CdnFox Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 1 hour ago, eyeball said: Yes an interrogation. As you say, an investigation. 1 hour ago, eyeball said: You're talking from experience? Yes, the experience of having a brain and having read a book at some point. Try it LOL - you're always spinning your wheels. Look at you go!!!! 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
paxamericana Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 There are legitimate business reasons for going to a sex island @robosmith. Quote
SpankyMcFarland Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Gotta hand it to Republican Congressman Thomas Massie. He has a firm hold on that Epstein bone and he ain’t letting go: Quote Rep. Thomas Massie has called for the resignation of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick following his ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as revealed in the latest batch of documents released by the Department of Justice. The Republican representative of Kentucky, who has led the charge in securing the release of the Epstein files, appeared on CNN’s Inside Politics Sunday and was asked whether Lutnick should testify before Congress. It emerged last week that Lutnick visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island with his family on at least one occasion and accepted an invitation in 2012. Quote “Look, Howard Lutnick clearly went to the island, if we believe what’s in these files. He was in business with Jeffrey Epstein. And this was many years after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted — you know, lightly sentenced, but was convicted for sexual crimes,” Massie continued. “So he’s got a lot to answer for. But really he should make life easier on the president, frankly, and just resign.” Quote The alleged revelations about Lutnick in the Epstein files contradict earlier claims that he cut ties with the disgraced financier long ago. Emails show Lutnick and his wife accepted an invitation to Epstein’s island, Little St. James, in the U.S. Virgin Islands in December 2012 and planned to arrive by yacht with their children. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/republican-lawmaker-demands-howard-lutnick-222446691.html?guccounter=1 Quote ‘How small we make our worlds. Gather them in, tighten them up into little castles of fear.’
CdnFox Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said: Gotta hand it to Republican Congressman Thomas Massie. He has a firm hold on that Epstein bone and he ain’t letting go: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/republican-lawmaker-demands-howard-lutnick-222446691.html?guccounter=1 Going to the island is no proof of wrongdoing and woudn't be reason to resign. But - as i understand it and i could be wrong but he insisted previously that he HADN'T gone there during the time periods involved. And for that he should resign. If he lied about it and was actively going there at a time he said he wasn't then that's an issue of credibility and ethics and he should step down Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 On 2/1/2026 at 8:46 AM, Goddess said: You can search names mentioned in the Epstein files, here: Department of Justice | Epstein Library | United States Department of Justice Just for fun, I searched: And: Does it include the co-conspirators that were redacted? They already found 6 of them today. 💡 Quote
Nationalist Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 I think the Epstein investigation needs to find out just what Stacy Plaskett has done to divert attention from Epstein and his sex chamber in The Virgin Islands. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Goddess Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 I almost think the real reveal from the Epstein Files is not the sex trafficking and deviant behaviour of the elite parasites and celebrities, as it is the exposure of how much a few people are controlling everything, including governments. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
robosmith Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 46 minutes ago, Goddess said: I almost think the real reveal from the Epstein Files is not the sex trafficking and deviant behaviour of the elite parasites and celebrities, as it is the exposure of how much a few people are controlling everything, including governments. You mean like Trump and all the Epstein cronies he put in his cabinet, probably to keep them quiet? Quote
Goddess Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 hour ago, robosmith said: You mean like Trump and all the Epstein cronies he put in his cabinet, probably to keep them quiet? Well, I saw it put this way and I agree with this assessment: consider: 1 email about pizza proves nothing. 900 emails where a large group of powerful people seem oddly obsessed with it? Now you’re raising questions. Layer on top of that a widespread and bizarre focus on “dentistry” which seems to make no contextual sense save as another code word and then drop the truly disturbing possible connotations of widespread networks all asking about “jerky” and “beef jerky” (that inexplicably, seems to need to be refrigerated) and the idea that you have a large network here speaking in codes about some set of practices that they all certainly seem to know better than to actually name, starts to look high probability, especially as these intense focuses seem to cluster on just a few keywords rather than being more generalized. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Goddess Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 There ARE monsters in the world. And a lot of them are showing up in this document dump. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
gatomontes99 Posted February 10 Author Report Posted February 10 4 hours ago, robosmith said: You mean like Trump and all the Epstein cronies he put in his cabinet, probably to keep them quiet? Weird. If they were such cronies, why did Trump tell the police that Epstein and Maxwell were evil? https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html President Donald Trump, in a call two decades ago to a Florida police chief, bashed former friend Jeffrey Epstein and called Epstein’s procurer Ghislaine Maxwell “evil,” the retired cop told FBI agents in 2019, a Department of Justice document shows. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Goddess Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 ** blink blink ** Say what? Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
West Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 7 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Weird. If they were such cronies, why did Trump tell the police that Epstein and Maxwell were evil? https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html President Donald Trump, in a call two decades ago to a Florida police chief, bashed former friend Jeffrey Epstein and called Epstein’s procurer Ghislaine Maxwell “evil,” the retired cop told FBI agents in 2019, a Department of Justice document shows. Sadly the Democrats are harassing a witness Quote
robosmith Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 9 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Weird. If they were such cronies, why did Trump tell the police that Epstein and Maxwell were evil? https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html President Donald Trump, in a call two decades ago to a Florida police chief, bashed former friend Jeffrey Epstein and called Epstein’s procurer Ghislaine Maxwell “evil,” the retired cop told FBI agents in 2019, a Department of Justice document shows. Because he's always trying to distance HIMSELF from the crimes he knew all about and probably participated in. He's just trying to say "don't look at me," because I'm (finally) trying to turn them in. Only FOOLS will fall for that attempted distraction. 1 Quote
West Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 6 hours ago, robosmith said: Because he's always trying to distance HIMSELF from the crimes he knew all about and probably participated in. He's just trying to say "don't look at me," because I'm (finally) trying to turn them in. Only FOOLS will fall for that attempted distraction. No evidence for this foolish claim Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 11 Author Report Posted February 11 6 hours ago, robosmith said: Because he's always trying to distance HIMSELF from the crimes he knew all about and probably participated in. He's just trying to say "don't look at me," because I'm (finally) trying to turn them in. Only FOOLS will fall for that attempted distraction. If I am reading that story correctly, he made that statement to police in 2009. The FBI collected that info from the police in 2019. That is not finally trying to turn them in. That is one of the first to turn him in. That also means that his FBI was the first to gather local police info and the first to disclose all the documents. Somehow, in your twisted mind, that makes Trump the villain. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Hodad Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 (edited) 16 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Weird. If they were such cronies, why did Trump tell the police that Epstein and Maxwell were evil? https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html President Donald Trump, in a call two decades ago to a Florida police chief, bashed former friend Jeffrey Epstein and called Epstein’s procurer Ghislaine Maxwell “evil,” the retired cop told FBI agents in 2019, a Department of Justice document shows. There's a pretty consistent pattern of Trump throwing people under the bus as soon as they catch heat. No matter how close they are, if someone gets caught, he suddenly doesn't know them and they are bad people. He expects total loyalty, but it's a one way street. Better question: If Trump knew about Epstein's crimes and abuses, as he clearly did, why didn't he get them shut down? He had the knowledge, money, and power, and chose to just let the predator continue victimizing girls. That alone makes him complicit, but the reasons why he chose to let the "party" continue are likely far darker. Edited February 11 by Hodad 1 1 Quote
West Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 57 minutes ago, Hodad said: There's a pretty consistent pattern of Trump throwing people under the bus as soon as they catch heat. No matter how close they are, if someone gets caught, he suddenly doesn't know them and they are bad people. He expects total loyalty, but it's a one way street. Better question: If Trump knew about Epstein's crimes and abuses, as he clearly did, why didn't he get them shut down? He had the knowledge, money, and power, and chose to just let the predator continue victimizing girls. That alone makes him complicit, but the reasons why he chose to let the "party" continue are likely far darker. According to the story he did in fact report the allegations to the police Quote
Hodad Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 10 minutes ago, West said: According to the story he did in fact report the allegations to the police Yeah, that's what Reiter said. He claims that Trump said that everybody knows and Ghislaine Maxwell is evil. Meanwhile, Trump himself said: Asked by reporters in 2019 - when Epstein was arrested by federal agents for sex trafficking - if he had "any suspicions" about the disgraced financier, Trump said: "No, I had no idea. I had no idea. I haven't spoken to him in many, many years." On Maxwell: "I just wish her well, frankly. I’ve met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach. I guess they lived in Palm Beach. But I wish her well." What a pickle for the Trump cultists. 1 Quote
John Johnston Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 And the Epstein Class runs America. I know! Blame the immigrants! That will get us clear of this! No wait... What a clown show. 1 Quote
West Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 9 minutes ago, Hodad said: Yeah, that's what Reiter said. He claims that Trump said that everybody knows and Ghislaine Maxwell is evil. Meanwhile, Trump himself said: Asked by reporters in 2019 - when Epstein was arrested by federal agents for sex trafficking - if he had "any suspicions" about the disgraced financier, Trump said: "No, I had no idea. I had no idea. I haven't spoken to him in many, many years." On Maxwell: "I just wish her well, frankly. I’ve met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach. I guess they lived in Palm Beach. But I wish her well." What a pickle for the Trump cultists. You would need to provide the questions asked. I find the press tends to obfuscate for political reasons. 1 Quote
Hodad Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 9 minutes ago, West said: You would need to provide the questions asked. I find the press tends to obfuscate for political reasons. So lazy. No, you don't "find" that. You make that accusation when it's convenient, but there is no magic obfuscatory version of the question that would make Trump tell the public that he didn't know about Epstein's crimes. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 11 Author Report Posted February 11 2 hours ago, Hodad said: There's a pretty consistent pattern of Trump throwing people under the bus as soon as they catch heat. No matter how close they are, if someone gets caught, he suddenly doesn't know them and they are bad people. He expects total loyalty, but it's a one way street. Better question: If Trump knew about Epstein's crimes and abuses, as he clearly did, why didn't he get them shut down? He had the knowledge, money, and power, and chose to just let the predator continue victimizing girls. That alone makes him complicit, but the reasons why he chose to let the "party" continue are likely far darker. Lame. The left: "Why didn't Trump turn him?" Also the left: "he is an ahole for turning him in!" Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
West Posted February 11 Report Posted February 11 31 minutes ago, Hodad said: So lazy. No, you don't "find" that. You make that accusation when it's convenient, but there is no magic obfuscatory version of the question that would make Trump tell the public that he didn't know about Epstein's crimes. Perhaps he had knowledge of some things, which he reported to police, but not about what he was asked? Seems plausible Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.