time. That is why @robosmith "blocked" me.
    2 points
  9. The girl wrote a document saying we should cancel all airplanes for carbon reasons. And people are shocked that she's brain dead about economic matters?
    2 points
  10. See how our resident fascists object over race? All you need to know about them.
    2 points
  11. Why is PP not invited to anything? He is a leader of a 4 term losing party and a 22 year parliamentary failure??? Obama has been president twice and respected world wide whereas PP has nothing after 22 years of being a LOSER LOL You truly proved you have no idea of what is going on. Carny never invited Obama. Obama was invited for a private dinner for Canada 2020 https://canada2020.ca/about/. which is "The Canada 2020 20th Anniversary Gala, a high-profile, private event held on Friday, May 8, 2026, at the Fairmont Royal York in Toronto. The gala celebrated two decades of Canada 2020, a leading progressive think tank founded in 2006 to advance policy research and dialogue for a more inclusive Canada." westy..... get a clue before you blow smoke LOL LOL LOL
    2 points
  12. There's a very long list of things that are fundamentally wrong with that post. Top 3: 1. It's absurd that you still don't know the difference between communism, socialism and liberalism. Conflating them is just silly, and neither socialists nor liberals are opposed to profit. 2. Nonprofits can't expand and grow? Are you oblivious? I really think you don't have any idea what "nonprofit" means. They absolutely can generate revenue over cost. They can hold cash reserves. They are not "living paycheck to paycheck,' and they certainly can grow. In fact, grow and expand is ALL that nonprofit can do. With no one taking profit out of the organization all revenue above cost is plowed back into the growth and expansion of the organization, as it must be. There are non-profits operating on a massive scale like a fortune 50 company. Kaiser Permanente is a $100+ billion organization. Novo Nordisk Foundation holds a $167 Billion endowment. It's true that they often grow slower because they actually have to earn their growth capital rather than gambling with investor contributed capital. But they do grow. 3. Your unfettered free market dogma is demonstrably wrong. There are countries that are thriving in systems that embrace profit, but also are structured to curb extreme individual wealth. (You're the OP of a thread discussing this fact.) They prioritize building a robust middle class of spenders rather than consolidating wealth in the hands of a few. Hell, the biggest economic boom period in American history was post-war through the mid 70s. And we had a top tax rate of 90%+. You want to "Make America Great Again," but you have no idea what made it great. It's certainly not the busted-ass dogma of the Reagan era.
    2 points
  13. I couldn't let this go. If you are a communist/liberal, you are nodding along with what she said. You believe that building a business based on a product or service, is not earning wealth. The argument is, correct me if I am wrong (but I am not) that the billionaire did not earn the money because (s)he exploited workers' talents for profit. And profit is bad. Let's explore that a little from back to front: Profit is not bad. We hear this a lot. Communist/liberals (I am sorry I repeat myself so much) love to lift up nonprofits as some bastian of freedom in the utopia of commy land. The reality is that a nonprofit is unstable and incapable of growth. Without capital from profits, nonprofits cannot weather economic downturns. They are "living pay check to pay check", so to speak. If they miss a pay check, they don't have the funds to maintain staff or property. Even if they don't miss a pay check, they still cannot expand, modify or improve product or react to market/demand changes. They are fixed to a specific set of products and services at a specific price in specific economic conditions. Any changes will cause a catastrophic collapse. Profits are not bad. If we stipulate that they are, we still have the factually inaccurate claim that business owners (in this case, billionaires) are exploiting workers for their talents. The logic (is it logic?) behind that claim is that employees are not being paid enough because the business owner is making a lot of money. The first, and wrong, assumption that they make is that they get to determine what a business owner can take in profit. Since they believe that profit is evil, they are hard wired to believe they have a moral authority to prevent such a travesty. The obvious argument against this is that a free society does not limit wealth. Which should tell you everything you need to know about their ideology. The fact that we have laws against exploitation means that widespread crimal exploitation is not reality. The reality is that employees are paid based on their worth to the business. If wages are too low, other businesses will hire off the best talent. If the wages are too high, profits will diminish. Employees trade their services for certainty of a steady pay check and benefits. Meanwhile, business owners take on the risk of producing and providing goods and services with the hopes of large profits. In a perfect world, both win. The idea that billionaires did not earn their money is also absurd. To run a business, the owner must be adept at organization, identifying talent and implementing policies and procedures to facilitate productivity. To say they did not earn their money because others did work too is like saying Tom Brady did not deserve his Superbowl rings. Being a part of a team is earning the accolades. Leading the team is no different. Here is where we need to be careful. If they can limit the wealth of billionaires, they can do it to all of us. That is all they need. They come for the billionaires first because if they can establish a precedence that wealth is the pervue of the government and contrallable via lrgislation, then they can expand to millionaires. Then, they can devalue the money until we are all millionaires. Do not fall for the communist/liberal demonization lf peopke with wealth. They do not do demonize them because of who they are, what they have done or how much money they have. They demonize them to establish the moral authority to take full control of the economy and ultimately, you.
    1 point
  14. Talking to your mirror again? Man, that's the best toy your mom ever got you, you're always using it
    1 point
  15. No love for Jagmeet Singh ? Wondering if he recieved a government funded 'spine/backbone replacement' ? Whack-a-doodle bunch . . .
    1 point
  16. he knows damn well he's being a twat. Canada was still affordable in 2015, that situation has deteriorated badly and for the average person especially the average young person it no longer is. He's just desperate to try and avoid facing the fact that things were better under harper and they were under Trudeau. It's like watching a 5-year-old try and explain why they should be allowed to stay up later
    1 point
  17. Greetings! Beer and popcorn? Oh no wait,... that's what the libs say Canadians would spend it on
    1 point
  18. Agreed, you should work on that Because each province controls their system. That's just how it works So? Once everybody's alerted if there she's not found right away they at least know about it and as they go to work they will be thinking about it and if they see something suspicious it may trigger their thoughts. They release the alert when they realize there's a threat to a child's life. They don't sit there and try and guess how far she might have:, they make the province aware. What, you think that they should allow you to send in a specific notation as to what time you get up and make sure you're not disturbed? Get your fcuking head out of your ass you dumbass twat. These are children and you're whining and crying that you lost 10 seconds of beauty sleep. So much for being a christian
    1 point
  19. Instead of leaving chocolates on your pillow, they will leave a knife so that you can kill your family and yourself before you all get tortured and murdered.
    1 point
  20. It was a threat to united states interests. And in fact we are seeing that proven now with the threat to the usa economy from the closure of the straight. While i understand that you personally feel the threat wasn't high enough to justify this action (and you may well be right) the fact is another reasonable person could review the same information we have and reach a different conclusion. ANd on top of that we don't know what additional information trump had when he made the decision But regardless, I think it's apparent to all that this did not go how he thought it would, and he's now making it up on the fly and trying to clean up a mess, and that's not a good thing. Even if he does wind up walking away with a win somehow it was a huge mistake to get this involved without a clear exit strategy from the get go,
    1 point
  21. Solar thermal it's all smoke and mirrors. and this has to do with thermal solar what?
    1 point
  22. You know that Gazans have street celebrations where children spit on the naked corpses of women who were r4ped and murdered by Hamas, so why is it so hard to believe the other things? If there's something I said that you doubt, then have the balls to call me out on it. Don't just say "I onwee beweeve wut I wanna beweeve an dat stuff aint on my wist" like a fkn 3 yr old. What did I write there in error, dummy?
    1 point
  23. Listen man, let’s cut to the chase yet again, you are a terrorist supporting lying fraud. You say bring Hamas to justice and have no answers for how. I keep pointing out that Hamas controls Gaza and your response is to say negotiate with Palestinians. Hamas controls Gaza. How does giving you try an election? Hamas controls Gaza. You played this stupid game before with me.
    1 point
  24. Palestinians rejected the 1947 UN partition plan, and leadership walked away from offers in 2000 and 2008. So you want to force them into statehood? Then the world gives them oodles of cash so they can build longer tunnels and bigger missiles. Folly.
    1 point
  25. It's two kids lives. If you don't want to get woke up turn your phone off. The hell's the matter with you? So disable your phone and shut the f up. Imagine what kind of scum ball wines and cries about being woken up for a few seconds because two children were in serious danger and the police needed the public's help. Don't be such a twat. I didn't like being woken up either but it's better than reading about two children being killed the next day
    1 point
  26. Oh please, you have tons of time down in the terror tunnels.
    1 point
  27. What a goof. I suppose you think L.A. would be better served by a Large Mouth Bass or the mother of Uber Eats bikers. Gawd you're a twit.
    1 point
  28. Yup. Don't worry Libbies. You're much safer now than you were with this example of total health.
    1 point
  29. Her APPEAL to the SCOTUS lasted for years. Duh
    1 point
  30. Trump didn't choose that, he fought it every step of the way and is STILL refusing to release 3M documents.. AKA you are LYING. Under Biden, the files were still sealed by the courts due to GM's trial ongoing. How many times do you need for be told that? LMAO
    1 point
  31. ZERO EVIDENCE for ^this lDIOTIC CLAIM. Disagreeing with you, doesn't make anyone "IGNORANT." Do you even know what evidence is? LMAO AOC is a Congressional Rep, What have you done with your life?
    1 point
  32. Mr. Lewis must run his party like a dictator, without worrying about what people say around him. The delegate positions are being sought by staff corrupted by corporations, and we don’t even know who the administrative staff, the hiring committee, and the political action committees really are. The people who come to speak at the microphone are mandated to defend the wealthiest, and all they are there to do is enrich millionaires. It’s not democracy to listen to what they have to say.
    1 point
  33. Trump only cares about money and his Ego. Money that does not belong to him and accolades he does not deserve. He is a man of hatred.
    1 point
  34. Can you cite all these " political scientist and observers". Poilievre lost because Canadians rejected him and his polls continued to go down after the election.
    1 point
  35. Trump is a nationalist. He defends America. ===== How is he different from the NDP, the Liberals or the PQ?
    1 point
  36. That happened. It didn't. Well.... 1200 israelis dead, 72,000 Palestinians by some counts. Plus they'll likely take over a good hunk of gaza and managed to talk the us into bombing the snot out of the iranian nuclear program. And they're trashing hezbollah and may take some of their land too. I wouldn't say it's working out BAD for them... Oh i think they're having a lot more fun than those Palestinian terrorists and their supporters you're so fond of
    1 point
  37. @eyeball @Gaétan Who has street celebrations where children can spit on the naked corpses of r4ped and murdered women, aside from Gazans? Are you men, or mice? C'mon, squeak up!! It's just words, guys. Don't be afraid to just try to say words to me. All I can do is say other words back. Are you afraid of the truth? Can you show us on the dolly where the truth hurt you? And eyeball, don't say that the Palestinians want peace again. I still feel embarrassed for you.
    1 point
  38. The Palestinians have been offered peace for almost 80 years, eyeball. There has never been a moment when the offer of peace wasn't on the table while you have been alive. Palestinians do not want peace. What part of "The Three Noes" don't you get? Do you know about the three noes, eyeball? No peace with Israel No negotiation with Israel No recognition of Israel What makes you think that "peace" was ever one of the Palestinians' goals? Who told you that? You're sitting there trying to negotiate something for them that THEY DO NOT WANT. I'd like for you to point me to something from the Palestinians or Hamas or from anyone else speaking for them, that says that one of their goals is peace....
    1 point
  39. Lest jus DAY parties are corrupt. The more you SAT it, the more the stupid will follow. No need for proof of actual corruption or even what flimsy definition you decide corruption is. Or even go full bizarro and claim the NDP is controlled by corporations.
    1 point
  40. Bad actors...Like China? Russia? Pakistan? India? North Korea? Isreal maybe? I understand that Iran and Isreal hate each other. I also understand why the Persians might hate America. What i don't understand is why America hates Iran. Let's say Iran gets a nuke loaded onto a missile. Well...Isreal has several nukes loaded on missiles. Why not just let the 2 belligerents fight? Why waste American resources on them? Why drive inflation up? If Isreal wants to fight with Iran...let 'em.
    1 point
  41. Only to the bigoted, close-minded, and stupid MAGA types.
    1 point
  42. 9% more is spent in the German system per GDP than in Canada.
    1 point
  43. Which is bullshit, and Rush Limbaugh dittohead stupid. Not even a straw man. Just dumb. Lol. Welp, you just confirmed that you have no farking clue what a nonprofit is. Maybe read up on that before offering any further opinions. i didn't attribute growth exclusively to a high top marginal tax rate. But it's absolutely a proof point that those rates are fully compatible with explosive growth. The idea that the rich will just stop their commerce if they have to pay protonate taxes is the silliest kind of dogma. But those high rates did indeed help fuel the economic boom. They funded things like the GI Bill and projects like the interstate highway system, adding massive amounts of human capital and economy-accelerating infrastructure. And if personal profit taking is heavily taxed, there is incentive to put profit back into expansion. You're welcome to dither about this or that, but bottom line is that it happened--for decades it worked. Rates were lowered in an effort to put more free cash into a stagnant economy. The economy did start rolling again (again not exclusively because of tax rates) but Reagan also gutted much of what helped build that boom with his trickle-down bullshit, and ushered in the era of voluntary deficits. We're still paying and suffering--from those decisions. Now the middle class continues to shrink, and the ultra rich keep getting richer. The American dream is dying in the shadow of the Reaganomics legacy.
    1 point
  44. Just a thoroughly dishonest creature, from where he was born to where he went to college, a creation of the lntelligence community and the Deep State. He set the table for the disastrous Biden administration, the worst President in American history.
    1 point
  45. Why? The evidence is already out. https://www.judicialwatch.org/russiagate-update/ And there's more to come. They're eventually going to completely destroy Barry and the rest of them.
    1 point
  46. Hilarious... Barry will be untouchable...legally. But he and his legacy will go down as a cheating little shit who was a traitor to his own nation. Enjoy the destruction of your Hopey-Changey gawd Libbies.
    1 point
  47. Yes, I stick with that. If it costs less in the long run it is VERY conservative. If you walk away because people simply think spending significant amounts that they hear about is bad, that is stupidity. Mr Ford should've presented a business case for it and obviously couldn't, so it was sold back.
    1 point
  48. The funding deal is the first to be announced through the federal government's $51 billion Build Communities Strong Fund and is meant to help municipalities cut development charges, or DCs, by as much as 50 per cent for the next three years. Don't developers and regulators usually do this sort of thing over hookers and coke?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...