Leaderboard

During the next interregnum. It'll probably form the basis for a religious book our descendants will spend a couple of thousand years squabbling over as they head towards the following interregnum.

Mmmm....sounds delish!

That would be due to all the people who apparently saw it all coming and not only didn't do anything......... but denied it too, and worse, they drowned the voices of those who saw it coming. Excuse for what? Those people who saw it coming, and sounded the alarm.....had done what they can do. The misguided left are responsible for the dismal future of their grandchildren. Too bad that saving the environment wouldn't make any difference, nor will it matter at all, when you live under oppression. The misguided left are doing one favor to their kids, though: they're teaching their kids how to appease, to be subservient.......and are now slowly being stripped of their own identity. Heck, they're even being shamed, and being pressured to apologise for the color of their skin! I suppose, when you've got no pride left as a people, it'll be so much easier to adapt to anything.

It seems peculiar to me that on a political website, few seem to know what political terms mean and from where they are derived. "Left" vs. "Right" goes back to the French Revolution, when those who sat on the right of the house wanted to maintain the Monarchy, and those who sat to the left wanted to revise the political system. Those who would "conserve" and those who would change. Simple as that. BUT: once the house had been divided in seating, what ideologies and policies each side of the house favoured changed constantly. Now, fast forward another couple centuries, and shift the discussion to other parliaments, and you can really attribute anything to either "leaning", and pretty much choose your own definition. From an earlier part of this thread, for instance, Nazis (the National Socialist Workers' Party) could be labelled either "left" or "right" depending upon which part of Nazi policy one chooses to compare with our rather fluid definition of left and right today. Being both workers and socialist, it had strong elements of ;what we today usually call the left. Being based on the idea of the Herrenvolk, that is nothing but purely racist, but here the new left uses that to try to hang that on the "right". Nazis were totalitarianists, which is as far from what I believe we mean today by "right" OR "left", as conservatives on the right tend to believe in and wish to maintain democratic institutions. Communism - which I think we can all agree is "the LEFT" is usually a totalitarian state of government, even though most have some kind of shadow of representative body shoved up front. Over the years, the terms right and left have been offered up under this very flexible system of inclusion based on the political expedience of creating an "us vs. them" over-simplification of any issue. Reality is that the truth lies somewhere in the middle with an array of detail within policy that makes actual programmes acceptable to modern standards.

Some are now millionaires.

Well the Nazis believed in all-doing big government, similar to todays leftists. The Nazis detested free market capitalism, similar to today's leftist liberal democrats. Do some research and you will understand that there really isn't much different between your "counter -protesting" goon squad known as antifa and the pointy hooded KKK and their current scummy Nazi pals.

This is what is becoming normal today. Kill or blow someone up and you will become a instant hero in the West. Terrorist bombings and shooting people is just a nice terrorists way of saying that he loves us all. He was really a very nice person. He did it in the name of Allah, and he did not really want to hurt anybody. The cultural marxists and their supporting liberal leftist media will destroy all things Western if they are allowed to get away with and continue on with their hatred for the West and allowed to continue on with committing violence against the Western people of the world. You should be happy to hear that countries like Poland, Hungary and The Czech Republic still have their sanity. They are the only three countries that have not taken in thousands of these so-called terrorist refugees. So far to date the people of those countries have not had to suffer from a terrorist going on a shooting spree, running people over with trucks or bombing the people of those countries unlike what we have seen happening in those other European countries that took in all those so-called terrorist refugees by the tens of thousands. They are only getting what they deserve. What they are sowing they are now reaping. Except for a few countries and their leaders most of the rest of our Western puppet on a string politicians have gone politically correct and multiculturally insane, and they are still being allowed to stay in office and are being still allowed to run their countries into oblivion. Aw well.

Wealthy people can afford to be more tolerant of racially diverse neighbours. For a start, their neighbours are a lot farther away and are unlikely to be competing directly with them for jobs and other resources. Israeli Arabs can tell you that Israel proper has problems with discrimination. They experience problems renting apartments, for example. Given the history of the region, such tensions are hardly surprising. We are all naturally tribal. Conflict and poverty accentuate these tendencies. Anyway, as Canadians, we should probably look to ourselves first before casting aspersions on others in this matter.

Eyewitness accounts of many supernatural events does constitute evidence. It is your bias that is getting in your way. Without knowing beans about it, you dismiss it as brainwashing. The irony is you are the most brainwashed person on here with your constant nonsense about the U.S. and west. So you are the last person who should speak of brainwashing.

Science and the Bible are two different things. Science is defined as a branch of knowledge conducted on objective principles involving the systematized observation of and experiments with phenomena, esp. concerned with the material and functions of the physical universe. (Oxford dictionary) On the other hand the Bible is a written revelation from God and a supernatural book. Much of what is recorded in the Bible is supernatural in character or nature. It does not claim to fit the definition of science according to the Oxford definition of science. People sometimes add confusion to the subject by arguing the Bible is scientific. It is not meant to be and is not a scientific book. The events recorded such as the creation account in the beginning part of Genesis in the King James Bible (1611) are supernatural. While I believe they occurred as they are written, it is not meant to try to fit it into a scientific mould. God who created everything did it in a supernatural way and is not required to prove how he did it. Neither are believers required to prove how God created the universe out of nothing. The evidence is all around us in the creation and the Bible itself gives ample evidence that it is indeed the word of God. One either accepts it by faith or doesn't.