Leaderboard

Landslide! "Trafalgar chief pollster predicts Trump victory: Polls 'predominantly missing the hidden vote' Trafalgar Group's polling in 2016 showed Trump leading in key battleground states including Pennsylvania and Michigan when almost all other pollsters had the Republican nominee trailing Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. Trump ended up wining both of those states and Wisconsin, becoming the first GOP presidential nominee to do so in decades. “I see the president winning with a minimum high 270s and possibly going up significantly higher based on just how big this undercurrent is,” Cahaly said, referring to Electoral College votes. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the White House. " https://thehill.com/homenews/media/522016-trafalgar-chief-pollster-predicts-trump-victory-polls-predominantly-missing

Trump already got elected...guess who picks the prez in the case of a tie ?

Could help Republicans regain the House though. The one I'd like to win is the 14th district. That's AOC's.

Not meaningless as every seat in Congress counts...as we've seen with the silly witch hunt. Majority in Congress? You can do all manner of stuff...President or not. Perhaps the Republicans will take Congress and you'll see what I mean...in action.

Donald J. Trump's Halloween Message to YOU.

Military spending has gone up from 1.29 percent of GDP to 1.45 percent this year, and for most Canadians including myself thats good news right..... Yet the figures show the expected increase isn't the result of a new infusion of cash for the Canadian Armed Forces this year as spending is expected to hit $30 billion, up just over $1 billion from 2019. Rather, NATO predicts Canadian GDP will shrink by about eight per cent this year as COVID-19 continues to ravage the economy. I know i to got excited there for a few brief seconds.... It should also be noted that new 1 billion dollars this year was spent of Covid supplies for DND, sooo no new money for equipment, or for that matter old used equipment like we like to do...well there is always next decade....after we have paid off Justin bill... https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/canada-jumps-closer-to-military-spending-target-thanks-to-covid-19-s-economic-damage/ar-BB1ag5eF?ocid=msedgntp

He shouldn't have to. Donations come from supporters...generally. If you're the #1 donator to your OWN campaign....well, that's pretty SAD...as they say. Trump has the people...you...you have Hunter Biden.

Translation of Boges to English: Trump isn't getting any of that sweet billionaire donation money from the swamp dwellers. Do dollars = votes? Perhaps in Ilhan Omar's district. But not generally. Dollars buy more Biden signs...and if you have to pay someone to put those signs up...you're not really getting ahead.

Biden is getting more and more incoherent.

Exactly. The most racist people today are in the Democrat party and advocate critical race theory which is about as racist as it gets. They also advocate segregation on college campuses and even in certain public places based on race.

Yeah, Marocc do that. I have some quotes from the Qu'ran on attacking the Jews I'd like to show you.

You can see her go "Trump" out of the corner of her mouth...priceless.

Biden can’t even remember who he’s running against!

This is why they say....vote RED down the line. Right down to your new Sheriff. Do I look like a poll? Get out and vote it what I advise.

No they aren't. You just wish it so.

In fact... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York's_congressional_districts

That would be swell if they were JUST voting for a President...but they ain't.

Why vote at all eh?

But you are the one so concerned about precious " democracy", regardless of EC votes. Why are you telling all those voters they don't matter ?

I know, so keep bashing "Jews for Trump" in New York so we can change that.

You still don't get it....Trump will drive voter turnout...providing more "democracy".

The EC was not designed to be "democratic". Scheer and the Conservatives got more votes in Canada too...so what ?

If it equals a new Republican majority in Congress...not wasted at all.

No...clearly you do not understand what is on U.S. ballots in each state.

No such thing as a safe state. Losing just a few seats in New York to Republicans transfers direct to Congress...you do realize...

Can't stop the Red Wave, Bud. You can I try though, I guess. At the rally in Ohio there were these three nuns standing behind trump fumbling with their rosaries or applauding as he spoke. On the right we got a big kick out of that. There are always "Blacks for Trump" or "Latinos for Trump" at those rallies too, There was a poll showing 41% favorablility amongst blacks for trump now. They say he only needs to steal 10% of the black vote to win everything. Just an outlier poll, of course, but still...

Staten Island looks rather radish...

Who says Trump can't take Brooklyn? You? New York isn't Democrat for life....

Wrong....I count several Republican districts in New York.

Hardly. Flip a few more Congressional Districts...bang...well what do you know? A swing state is born. New York State has 27...not all are New York City.

Islam needs to condemn its own extremism, I agree. To be fair, there are moderate Muslims who are doing that. The problem for them is that same as for us and everywhere right now. Extremists use the internet as a platform to catapult their propaganda, targeted toward the most disadvantaged in society in order to stir them into uprising.

Resident Biden...please stand by.

Every time somebody comes out with Campaign ad, meme video I like, like that one, somebody else comes along with one I like even better. This one below is my favorite so far. It's so Clever.

I don't care who she voted for...you are missing the point entirely. Arrest...convict...incarcerate...deport...no matter who they voted for illegally. It doesn't have to be "rampant" to be a concern about the integrity of precious "democracy".

They did for this one....

"Jews for Trump" rally in New York today....

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/opinion/letters/july-4-a-million-people-in-canada-can-vote-in-the-us-election-plus-other-letters-to-the-editor/article30729582/ https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2019/10/17/american-interference-in-canadas-election/ No clue.

Yeah, I like that outcome too. Liberals needed a wake up call and now they have one.

The Vietnam Reader looks good. Going to look for it. A old boss of mine flew the F-105 in Viet-Nam and the F-106 in the National Guard...so I heard plenty of tales about the air war. The F-105 was a very odd aircraft. One of the few back then that could go supersonic at sea level in 100 degree heat with a full load of bombs. Couldn't turn worth a darn, though.

Indeed, it seems that there is some strange worldwide urge to crash the economy and the virus offers a perfect excuse for that purpose.

More discussion on male athletes who self identify as female playing against, and hurting, regular women. Relying on data published by Sweden’s pre-eminent Karolinska Institute of medical academic research, they concluded that even when following IOC hormone-reduction guidelines, genetically male athletes are, on average, 40 per cent heavier, 15 per cent faster, 30 per cent more powerful and 25-50 per cent stronger than female athletes. These spreads are enormous, considering the minuscule measures of time, distance or weight that distinguish gold from silver, silver from bronze. (Ironically, doping “only” confers an advantage of nine to 12 per cent.) It should therefore come as no surprise that injury to female athletes increases by 30 per cent when genetically male competitors enter the sport. On Oct. 9, the World Rugby Council issued a new resolution on transgender participation: “Transgender women may not play women’s rugby.” This statement marks the first time a sport federation has broken ranks with the IOC on this issue. Rugby Canada, however, is run by far left zealots and expressed indignation at the scientifically backed rule. As far as they're concerned anyone who self-identifies as female for even one day should be able to play against women, no matter how much physical damage that causes those women. Rugby Canada’s response was, disappointingly, to state that the new World Rugby guidelines “are not policy that can or will be adopted.” Instead, it doubled down on commitment to its own Trans Inclusion Policy, which declares that players “should be able to participate as the gender with which they identify and not be subject to requirements for disclosure of personal information beyond those required of cisgender athletes. Nor should there be any requirement for hormonal therapy or surgery.” In other words, anyone is eligible for entry into women’s rugby without preconditions of any kind but the statement, “I identify as female.” https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-transgender-sports-policies-have-thrown-fair-play-out-the-window

The Economist commenting on the study done by World Rugby which said including male bodied people in with female bodied people posed too much danger to the latter and was unfair. The evidence presented to World Rugby was not perfect, but it was enough to suggest strongly that this compromise does not work. Suppressing testosterone appears to have only a minor impact on strength—too small to undo the advantages bestowed by male puberty. And no amount of hormone therapy can shrink skeletons. That was enough for World Rugby to decide that the risk posed by trans women to other players in the women’s game would be too great. It has said it is ready to fund more research and will review its decision regularly. But in a risky sport already worried about the long-term impact of common injuries like concussion, its conclusion makes sense. That evidence matters for non-contact sports, too, for it also concerns fairness. Women’s sport exists precisely to exclude males. That is true at both the elite level, where rewards are greatest, and at the recreational one, where the vast majority of sport is actually played. Without it, half the population would be left struggling against an insurmountable advantage granted by mere biological chance to the other half. If testosterone suppression cannot remove that advantage, then it is unjust for those who still possess it to compete against those who never did. (It is worth noting that this leaves room for trans men—those born female—to play in men’s sports if they wish, since they possess no biological advantage, and in contact sports are unlikely to pose a danger to their fellow competitors.) https://outline.com/uNTUTe