Moonlight Graham Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 It's definitely a new world order now with how Trunp has been threatening allies. But Carney shouldn't have said "new world order" because uneducated conspiratards aren't going to understand what it means and then make up conspiracy theories about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics) 1 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
ExFlyer Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 6 hours ago, CdnFox said: Woah woah woah! You're POOR on top of it all!?!?! I thought your mom made descent money 'entertaining' men? You mean you're the son of a whore AND broke? Dude. No wonder you're so messed up. Here's 10 bucks, go buy yourself a real parent. HA HA HA...the pedophile LOSER cannot stop and...his reading comprehension show now too LOL LOL LOL And still demeaning dead parents....WOW... Calling someones mother a whore??? What a sick and spiteful person you are. You are definitely spinning an a perverted cycle. But then again...once a LOSER, no place to go but to the LOSERS corner 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
WestCanMan Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 8 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: It's definitely a new world order now with how Trunp has been threatening allies. But Carney shouldn't have said "new world order" because uneducated conspiratards aren't going to understand what it means and then make up conspiracy theories about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics) Carney shouldn't have said "new world order"... when he was shifting Canada's "economic and strategic partnerships" from the US to communist China. Wake up. From your LPOC-coloured glasses POV that was always going to be cute and positive, because Carney said it, but from a reality-based Canadian and American POV, that was catastrophically stupid. Ask yourself: if Poilievre did this, would you somehow see just a teensy bit of a problem with it? 😂 The CBC would be ranting about"Chinagate: the biggest political blunder in the last 200 years of Canada-US relations", and they would also be calling the next election "a referendum on Chinagate". Carney is even talking about letting China be a partner in a new pipeline. Isn't that weird, when you consider that the Libs spent so much time and energy making pipelines impossible, and Trudeau chased away over $135B in energy projects in Alberta? Did those two chase away American and Canadian investment to pave the way for China to slide in there and get a bigger share? A controlling share? Here's something about China that you don't know: they killed millions of their own people in the middle of the 1900s ("the 1900s" sounds so long ago now), and then they did God-only-knows-what to all of their own babies circa 2000, you are completely oblivious to reality if you think that killing 500,000 Canadians would phase them. And was it really a casual mistake to talk about the "new world order" while he was right on the podium at the WEF...? The place that our LPOC MP's go to get their marching orders? Or did he use his inside voice out loud? 2 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
ExFlyer Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 58 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Carney shouldn't have said "new world order"... when he was shifting Canada's "economic and strategic partnerships" from the US to communist China. Wake up. From your LPOC-coloured glasses POV that was always going to be cute and positive, because Carney said it, but from a reality-based Canadian and American POV, that was catastrophically stupid. Ask yourself: if Poilievre did this, would you somehow see just a teensy bit of a problem with it? 😂 The CBC would be ranting about"Chinagate: the biggest political blunder in the last 200 years of Canada-US relations", and they would also be calling the next election "a referendum on Chinagate". Carney is even talking about letting China be a partner in a new pipeline. Isn't that weird, when you consider that the Libs spent so much time and energy making pipelines impossible, and Trudeau chased away over $135B in energy projects in Alberta? Did those two chase away American and Canadian investment to pave the way for China to slide in there and get a bigger share? A controlling share? Here's something about China that you don't know: they killed millions of their own people in the middle of the 1900s ("the 1900s" sounds so long ago now), and then they did God-only-knows-what to all of their own babies circa 2000, you are completely oblivious to reality if you think that killing 500,000 Canadians would phase them. And was it really a casual mistake to talk about the "new world order" while he was right on the podium at the WEF...? The place that our LPOC MP's go to get their marching orders? Or did he use his inside voice out loud? Polievere cannot even leave the country or attend meetings with world leaders to find out the real facts and what is going on as he cannot get security clearance LOL. so, your point is moot. LOL When and where did Carney ever say letting China be a partner in building a pipeline?? More BS for a righty tighty??? Then again..if they have the money an d no one in Canada will step up...why not?? What $135 billion did Trudeau chase away?? More BS LOL You mean they killed their own citizens like: Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union): Orchestrated the "Great Purge," leading to hundreds of thousands of executions and millions of deaths in the Gulag system. His regime also conducted massive ethnic deportations, causing hundreds of thousands of additional deaths. Mao Zedong (China): Responsible for the deaths of millions, largely stemming from forced social engineering projects, starvation, and political repression. Pol Pot (Cambodia): Led the Khmer Rouge regime, which killed an estimated 1.5 to 2 million people—roughly a quarter of the population—through execution, torture, and starvation. Adolf Hitler (Nazi Germany): Responsible for the Holocaust and the murder of millions of citizens and foreign civilians. Other Leaders/Regimes: Idi Amin (Uganda): Responsible for widespread executions and ethnic purges in the 1970s. Kim Il-sung/Kim Jong-il (North Korea): Implemented labor camps and caused famines resulting in significant population loss. Jean Kambanda (Rwanda): Interim prime minister convicted for his role in the 1994 genocide, where at least 800,000 citizens were killed. So no, it was not wrong to call it a new world order because, like it or not it is. All world leaders (a few exceptions) agree things will never be the same as Carney said. Oh and....just to correct you ...again...Carney never said the words "New World Order" in his speech to the world leaders. Read the transcript if you want to argue but..you will not find it so...more BS from you LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 11 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: It's definitely a new world order now with how Trunp has been threatening allies. But Carney shouldn't have said "new world order" because uneducated conspiratards aren't going to understand what it means and then make up conspiracy theories about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics) For a couple of decades now the term has been associated with various conspiracy theories. So it's not that they're not going to understand what it means, it's that you're deliberately leaving the door open to misinterpretation. It's a stupid thing to say. Especially in a mega creepy long drawn out way like that As google ai says, 'The phrase "New World Order" is often associated with conspiracy theories regarding a secretive, totalitarian world government, frequently linked to dictatorships or global elite control' That's not what you want your vision of the world to be associated with It would be like claiming your gov't was dedicated to a world of happyness where everyone is gay! Technically not inaccurate but dude! The word is associated with something else these days 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 6 hours ago, ExFlyer said: HA HA HA...the pedophile LOSER cannot stop and...his reading comprehension show now too LOL yes we see you can't stop! You're obessed But... "his reading comprehension show now too"? LOLOL looks like i've upset you to the point where you're unable to use english properly yet again Maybe don't screw up and sound like you failed grade 3 english when you're commenting on other people's 'comprehension'? LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: Polievere cannot even leave the country or attend meetings with world leaders to find out the real facts and what is going on as he cannot get security clearance LOL. so, your point is moot. LOL Of course he can. But it would be very rare for the opposition to do that. 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: When and where did Carney ever say letting China be a partner in building a pipeline?? Government has talked about it and has not ruled it out and the gov't propaganda arm, the cbc, is floating the idea as well. They point out that china would be the ones buying half the oil from a new pipeline, so it would be normal they'd want to be a major investor. In wake of new energy pact, could China invest in West Coast pipeline? | CBC News You always open your mouth before doing your research and you wind up looking like a tard 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: LOL yes we see you can't stop! You're obessed But... "his reading comprehension show now too"? LOLOL looks like i've upset you to the point where you're unable to use english properly yet again Maybe don't screw up and sound like you failed grade 3 english when you're commenting on other people's 'comprehension'? LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!! Poor poor pedophile LOSER... so sad you cannot climb out of your obsessive barrel. So, I will continue to tap tap tap away in your head. LOL LOSER. You have so lost control of your own thread you should ask the admin to delete it...you have totally embarrassed yourself. You tried to make an interesting thread for discussion but....in the end, as usual...you FAIL LOSER HA. HA HA Edited January 25 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 2 hours ago, CdnFox said: Of course he can. But it would be very rare for the opposition to do that. Government has talked about it and has not ruled it out and the gov't propaganda arm, the cbc, is floating the idea as well. They point out that china would be the ones buying half the oil from a new pipeline, so it would be normal they'd want to be a major investor. In wake of new energy pact, could China invest in West Coast pipeline? | CBC News You always open your mouth before doing your research and you wind up looking like a tard No he cannot ...no leader can meet with a person that has no security clearance...it would not be allowed by their own security system. LOL Government talked about it??? What government? When? By who...More BS dribbles out of your mouth LOL "Heather Exner-Pirot, a senior fellow and director of natural resources, energy and environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said any pipeline would require a lot of investment — and a customer on the other end of it." is not government and they did not mention China. "Richard Masson, an executive fellow at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy and the former CEO of the Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission, said previous Chinese investments in the oilsands and fracking have produced poor economic returns." Nowhere is anything said about China building a pipeline LOL Don't even read your own links I see LOL LOSER And back at ya "You always open your mouth before doing your research and you wind up looking like a tard" LOL LOSER Edited January 25 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 17 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: No he cannot ...no leader can meet with a person that has no security clearance.. That is absolutely not true. It's not considered to be a good idea because the leader of the opposition can't speak for the gov't, but there's nothing forbidding it and in fact it has happened many times. You'll remember Andrew Scheer when he was leader of the opposition meeting with Mike Pence, vice president at the time. . You're absolutely wrong as always. Why don't you look this stuff up beforehand? Why are you always this stupid? 25 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Poor poor pedophile LOSER... If you're so broke, why don't you sell yourself to strangers like your mother does? You obviously want older men to pay attention to you you talk about it 24 hours a day. If that's your thing why not make some money at it? Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Just now, CdnFox said: That is absolutely not true. It's not considered to be a good idea because the leader of the opposition can't speak for the gov't, but there's nothing forbidding it and in fact it has happened many times. You'll remember Andrew Scheer when he was leader of the opposition meeting with Mike Pence, vice president at the time. . You're absolutely wrong as always. Why don't you look this stuff up beforehand? Why are you always this stupid? Oh yes it is.... Why, as you say, did Scheer meet with Pence is he cannot speak for government?? Your BS baffles even you LOL LOSER If you cannot get a security clearance, no world leader will meet with you because you cannot guarantee that you will not disclose what has been discussed in private. You would be a security risk and could leak discussions. Besides, we know PP cannot keep hos mouth shut LOL Scheer and all other conservative leaders had security clearance. So, as usual...you are wrong LOL....LOSER Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: Oh yes it is.... Why, as you say, did Scheer meet with Pence is he cannot speak for government?? ummmm...... you're the one who claims he can't. I'm pointing out he did LOLOL holy shit kid did you forget what you were even arguing? Quick - is it rabbit season or duck season LOLOL!! You're such a tard! Leaders can and do meet with anyone they want to. However generally speaking it would be frowned on to meet with representatives who aren't part of the gov't about gov't matters as a matter of course. It happens but it's far less common. But it happens. Remember when danielle smith went to meet with trump to discuss federal trade issues? Yeah, me too I don't know where you get your weirdo ideas from but it's certainly proof you never worked for the gov't or military. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 13 hours ago, CdnFox said: ummmm...... you're the one who claims he can't. I'm pointing out he did LOLOL holy shit kid did you forget what you were even arguing? Quick - is it rabbit season or duck season LOLOL!! You're such a tard! Leaders can and do meet with anyone they want to. However generally speaking it would be frowned on to meet with representatives who aren't part of the gov't about gov't matters as a matter of course. It happens but it's far less common. But it happens. Remember when danielle smith went to meet with trump to discuss federal trade issues? Yeah, me too I don't know where you get your weirdo ideas from but it's certainly proof you never worked for the gov't or military. ummm, you are wrong...once again. The topic is security clearances and PP does not have pone. I said Polirevere cannot have meetings with foreign leaders because he has no security clearance. Scheer could because he had clearance.... Absolutry leaders can meet anyone ...if they have the required security clearance...and PP does not have it so...he cannot. Yup...Smith has her security clearance LOL I get my ideas form know when a security clearance is required...I had a top secret clearance as opposed to you that had, if any at all, a green bin clearance LOL So, once again...you have no idea what you are talking about and obfuscating the discussion...as the LOSER in you so often does. So... the tard is you ...again LOL LOL LOL LOSER!!!! Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
cannuck Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 On 1/17/2026 at 2:44 PM, CdnFox said: I think everything you said has validity, but I think it's still coming from a point of view where you are assuming that the interests he has in his mind are Canadian. I think he's trying to set up his relationships for after he leaves office which is where the real money starts. Remember that as part of Justin's trade mission he went to represent Canada but also negotiated a deal for brookfield for the loan of the $500 billion that elon musk used to buy twitter. That is a matter of public record, so we already have substantial business dealings with these people and I think he wants to be the guy that you call if you need a $500 billion dollar loan in the future from someone and he'll arrange it with a small 5% commission I do not believe that his current actions are intended to serve the interest of Canada. He has given access to Canada to the Chinese EV manufacturers basically for free. They have made no commitments, they have not promised to do anything and he has already stated that this is the"Initial " Round of cars with more to come. And we got our tariffs on food that they need reduced to a mere 15% which is still severely egregious, and no guarantee that they won't raise it the next day and if they do we still have to let them bring in their cars To begin with: Carney is FROM the big bux world - sent out from Wall Street by his mentors at Goldman Sucks to perpetuate Casino Capitalism globally. Going down the EV road is full of potholes. The Little Turd threw mega billions of our grandchildrens' tax dollars into propping up the EV business based on nothing but political greenwashing and obsolete and ecologically unsustainable battery technology. The Chinese simply took advantage of our tiny pea brains and learned to be able to out-compete our backwards economies and industries. Let's never forget the multi billions spent on bribing the press....oh....INDEPENDENCE of the media from the last government. The only upside is that the Carnival sideshow is far less embarrassing to Canada when he opens his mouth than the Little Turd was. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 26 Author Report Posted January 26 (edited) 7 hours ago, ExFlyer said: ummm, you are wrong...once again. The topic is security clearances and PP does not have pone. That was not the topic we were discussing, we were discussing whether or not Poilievre could talk to other government officials outside of Canada. You said "NO HE CAN'T!!!!!" I said yes he can. There's other people in his position doing the same thing You said "YES HE CAN, OTHER PEOPLE IN HIS POSITION DID THE SAME THING" LOLOLOL It's wabbit season kiddo LOLO You are SO stupid it's just absolutely hilarious to watch 7 hours ago, ExFlyer said: I said Polirevere cannot have meetings with foreign leaders because he has no security clearance. Scheer could because he had clearance.... no he didn't. Neither did harper when in opposition btw. Neither did justin. When you're caught in a lie you always double down. All mp's get the basic security clearance of course (can't be one without it) but scheer was never cleared for secrets the way you claim he was. Further, Leaders meet all the time with all kinds of businessmen, famous people, and other dignitaries from both within and outside of their own country and those people don't have any security clearance either. Can you show me in the constitution or in the laws where it says that a prime minister may not Meet with someone without a security clearance? Or that the opposition is not allowed to meet with other national leaders without a clearance? Or anything in the American or any other constitution that says that? You just flat out lying and making shit up. Which is about what we'd expect from a 13 year old living in his mother's basement Quote Yup...Smith has her security clearance LOL Nope/ Does not have national security clearance Danielle Smith does not have national security clearance. While she is a prominent Canadian politician and has served as the Premier of Alberta, there is no specific information indicating that she holds a national security clearance in the provided sources. Why the hell would the premier of a province have national security clearance? You're not just a liar, you're a bad liar. Even you should have realized that was insane Edited January 26 by CdnFox 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted January 26 Author Report Posted January 26 5 hours ago, cannuck said: To begin with: Carney is FROM the big bux world - sent out from Wall Street by his mentors at Goldman Sucks to perpetuate Casino Capitalism globally. Going down the EV road is full of potholes. The Little Turd threw mega billions of our grandchildrens' tax dollars into propping up the EV business based on nothing but political greenwashing and obsolete and ecologically unsustainable battery technology. The Chinese simply took advantage of our tiny pea brains and learned to be able to out-compete our backwards economies and industries. Let's never forget the multi billions spent on bribing the press....oh....INDEPENDENCE of the media from the last government. The only upside is that the Carnival sideshow is far less embarrassing to Canada when he opens his mouth than the Little Turd was. True, at least carney knows how to give a speech. It would be nice if you listen to his own and actually follow them but that might be too much to hope for 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 (edited) 53 minutes ago, CdnFox said: That was not the topic we were discussing, we were discussing whether or not Poilievre could talk to other government officials outside of Canada. You said "NO HE CAN'T!!!!!" I said yes he can. There's other people in his position doing the same thing You said "YES HE CAN, OTHER PEOPLE IN HIS POSITION DID THE SAME THING" LOLOLOL It's wabbit season kiddo LOLO You are SO stupid it's just absolutely hilarious to watch no he didn't. Neither did harper when in opposition btw. Neither did justin. When you're caught in a lie you always double down. All mp's get the basic security clearance of course (can't be one without it) but scheer was never cleared for secrets the way you claim he was. Further, Leaders meet all the time with all kinds of businessmen, famous people, and other dignitaries from both within and outside of their own country and those people don't have any security clearance either. Can you show me in the constitution or in the laws where it says that a prime minister may not Meet with someone without a security clearance? Or that the opposition is not allowed to meet with other national leaders without a clearance? Or anything in the American or any other constitution that says that? You just flat out lying and making shit up. Which is about what we'd expect from a 13 year old living in his mother's basement Nope/ Does not have national security clearance Danielle Smith does not have national security clearance. While she is a prominent Canadian politician and has served as the Premier of Alberta, there is no specific information indicating that she holds a national security clearance in the provided sources. Why the hell would the premier of a province have national security clearance? You're not just a liar, you're a bad liar. Even you should have realized that was insane Frack...you certainly are a twisted fool. A LOSER twisted fool. Once again...you demonstrated that your reading comprehension is deplorable and you cannot understand even the most basic things. You are all caught up in your lies and making shit up trying for validity...and FAILING!!!! A lying twisted Fool LOSER Time for you to go away LOSER LOL LOL LOL Not talking with a twisted lying uninformed fool LOSER on this anymore Edited January 26 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted January 26 Author Report Posted January 26 2 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Frack...you certainly are a twisted fool. A LOSER twisted fool. Frack? Well i guess a 12 year old might be watching battlestar reruns ,,,, So what you're saying is that once again i was right and you were wrong and you're very unhappy about it. Dude. Next time when i point out you've been incorrect about something take the time to verify and then make peace with he fact i'm right. Doubling down on the stupid just makes you cry like this in the end. That was quite the hissy fit tho LOL 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 18 hours ago, CdnFox said: Frack? Well i guess a 12 year old might be watching battlestar reruns ,,,, So what you're saying is that once again i was right and you were wrong and you're very unhappy about it. Dude. Next time when i point out you've been incorrect about something take the time to verify and then make peace with he fact i'm right. Doubling down on the stupid just makes you cry like this in the end. That was quite the hissy fit tho LOL Lying LOSER tries again LOL LOL LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted January 27 Author Report Posted January 27 4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Lying LOSER tries again LOL LOL LOL Yes, we see you trying again, we're all looking, you're doing great little guy (so needy.) 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 30 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yes, we see you trying again, we're all looking, you're doing great little guy (so needy.) LOSER!! LOL LOL LOL Phked your own thread LOSER !!! LOL LOL LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
BeaverFever Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 On 1/17/2026 at 2:02 AM, CdnFox said: Carney called china and its relationship with Canada part of the "new world order" That was a phrase linked to shadowy 'davros style' gov'ts by conspiracy nuts and the like and it's got some severely negative connotations and was received very badly So instead of showing it cbc edited it out. They are nothing more than the propaganda wing of the federal liberals. Another crackpot thread that didn’t age well LOL. 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 (edited) 14 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Another crackpot thread that didn’t age well LOL. The Russian collusion witch hunt just called. They were looking for their last cultist holdout. I will send them a link to this thread for you. You're welcome. What makes you think this thread didn't age well, dummy? The CBC 100% did what they were accused of... Oh, and the vaccine that's safe, and makes it so that you can't get sick or spread covid to granny still hasn't called. Nor have any unicorns. Looks like you were imagining them all, grade-4 dropout. Edited January 27 by WestCanMan 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
CdnFox Posted January 27 Author Report Posted January 27 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: LOSER!! LOL LOL LOL You shouldn't be that hard on yourself. I mean sure you're a loser but there's no need to laugh at yourself on top of it 25 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: Another crackpot thread that didn’t age well LOL. Why didn't it age well? There's still newspaper stories about it for heaven's sake Wasn't a good look for carney and it's not a good look for the CBC. Still isn't I see now he's spending his time defending the fact that when you talk to Donald Trump he tried to aggressively walk back everything he said at Davos. "No no Mr Trump gosh I didn't mean any of those things I said...." Which is typical, that's about the third time he's been caught saying one thing to the public and something completely different to trump Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted January 27 Report Posted January 27 (edited) 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: You shouldn't be that hard on yourself. I mean sure you're a loser but there's no need to laugh at yourself on top of it Why didn't it age well? There's still newspaper stories about it for heaven's sake Wasn't a good look for carney and it's not a good look for the CBC. Still isn't I see now he's spending his time defending the fact that when you talk to Donald Trump he tried to aggressively walk back everything he said at Davos. "No no Mr Trump gosh I didn't mean any of those things I said...." Which is typical, that's about the third time he's been caught saying one thing to the public and something completely different to trump Oh my..the pedophile LOSER is back...trying to sound ....well trying...and getting nowhere... except to phk up his own thread LOL LOL LOL Trying to be witty?? Yup, once again a major FAIL by the pedophile LOSER!!! LOL LOL LOL Edited January 27 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.