blackbird Posted October 28, 2025 Report Posted October 28, 2025 (edited) The BC NDP has been working for years to enable FNs to acquire control and title over private property in BC. Nobody should feel safe in their homes now because some FN might just lay claim to the land it is on and the courts might just rule in their favour because of NDP laws and policies in a number of issues. The BC NDP adopted UNDRIP, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, which laid the groundwork for what is happening now. The BC NDP just the other day voted against a motion to stop all the land acknowledgments being made in the province. These land acknowledgments will carry weight in court rulings giving further credence to FNs claims over the private property of homeowners and other lands. The NDP signed a major agreement with FNs giving them the whole of Haida Gwaii (formerly the Queen Charlotte Islands) recently. This set a precedent as well for the FNs taking over private land. All these NDP acts give more legal support to FNs claiming private land in BC. The Cowichan Band is claiming their aim is not to takeover private homes and land, but this is just a cover. Such a claim means nothing. When the time is right, they will have the power to claim rent, compensation, or evict people from properties. For more information on how the NDP has sold out 95% of the population of BC to FNs see this article: Caroline Elliott: B.C. government laid groundwork for turning private property into Aboriginal land And why does the BC NDP want to give FNs ownership of people's private property, even though all of a sudden they claim they are concerned about the court ruling? Well I think the answer is Commie ideology. That means they don't really believe in private property ownership. As there is nothing in the Charter of Rights to protect private property ownership, this is something they can really exploit for their leftist ideology. By giving FNs control of private property, it could be some kind of stepping stone to government seizing more control of private property. So what is the next step? Well, we will have to wait and see what exactly the courts and the NDP do, but it could open the whole matter of private property ownership to some kind of government control over private property in B.C. Perhaps that is what their end goal is. They could bring in some kind of law that takes control of private property away from FNs land claims but gives control to the government. So in the end the NDP gains more control over private property. They could end up looking like they are saving property owners from FNs takeover, but actually giving the government more control. Control is Communist/Socialist ideology. Private ownership of property goes against that ideology. Edited October 29, 2025 by blackbird Quote
PIK Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 West Quebec is next. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
CdnFox Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 3 hours ago, PIK said: West Quebec is next. Yeah I saw that It is a shame that we now live in a country where the older generation is happy that they have their lives previously and don't have to Grow up in what Canada has become 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Shady Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 Canada invents new ways to drive off foreign investment. It's astonishing. 1 Quote
herbie Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 Wha's astonishing is how the US style of total distrust of government has infected so many gullible Canadians. No government will give away your private propery in treaty negotiations. No Band has asked anyone to give them up. The court ruling simply says the Cowichans have traditional territorial rights there and that's being contested, even by other Bands like the Musqueam. If that stands in the end, it will require some negotiations. So quit hiding your colonial insistence against even negotiation to achieve a reconciliation with fear mongering about something being taken away from you. 1 Quote
paxamericana Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 1 minute ago, herbie said: achieve a reconciliation with fear mongering Why though? You obviously wiped out the natives with most of the 18 and 19th century doing genocide. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 2 minutes ago, paxamericana said: Why though? You obviously wiped out the natives with most of the 18 and 19th century doing genocide. There's a hell of a lot of them kicking around for a group that was wiped out Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
herbie Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 He's unable to comprehend how you can build a nation without mass killings. How a native American be anything other than a nuisance to remove. You see it with their 'negotiations' today, allow us a tariff or we'll kill you. 1 Quote
paxamericana Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 9 minutes ago, herbie said: He's unable to comprehend how you can build a nation without mass killings. How a native American be anything other than a nuisance to remove. You see it with their 'negotiations' today, allow us a tariff or we'll kill you. No that's a missread. accept this tariff or become 51st. NO killing of Canadians required. We're Americans after all, not Canadian... Quote
herbie Posted October 30, 2025 Report Posted October 30, 2025 No that's Trump stupidity. We let Americans buy companies and resources here without asking for US citizenship rights, but he'd rather lie and claim we won't so ge can hose his own people with tariffs Quote
PIK Posted November 19, 2025 Report Posted November 19, 2025 On 10/30/2025 at 4:02 PM, herbie said: He's unable to comprehend how you can build a nation without mass killings. How a native American be anything other than a nuisance to remove. You see it with their 'negotiations' today, allow us a tariff or we'll kill you. Every country has been won and lost. Part of history. The natives were defeated and we won. To bad. But now we are giving it all back, because of leftwing guilt. How many natives today want to go back to the old ways, none. They wouldn't survive.. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
CdnFox Posted November 19, 2025 Report Posted November 19, 2025 4 minutes ago, PIK said: Every country has been won and lost. Part of history. The natives were defeated and we won. To bad. But now we are giving it all back, because of leftwing guilt. How many natives today want to go back to the old ways, none. They wouldn't survive.. The natives were never defeated. We didn't go to war with them except for the Riel Revolution which really isn't quite the same thing The first nations signed treaties, they accepted the people onto their lands and what is often forgotten is they demanded the education that they are now complaining about. It's fair to argue that they were a very immature society and didn't realize what they were getting into but it doesn't change the fact that all of this happened with their cooperation and in many cases at their demand It's a shame we didn't conquer them violently back in the day. It would have ended all of this discussion Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
herbie Posted November 19, 2025 Report Posted November 19, 2025 1 hour ago, PIK said: But now we are giving it all back, because of leftwing guilt Counter to your wrong wing total lack of shame, eh? We stole it fair and square, right? They're not asking for your land, let alone demanding it. And all levels of govt are out to protect private property in spite of some people's lies and negativist perceptions. Quote
Legato Posted November 19, 2025 Report Posted November 19, 2025 3 minutes ago, herbie said: Counter to your wrong wing total lack of shame, eh? We stole it fair and square, right? They're not asking for your land, let alone demanding it. And all levels of govt are out to protect private property in spite of some people's lies and negativist perceptions. Who did they steal it from? 1 Quote
blackbird Posted November 20, 2025 Author Report Posted November 20, 2025 (edited) On 10/30/2025 at 12:38 PM, herbie said: No government will give away your private propery in treaty negotiations. No Band has asked anyone to give them up. Government doesn't have the final say if the courts rule that land belongs to the natives. Government has to go to court to fight it just like anyone else. They can pass new laws, but the court can overrule the laws as was just done in Richmond, BC. Wow! You are totally deceived by leftist NDP ideology. The fact is the court just ruled over 100 property owners in Richmond, BC don't actually have legal title to their property because some native ancestors stayed there at least part of the year way back in history. This means nobody's private property is guaranteed in B.C. We are screwed unless something changes this. The Kamloops band that claimed 240 children are buried beside the residential school in Kamloops, without actually producing the bodies, also claim part or all of the city of Kamloops is their land. Hundreds of citizens of Kamloops could be losing their land. That may become the next court battle. Edited November 20, 2025 by blackbird Quote
eyeball Posted November 21, 2025 Report Posted November 21, 2025 On 11/19/2025 at 10:22 AM, PIK said: The natives were defeated and we won. You have surrender documents that can attest to that? And what about the declaration of war? That's generally an official act as well when the intent is to take over lands and territories that don't belong to you. On 11/19/2025 at 10:22 AM, PIK said: But now we are giving it all back, because of leftwing guilt. No, it's because of jurisprudence - knowledge of the law. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
herbie Posted November 21, 2025 Report Posted November 21, 2025 The arsehole justification is predominant among our wrong wing peanut gallery, As prevalent as the attitude of segregationists in 1953. But no, they're not prejudiced at all... Quote
CdnFox Posted November 21, 2025 Report Posted November 21, 2025 3 hours ago, eyeball said: You have surrender documents that can attest to that? Don't be silly! Natives couldn't write, they hadn't gone to school yet!! Ba da dum TING!!! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.