All Activity

If the courts are so apolitical, why do the Demoncrats want to pack the SCOTUS? No...either you're blind or lying.

WAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!! CdnFox made me REAAAAAAD!!!! Some of the words were REAAAALLY BIG and now my HEAD HUUUURTS!!!! LOL wow you really DO need things explained in Crayon to you don't you If only we could get you to stop eating them. Anyway, that's a lot of words just for you to say "i'm to stupid to understand what we're talking about', but there you go LOL you really do suck at this

By law she had to know and would have known

Proof that too many Canadians ill not wake up until it affects them personally. They don't give a rat's a$$ about anyone else. This madness with immigration has got to stop.

Awww muffin I live rent free in your head don't I Oh sorry, .............................................................. rent free in U head

Vassey does go hard right when presented with the frequent hard left . . . the hard left that gets a free ride most often on the air waves. Hat's off to her.

A lot of them are nutters, not every single one of them.

I'm afraid that conclusion comes from your defective mind not mine You haven't been terribly vague about it I literally posted links to the whole article. For sure Even carney realizes it would be political death But that in no way shape or form takes away from the headline or the story or what I said This is what your side wants these days. Your side literally just voted unanimously to jail people who say things they don't like. That was your people The left is all about hatred and bigotry these days

They are? Please do tell us of your first hand experience in the purported matters.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra was an esteemed British cardiologist who frequently appeared on television and fully supported the covid injections......until his father, who had no cardiac issues before the jabs, died shortly after getting them, from heart attack. It prompted him to investigate them more deeply and he was shocked by what he discovered. When he began speaking out, he was vilified, censored and blacklisted. Dr. Malhotra, at yesterday's US Senate hearings on outcomes from the covid injections (particularly cardiac and cancer issues): ‘Looking at the totality of up-to-date evidence, and what you’ve heard from eminent witnesses today, in my view, millions of Americans and millions more across the world may be in clear and present danger of suffering premature cardiovascular disease and cancer. Without allowing all scientists to debate this openly without fear of censure, we will not be able to identify who is most at risk and how these risks can be mitigated. When it comes to making money, multi-national corporations have been diagnosed by Forensic psychologist Robert Hare and Law Professor Joel Bakan as legal entities that fulfil the criteria for Psychopathy. Characteristics include: callous unconcern for the safety of others, incapacity to experience guilt, repeated lying, and conning others for profit. The evidence presented here today exposes the corporate tyranny underlying public health practice. This profitability over people rooted in the neo-liberal economic model has led to trust being at an all-time low in the medical profession. A full public apology from government bodies and medical leadership to the vaccine injured and bereaved is an essential first step in restoring that trust. Tyranny emerges when people are afraid to say what they think. When you have something to say, silence is a lie. When everyone lies all the time, the tyranny is complete. To save the health of the American people and to save democracy, it is our responsibility to expose, resist and dismantle the era of corporate tyranny we currently find ourselves in’

You're still at this? He answered your questions. I answered your questions. The government gave a half-a$$ed warning. In reality, it wasn't even a warning. It was an assurance. They assured people that the risks were inconsequential across multiple age groups, across individual health. Even scientifically/medically that is false. No medical intervention is "one size fits all." STFU already.

No, that is the leftist lie you are obsessed with pushing because you are a depraved thug.

It is amazing how much you people will lie to protect the trans madness you want to force onto others. Live and let live? BS. Are you being purposely obtuse or did you really not grasp the concept of the analogy? I mean, I even explained it. The point is that something doesn’t have to happen to me for me to care that it does happen to others.

Here's part of the problem I have with this: Who the f*ck is this person? Does anybody know? Nobody voted for this person. I'm tired of people no one voted for making decisions that affect our lives, but not their's.

Um, nope.

Because we let them.

Likely accusations against Bari Weiss? Weiss reportedly intervened to block a segment on the CECOT prison in El Salvador, allegedly to appease President Donald Trump? Another example is former correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi accusing Weiss of deliberately sidelining her after refusing to “sanitize” factually accurate reporting that cast ‘bone spurs’ in a poor light.

You're just repeating yourself. Let's see the quotes. 🙂 Howard: "This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that is, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers..." Turnbull: Mr. WEST: I desire to know what meaning will be attached to these words "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." Is it to be understood that every person born in the United States is to be a citizen of the United States? Mr. TRUMBULL: What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means. We have had in this country from its foundation a large region of country within the territorial limits of the United States over which we do not pretend to exercise any civil or criminal jurisdiction, where wild tribes of Indians roam at pleasure, subject to their own laws and regulations, and we do not pretend to interfere with them. Can you sue a Navajoe Indian in court? Are they in any sense subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States? By no means. We make treaties with them, and therefore they are not subject to our jurisdiction. It is only those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens. Not that the laws of this land require an originalist interpretation, but even if you are of that bent, this is an open and shut case. That's why it's been interpreted as it has for over a century. You people try to actively misread the language of the law. That's the only way to contort yourself into that position. -- Just be honest and say you want an amendment, because inventing a cockamamie reading of the existing text is not going to work.

You mean plenty of time for cheating ass Democrats to fill out enough ballots and mail them in so there is 0 chance a Republican takes a high profile seat when the feds aren't looking that hard.

It’s factually true. While it’s fair to say inflation is on the ballot, that hasn’t answered the question of who is going to do a better job. Democrats don’t have a proposal other than orange man bad. And do what? Get JD Vance for president? Clearly they don’t have a deep state inside man like VP pence that would be their new puppet. Serves no purpose.

I don't get why you all think this was Trump considering the dummy talked crap about his new boss publicly and refused to meet with her. Im pretty sure if you did that at your job you'd be fired too.

Well, shit. Look which senile old twat suddenly remembered he was arguing against the bail system. I'm actually a little bit proud of your for reading something, but in this case it was just a propaganda article that's trying to blow up a small study of unusual circumstances into a representative study with broader implications. That was a COVID policy that abandoned risk assessment that is typically part of bail processes--cashless or otherwise. Cashless bail has been studied extensively for a very long time across multiple jurisdictions. It actually works just fine. Most studies actually track a decrease in re-offense during the bail period.

........... tail tried to wag the dog. Rumor is Trump got a pudgy at hearing the news.

Have u ever noticed how hysterically manic u sound? ............ and how repetitive? Def doesn't take much to get u into a hissy fit, faux. Ur mommy still around - she's likely still complaining that ur her biggest mistake. 😅