Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/10/2019 in all areas
-
Anybody who signs the contract of unlimited liability is a warrior. You signed your life away to the Crown, that's good enough for me. Plenty dangerous enough just being at sea. And in the event of war; P-700 Granit or Type 65 homing torpedo. We all saw in the Falklands what happens when navies go to war. Sailors have nothing to prove to me, just bouncing up and down on the high seas would be no fun for me, I don't mind pain, but I don't like constant nausea.1 point
-
The point about Norman banning drinking is not about sailors chugging brewskis, it was a time honored tradition, which Norman took it upon himself to end, for no other reason that he was appeasing the military bashing left wing media, one negative news story about two sailors. He's a fuckin' liberal media Cuck. All he got was a taste of his own medicine.1 point
-
Show me one MSM article that said Trump colluded with Russia. They only pointed out all the evidence of it, which was all true. You're full of shit and you have nothing.1 point
-
When it comes to the decrease of availability of affordable housing, I'd ban them buy lunch today.1 point
-
Nobody I'd kill Commonwealth troops too, if they are want to fuck with the likes of me, God have mercy on them. As to "Canadians", there's no such people, it's a fake country, there is only Americans in America.1 point
-
Canada is part of the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth will always be there for Canada. Did Canadians hurt you?1 point
-
Canada has no rights, Canada is a colony of the United States, if Canada tries to become a Russian client or a Chinese client, the Americans will depose that government. The Americans would probably be merciful to such traitors, but I think they deserve death, and not just them, we should kill their families too. Total annihilation for communist Canadians, no quarter, no mercy, kill them all.1 point
-
What's wrong with you? Are you Canadian by the way? If Canada chooses to side with Russia or China or Europe or whoever, that is their right. Canada is a sovereign nation, don't you forget that, ma'am.1 point
-
Like on my ISCC final ex, we went nine days with no sleep to speak of, section attacks, all day, dig a defensive, then patrols, all night, wash rinse repeat. Only 14 of us passed the course in the end, when they called Endex, that was one of the greatest moments of my life. I could take it, I could take the pounding, and I could have fun doing it, that's the key, happy warrior. It was the chickenshit that brought me down, defaulters, confinement, detention, etc. Although I endured it without letting them see me sweat, bet dat.1 point
-
That's a serious accusation which comes with a burden of proof. Trot out something to back your unsubstantiated claims or shut up.1 point
-
How many people on this forum have said or told you directly your full of shit....and not all of them are conservatives....you can call me what every you like, but where I'm from your blowing hot air out your arse… And your source WTF, thats not making a huge leap is it....1 point
-
Your idiotic opinions are not 'evidence'. Nor are the idiotic opinions of your fellow fringe leftists.1 point
-
I wonder if that was the last straw for the Liberals, Leslie actually hugged Norman afterwards. Apparently Marie Henein has said that PMO/PCO were "counselling witnesses as to what they could and could not say." Kinsella nails it which has me wondering if Kinsella is still actually a Liberal or is it just this crop of Trudeau Liberals he hates.. https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-trudeau-government-trying-to-cover-its-tracks1 point
-
1 point
-
As Liberal Warren Kinsella says: Warren KinsellaVerified account @kinsellawarren Warren Kinsella Retweeted National Post These bastards bankrupted this man, tried to destroy him, and now are abandoning their show trial - because they realized they are the ones who were going to get destroyed. They’re the scum of the Earth. #cdnpoli1 point
-
Sure...more comparisons to America...it's the Canadian way. And that's OK. America is far more than 36 million people....hell...we have more landed immigrants than that. You do Canada...and we will do the United States.1 point
-
Why stop at only half the expenditures ? Do you still expect the United States to bear the largest NATO burden in blood and treasure ? Syrian refugee counts in Canada are tiny compared to the total number of immigrants and refugees admitted by the U.S. for many, many years.1 point
-
Yeah when I read comments like this I can’t help but wonder how many fake Canadians are on here trying to shape public opinion. Many international organizations have target contribution amounts, such as the UN on foreign aid of .7 of Gross National Income. Canada contributes .28 of GNI. The US contributes .17. The US spends about 4.5% of GNP on defence Why? It’s more than double the percentage of the second place donor country. NATO has been drawn on to support the US after it was attacked on 9/11. No doubt the military force available to attack the Taliban far outstripped the need. Cut the US military expenditures in half and, when combined with NATO allies, the military might is formidable and beyond what China and Russia have at their disposal. Should Canada spend more on military? Yes, but Canada made four times the contribution of the US to accepting refugees from Syria. What actions and contributions pay the biggest dividends in terms of peace and stability? Canada is still the sixth largest contributor to NATO: https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi-lIbNmo3iAhWtVN8KHdZ1BWoQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fniallmccarthy%2F2018%2F07%2F10%2Fdefense-expenditure-of-nato-members-visualized-infographic%2F&psig=AOvVaw0yGaQZc1G4vThhQO_HmX2p&ust=15574486824457411 point
-
That's going to make a lot of them angry but if it helps to push them towards China's embrace, that's fine with me. Yes, there a lot of people who do. Why? Because according to a lot of people, China builds up the world whereas the US only wants to bomb it. A lot of people hate this exceptionalism. To them, it is the source of arrogance and ignorance of Americans. That is one of the many reasons why so many people don't want the US to be the super power anymore and want it to collapse. According to them and Europeans, guns are bad it, is only used for mass murders. Ma'am, may I also ask, why waste money, manpower and resources on them despite them hating you? A lot of them don't even acknowledge that you helped Europe rebuild after WW2 or your men and women who died for them. All they see in you are a bunch of fat, arrogant, ignorant, stupid, loud imperialists. They are happy to accept what you give them and they are more than happy to stab you in the back after. If I found out that people I helped in real life were talking behind my back, I would slap them so hard numerous times and then spit in their faces and enjoy watching them suffer.1 point
-
Now you're backtracking again. I think I'm done with this. These types of posts help progressives look illogical... Please do yourself a favour and run through some math exercises, times tables etc. Edit: Ok - I see you said 'base'. You're not backtracking - I missed this detail mea culpa. Your math is still wrong, though but maybe you can advance to calculus.1 point
-
Milton Friedman's Hong Kong sure rode that strategy to prosperity, despite being a desolate rock with no natural resources other than a natural harbor. Don't see Canada adopting that policy though, if the Zombie Confederation ceases to be, perhaps Upper Canada without the baggage of the rest of Canada, would be more likely to adopt such a strategy. But as long as Quebec remains a part of Canada, they will demand their supply management gulag be propped up by insanely high tariffs against their foreign competition, so that's a non-starter.1 point
-
Canadian tariffs hurt Canadian consumers more than they do anyone else and American tariffs hurt American consumers more than they do anyone else. Both sides would be wise to knock it off and come to their senses, but I wouldn't hold my breath on either side realizing that any time soon.1 point
-
Ghettoes may have more than one force at play. In order for an ethnic ghetto to be born, not only do people from that ethnicity have to move there, but oft times people from other ethnicities have to move away, and refrain from moving there in the first place. Ethnic ghettoes, except in the instance of new construction, are not created by one ethnicity.1 point
