Potential for Poilievre to lose even more - another floor crosser crosses the floor

[eyeball]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You mean democracy.

No, I mean that your little x-on-a-ballot shtick is the end all and be all solution to corruption is a joke. Your little shit eating    only underscores the fact you're just a lame-assed troll - a dillitent just like Justin really. Its no wonder why you're forever thanking everyone around here for voting for the Liberals. You'd have to come up with an argument otherwise.

 

 

[eyeball]

30 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Why do posters get so upset with the down arrow? 

Maybe they'd be happier getting/giving people the🖕 instead.

[Legato]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

What I reject is the notion the PMO is the CBC's editor-in-chief.

I certainly don't reject the idea that the majority of journalists and other usually higher educated people in the industry are more progressive than conservative. And that being the case, I'm perfectly capable of applying the appropriate bullshit filters. You people not so much. Instead it does this to you.

 

Dodging the moving goalposts again I ask again...

Do you reject that the CBC is biased toward the Liberals?

[eyeball]

7 minutes ago, Legato said:

Dodging the moving goalposts again I ask again...

Do you reject that the CBC is biased toward the Liberals?

Yes I do reject it.

Now it's your turn.

Do you accept the notion the PMO is the CBC's editorial room and editor-in-chief?

 

[Legato]

13 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yes I do reject it.

Now it's your turn.

Do you accept the notion the PMO is the CBC's editorial room and editor-in-chief?

 

No they are not, I would call it more of an advisory concept

Here you go.....

It’s no secret that the CBC has a long-standing left-wing bias that permeates every aspect of its reporting. From its selective coverage of certain stories to its slanted opinion pieces, it’s clear that the CBC is more interested in pushing its own political agenda than in reporting the news objectively.

The CBC has been caught time and time again censoring or downplaying stories that don’t fit their liberal narrative, while exaggerating or sensationalizing stories that do. 

CBC’s recent spat with Twitter over a “government funded media” label has many Canadians paying attention to the broadcaster’s political bias. 

True North has compiled seven times the CBC’s bias against conservative politicians and causes was on full display in recent years.

Evidence here...

https://tnc.news/2023/04/21/seven-times-the-cbcs-bias-was-on-full-display/

This just little tippy iceberg.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

No, I mean that your little x-on-a-ballot shtick is the end all and be all solution to corruption is a joke. Your little shit eating    only underscores the fact you're just a lame-assed troll - a dillitent just like Justin really. Its no wonder why you're forever thanking everyone around here for voting for the Liberals. You'd have to come up with an argument otherwise.

 

 

Yeah that's democracy kiddo    I know you left these can't identify what a woman is or what an assault rifle is, Or what a child is, but I'm disappointed that you didn't know what democracy is   

It's not a shtick kiddo. It's the solution a number of oppressed people came up with to prevent their government from ever being able to oppress them again without their consent. That's why we fight for it

So yes, it's not just me but the founding fathers of America the founding fathers of Canada and a lot of other nations, plus the millions of soldiers who died for it.

It is not the only thing that could prevent corruption but it is the absolute number one tool and that's why democracy is a good thing

And look at your reply  Your furious that I'm right. You're angry as hell at the idea that voters should hold the government to account because you know it's the death of your the love of liberals. I can practically hear you gnashing your teeth from here in frustration and anger after thought

Democracy works. I'm sorry that that's inconvenient for you. But you're the only one that doesn't get that

[ExFlyer]

12 hours ago, taxme said:

Lets be honest here. You are the sorry little sad child here that cannot stop posting down arrows all the time. And it's really nice to know that you at least recognize that i am a man, unlike you, who cannot stop acting like a little child. Just saying!! 

I prefer to consider you more like my little biotch. 😂😂😂

OK...lets be honest here.

I see the world as is is, not wearing PP Le Pews glasses LOL

If you really need a "little biotch", well then you ain't much of a man HA HA HA

[ExFlyer]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You may accurately?

Yeah, I do. That's why I don't have to keep repeating the same crap over and over again   Truth - you should try it someday!   

.LOSERS like you always whine and cry becasue it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL

Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING..

Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA

Edited December 18, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

Canadians were told the Poilievres needed privacy. They needed space. They needed time to “write a book.” So Ana Poilievre ascended into that luxurious Montreal penthouse, the type of address regular Canadians only see on postcards, and quietly separated herself from Pierre's circus tent of political theatre.

Well, the cheque has cleared, and suddenly Ana has descended from the clouds again. Not for policy. Not for service. Not for the people.

No, she's back because her husband is fighting for his political survival.

And make no mistake: that's exactly what this sudden holiday-season “tour” by the Conservative Party is. Not an election campaign, there is no election for 3½ years. Not a listening tour, Pierre Poilievre's never listened to anyone who can't cut him a campaign cheque. This is a save-my-job sprint, paid for by the same taxpayers he lectures about “fiscal responsibility.” This month-long winter cross-country rally spree isn't about Canada.

It's about Pension Poilievre desperately begging Conservative members to keep him through what many in his own party are whispering will be a bruising leadership review. And now—because Pierre knows his own routine is wearing thin—he's brought out the so-called “big guns.” His secret weapon. Ana.

Funny how she disappears when accountability comes knocking, but reappears the moment Pierre needs a softer image. Hilarious how she suddenly has time to “reconnect with Canadians” right when her husband's grip on the leadership is slipping.

But here's the question I've been asking for years:

How much of this lifestyle—the penthouse, the travel, the staging, the private arrangements—is being paid for by Canadian taxpayers?

Readers of The Provincial Times know the answer: More than they'll ever admit.

Yes, this is deeply problematic, and yes, this should be treated accordingly. If Diana Fox Carney decided to move into a Montreal penthouse during her husband's leadership as Prime Minister, it would be turned into a multi-week scandal by the right-wing establishment media.

If Rebecca O'Toole had lived anywhere other than the official residence during Erin's time as leader of the Opposition, it would have sparked a full audit.

If Catherine Pinhas Mulcair so much as breathed near a luxury suite when Tom was leader of the Opposition? There would've been a parliamentary inquiry.

But Ana Poilievre?

Apparently, she's allowed to hop between luxury properties as she pleases, and the right-wing establishment media tells you it's “rude, ” “inappropriate,” and “unfair,” to ask questions.

Why?

Because the right-wing establishment media has decided that any scrutiny of the Poilievres is off-limits. Because they've built a brand around Pierre as the “ordinary working-class champion”—even as he lounges in publicly funded luxury, rents penthouses, and turns Stornoway into his own Shopify warehouse.

They're terrified that Canadians might start asking real questions.

Questions like:

How much taxpayer money is subsidizing the Poilievre lifestyle?

Who approved Ana's penthouse arrangements?

Why was an unnecassary, costly by-election forced for a seat Poilievre didn't need, only so he could parade around pretending he's already Prime Minister?

And why in God's name is a holiday-season national rally tour being billed as “political outreach” when it is transparently a survival strategy?

While Canadians struggle with rent, groceries, and heating bills, Pierre Poilievre is spending the winter—and your money—playing dress-up in platform shoes and a muscle suit, touring the snow-covered country like a man running from his own party's judgment.

He isn't campaigning for Canada's future. He's campaigning for his mansion.

And yes, Ana Poilievre's entitlement deserves criticism. If the Poilievres want to enjoy a luxury Montreal penthouse, that's their business. But if taxpayer dollars are even adjacent to those costs? If party funds—subsidized by public reimbursements—are being used to underwrite their lavish arrangements? Then Canadians deserve answers.

Because if anyone else in federal politics behaved like this, the radical right would be screaming “corruption” so loudly we'd all lose hearing. But when the Poilievres do it? Suddenly everyone is expected to shut up, clap politely, and pretend it's normal for a couple who claims to be “working class” to live like monarchs.

Sorry, we're not playing that game.

We're not here to protect Pension Poilievre's ego. We're not here to sanitize Ana's sudden return from the clouds. We're not here to pretend that #MANSIONGATE is anything but a growing symbol of what they actually are: A pair of political aristocrats using public funds, donor money, and taxpayer-backed perks to fund the lifestyle they believe they deserve. while lecturing the rest of us on thrift.

Canadians deserve better. Conservatives deserve honesty.And Pension Poilievre deserves the leadership review he's so terrified of.

Let the tour begin.

[ExFlyer]

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

.LOSERS like you always whine and cry becasue it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

 

You LITERALLY woke up this morning, jumped out of bed and spent your morning running around looking for all my posts to put little down arrows on them because i don't see things your way 

ROFLMAO!! Thanks! I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning! LOLOL 

Honestly kid you're your own worst enemy  

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You LITERALLY woke up this morning, jumped out of bed and spent your morning running around looking for all my posts to put little down arrows on them because i don't see things your way 

ROFLMAO!! Thanks! I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning! LOLOL 

Honestly kid you're your own worst enemy  

LOSERS like you always whine and cry because it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL

Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING..

Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA

[eyeball]

18 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It's not a shtick kiddo. It's the solution a number of oppressed people came up with to prevent their government from ever being able to oppress them again without their consent. That's why we fight for it

So yes, it's not just me but the founding fathers of America the founding fathers of Canada and a lot of other nations, plus the millions of soldiers who died for it.

It is not the only thing that could prevent corruption but it is the absolute number one tool and that's why democracy is a good thing

That gives me a real lump in my throat alright. 😥

18 hours ago, CdnFox said:

And look at your reply  Your furious that I'm right. You're angry as hell at the idea that voters should hold the government to account because you know it's the death of your the love of liberals. I can practically hear you gnashing your teeth from here in frustration and anger after thought

No, I'm definitely just laughing my ass off.

18 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Democracy works. I'm sorry that that's inconvenient for you. But you're the only one that doesn't get that

Sure, but it's not democracy that's the issue. Like most Canadians, 70%, I have lots faith in democracy. Unfortunately I just have low expectations it can do much if anything about;

Low Trust in Politicians: Only 17% of Canadians report trusting politicians

Voting is a lot more like an act of desperation these days.  Why do think you hear so many people talk about plugging their noses when they go vote?

It's a little sad but no wonder that people have to explain stuff like this to you.

 

[cougar]

Carney turned out to be a conservative in liberal clothing , so having conservatives join him , while liberal in his cabinet resign is no surprise!

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

LOSERS like you always whine and cry because it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL

Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING..

Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA

Still pooping your pants i see    keep spamming big guy !!

[TreeBeard]

Poilievre’s interviews with mainstream media, CBC and CTV, were….  well, awful.  Now I see why he never does them.  He can’t form sentences without slogans.   Awful.  
 

His “backroom deals” schtick came across as so hypocritical.  He literally had to bribe a Conservative in Alberta to vacate his seat so he could win a safe by-election.  It’s the very definition of backroom deal. 
 

And the guy who resigns his seat gets a job at a conservative lobbying firm.   Convenient. 

[CdnFox]

9 hours ago, eyeball said:

That gives me a real lump in my throat alright. 😥

 

Should go nicely with the one on your head  

 

Quote

No, I'm definitely just laughing my ass off.

It's painfully obvious that you're not

Quote

Sure, but it's not democracy that's the issue. Like most Canadians, 70%, I have lots faith in democracy. Unfortunately I just have low expectations it can do much if anything about;

It is obviously democracy that's the issue with you.

Quote

 

Voting is a lot more like an act of desperation these days.  Why do think you hear so many people talk about plugging their noses when they go vote?

It's a little sad but no wonder that people have to explain stuff like this to you.

 

Absolutely not true, but the type of lie that you like to spread to justify your constant support of a party who's corruption rivals some of the better Eastern European countries parties.

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Still pooping your pants i see    keep spamming big guy !!

LOSERS like you always whine and cry because it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL

Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING..

Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA

[SpankyMcFarland]

Some of the right-wing supporters here are way to the right of average Canadians. I think this is why they can’t see or acknowledge Poilievre’s essential problem that has caused him so many difficulties of late. Like them he comes across as an angry populist rather than a leader for the entire country in a time of grave national crisis. 

Edited December 19, 2025 by SpankyMcFarland

[Nationalist]

On 12/18/2025 at 10:36 AM, ExFlyer said:

Canadians were told the Poilievres needed privacy. They needed space. They needed time to “write a book.” So Ana Poilievre ascended into that luxurious Montreal penthouse, the type of address regular Canadians only see on postcards, and quietly separated herself from Pierre's circus tent of political theatre.

Well, the cheque has cleared, and suddenly Ana has descended from the clouds again. Not for policy. Not for service. Not for the people.

No, she's back because her husband is fighting for his political survival.

And make no mistake: that's exactly what this sudden holiday-season “tour” by the Conservative Party is. Not an election campaign, there is no election for 3½ years. Not a listening tour, Pierre Poilievre's never listened to anyone who can't cut him a campaign cheque. This is a save-my-job sprint, paid for by the same taxpayers he lectures about “fiscal responsibility.” This month-long winter cross-country rally spree isn't about Canada.

It's about Pension Poilievre desperately begging Conservative members to keep him through what many in his own party are whispering will be a bruising leadership review. And now—because Pierre knows his own routine is wearing thin—he's brought out the so-called “big guns.” His secret weapon. Ana.

Funny how she disappears when accountability comes knocking, but reappears the moment Pierre needs a softer image. Hilarious how she suddenly has time to “reconnect with Canadians” right when her husband's grip on the leadership is slipping.

But here's the question I've been asking for years:

How much of this lifestyle—the penthouse, the travel, the staging, the private arrangements—is being paid for by Canadian taxpayers?

Readers of The Provincial Times know the answer: More than they'll ever admit.

Yes, this is deeply problematic, and yes, this should be treated accordingly. If Diana Fox Carney decided to move into a Montreal penthouse during her husband's leadership as Prime Minister, it would be turned into a multi-week scandal by the right-wing establishment media.

If Rebecca O'Toole had lived anywhere other than the official residence during Erin's time as leader of the Opposition, it would have sparked a full audit.

If Catherine Pinhas Mulcair so much as breathed near a luxury suite when Tom was leader of the Opposition? There would've been a parliamentary inquiry.

But Ana Poilievre?

Apparently, she's allowed to hop between luxury properties as she pleases, and the right-wing establishment media tells you it's “rude, ” “inappropriate,” and “unfair,” to ask questions.

Why?

Because the right-wing establishment media has decided that any scrutiny of the Poilievres is off-limits. Because they've built a brand around Pierre as the “ordinary working-class champion”—even as he lounges in publicly funded luxury, rents penthouses, and turns Stornoway into his own Shopify warehouse.

They're terrified that Canadians might start asking real questions.

Questions like:

How much taxpayer money is subsidizing the Poilievre lifestyle?

Who approved Ana's penthouse arrangements?

Why was an unnecassary, costly by-election forced for a seat Poilievre didn't need, only so he could parade around pretending he's already Prime Minister?

And why in God's name is a holiday-season national rally tour being billed as “political outreach” when it is transparently a survival strategy?

While Canadians struggle with rent, groceries, and heating bills, Pierre Poilievre is spending the winter—and your money—playing dress-up in platform shoes and a muscle suit, touring the snow-covered country like a man running from his own party's judgment.

He isn't campaigning for Canada's future. He's campaigning for his mansion.

And yes, Ana Poilievre's entitlement deserves criticism. If the Poilievres want to enjoy a luxury Montreal penthouse, that's their business. But if taxpayer dollars are even adjacent to those costs? If party funds—subsidized by public reimbursements—are being used to underwrite their lavish arrangements? Then Canadians deserve answers.

Because if anyone else in federal politics behaved like this, the radical right would be screaming “corruption” so loudly we'd all lose hearing. But when the Poilievres do it? Suddenly everyone is expected to shut up, clap politely, and pretend it's normal for a couple who claims to be “working class” to live like monarchs.

Sorry, we're not playing that game.

We're not here to protect Pension Poilievre's ego. We're not here to sanitize Ana's sudden return from the clouds. We're not here to pretend that #MANSIONGATE is anything but a growing symbol of what they actually are: A pair of political aristocrats using public funds, donor money, and taxpayer-backed perks to fund the lifestyle they believe they deserve. while lecturing the rest of us on thrift.

Canadians deserve better. Conservatives deserve honesty.And Pension Poilievre deserves the leadership review he's so terrified of.

Let the tour begin.

That's a lot o' words to say, 'I don't like Poilievre living in a penthouse! Who's paying for this?'

[Legato]

3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Some of the right-wing supporters here are way to the right of average Canadians. I think this is why they can’t see or acknowledge Poilievre’s essential problem that has caused him so many difficulties of late. Like them he comes across as an angry populist rather than a leader for the entire country in a time of grave national crisis. 

Why are you frightened of Poilievre?

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

LOSERS like you always whine and cry because it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL

Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING..

Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA

Awww are you mad because your mom spends SOOO much time with other men but won't spend any with you?  

[ExFlyer]

32 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

That's a lot o' words to say, 'I don't like Poilievre living in a penthouse! Who's paying for this?'

I didn't write em..I just cut and pasted.

 

 

Edited December 19, 2025 by ExFlyer

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Some of the right-wing supporters here are way to the right of average Canadians. I think this is why they can’t see or acknowledge Poilievre’s essential problem that has caused him so many difficulties of late. Like them he comes across as an angry populist rather than a leader for the entire country in a time of grave national crisis. 

I've said this a thousand times and you dodge the question every single time: If he's so terrible how did he get almost 42% of the vote? How is he still polling at those same numbers?  Almost the same number of Canadians who voted for Carney voted for PP, and carney had all the advantages. 

So if you're right.... how do you circle that square?

Not to say he couldn't get more, but ... explain how someone so 'fundamentally unelectable' got enough votes to win a majority at any other time in our history, 

 

[ExFlyer]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Awww are you mad because your mom spends SOOO much time with other men but won't spend any with you?  

LOSERS like you always whine and cry because it is not their way LOL LOL LOL

Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL

Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING..

Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA

Edited December 19, 2025 by ExFlyer