Ms. James Is Indicted

[Hodad]

17 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I am talking about the office led by Spencer B. Merriweather III. They allowed Decarlos Brown Jr. To go free 14 times before he killed. I am sure Spencer B. Merriweather III is immenently qualified. But his qualifications aside, he sucks at his job. So, maybe we need to rethink what qualified actually means. 

In this case, it means getting results. While you don't like the results, the results are effective. A grand jury in an area of Virginia that is deeply blue saw enough evidence to determine James should stand trial, despite the fact that many in that state would view her as a hero. 

Don't start nothing, wont be nothing. You guys had to go around with your banana republic style persecutions. It made us believe that the only way to stop that is for you to have real, material consequences for your shitty behavior. And that is exactly what is happening. If you hadn't behaved like little biotches, we wouldn't be doing this.

You should understand that my support for Trump is not idolization of Trump. My support for him is 95% anti-you. Aka anti-left.

Crazy that you see independent DoJ and state investigations and prosecutions of actual crimes and unfounded, nakedly political prosecutions at the order of the POTUS as the same thing. 

These cases are going nowhere. You don't care. 

All you actually want is for you orange Jesus to be above the law. You are offended that he was held accountable for his actions. And you want the people who stood up to him to be punished.

12 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...deny deny deflect.

What a hypocrite. 

WTF are you even talking about. Sober up and try again when you can string together a cogent reply. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Legato said:

Does not matter if any of the indictments succeed.

In reality, a very poor result reflects very badly on the strength of the case.  Duh

3 hours ago, Legato said:

Comey not only thinks he's the smartest person in the room, he thinks he's the holiest.

I'm sure it depends on the room, and with Halligan in it, he'd be right on.

3 hours ago, Legato said:

Being dragged through the mud will be punishment in itself. Same with the arrogant James woman who ran for office on a "I will get Trump ticket"

Not if as suspected, the case is thrown out for any of several VERY LIKELY reasons.

Do you even know that it is likely that Halligan was illegally appointed and if that's found, the indictment will be invalid due to statute of limitations exceeded. LMAO

Edited October 11, 2025 by robosmith

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, User said:

I don't care if they are a steaming pile of rhino dung. Drag anyone and everyone they can through the legal process. 

Look at ^tough" guy applauding the CORRUPT MISUSE of the "JUSTICE" Dept. LMAO

Thanks for admitting just how corrupt YOU ARE. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, User said:

Too? They already did. 

You have ZERO EVIDENCE of Joe Biden interfering in the DoJ LIKE TRUMP HAS PROMISED TO DO and DONE.

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

"NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW!"

Now grow up.

I'm already TWICE YOUR SIZE little girl.

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, Hodad said:

Crazy that you see independent DoJ and state investigations and prosecutions of actual crimes and unfounded, nakedly political prosecutions at the order of the POTUS as the same thing. 

 No, it is delusional that you refuse to acknowledge reality. 

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, Hodad said:

WTF are you even talking about. Sober up and try again when you can string together a cogent reply. 

Playing dumb now? Or are you just dumb?

This case is very obvious. You cant argue the facts of it, so you pretend to not understand. 

Typical Libbie fembot.

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You have ZERO EVIDENCE of Joe Biden interfering in the DoJ LIKE TRUMP HAS PROMISED TO DO and DONE.

I'm already TWICE YOUR SIZE little girl.

Lol...maybe so...maybe not.

Fact is...James is a hypocrite and so are you.

Edited October 11, 2025 by Nationalist

[User]

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

You have ZERO EVIDENCE of Joe Biden interfering in the DoJ LIKE TRUMP HAS PROMISED TO DO and DONE.

This wasn’t the claim scooter. 

9 hours ago, robosmith said:

Look at ^tough" guy applauding the CORRUPT MISUSE of the "JUSTICE" Dept. LMAO

Thanks for admitting just how corrupt YOU ARE. 

I told you clowns during the election that if Trump wins I hope they vindictively go after anyone and everyone they can.

You don’t get a free pass for cheering this on when it was the left doing it the last 4 years. 

[Legato]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

In reality, a very poor result reflects very badly on the strength of the case.  Duh

I'm sure it depends on the room, and with Halligan in it, he'd be right on.

Not if as suspected, the case is thrown out for any of several VERY LIKELY reasons.

Do you even know that it is likely that Halligan was illegally appointed and if that's found, the indictment will be invalid due to statute of limitations exceeded. LMAO

Ever been mudding?

[Chrissy1979]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Now we never said anything of the kind and once again you have to lie to try and make your point.

What we have said is that you cannot complain about what the republicans are doing now because you didn't complain when the democrats were doing it before. And that it is reasonable and justified if the democrats are going to do it that the republicans will do it as well.

So you admit you won't be able to complain about Democrats doing the same thing in the future because you're not complaining about Republicans now. 

Maybe you should stick to the "I'm an old man and I don't understand" excuse. Lol

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, robosmith said:

IF you want to be INFORMED, you need to watch news other than FOS LIES. LMAO

Have you even read the indictments?

Stuff keeps coming up, dipshit. It all adds up, you know? That b*tch has probably been committing crimes since she was 12. 

[LinkSoul60]

23 hours ago, Deluge said:

1. The Justice Dept. is indicting fat ass, not just some personal attorney. You need to pull your head out of the Left's ass and get your facts straight. 

2. I like our chances in a civil war, in fact it feels less like a good chance and a lot more like a guaranteed win. 

 

1. Has nothing to do with left, right, up or down. He's a petulant narcissist that is an absolute embarrassment.

2. I don't like anyone's chances in a civil war.  Can't see how any side would win, except for China and Russia.

21 hours ago, Shady said:

A grand jury found that there was enough evidence to indict.  No embarrassment at all.  Cry harder.

I'm not crying at all...why would I.  Your hero is an embarrassment.

[LinkSoul60]

19 hours ago, West said:

There would be no need for retribution if lefties didnt decide to use lawfare against conservatives 

So you're good with petty retribution.  Make America great again right... 😂

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Playing dumb now? Or are you just dumb?

This case is very obvious. You cant argue the facts of it, so you pretend to not understand. 

Typical Libbie fembot.

Lol...maybe so...maybe not.

Fact is...James is a hypocrite and so are you.

FACT is you cannot even specify your ALLEGED hypocrisy because there is NONE.

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Ever been mudding?

Sorry NOT a TROLL PIG like YOU.

[Legato]

20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

FACT is you cannot even specify your ALLEGED hypocrisy because there is NONE.

Sorry NOT a TROLL PIG like YOU.

So no. You can join Comey it should be fun.

[Shady]

40 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. Has nothing to do with left, right, up or down. He's a petulant narcissist that is an absolute embarrassment.

2. I don't like anyone's chances in a civil war.  Can't see how any side would win, except for China and Russia.

I'm not crying at all...why would I.  Your hero is an embarrassment.

An embarrassment for what?

[LinkSoul60]

8 minutes ago, Shady said:

An embarrassment for what?

lol... where do you want to start?  To stay on the subject though...  The petty petulance he displays daily by either verbally or having the DOJ go after political rivals is incredibly weak and not very becoming of the POTUS, who at the very least should try to provide moral leadership.  He's an utter embarrassment...

[robosmith]

29 minutes ago, Legato said:

So no. You can join Comey it should be fun.

Comey's charges will be dismissed. Either sooner when Halligan is dismissed as an illegal appointment or later, due to a complete lack of evidence supporting the charges. That is why NO ONE in Eastern VA District was willing charge him.

Of course you've never even read Project 2025. LMAO

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

lol... where do you want to start?  To stay on the subject though...  The petty petulance he displays daily by either verbally or having the DOJ go after political rivals is incredibly weak and not very becoming of the POTUS, who at the very least should try to provide moral leadership.  He's an utter embarrassment...

Trump is so STUPID he doesn't understand that every time he publicly demands more prosecutions, he just adds MORE EVIDENCE that they are illegal "vindictive prosecutions." Usually a hard defense to make stick, but Trump is very STUPIDLY making that easier an easier. LMAO

 

Quote

Vindictive prosecution is a form of prosecutorial misconduct that occurs when a prosecutor increases charges or prosecutes a defendant in retaliation for the defendant exercising a legal or constitutional right, such as the right to a trial. This practice violates a defendant's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. To prove vindictive prosecution, a defendant can either show evidence of actual retaliatory motive or present facts that create a "realistic likelihood of vindictiveness," which the prosecution must then rebut. 

 

What vindictive prosecution is

• It is the use of the criminal justice system to punish a defendant for exercising their legal rights. 
   
• This can include bringing more serious charges after a defendant appeals a conviction, requests a new trial, or pleads not guilty. 
   
• The United States Supreme Court has established that retaliatory prosecution is a violation of a defendant's right to due process. 
   

How to prove vindictive prosecution

• Show actual animus: 

  The defendant must prove that the prosecutor brought charges with a specific retaliatory motive or ill will. 

   
• Show a "realistic likelihood of vindictiveness": 

  If direct evidence of motive is unavailable, a defendant can create a presumption of vindictiveness by presenting facts that show a realistic possibility of retaliation. The prosecution must then provide a valid justification for its actions. 

   
• Differentiate from selective prosecution: 

  Vindictive prosecution is distinct from selective prosecution>>, which occurs when a prosecutor targets an individual based on an unjustifiable classification like race or religion. 

   

Legal precedent and implications

• The Supreme Court's rulings in cases like North Carolina v. Pearce (1969) and Blackledge v. Perry (1974) established the legal concept of prosecutorial vindictiveness. 
   
• If a claim of vindictive prosecution is successful, the charges may be dismissed, but the burden of proof can be high. 
   
• A defendant must typically raise this claim before trial. 

 

[Venandi]

2 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

So you admit you won't be able to complain about Democrats doing the same thing in the future...

The people complaining will vary as administrations change... next time you'll be the one cheering. This whole thing was a very bad idea right from the start, but we're in it now and the amplitude of the see-saw will increase over time.

Ironically (and IMO of course), how much it increases after this is up to the democrats who set the ball in play and how loudly their supporters cheer for the things they now scream Hitler and fascist over. 

The centre has all but evaporated now, they were the ones saying don't do this because they feared what would happen. They were the ones warning not to open this door and predicted that you wouldn't like what happens next.

The door wasn't simply opened, it was an explosive breach and now there's no one left to say don't go there. What happens next is that people begin to fear election results that don't go their way and you're going to like what proceeds from that a whole lot less. I'd say don't go there, but that didn't work last time.

Flank speed for the island Capt Chrissy... 

Edited October 11, 2025 by Venandi

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

FACT is you cannot even specify your ALLEGED hypocrisy because there is NONE.

Sorry NOT a TROLL PIG like YOU.

Boo hoo hoo...poor Libbie.

Don't like being fed your own crap do ya Tweenkie-Poo.

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Venandi said:

The people complaining will vary as administrations change... next time you'll be the one cheering. This whole thing was a bad idea from the start but we're in it now and the amplitude of the see-saw will increase over time.

Ironically (and IMO of course), how much it increases after this is up to democrats and how loudly their supporters cheer for the things they now scream Hitler and fascist over. 

The centre has all but evaporated now, they were the ones saying don't do this because they feared what would happen. They were the ones saying don't open this door because you won't like what happens next.

The door wasn't simply opened, it was an explosive breach and now there's no one left to say don't go there. What happens next is that people begin to fear election results that don't go their way... you're going to like what comes of that a whole lot less. 

The trouble with ^this is, Trump's charges are so weak no one in the East VA district even wanted to prosecute because they didn't want to be disbarred for vindictive prosecutions.

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Boo hoo hoo...poor Libbie.

Don't like being fed your own crap do ya Tweenkie-Poo.

Thanks for admitting even YOU BELIEVE what YOU'RE DISHING OUT IS CRAP. LMAO

[Chrissy1979]

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Boo hoo hoo...poor Libbie.

Don't like being fed your own crap do ya Tweenkie-Poo.

Sounds like you haven't any defence whatsoever. That must mean you know you're wrong 

[robosmith]

Just now, Chrissy1979 said:

Sounds like you haven't any defence whatsoever. That must mean you know you're wrong 

He knows it's CRAP. LMAO

[LinkSoul60]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump is so STUPID he doesn't understand that every time he publicly demands more prosecutions, he just adds MORE EVIDENCE that they are illegal "vindictive prosecutions." Usually a hard defense to make stick, but Trump is very STUPIDLY making that easier an easier. LMAO

 

 

I'll give Trump this... he is absolutely brilliant in his ability to get what he refers to as the 'uneducated' to idolize and follow his rhetoric. Not many are capable of that...  Where I don't give it to him is how blatantly stupid he can be. Fortunately for him he has a group of equally inept subservients in his administration to deflect and spread the stupidity around.  

[Nationalist]

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The trouble with ^this is, Trump's charges are so weak no one in the East VA district even wanted to prosecute because they didn't want to be disbarred for vindictive prosecutions.

Thanks for admitting even YOU BELIEVE what YOU'RE DISHING OUT IS CRAP. LMAO

Frankly I could care less.

The whole world watched in disgust while Brandon and his slime abused the legal system.

Now it's being rubbed in your black wet noses.

You were warned this would be the result. So you can just sit back and enjoy the consequences of your own chickenshit.

13 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Sounds like you haven't any defence whatsoever. That must mean you know you're wrong 

Chrissy...baby...nobody takes you seriously. 

Go smoke more rock and re-color your hair green.