Leaderboard

Those burning churches are only exercising their legal right to commit whatever level of violence and vandalism they choose as long as it's done in the name of native rights or native protesting or whatever. The soft liberal bigotry of low expectations says we can't hold non-whites to the same standard of behaviour we do white people. I guess they're just not capable of self control or civilized behaviour.

Victoria, BC: Victoria city council has voted unanimously to cancel 'Canada Day'. They are spineless.

Boris Johnson warned the English about a rough winter ahead, in June. Do you think these kinds of news, will hurt other countries vaccinations numbers seeing that our civil liberties are still going to be stampeded on by the State at the snap of their fingers? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/health-chiefs-covid-winter-plan-24440330.amp?__twitter_impression=true

I have no complaints about my government residential education at the RCR Battleschool best education a boy could ever have of course, at the time we were fighting against the Communists who have taken over in Ottawa now we were the best small army in the world vigilamus pro te

Churches are being burned down and people are being hurt. The Rebel Media is one of the few media outlets that are speaking out about this and has offered a reward for information. Political leaders are saying very little against burning down churches. The police and justice authorities are saying very little. What are they actually doing? There is a lot of hate against Christianity in the world in general as Jesus said there would be, but this burning down places of worship is a special kind of hate that needs to be dealt with in Canada.

I prefer to extend a Happy Dominion Day and I'd prefer it even more under the proper flag, the Red Ensign, not the Liberal Party logo flag of 1965. As for best country, you have the Scandinavian countries and specifically Norway.

Indeed. We need fiscal conservatives a lot more than social conservatives.

1. It depends on where you read that. There's a lot of disinfo out there, but I have to remind myself to read deep before I dismiss things. It's very difficult to keep doing that and I do slip up. 2. For example, I doubted what you wrote here but when I saw the link... 3. It's a completely legitimate theory, published by real scientists and it makes sense. This BBC article dumbs it down for non-climate-scientists like me. It's a three million year cycle though, and may have been disrupted by the human-caused carbon dumb we are living through now. The fascinating thing for me is that I never heard of a carbon sink like that before. Thanks for posting.

And reasons for that are worth exploring. Whether something is tangibly real is not the only definition of what is real. Ideas have impact. I don't need a god to tell me what to do, my own Dad explained to me good vs bad, and it is logical. I do like the idea of god to act as a boundary condition, to limit the power of arrogant men who aspire to be leaders. One nation under god is better than one nation under Stalin

Have an idea of a great freedom experiment - should try it one Canada day, and year. It's very simple: - Minus the entitlement, privilege, outrageous salaries, expenses, pensions - Plus merit, competence, inclusiveness and pride And after six month to a year, see what happens. That is, who's left there for the country and freedom, without conflicts and doubts. Where there's public money, lots of it flowing freely to drink, swim in and do any of obscene things with, one can find the bureaucracy. No, not a single exception that I know; and now, what if one tried the opposite: can that freedom-loving country-caring bunch be found where there's no public money, only the job and duty? Good question, if only for the freedom.

Bit of pushback . . . . torched totems.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is everyone should get to voice their opinion. Hillary Clinton claims to this day that the 2016 election was stolen from her and she has every right to make that claim. She has not been prevented from saying so and hasn't been censored on Facebook, Twitter or Youtube. Why the blatant double standard for Donald Trump with his similar concerns for the 2020 election? Why does the angry Democrat get to speak out on all social media platforms while the angry Republican get's censored?

Can anyone say with 100% certainty that mail-in ballots are every bit as secure as in person voting? Were there no strange results in the 2020 election. Biden get's more ballots than any candidate in history, easily surpassing Obama's numbers, and yet the Democrats lost ground in the House. Biden is way more popular than Obama? Who knew that all along it was Obama riding Biden's coattails?? A statistically impossible election (publish0x.com) Voter Fraud Never Happens! (Except in These 10,000 Cases) - Ann Coulter If people are suspicious of the 2020 election, so what? What's the difference between saying the 2020 and 2016 elections were stolen. The election cannot be undone and everyone has to live with the results. It's not as though there has never been a single case of voter fraud in the US before. It's almost funny that Democrats have the ability to "find" more votes in close races they have apparently lost. I totally accept that Biden is President(at least in theory). I do think democracies should also strive to make elections more secure and I believe in person voting with ID is hard to beat.

and the Irish would have been treated worse under Catholic rule look at the nations who lived under British rule and compare them to nations who lived under French or Spanish rule life under the Protestant rule was better than life under Catholic rule, even for Catholics those under British rule faired far better historically, and are much better off today than those living under French or Spanish rule I'm both Irish and Catholic myself, difference is, I know my history you have to compare Britain to it's actual competition, to properly put life under British rule into context not against some perfect standard that has never been achieved while ignoring the alternatives

Right off the media waves. Sounds great, solemn and so responsible. Sure, coming ... wait, just give a minute to think it over. For two centuries now or very close the bureaucracy ostensibly divided in parties but essentially for all it matters, one and same has ruled the country (and its budget) as its own. It made decisions suggested by unknown figures justified and defended by unknown arguments in near total obscurity with no accountability. It actively resisted calls and attempts for transparency and accountability. As just seen, between the era of residential schools and now, over a century on, very little if anything has changed in this pattern of behavior. But now, comes the reckoning time, it became "We", generously. You guys and gals have to take that responsibility. We have little to do with it, it's you who elected us after all (forget the choice problem for now). Come on, let's assume it, solemnly. On the other thought though... sorry, but no. Nope. I will not accept responsibility for anything where I have not been given a honest opportunity to participate. "No taxation without representation" they said. And this is no representation. And a formal checkmark once so many years does not change anything, it's not a paper thing but an essence thing. No responsibility without accountability. No responsibility without transparency and honest participation. You created this problem, as so many other problems single-handedly, in the closed circle, behind closed door far away from the light of the day, and scrutiny of the citizens. You paid yourselves outrages entitlements and privileges for that. And that means that you own it, before and more than anyone else. So don't try making it stick: it's pathetic and ridiculous and doesn't make any sense.

All that matters to leftists when they talk about Trump is their own emotions. Talking about facts to them is like talking about geometry with a snake.

I refuse to take responsibility for anything somebody else is responsible for, that occurred before I was even alive.

The fully vaccinated are largely protected from serious illness. The vast majority of unvaccinated children are also unlikely to get seriously ill from C-19. If you’re worried about your unvaccinated under 12’s, they can wear masks, social distance, stay away from crowds, etc. If people who can have vaccines don’t want them, they can roll the dice on their own lives. That’s a personal choice and vaccine passports seem like a way to force people to comply with inoculations that are manufactured healthcare for which we don’t know the long term effects. Though I value vaccination and have been vaccinated, health passports seem like a violation of privacy and freedom. I just don’t think they’re necessary for reopening. I also don’t think we should return to mandatory restrictions once most of the population is fully vaccinated. We can’t thrive under such infringements on human freedom. Enough already.

Because the cream rises to the top, while the scummy curds and rennet are only good for throwing awhey. Let me put it another whey, wheat must be separated from chaff there's only some wheat but a whole lotta chaff it doesn't matter however it's like my pappy used to say you wanna make a good rye you better start with some good rye

in order to not offend the French & Indian ethno nationalists, the Anglos erase their own history I don't think that is what "unity" actually means, but whatever

Were it not for Quebec supporting the Liberals and Quebec PMs Canada would look very different. It was Pierre Trudeau who liberalized Immigration and did away with so many traditional symbols and institutions, Brian Mulroney who tripled immigration numbers, and now Justin Trudeau who has increased them again while saying Canada wasn't even a nation. It is Liberals who disdain nationalism. If Quebec wasn't here Canada would have had a lot more Conservative governments, ones who cared about the traditions, values and culture. Small c conservatives are big believers in such things, and according to polls the great majority want lower immigration, and support protecting our culture and values.

funny because it's true the attempt to erase British & French Canada to replace it with the Liberal Party of Canada has resulted in no Canada at all

perfect opportunity to pull down the Liberal Party of Canada flag to fly the Red Ensign once again Based & Orangepilled

Mr. Trudeau - The Weeping Prime Minister - has effectively killed Canada. Post-national, get it? Not even a funeral. Oh well, it wasn't a real country anyway... We no longer stand on guard for thee.

Like John A. MacDonald ? ?