Kamalas book tour

[Fluffypants]

Watching her media blitz and the complete lack of the DNC media lackeys even questioning her obvious lies.

My favorite was her telling multiple interviewers that she lost the closest election in the 21st century. Can someone show me what metric she pulled that load of BS from.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/rachel-maddow-nods-along-kamala-180527173.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAACEbU8Z-F1gEOkZERrBO1M3VJOAal7rjzBys7OuxamuIRChKmYWMRFojgvd76_AMh0v1mDSHaWu-grbbdIalE-REPn2fHozN9b1XEgMMir3tGhF_V2MHwcbfzxThe2k49SRvsD5C97m16fMCYjM5kVekEOYeYHMLwknb4anO2omk

She lost the popular vote and every swing state by enough of a margin there was no recount.

[Michael Hardner]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

 

I was about to say she's wrong, but I saw your quote that it's the 21ST CENTURY.

 

So, yes, but there have only been six so...

 

 

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

 

I was about to say she's wrong, but I saw your quote that it's the 21ST CENTURY.

 

So, yes, but there have only been six so...

 

 

So?

[Michael Hardner]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

So?

Exactly 

[Legato]

11 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Exactly 

What?

[Michael Hardner]

Just now, Legato said:

What?

SO!

 

You got it right 👍 

[User]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

I was about to say she's wrong, but I saw your quote that it's the 21ST CENTURY.

 

So, yes, but there have only been six so...

Why provide a link to the popular vote margin?

Presidential elections are not won or lost by the popular vote. 

 

[Shady]

She lost all 7 battleground states as well as some traditionally blue ones.

[Hodad]

It's pretty obvious she's referring to the popular vote. 

The orange manbaby's fragile ego simply can't abide anything that suggests he isn't universally beloved.

Why would a sitting president (with any dignity) even comment on such a remark? Sore winner whiny child throws a social media tantrum. 

[Nationalist]

48 minutes ago, Hodad said:

It's pretty obvious she's referring to the popular vote. 

The orange manbaby's fragile ego simply can't abide anything that suggests he isn't universally beloved.

Why would a sitting president (with any dignity) even comment on such a remark? Sore winner whiny child throws a social media tantrum. 

Ahhh...the sour grapes of the Libbie hoard. Its so delicious to see and hear.

You fckers warped everything you touched for years with no restrictions. Now you whine and cry about the election results and actually support a drunken b1tch.

You're such filth.

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ahhh...the sour grapes of the Libbie hoard. Its so delicious to see and hear.

You fckers warped everything you touched for years with no restrictions. Now you whine and cry about the election results and actually support a drunken b1tch.

You're such filth.

Jeebus, did you just stumble your senile old ass home from the bar? You make about as much sense as a Trump UN speech. 

The only people whining are Trump and, as always, his servile army of witless keyboard warriors. 

Harris stated a fact--a statement that didn't affect Trump in the least--and he threw a tantrum because it didn't fluff his ego. 

 

[Nationalist]

46 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Jeebus, did you just stumble your senile old ass home from the bar? You make about as much sense as a Trump UN speech. 

The only people whining are Trump and, as always, his servile army of witless keyboard warriors. 

Harris stated a fact--a statement that didn't affect Trump in the least--and he threw a tantrum because it didn't fluff his ego. 

 

Lol...yes. Whine, complain, lie, I love it.

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin

 

I was about to say she's wrong, but I saw your quote that it's the 21ST CENTURY.

 

So, yes, but there have only been six so...

2000 was part of this century, and it was closer. 

[Legato]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

Jeebus, did you just stumble your senile old ass home from the bar? You make about as much sense as a Trump UN speech. 

The only people whining are Trump and, as always, his servile army of witless keyboard warriors. 

Harris stated a fact--a statement that didn't affect Trump in the least--and he threw a tantrum because it didn't fluff his ego. 

 

I see the Dillon Wagoner spin generator has received some more funding.

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, Hodad said:

Jeebus, did you just stumble your senile old ass home from the bar? You make about as much sense as a Trump UN speech. 

The only people whining are Trump and, as always, his servile army of witless keyboard warriors. 

Harris stated a fact--a statement that didn't affect Trump in the least--and he threw a tantrum because it didn't fluff his ego. 

 

Dude, how can you complain about the fact that Trump took umbrage to "a meaningless statement" when meaningless statements form the basis of your most serious accusations against him?

For years the pièce de résistance to your "Twump is a sewial liow 😭" claim was "He said that it didn't rain during his speech, but look, Melania held an umbrella before the speech! That is proof that it rained during his speech! And then there was a light drizzle for 14.3 seconds out of 17 minutes! It's possible that some of his hair was even wet! OMG, people elected him to always tell the truth and then he went and said that!!!!! AAAAAAAAAGHHHHHH!!!!!!!! THE INHUMANITY!!!!!!!"

 

And don't forget the famous string of nameless, faceless accusations that you considered to be gold: "An anonymous source says that Trump said something. OMG!!!! That means it's 100% true until proven otherwise, and all accusations against Trump are automatically considered to be 100% valid based on this anonymous claim. That's the news for today."

Edited September 26, 2025 by WestCanMan

[gatomontes99]

25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

2000 was part of this century, and it was closer. 

In fact!

The 20th century was from January 1st, 1901 to December 31st of the year 2000! This century, being the 21st century, is, of course, from January first of 2001 to December 31st of the year 2100. You, sir, are herby ABMONISHED for such heresy! 

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

In fact!

The 20th century was from January 1st, 1901 to December 31st of the year 2000! This century, being the 21st century, is, of course, from January first of 2001 to December 31st of the year 2100. You, sir, are herby ABMONISHED for such heresy! 

Oh shit. I was incorrect.

That means I'm only 10,000 lies away from being just like Hodad, eyeball, MH, Herbie, ex-flyer, Beave, crackhobarbie, CNN, CBC, Carney, MSNBC, and Fauci.

[gatomontes99]

40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Oh shit. I was incorrect.

That means I'm only 10,000 lies away from being just like Hodad, eyeball, MH, Herbie, ex-flyer, Beave, crackhobarbie, CNN, CBC, Carney, MSNBC, and Fauci.

And that's just this morning!

Edited September 26, 2025 by gatomontes99

[User]

10 hours ago, Hodad said:

It's pretty obvious she's referring to the popular vote. 

If she was referring to the popular vote, it only makes her that much dumber. 

The popular vote does not win presidential elections. This is like someone bragging about how great they were at checkers when the game was chess. 

 

[Hodad]

51 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Dude, how can you complain about the fact that Trump took umbrage to "a meaningless statement" when meaningless statements form the basis of your most serious accusations against him?

For years the pièce de résistance to your "Twump is a sewial liow 😭" claim was "He said that it didn't rain during his speech, but look, Melania held an umbrella before the speech! That is proof that it rained during his speech! And then there was a light drizzle for 14.3 seconds out of 17 minutes! It's possible that some of his hair was even wet! OMG, people elected him to always tell the truth and then he went and said that!!!!! AAAAAAAAAGHHHHHH!!!!!!!! THE INHUMANITY!!!!!!!"

 

And don't forget the famous string of nameless, faceless accusations that you considered to be gold: "An anonymous source says that Trump said something. OMG!!!! That means it's 100% true until proven otherwise, and all accusations against Trump are automatically considered to be 100% valid based on this anonymous claim. That's the news for today."

He is a serial liar. Compulsive. Pathological. About all things big and small, meaningful and trivial. 

You simply don't find that a disqualifying character flaw because it's one you share. 

Meanwhile, back on topic, you don't seem have any opinion at all about why a casual statement of fact from his vanquished opponent provoked such a childish outburst. 

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...yes. Whine, complain, lie, I love it.

Another ^BANKRUPT dishonest response. LMAO

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

I see the Dillon Wagoner spin generator has received some more funding.

^Another FICTIONAL CLOWN TROLLegato. You just keep EMBARRASSING YOURSELF.

Spindizzy | Concordances and Characters - Fandom

Fandom

https://concord.fandom.com › wiki › Spindizzy

 

The Dillon-Wagoner Graviton Polarity Generator, known colloquially as the spindizzy is a fictitious anti-gravity device imagined by James Blish for his ...

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Dude, how can you complain about the fact that Trump took umbrage to "a meaningless statement" when meaningless statements form the basis of your most serious accusations against him?

For years the pièce de résistance to your "Twump is a sewial liow 😭" claim was "He said that it didn't rain during his speech, but look, Melania held an umbrella before the speech! That is proof that it rained during his speech! And then there was a light drizzle for 14.3 seconds out of 17 minutes! It's possible that some of his hair was even wet! OMG, people elected him to always tell the truth and then he went and said that!!!!! AAAAAAAAAGHHHHHH!!!!!!!! THE INHUMANITY!!!!!!!"

 

And don't forget the famous string of nameless, faceless accusations that you considered to be gold: "An anonymous source says that Trump said something. OMG!!!! That means it's 100% true until proven otherwise, and all accusations against Trump are automatically considered to be 100% valid based on this anonymous claim. That's the news for today."

Oh NO! the baby is back. LMAO

So convincing (that you are an lDIOT).

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, User said:

If she was referring to the popular vote, it only makes her that much dumber. 

The popular vote does not win presidential elections. This is like someone bragging about how great they were at checkers when the game was chess. 

 

I never bothered to check into it, but I heard that Trump won 90% of the counties in the US. 

I can't even imagine how low the avg IQ is in the ones that voted for middle-class grass. 

[gatomontes99]

Who votes for Democrats? Democrats and some wishy washy independents. Who doesn't conservatives/Republicans. 

So why did Bootyjudge's sexual preferences matter? Because Kamala didn't think Democrats would vote for him.

[gatomontes99]

14 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I never bothered to check into it, but I heard that Trump won 90% of the counties in the US. 

I can't even imagine how low the avg IQ is in the ones that voted for middle-class grass. 

I think you are talking about the change in votes by county. Trump improved on about 90% of the counties. Kamala did not improve on a single County.