Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, User said:

OMG Robo is desperately spamming because he is a cowardly troll!

 

Its funny. Just a little thought and one realizes there are reasons this info is not going to be disclosed and its hardly Trump. Robo-dweeb is having a dry day and so he spams garbage thinking anyone really cares...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, User said:

OMG Robo is desperately spamming because he is a cowardly troll!

 

I wish that was actually the case. It’s much worse, he’s so ideological driven that trolling is beyond his mental capacity. He believes his own fake news…

Edited by paxamericana
Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Its funny. Just a little thought and one realizes there are reasons this info is not going to be disclosed and its hardly Trump. Robo-dweeb is having a dry day and so he spams garbage thinking anyone really cares...

We all know you're in total MAGA denial and won't believe ANY EVIDENCE which further tars your HERO Trump. LMAO

The thing you'll never understand is, there is a REASON WHY just how desperate Trump is to HIDE THE FILES. 

You probably haven't seen that EVIDENCE because they don't show it on FOS LIES.

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, paxamericana said:

I wish that was actually the case. It’s much worse, he’s so ideological driven that trolling is beyond his mental capacity. He believes his own fake news…

You have NO IDEA what you're missing when you IGNORE everything that FOS LIES doesn't want you to see because you can't handle the TRUTH.

You don't even know WHY FOS LIES had to LIE, and PAY $800M penalty FOR LIBEL.

Posted
19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You have NO IDEA what you're missing when you IGNORE everything that FOS LIES doesn't want you to see because you can't handle the TRUTH.

You don't even know WHY FOS LIES had to LIE, and PAY $800M penalty FOR LIBEL.

Get help dude. Seriously. Find a good therapist and work these things out. No joke. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump COVER UP of DARK PAST BACKFIRES…GOP PANICS!!

Epstein files worse than anyone thought

 

 

Rumors

47 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Corroborating EVIDENCE.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1522671359039853 VIDEO

 

Repeated rumors

There is no proof here. 

Why didn't Biden release the files if they were so damning to Trump? Biden tried 6 ways to Sunday to get Trump convicted of something. Surely, if the files had what is rumored to be in them, Biden would have released them.

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Legato said:

Dark past?

I'm sure he had electrickery at his home.

I'm sure you KNOW that any kind of trickery can be VERY DARK.

15 hours ago, Legato said:

Why the innuendo? Do try some outuendo and breathe the fresh air.

Do try to use English, instead of TROLLish

Edited by robosmith
Posted
19 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump COVER UP of DARK PAST BACKFIRES…GOP PANICS!!

Epstein files worse than anyone thought

 

 

Have you submitted this to SNL? They love left-wing propaganda. 

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

We all know you're in total MAGA denial and won't believe ANY EVIDENCE which further tars your HERO Trump. LMAO

The thing you'll never understand is, there is a REASON WHY just how desperate Trump is to HIDE THE FILES. 

You probably haven't seen that EVIDENCE because they don't show it on FOS LIES.

If Trump ever goes down for wrong behaviors then so be it. It'll be the next man up mentality. 

MAGA!!!

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

Lol this "story" is nothing more than an intimidation attempt toward the attorney general and Trump by the corrupt democrats 

Too bad you have NO REASON for ^this OPINION let alone EVIDENCE.

Posted
53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Too bad you have NO REASON for ^this OPINION let alone EVIDENCE.

evidence is what you seem to have this abnormal gift for avoiding.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Too bad you have NO REASON for ^this OPINION let alone EVIDENCE.

The Republicans voted to release the files and debunk another vile left wing conspiracy theory but democrats choose to spin a narrative instead

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

The Republicans voted to release the files and debunk another vile left wing conspiracy theory but democrats choose to spin a narrative instead

Did they really? Why don't you have ANY PROOF?

Mike Johnson shut down the House  for 2 months to avoid a vote on releasing the files know as the discharge petition which was ONLY necessary because HE REFUSED to ALLOW A VOTE..

And today Trump called Rep Boebert to the WH to coerce her removal from approving the discharge petition. Too bad he FAILED, so sad. LMAO

FOS LIES probably didn't tell you  about that. LMAO

Posted
46 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Did they really? Why don't you have ANY PROOF?

Mike Johnson shut down the House  for 2 months to avoid a vote on releasing the files know as the discharge petition which was ONLY necessary because HE REFUSED to ALLOW A VOTE..

And today Trump called Rep Boebert to the WH to coerce her removal from approving the discharge petition. Too bad he FAILED, so sad. LMAO

FOS LIES probably didn't tell you  about that. LMAO

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

@robosmith

Tweenkie-Poo...Virginia Giuffre has testified that Trump was never involved.

So the best you whiney little biatches can say is that it "appears" that Trump knew about Epstein's fixation on young girls, but said nothing.

Too bad, so sad. You've struck out yet again.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Virginia Giuffre has testifies that Trump was never involved.

And the fact that they talked at some length at Epstein's place isn't terribly surprising to me. He knew her because she worked for him briefly and the only reason he even hired her was because she was the daughter of the maintenance man he employed at Mar a Lago.

At first I thought dumping all of the information into the public domain was a bad idea because it tended to tarnish far too many innocent people and victims alike, placing all of them under a spotlight in the public domain that they didn't deserve to wither under. I was prepared to trust the DOJ (of any administration) to investigate and bring charges where appropriate as opposed to tarring and feathering all and sundry.

I didn't anticipate the level of the self serving cherry picking that would take place though and I've had a change of heart because of it. I now say dump it all, let the chips scatter as they will and let the great axe fall where the offence lays.

Democrats may find themselves suddenly defanged and more on the defensive about "their guy(s)" than they anticipated.

So... up to now I considered the contents to be a criminal matter as opposed to a political one and thought it reasonable to protect the innocent from scrutiny and abuse. I now think Robo deserves to wear the consequences of the very data dump he longs for and in response to his selective snippets of self serving appetizers served out of context I'm now in favour of stuffing the entire menu up his left nostril and passing out Gravol to anyone inclined to vomit. 

Edited by Venandi
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Venandi said:

And the fact that they talked at some length at Epstein's place isn't terribly surprising to me. He knew her because she worked for him briefly and the only reason he even hired her was because she was the daughter of the maintenance man he employed at Mar a Lago.

At first I thought dumping all of the information into the public domain was a bad idea because it tended to tarnish far too many innocent people and victims alike, placing all of them under a spotlight in the public domain that they didn't deserve to wither under. I was prepared to trust the DOJ (of any administration) to investigate and bring charges where appropriate as opposed to tarring and feathering all and sundry.

I didn't anticipate the level of the self serving cherry picking that would take place though and I've had a change of heart because of it. I now say dump it all, let the chips scatter as they will and let the great axe fall where the offence lays.

Democrats may find themselves suddenly defanged and more on the defensive about "their guy(s)" than they anticipated.

So... up to now I considered the contents to be a criminal matter as opposed to a political one and thought it reasonable to protect the innocent from scrutiny and abuse. I now think Robo deserves to wear the consequences of the very data dump he longs for and in response to his selective snippets of self serving appetizers served out of context I'm now in favour of stuffing the entire menu up his left nostril and passing out Gravol to anyone inclined to vomit. 

I agree but, we have to anticipate that very little real "evidence" will ever come to light. I believe the reason for that is, those involved with Epstein were very powerful people and would obviously kill to keep their names out of the fray.

What robo "deserves" is an award for the nerve to act like a child and embarrass himself over and over. If anyone should be nervous about anything that might be revealed by exposing all the info in these "supposed" damning documents, it would be those who buy loads of arms and don't really want the sun to shine on said purchases. People like...oh just off the top o' my head...Netanyahu and his government? The Saudis? Iran?

Peace in the Middle East is indeed...a messy business.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...