Leaderboard

That's OK...every day that Trump is president means another day that Hillary Clinton is not.

A vast section of the public no longer cares re: debate...or discussions about each other's chosen leader's mental fitness. The media has hit new lows. What is Trump's IQ? Depends on what scale one wants to use, I suppose. Sources say 156 which is indeed very high on any scale. Buzz Aldrin whom I think of as pretty much a genius is 141. But, pretty eccentric...a little orbit joke there.

You have an unfortunately narrow view of 'real' conversation which appears to be limited to themes you're interested in.

Trump is a lot of things but to question whether he is mentally fit is political patronage b.s. I listened on public radio to the Psychiatrist from Yale who started this whole discussion and she quickly covered herself and said she never diagnosed or commented on Trump and was only discussing whether he triggers unhealthy reactions. She then said the press misquoted her study. All of us have symptoms of so called behavioural disorders. Trump like most if not all politicians could easily be defined as anti-social, narcissistic, even sociopathic. Most leaders have these traits-they wouldn't get to where they are without them. Justin Trudeau for example is the classic child of a mother with bi-polar disorder. He seeks to be an emotional caretaker of everyone just like he was for his mother believing he is responsible for their moods. He also manifests his father's bisexuality and inflated sense of intelligence. Trump is very easy to read. He comes from a classic dysfunctional family where the father was cold and distant and highly critical and no emotional expressions were given. High criticism and repressed feelings were the order of the day in his family upbringing. Ridicule was a way to challenge him to succeed. He lived isolated from the mainstream with a lot of pressure to make money with actually no formal training in business as much as he claims to be a business man. His business acumen as he likes to refer to it is non existent. He has no idea how to manage or invent. What he is, is someone born within an elite upper class lifestyle and told-here's a million-reproduce it or phack off. He had to mimmick. He mimmicked what he thought he saw his father do which was to take money and humiliate people with it and use the money as leverage to control. He fits the psyche of hundreds of thousands of men brought up in emotionally dysfunctional families. He's just a wind bag bully in layman's language and underneath his wind is someone easily frightened. Interestingly he does and will defer to authority if its in uniform, i.e., military just not civilian. He badly wants to be admired by his military which means contrary to what people believe he won't go off half cocked with them. He will talk tough but won't actually do anything unless he is fully backed by his military or has someone to blame if his puffing goes pffft. He is self destructive, ignorant, everything negative you can say, but there's more of a chance of Putin or Iran or that fat boy in North Korea starting a war. Where he might be dangerous is if there is some kind of terrorist attack in the US. He will for sure over-react to that and trigger a constitutional crisis. In the bigger picture Obama and the Clintons have done more damage than Trump can.

For those unaware, North Viet-Nam invaded Cambodia, Laos and South Viet-Nam...ethnically cleansed the South...was rewarded by the UN with a full seat in the assembly and was never asked to give back any of the land they conquered. The North even renamed the ancient city of Saigon after their dictator. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_413

Lots of rocks in Africa, maybe you will catch on soon. --- Concerning creation scientists, this is the claim of that group: Since the beginning of modern science, creationists have strived to explain our world based on the unchanging laws of our Creator. If you look closely you will see that they are in fact not scientists and admit so in their own statement. They are not looking for evidence driven knowledge, but how they can jerry rig the evidence to fit their creationist mentality. The problem of course is every step of they way they become more and more absurd.

I know. I had to get rid of those "glasses" to find out that I am a wonderfully flawed woman, worthy of life on this planet. Otherwise I would still be thinking I am nothing but a lowly woman, subject to the whims of whatever man is in charge, harassed by having a religion dictate each action, choice and decision, constantly reminded that I am "not good enough". You can keep your spiritual "glasses". I'll stick with reality. Every religion says this exact same thing about their own personal made-up Gods/Allahs:

Yeah, I know. That part is very clear. But religion doesn't explain anything beyond: "Hey look, a beautiful flower!" "That flower is clearly evidence that an invisible multi-colored unicorn from outer space created the universe." "???" "You're a fool if you can't see that an invisible unicorn made that flower." "???" Exactly. When a hypothesis turns out to be not true, science adjusts its thinking and continues to look for an answer. Not so with religion. Religion in general refuses to adjust to new information and when it is forced to, it has to be dragged kicking and screaming. If science didn't exist, religion would have kept mankind poor, dirty, confused, enslaved, etc. Women would still be chattel, barbaric punishments for trivial matters would still be doled out - as it still is in countries trapped in the stranglehold of religion to this day.

Is this a case of preemptive whataboutism? Why yes that's exactly what it is. Why can't ideologically driven people criticize people in power without resorting to partisanship in the process? I think the hardest thing to overcome in the struggle between governed and their governments are the sycophants who happily blast away at people in power while seemingly oblivious to the fact the power is by far the bigger problem.

You are correct. But Saudi Arabia as stinky as its regime is agreed to provide background check and info on its citizen travelers not those countries which were banned (either because the regime in power was not trusted with those info or they could not because they were weak unstable governments).

So she's pissed about being booted, and at this time we don't know if she's telling the truth or not, as mentioned it's still he said, she said. What I find notable is that at least Scheer takes action, Trudeau on the other hand absolutely refuses to do the same when his people make far more egregious gaffs. You know, Mourneau, Monseff, Hehr etc. All of them should have been given the boot yet Trudeau refuses to do what he should. That to me shows a contrast between the two men, and it's a contrast that further makes Trudeau look even worse than he already does.

Many illegals are going to stay in the country anyway...that's why we call them ILLEGALS. The Canadian and other illegals, DACA or otherwise, won't leave voluntarily. Congress can give them legal residency...POOF...no longer ILLEGAL.

Or sports fans that watched it. A stable genius would know the words.

Oops! Someone really stepped in it with both feet! What's truly amazing is that not only did someone think this was a good idea but someone else agreed and signed off on it. http://torontosun.com/life/fashion-beauty/hm-sorry-for-advertisement-showing-black-model-wearing-monkey-hoodie/wcm/94029477-f313-4a37-8c64-c962eaa1ee7chttp://torontosun.com/life/fashion-beauty/hm-sorry-for-advertisement-showing-black-model-wearing-monkey-hoodie/wcm/94029477-f313-4a37-8c64-c962eaa1ee7c

Every day that goes by where she still roams around a free criminal is a sad day for America. Thank gawd Trump is President, and not her.

Trump made quite a few speeches that American politicians have been avoiding to be politically correct but American public wanted to hear and vote for someone to act on their concerns. Take his stand on immigration for example. Many agreed with what he said and is doing now. Take her stand on banning several Middle Eastern nations. Although I personally do not agree with ban based on nationality but this was a major concern for US citizens after several terrorist attacks on US soil. Trump also has the balls and intelligence to support liberation movements in the world unlike Obama who signed a pack with the devil to leave a legacy.

Point stands then: the very person in charge of looking for witches Islamophobes in the Motion 103 is the same person that imagines crosses burning on lawns where there are none. She's perfect.

Andrew MacDougall, a PMO spokesperson, said Harper is paying face value ($500) for his ticket and the same for Rachel’s ticket. “The prime minister is always scrupulous about paying his own way,” MacDougall remarked. He said Harper is the first prime minister to reimburse the government—with the equivalent of a commercial fare—for use of the Challenger. So has the current PM paid back the 250g's it cost us to take his family and friends to visit the khan?

But yet the PM can do and spend what he wants. And when asked about his christmas holidays, we are going to harrington lake, then we fly out to the rockies. Harrington lake is fine but then fly out west for a ski trip on our dime. I remember harper was ripped just for using a jet for official business. It does not end for this guy.

As I've mentioned: I worked with Hedy in the 1990s. Before you became an adult...more than likely. But, you know what she is REALLY like. Not having met her ever.

You'd know all about gay porn...of course.

Liberals 2017: "Trump colluded with Russia to win." Liberals 2018: "Trump never even wanted to win."

See "social justice warrior": Motion M-103 is a direct result of such ideology.

A stable genius would know that Trump is far better a President than what Hillary would have ever been. Obama was a disaster. Trump is a stable genius. Jealous, are we?

Apparently, the liberal media was at it again saying that Trump looked like he could not remember some words to the anthem. These liberal morons never quit, do they?