Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/02/2018 in all areas

  1. Man...do I love when a poster that I am debating (well more like I'm toying with) actually posts something that contradicts his whole argument. I am guessing that you googled conservative and deficits, then found this article and read the title only thinking you found your savior! Am i right? Am I right??? Lol Perhaps you actually want to read what the article says....you know like the parts where it says: Or maybe this: But this is the part you really should have focused on: PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING HOLY....READ WHAT YOU POST AND TRY YOUR BEST TO COMPREHEND IT AS IT JUST OBLITERATED YOUR ARGUMENT!
    3 points
  2. I'm not surprised. Traditionally that's how these things have always played out on the dark continent. Before anyone starts screaming racist, dark continent is what Africa was called in the past, a historical term.
    2 points
  3. You really are a dreamer. He did it to keep the conniving weasels from taking over. Luckily the people of Canada agreed with him and gave him a majority so that type of extortion wouldn’t happen.
    2 points
  4. Is Trudeau trying to give Trump a run for the money as the West's dumbest, most ignorant, most idiotic leader, a waif abroad who can't be trusted to even dress himself? Can anyone recall a bigger international flub by a Canadian PM than this in the last twenty or thirty years? It's being commented on by the BBC, CNN and Washington Post, as well as other international media. He's becoming an international joke. Prime Minister Wardrobe Malfunction's awful parade of idiocy continues Imagine how India's leader must have reacted upon being apprised of headlines such as 'Trudeau stands by official who suggested Indian factions sabotaged trip' On Tuesday, Trudeau got up in the House of Commons and responded to an Opposition question in such a way as to leave the unavoidable impression that he himself subscribed to the conspiracy theory that Daniel Jean had been cirulating — the one involving elaborately covert black-ops shenanigans orchestrated somewhere down in the dark deep-state catacombs of India’s intelligence agencies. The one that fell apart even before Sarai’s admission, when it was determined that Jaspal Atwal was not suddenly lifted from India’s blacklist and quietly provided with travel documents last summer, as Jean had claimed, but had in fact travelled to India several times since serving a jail term for his part in the attempted assassination of Punjab cabinet minister Malkiat Singh Sidhu on Vancouver Island in 1986. A brief digression: to appreciate just how disastrous all this has been, you’ll want to keep in mind that the only significant purpose of Trudeau’s trip to India in the first place was to cement a healthy working relationship between the law enforcement and intelligence agencies of the two countries. The hope was that Team Trudeau would convince Modi and Amarinder Singh’s state government in Punjab that Canada is a country run by adults who take the threat of Khalistani terrorism seriously. http://nationalpost.com/opinion/terry-glavin-prime-minister-wardrobe-malfunctions-awful-parade-of-idiocy-continues
    2 points
  5. You Trudeau lovers are the same as the Trump lovers. You'll seize on any pretext to lie, distract or dissemble. What Harper did was give us a big tax cut. Again, something you Liberals don't understand. The money belongs to taxpayers. Giving it back does not mean he 'squandered' it. As for the deficit, there was a whopping big recession in there, which you know full well. You also know full well that all three of the Opposition parties in a minority parliament, including your beloved and saintly Liberals, demanded a huge economic incentive program. Nor did they protest it was too small! Instead they demanded more spending!
    2 points
  6. Well, most children at least learn how to spell, punctuate and use paragraphs before sixth grade. You might see if you can find one to teach you how. Then find someone to teach you how to read the cites people post to educate you.
    2 points
  7. Thought you might like this one too. Very similar but adds a few points. 100 years Justin? Yeesh....
    2 points
  8. Don't tell me you are playing the same game as Eric? Its not going so well for him. I'll help you out though. Have a read and maybe focus on the last line to see why that deficit happened.
    2 points
  9. Do you mean the policy of GST which Jean Chretien strongly campaigned to get rid of once he got in. What? We still have GST? Why that dastardly devil! Of course your comment is true but unfortunately works against you as the only one saddled with poor policies was Mulrooney who had to deal with Trudeau Senoir's missteps. There was little to no debt before he came into office and then introduced a slew of deficit ridden policy that took us in that direction. bleeding? He was handed a balanced budget when he took office. You really don't understand numbers do you? And by fixing it you mean consecutive deficits for the foreseeable future? That is fixing it??
    2 points
  10. Who would've thought this would happen? In California to boot! Finally.......reason seems to be coming back. This must be a precedent! https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/the-stuff-of-tyranny-christian-baker-scores-major-victory It is indeed tyranny! To have let this go on, which saw some folks lose their business over frivolous lawsuits by senseless LGBT activists, is what's so disgusting about this! How many cases involved premeditation and malice - to actually pick out known Christian entrepreneurs to bully? Not only does this kind of frivolity clutters the justice system....but it also disrupts businesses, and lives! How many employees lose their jobs when a small business goes under because of this? It has its own ripple effect! There should be some penalties for LGBT activists who indulge in this kind of shenanigans. If they lose the case, the plaintiff must shoulder all the expenses incurred by the defendant in defending himself - which include his legal expenses (and punitive damages)!
    1 point
  11. Anyone who thought South Africa was headed in the right direction had best think again. Apparently the raging success of neighbouring Zimbabwe, whose agricultural sector and economy collapsed after it seized white owned farms, has inspired South Africa to go the same route. Farms owned by white people will be 'expropriated' without compensation. In other words, simply stolen and then given to party loyalists. No doubt white companies and properties will come next. White South African farmers will be removed from their land after a landslide vote in parliament. The country's constitution is now likely to be amended to allow for the confiscation of white-owned land without compensation, following a motion brought by radical Marxist opposition leader Julius Malema. It passed by 241 votes for to 83 against after a vote on Tuesday, and the policy was a key factor in new president Cyril Ramaphosa's platform after he took over from Jacob Zuma in February. Mr Malema said the time for 'reconciliation is over'. 'Now is the time for justice,' News24 reported. 'We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.' He's talking about the 17th century, btw. None of the people alive today had anything to do with it, but he's referring to them as 'criminals' regardless. Mr Malema has a long-standing commitment to land confiscation without compensation. In 2016 he told his supporters he was 'not calling for the slaughter of white people - at least for now'. Guess we'll be hearing howls of protest from all the liberal western governments who denounced Apartheid, right? I mean, Trudeau will be in a rage over this! LOL. There won't be a peep of protest. And I bet most of the Western media ignores it completely. It doesn't fit in with the narrative of "whites evil - blacks helpless, innocent victims". http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5443599/White-South-African-farmers-removed-land.html
    1 point
  12. There's no way to prove Trump was responsible for the rise of the Stock Market last year. It's objectively provable he's at fault for it plunging this week.
    1 point
  13. Disagreeing with some practice or belief is not "reviling'. Calling people who disagree "revilers" is just a way to shut down debate or disagreement, much like liberals who call anyone who disagrees with M103 "racists" or bigots.
    1 point
  14. Again, people can revile all they want, but if they say they are doing so under the guidance of God's word, that is blasphemy. So-called Christians use contemptuous language to describe their gay neighbours and use misquoted texts from the Bible to justify refusing to do business with them. This is a sin on par with being a catamite, as cited in your post. If they were actually adhering to their religious belief, they would love their neighbour and let God judge them.
    1 point
  15. No....no you didn't. Because any sane person trying to make an argument against the Conservatives would not have posted an article supporting them! You read the title and thought you had your Ah HA! moment but it blew up in your face. Of course now you move on to your next tactic of deflection. I have shown you. Many times. The fact that you can't read the interactive chart is not my fault. I can give you a little hint, if there is a minus sign (you know....a horizontal dash) next to the number then that means deficit (not debt which confuses you as well). If there is no sign next to the number then that means surplus. This happens in three years under Harpers terms. Would it help if they put in a plus sign? You know the sign that looks like the first aid symbol? Would that help? I can draw you a picture and put those in if you can't see from the graphic that i have pointed to MULTIPLE TIMES!
    1 point
  16. So why are you arguing here? It's the same thing as an atheist arguing whether Jesus is God Himself! What do you understand about a faithful trying to adhere to his faith? You don't know squat about faith since you don't believe in it. Just look at your comments! They really add nothing to the discussion, but to show more about you......showing us what you know, and do not know. We know your jar is empty on this subject. Because your words sound hollow. Like I said.....a lot of non-religious cannot give substantive comment on faith issues like this one..... .........largely due to ignorance.
    1 point
  17. There is no fake Christianity involved. Believers are called to follow the Bible which expressly condemns homosexuality. It's as simple as that. It's wrong to try to force people to do something against their conscience.
    1 point
  18. The world whined and cried about apartheid and the world got together to bring it down. Now we have apartheid back again. But this time it is the white folk who are going to be shown a touch of racism. For me this just shows us all that the black Africans are no better than the white people.But instead of trying to work out some kind of plan between the two races where everybody will be happy we are going to see more racism, not less. And wait until the non-white people become the majority in North America or Europe. I believe that then white people will really learn and find out what real racism is all about. My opinion.
    1 point
  19. Sure...because nobody would ever use drugs in Canada or Mexico. Better to dig tunnels to the USA and make lots 'mo money !
    1 point
  20. The Covenant is a great book, I read it years ago, lately I've been thinking about reading it again. Currently I'm reading Birds of Prey by Michener. It's about the Corsair's, specifically the Nautoniers, a seafaring offspring of the Nights Templar. It's set around the coast of South Africa and tells the story of an English knight and his son, how they raided and fell afoul of the Dutch East India Trading Company. I haven't finished it yet but I'm sure young Hal will avenge his fathers death by drawing and quatering, and will eventually carry the day. Love Michener, always a great read.
    1 point
  21. Maybe Trump will make a tweet about it. Other than that, it will be ignored by Western governments for sure. Even if they go full genocide with extermination camps and all, chances are it would still be ignored. What's the chance Canada will take in White South African refugees fleeing persecution?
    1 point
  22. Yep...the Dutch ( Afrikaners ) were more hard core....maybe led to this invention for personal defense in South Africa:
    1 point
  23. A lot less Natives in Canada to subjugate, as well. I watched some reports by Lauren Southern out of SA and it does look grim. A genocide in the making. Perhaps Nick Nolte can still play the part of dedicated UN man in the upcoming movie.
    1 point
  24. Apartheid started 70 years ago. Who do you think was responsible for that? Give you a hint, they were white, and maybe a little racist.
    1 point
  25. Are you that daft? Do you know how to add or do I have to hold your hand on that? If you add up every year that Chrétien had surpluses, it would come up to about 60 billion! How on earth do you think he paid off 140 billion of debt with 60 billion?? Oh wait...it gets better. It would be great if Cretien only had surpluses however his first three years he ran massive deficits that added up to 100 billion. So as I stated earlier, his net contribution to the debt was 40 billion. You’re really struggling here. Might want to retreat and figure what other Harper bashing therapy works for you
    1 point
  26. Nope. Never once ignored that or tried to hide it. I even supplied the link showing the various deficits by each leader....did you miss that too? Please try to keep up to the conversation will ya? Your pal Eric made the claim that all only conservatives have added to the debt which was just preposterous and was the point being argued.
    1 point
  27. Let me guess....some right wing leaning guy fired you from your entry level job about 30 years ago and you've never forgotten. So now you go on to fight the good fight of revenge but instead of using fact and other objective things like numbers, you choose to use illiterate ramblings and incoherent jabs to try and get your frustrations out. No matter how much you babble on, it will not erase the fact that Trudeau Sr added ~140 billion to the debt in his time. Even your beloved Cretien added ~40 billion to the debt by the time he was done. The only leader in recent history to NOT add to the debt was Paul Martin who was only in for two years. THEY ALL ADD TO THE DEBT INCLUDING YOUR BELOVED LIBERALS!!!
    1 point
  28. No PM Justin Trudeau thread would be complete without this acknowledgement of his foreign relations prowess:
    1 point
  29. LMFAO! You used your Google skills to actually have some one explain this to you. Do you get it now? Debt does not equal Deficit but rather deficits add to the debt. So your moronic comment that only Conservatives have added to the debt is easily disproven by looking at the vast number of years that Liberals ran deficit years. Although I am getting the sense that you already know this and are really just here to troll...
    1 point
  30. I get that. I really do. It just bothers me that these Khadrs have done nothing but piss on our charter and our country until it benefitted them. And that we paid them to the tune of 10.5 million dollars for pissing on our country. And that they continue to piss on our country. I'd love to see them GTFO and I'd love to see us slam the door behind them. Just because something is legal, doesn't mean it's right or just. Legality is a matter of power. Apartheid was legal. The Holocaust was legal. Slavery was legal.
    1 point
  31. Perhaps Trudeau is expecting more cases involving our own terrorist citizens. He's prolly stacking the judge circuits with terrorist sympathizers in anticipation.
    1 point
  32. It is very quiet, I thought the usual suspects would have been all over this .
    1 point
  33. Notice, no fanfare over that. Not even a mention in any mainstream media.
    1 point
  34. 1 point
  35. Yeah. When Trudeau speaks, the world stops and listens.
    1 point
  36. That a lady. Think the way you've been programmed.
    1 point
  37. Sessions and Rosenstein allow photographs having dinner together last night. I wonder who the real Mr. Mcgoo is?
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...