ExFlyer Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: LOL i always know w.. Which if anything is more proof you're just a kid. And it's goddess that calls you 12, i usually peg you at 15 or so, tho she might be right. More useless blather from the biggest BS er on this forum...Ho Hum...from pedophiles really lost all credibility Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ironstone Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 "What the Liberals did to Canada" Canada’s economy is on life support and country is in recession watch, says economist https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/canadas-economy-is-on-life-support-and-country-is-in-recession-says-economist/ Doesn't sound too encouraging. 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
I am Groot Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 On 2/4/2026 at 5:37 PM, ExFlyer said: You are aware it was the BC government that had issues??? "suspended all non-essential spending on the project in April 2018 due to investor uncertainty, primarily stemming from opposition by the British Columbia government." The BC government has no say in it. Constitutionally, interprovincial trade and travel, as well as all trade going out of Canada, as well as our coastal waters are under federal jurisdiction. Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
eyeball Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 7 hours ago, Goddess said: Both Kinder Morgan and now the newly lost $1 billion Glencoe project in Quebec - both companies have directly blamed the liberal gov't for hindering and delaying their projects. Are they lying? My guess is they're hoping they'll do the same thing in Quebec that they did in BC. After the hullabaloo Quebec put up over asbestos you'd think forcing the people of Quebec to accept higher more toxic emissions of arsenic would be a snap. 7 hours ago, Goddess said: And there's a myriad of other companies that have said the same thing. And we don't know how many other companies just don't even try. We also know that the feds could easily green light these infrastructure projects, cut through the red tape and make the investment environment more attractive. But they refuse to. Why? They probably expect stiff resistance from people on the ground where these projects would land as well as from the provincial, municipal, regional district and first nations governments who represent them. You're dreaming if you think this can be accomplished easily. Why, you'd almost need a government that was willing to impose mandates to get anything done. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 5 hours ago, eyeball said: My guess is they're hoping they'll do the same thing in Quebec that they did in BC. They have specifically stated otherwise. They want nothing to do with Canada until the regulations change. They're investing their money in the united states. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 11 hours ago, I am Groot said: The BC government has no say in it. Constitutionally, interprovincial trade and travel, as well as all trade going out of Canada, as well as our coastal waters are under federal jurisdiction. Oh?? Like they and indigenous have no say now?? LOL I have no idea where you get your info but it is incorrect. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
eyeball Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 11 hours ago, CdnFox said: They have specifically stated otherwise. They want nothing to do with Canada until the regulations change. They're investing their money in the united states. They want to produce more pollution. Canadians don't Americans do Everyone is happy. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
ironstone Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 "The budget will balance itself" Justin Trudeau How does our current Finance Minister respond to the question "In what year will you balance the budget?" (Even a rough estimate would be better than nothing) Blah blah blah...unprecedented times...blah blah blah...unprecedented times.... Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
eyeball Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 56 minutes ago, ironstone said: How does our current Finance Minister respond to the question "In what year will you balance the budget?" There's a reason it's not called Answer Period. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
ironstone Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 23 minutes ago, eyeball said: There's a reason it's not called Answer Period. I wish all MP's were held to a higher standard when it comes to answering questions. Off the top of my head, the only time I remember an MP giving a straight, honest answer to a question was Public Safety Minister Gary A, when he actually admitted he had no idea what a PAL or RPAL was. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
I am Groot Posted February 6 Report Posted February 6 11 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Oh?? Like they and indigenous have no say now?? LOL I have no idea where you get your info but it is incorrect. You roped the indigenous in here. The only reason the indigenous have a say is that federal legislation gives them a say. That legislation can be amended, changed, or rescinded. Trade is under federal jurisdiction, trade that crosses internal or external borders. The provinces can't do a thing. Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
eyeball Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 (edited) 3 hours ago, ironstone said: I wish all MP's were held to a higher standard when it comes to answering questions. I'd like something more productive than a wish. We need to strip our representation of as much party politics as possible. As I've said before, pick and vet representatives like jurists and afford no more status to political parties than any other social club...like the Lions or Masons. The bigger your club the more likely a few of your members will be drafted for Parliamentary duty. Edited February 7 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 On 2/5/2026 at 3:30 PM, ExFlyer said: More useless blather from the biggest BS er on this forum... You mean you posted again? Yep, I see that Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 12 hours ago, CdnFox said: You mean you posted again? Yep, I see that See, the ExFlyer degenerate pedophile LOSER junkie responds again A LOSER and a ExFlyer junkie...what a LOSER combo LOL LOL LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 13 hours ago, I am Groot said: You roped the indigenous in here. The only reason the indigenous have a say is that federal legislation gives them a say. That legislation can be amended, changed, or rescinded. Trade is under federal jurisdiction, trade that crosses internal or external borders. The provinces can't do a thing. Nope...the indigenous have always been against the pipeline,...the links I posted made note of that but but hey, if you have difficulty reading maybe get assistance LOL So, go ahead and read again https://globalnews.ca/news/4139833/kinder-morgan-trans-mountain-pipeline-what-to-know/ https://thenarwhal.ca/real-reason-canada-crisis-over-kinder-morgan-pipeline/ https://www.dogwoodbc.ca/news/six-reasons-kinder-morgan-hope/?srsltid=AfmBOoqI4qiLFmiW1fpWjewcyNbCxK35DLC-0AlRpwh-Tp3ih53yzvOr Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
I am Groot Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 2 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Nope...the indigenous have always been against the pipeline,...the links I posted made note of that but but hey, if you have difficulty reading maybe get assistance LOL I didn't say they, or some of them (the ones being paid), aren't against pipelines. I said they don't have any kind of control over them, other than those that would actually cross their reservations. Try to keep up. This is a discussion on legal and constitutional powers. 1 Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 34 minutes ago, I am Groot said: I didn't say they, or some of them (the ones being paid), aren't against pipelines. I said they don't have any kind of control over them, other than those that would actually cross their reservations. Try to keep up. This is a discussion on legal and constitutional powers. Unfortunately, the deals BC government and the feds have made with the indigenous...there is no way west from Alberta that does not cross their land Even our Highway 1 crosses indigenous land many times so...they could block the highway LOL There have been numerous "discussions" and the indians won Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ironstone Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 It's extremely difficult to get any major projects done in Canada if they require Indigenous approval. The chiefs have to be $atisfied in some way. And all that in spite of the fact that the Indian Affairs budget in Canada has almost TRIPLED since 2015. 1 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 59 minutes ago, ironstone said: It's extremely difficult to get any major projects done in Canada if they require Indigenous approval. The chiefs have to be $atisfied in some way. And all that in spite of the fact that the Indian Affairs budget in Canada has almost TRIPLED since 2015. "While some reports have highlighted, in past years, top earners making over $250,000 to nearly $1 million—often due to bonuses from economic development projects or, rarely, very high salary agreements". "In some cases, high total remuneration includes bonuses, honoraria, and travel expenses, especially if the chief also acts as the economic development office" What many/most people do not know is that the indigenous get free housing and infrastructure for their "land/reserves/nations". They also get free support and maintenance for their infrastructure....along with salaries for life. The Indian Affairs budget can only go up year after year as everything costs more. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 5 hours ago, ExFlyer said: See, the ExFlyer degenerate pedophile LOSER junkie responds again ROFLMAO!!! Yes, exflyer, the degerate pedophile loser and junkie apperently, responded again (waves!!) LOL i suspect you meant to write that differently I love it when you post drunk on the weekends! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 (edited) 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: ROFLMAO!!! Y... LOL i suspect you meant to write that differently I love it when you post drunk on the weekends! Once more...another degenerate, pedophile LOSER confux BS post!! LOL It proves I totally live rent free in your head kid You are now officially a ExFlyer junkie...addicted to me...cannot help yourself and have to respond to all my posts over and over and over again...Naloxone cannot help you junkie. LOL confux cannot respond to anyone without throwing insults to everyone he responds to. LOL Another thread ruined by the junkie confux LOL Oh and, I don't drink...cancer made me quit and weekends??? What are they...every day is Saturday to me LOL. Once again your insults FAILED...as expected from a degenerate pedophile LOSER LOL Edited February 7 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Goddess Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Carney’s energy superpower talk isn’t cutting it—we need action - The Hub "The pancake stack of investment-killing climate regulations introduced by former ministers of environment Catherine McKenna, Jonathan Wilkinson, and Steven Guilbeault is not only largely intact; additional phases of their legacy policies are kicking in, and new ones are being added by Carney." You tell me, just how "different" is his approach to the previous LPC Trudeau government, when in fact it is likely WORSE: -> ECCC from Dec 19, proposing a new and aggressive approach to industrial carbon pricing that not only contradicts the Alberta-federal MOU, it adds uncertainty to any new plans being considered for electricity, O&G, etc. -> Then came finalized methane regs which the Canadian Gas Association says will cost $3000/CO2 tonne to comply with and CAPP says will impose $14.6 billion in compliance costs. Just as we are trying to get FID on two major LNG projects -> Then Canada said they were going to continue work on a green taxonomy, and named the Canadian Climate Institute to lead it, which is viewed by many in industry as ideological, some of their proposals as even “radical." -> Meanwhile other legacy policies and reviews from the Trudeau era continue, such as new 2025 building code - Greenhouse Gas provisions (OpGHG) , that will limit choice in home heating to achieve net zero, ie harder to build for natural gas heating. This is a classic bait and switch, Carney is smarter than Trudeau. He is telling Canadians one thing and doing the opposite by keeping existing regulations in place and sneakily tucking in new ones. We need to wake up before it’s too late, and I fear it may already be. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
CdnFox Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Once more...another degenerate, pedophile LOSER exflyer BS post!! LOL Yes it was another one of your drunken BS posts 16 minutes ago, Goddess said: Carney’s energy superpower talk isn’t cutting it—we need action - The Hub "The pancake stack of investment-killing climate regulations introduced by former ministers of environment Catherine McKenna, Jonathan Wilkinson, and Steven Guilbeault is not only largely intact; additional phases of their legacy policies are kicking in, and new ones are being added by Carney." You tell me, just how "different" is his approach to the previous LPC Trudeau government, when in fact it is likely WORSE: -> ECCC from Dec 19, proposing a new and aggressive approach to industrial carbon pricing that not only contradicts the Alberta-federal MOU, it adds uncertainty to any new plans being considered for electricity, O&G, etc. -> Then came finalized methane regs which the Canadian Gas Association says will cost $3000/CO2 tonne to comply with and CAPP says will impose $14.6 billion in compliance costs. Just as we are trying to get FID on two major LNG projects -> Then Canada said they were going to continue work on a green taxonomy, and named the Canadian Climate Institute to lead it, which is viewed by many in industry as ideological, some of their proposals as even “radical." -> Meanwhile other legacy policies and reviews from the Trudeau era continue, such as new 2025 building code - Greenhouse Gas provisions (OpGHG) , that will limit choice in home heating to achieve net zero, ie harder to build for natural gas heating. This is a classic bait and switch, Carney is smarter than Trudeau. He is telling Canadians one thing and doing the opposite by keeping existing regulations in place and sneakily tucking in new ones. We need to wake up before it’s too late, and I fear it may already be. I said it when it was announced, and I don't think there's anyone with a quarter of a brain who doesn't see what he did there. We're not going to get new pipelines. We're not going to get significant investment. We'll get a few small deals here and there but don't come close to making up for what we've lost and in the meantime we will borrow whatever money is necessary to make sure Brookfield and other groups that will pay carney after he leaves are well funded Canada is now a money-making machine for Kearney and his friends and that is all it is 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 51 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yes it was another one I.. Once more...another degenerate, pedophile LOSER confux BS post!! LOL It proves I totally live rent free in your head kid You are now officially a ExFlyer junkie...addicted to me...cannot help yourself and have to respond to all my posts over and over and over again...Naloxone cannot help you junkie. LOL confux cannot respond to anyone without throwing insults to everyone he responds to. LOL Another thread ruined by the junkie confux LOL Oh and, I don't drink...cancer made me quit and weekends??? What are they...every day is Saturday to me LOL. Once again your insults FAILED...as expected from a degenerate pedophile LOSER LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 hour ago, Goddess said: Carney’s energy superpower talk isn’t cutting it—we need action - The Hub "The pancake stack of investment-killing climate regulations introduced by former ministers of environment Catherine McKenna, Jonathan Wilkinson, and Steven Guilbeault is not only largely intact; additional phases of their legacy policies are kicking in, and new ones are being added by Carney." You tell me, just how "different" is his approach to the previous LPC Trudeau government, when in fact it is likely WORSE: -> ECCC from Dec 19, proposing a new and aggressive approach to industrial carbon pricing that not only contradicts the Alberta-federal MOU, it adds uncertainty to any new plans being considered for electricity, O&G, etc. -> Then came finalized methane regs which the Canadian Gas Association says will cost $3000/CO2 tonne to comply with and CAPP says will impose $14.6 billion in compliance costs. Just as we are trying to get FID on two major LNG projects -> Then Canada said they were going to continue work on a green taxonomy, and named the Canadian Climate Institute to lead it, which is viewed by many in industry as ideological, some of their proposals as even “radical." -> Meanwhile other legacy policies and reviews from the Trudeau era continue, such as new 2025 building code - Greenhouse Gas provisions (OpGHG) , that will limit choice in home heating to achieve net zero, ie harder to build for natural gas heating. This is a classic bait and switch, Carney is smarter than Trudeau. He is telling Canadians one thing and doing the opposite by keeping existing regulations in place and sneakily tucking in new ones. We need to wake up before it’s too late, and I fear it may already be. Old opinion post...who cares...Carney is still the Prime Minister and out polled PP by more then double . It for sure is too late...PP lost the election and Carney is waaaay ahead in popularity for Canadians LOL LOL LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.