Army Guy Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 19 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: You follow the exact schtick your party leader espouses.... So what is your idea and solution to the US being hell bent of weakening our economy? I told you twice now fentanyl is a problem everywhere and here in Canada as well. I really don't care about your stats because the fact is Trump only brought up fentanyl as a national security emergency so he could impose tariffs. If you believe we should throw another $1.3B at it then fine, but I'm sure you'll b*tch about that spending if they did it. Nahhhh.... I find Poilievre both annoying and amusing at the same time but he certainly doesn't live in my head. He's more of an afterthought than anything.... Sorry well above my pay grade, but I'm sure if we are going to come to a comprise we need to be sitting at the table...and yes there is going to be some compromises to be made, what they are i'm not sure...But according to the below article we are not even in the same game as the us.... Barry Appleton: Canada's 'hopium' U.S. trade strategy all talk, no troops Again, this is not about trump this is about looking after our won border security that Border services and RCMP have repeatedly said is very weak....I now what do they know they are not inside the liberal circle....I think we should invest what ever we need to invest to secure our borders....because i don't know about you but 1 % of all containers and zero percent of rail cars, does not give me a sense of security... Thats another problem with Liberals they don't care about stats....Trump has a point more than 73,000 Americans die each year just from fentanyl...and more than 200,000 from all drugs every year....it would be a national security item for me as well....And if your going to pledge 1.3 bil, (which was peanuts)you should do just that....I don't here any conservative b1tching about any spending our our security apparatus... because it benefits all Canadians... That's all we here from the leftist in the crowd, just how bad PP is, when he is Just the leader of the opposition party, he's given the liberal party more well thought out plans and ideas than any of Carneys cabinet has...If the liberals spent as much time solving problems in Canada as they do talking about PP all of our issues would be solved....And PP lives in every liberals head...it's all they talk about, yourself included... 1 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Army Guy Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 20 hours ago, eyeball said: Get a grip. The left is not responsible for the export of American weapons across our border. Who set our gun policies up, who decided not to fully fund Border services or RCMP police, You seem to forget WHO has been in charge in the last 10 plus years....IF the liberals were serious about these policies they would have put funding towards all these crimes, instead they decided to attack legal gun owners who are not the problem...they also decided to attack kids, BB and pellet guns , airsoft guns, replica guns, paint ball guns, bolt action rifles and shotguns... 1 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
LinkSoul60 Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 41 minutes ago, Army Guy said: Sorry well above my pay grade, but I'm sure if we are going to come to a comprise we need to be sitting at the table...and yes there is going to be some compromises to be made, what they are i'm not sure...But according to the below article we are not even in the same game as the us.... Barry Appleton: Canada's 'hopium' U.S. trade strategy all talk, no troops Again, this is not about trump this is about looking after our won border security that Border services and RCMP have repeatedly said is very weak....I now what do they know they are not inside the liberal circle....I think we should invest what ever we need to invest to secure our borders....because i don't know about you but 1 % of all containers and zero percent of rail cars, does not give me a sense of security... Thats another problem with Liberals they don't care about stats....Trump has a point more than 73,000 Americans die each year just from fentanyl...and more than 200,000 from all drugs every year....it would be a national security item for me as well....And if your going to pledge 1.3 bil, (which was peanuts)you should do just that....I don't here any conservative b1tching about any spending our our security apparatus... because it benefits all Canadians... That's all we here from the leftist in the crowd, just how bad PP is, when he is Just the leader of the opposition party, he's given the liberal party more well thought out plans and ideas than any of Carneys cabinet has...If the liberals spent as much time solving problems in Canada as they do talking about PP all of our issues would be solved....And PP lives in every liberals head...it's all they talk about, yourself included... So Barry Appleton advocates to bring on more people like him as trade consultants. Wonder why.... Fact is he doesn't know what the discussions are either and suggests we need more people like Barry to help us. Got it. I'll say it again.... you'd complain if we spent more money on border security. You complained about defence spending and I'm sure you'd complain with more border spending. Hopefully they do increase container inspections and the costs associated with it. We'll revisit if/when that happens. Your admiration for Trump is admirable and not surprising given most of the maple Maga's here adore him as well. Given that he's the direct reason for our current economic challenge and direction you may want to reconsider touting Carney as a failure. There's a conflict of argument for you with that. And no, Poilievre's not in my head. He's irrelevant.... Quote
Army Guy Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: So Barry Appleton advocates to bring on more people like him as trade consultants. Wonder why.... Fact is he doesn't know what the discussions are either and suggests we need more people like Barry to help us. Got it. I'll say it again.... you'd complain if we spent more money on border security. You complained about defence spending and I'm sure you'd complain with more border spending. Hopefully they do increase container inspections and the costs associated with it. We'll revisit if/when that happens. Your admiration for Trump is admirable and not surprising given most of the maple Maga's here adore him as well. Given that he's the direct reason for our current economic challenge and direction you may want to reconsider touting Carney as a failure. There's a conflict of argument for you with that. And no, Poilievre's not in my head. He's irrelevant.... Sorry wrong guy, i have ben a long advocate for increasing defense spending along with our entire security apparatus...what i object to is how that funding is spent, and the whole process that is our purchasing department. But nice try, i guess if you have no facts you start pulling facts out of that 1/4 inch orifice you have... That's the entire liberal platform tied up in a few words "We'll revisit if/when that happens." until then remember to stick your heads in the sand...it is not a problem if you don't see it... Not a big trump fan, but he has brought to light a lot of Canadian made issues that we have done to ourselves, that we have taken advantage of the US good will in many different areas...As for the tariffs you said we can afford that and much more so what are you worried about....So what is it are we in trouble or should we compromise with trump and end this trade war... I have not touted Carney as a failure, i have pointed out he has not done much since taking office...i also have said come budget time is going to be a pucker factor for all liberals , since he no longer enjoys support from any one party...and the NDP are pretty much dead.... If he is irrelevant then you got no worries, if fact you should be encouraging conservatives to support him....but nah he lives in there rent free, like many liberals Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
LinkSoul60 Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 1 hour ago, Army Guy said: Sorry wrong guy, i have ben a long advocate for increasing defense spending along with our entire security apparatus...what i object to is how that funding is spent, and the whole process that is our purchasing department. But nice try, i guess if you have no facts you start pulling facts out of that 1/4 inch orifice you have... That's the entire liberal platform tied up in a few words "We'll revisit if/when that happens." until then remember to stick your heads in the sand...it is not a problem if you don't see it... Not a big trump fan, but he has brought to light a lot of Canadian made issues that we have done to ourselves, that we have taken advantage of the US good will in many different areas...As for the tariffs you said we can afford that and much more so what are you worried about....So what is it are we in trouble or should we compromise with trump and end this trade war... I have not touted Carney as a failure, i have pointed out he has not done much since taking office...i also have said come budget time is going to be a pucker factor for all liberals , since he no longer enjoys support from any one party...and the NDP are pretty much dead.... If he is irrelevant then you got no worries, if fact you should be encouraging conservatives to support him....but nah he lives in there rent free, like many liberals You've complained about liberal spending, don't deny that. Now you say we need to spend more than the $1.3B we commited to back in November. Why? You're certainly enough of a Trump fan with the comment 'taking advantage of the US goodwill in many different areas'. That's his line... Best I can tell from the trade we have with them, which is mostly raw materials, components and energy that a large part of their manufacturing sector runs off of the 'goodwill' is mutual. And I've said repeatedly we won't win any trade war with the US but we can most certainly afford to wait for a deal that is in the best interests of our country, which is why no deal has been done yet. Again, I have no idea what the discussions are so I certainly can't answer you asking why we shouldn't compromise. Compromise on what? And no, he isn't in my head but there is enjoyment from time to time throwing him back at you loyal cons when the liberal comes out. 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 On 9/16/2025 at 7:43 PM, Shady said: I have no words. The perfect summary of the LPOC's commitment to Canada. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
taxme Posted September 23, 2025 Report Posted September 23, 2025 On 9/16/2025 at 8:21 PM, CdnFox said: People don't understand that this is generational damage and there is no easy recovery from it now And Carney is already making it worse. Carney obviously intends to keep deficits at the 60 to 70 billion dollar range for the next 4 years minimum. And the deficits may be higher than that on average. Our debt load will be so high there will be absolutely no room to maneuver and all it will take is a slight bump in interest rates to sink the ship. I see that the leftwing lieberal troll dummy gave you an arrows down. What a piece of crap that imbecile is. It's like he wants to see Canada go down the woke and broke tubes. If that imbecile is not a communist, it would really shock me. 😇 1 1 Quote
taxme Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 On 9/16/2025 at 7:43 PM, Shady said: I have no words. There are no words to describe as to what the globalist Marxist lieberaLs have done to what was once a great country called Canada. And they have four more years to finish off Canada for good. Canada is in big time trouble ahead. I know that you and no doubt many others here do not want to hear that i am all in favor of western Canada separation from the lieberal Marxist eastern elite from Quebec. The french Marxist elite from Quebec have done a great job of trying to destroy Canada as we once knew it and they are trying to turn Canada into a Marxist globalist 3rd world multicultural hell hole. I will even go for Alberta separating from Canada. As far as i am concerned, Canada is dead and like i always like to say RIP Canada. It's been a slice. Just my belief and opinion. 😇 1 Quote
Army Guy Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: You've complained about liberal spending, don't deny that. Now you say we need to spend more than the $1.3B we commited to back in November. Why? You're certainly enough of a Trump fan with the comment 'taking advantage of the US goodwill in many different areas'. That's his line... Best I can tell from the trade we have with them, which is mostly raw materials, components and energy that a large part of their manufacturing sector runs off of the 'goodwill' is mutual. And I've said repeatedly we won't win any trade war with the US but we can most certainly afford to wait for a deal that is in the best interests of our country, which is why no deal has been done yet. Again, I have no idea what the discussions are so I certainly can't answer you asking why we shouldn't compromise. Compromise on what? And no, he isn't in my head but there is enjoyment from time to time throwing him back at you loyal cons when the liberal comes out. Yes i have complained about liberal spending which is out of control, Do you think doubling the national debt in less than 5 years is good fiscal planning, with no efforts to control spending in this new term either........ but that's not what you accused me off is it...1.3 bil is peanuts and you know it....when Border services says it does not have the tools to do their job what message does that send to you....that perhaps 1.3 bil is enough...the hiring of under a 1000 new people will some how plug the gaps...And according to the CBSA, there is NO plan to hire anyone....yet....their words not mine....SO we have rented a few Helos do you think we can close the books on border security now... https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=675326492265953 Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
LinkSoul60 Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 2 hours ago, Army Guy said: Yes i have complained about liberal spending which is out of control, Do you think doubling the national debt in less than 5 years is good fiscal planning, with no efforts to control spending in this new term either........ but that's not what you accused me off is it...1.3 bil is peanuts and you know it....when Border services says it does not have the tools to do their job what message does that send to you....that perhaps 1.3 bil is enough...the hiring of under a 1000 new people will some how plug the gaps...And according to the CBSA, there is NO plan to hire anyone....yet....their words not mine....SO we have rented a few Helos do you think we can close the books on border security now... https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=675326492265953 So we got from me saying the reason Trump played the fentanyl card was so that he could declare national emergency and impose tariffs, to the ins and outs of the border spend... I agree we need to do a much better job of inspecting containers that arrive by sea or land but also say it's not the national emergency he makes it out to be from what goes through the northern border. That was done for his tariff 'policy'. Quote
Army Guy Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 17 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: So we got from me saying the reason Trump played the fentanyl card was so that he could declare national emergency and impose tariffs, to the ins and outs of the border spend... I agree we need to do a much better job of inspecting containers that arrive by sea or land but also say it's not the national emergency he makes it out to be from what goes through the northern border. That was done for his tariff 'policy'. Having the manpower and resources to just check 1 % of all containers coming into the country and zero % of rail cars, Says it all, and when you combine all of that with reports made up from Border services there is a huge red flag......i mean it could get worse we could not be checking anything at all, you could by those numbers smuggle in a main battle tank on a open flat car and odds are nobody would even see it or investigate it...At 1 % i would have thought a G-7 nation would at least be able to hit the 50 % mark....But some how YOU think we should be able to do better, but it is not an emergency....And trump did not have to rub our noses in that, we has a sovereign nation and a G-7 nation should have had the leadership and knowledge to fix that on our own....But we would rather skip all those responsibilities of having a sovereign nation like our entire security apparatus and use those funds on social projects that are nice to have, That's liberal thinking....As for tariffs you said Carney has all that in hand, that the reason he got voted in for right....so why are you worried about tariffs... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
eyeball Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 3 minutes ago, Army Guy said: At 1 % i would have thought a G-7 nation would at least be able to hit the 50 % mark.... We did the math before on this and even checking half the millions of containers entering Canada every year the cost and required manpower would make the Dept of Checking Containers the biggest government department in Canada. Maybe the world. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Army Guy Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 36 minutes ago, eyeball said: We did the math before on this and even checking half the millions of containers entering Canada every year the cost and required manpower would make the Dept of Checking Containers the biggest government department in Canada. Maybe the world. So i guess we say F*ck it , lets save some dollars and not check anything i mean we are almost there right now...1 %... So it becomes the largest department in the federal government, what are you worried about some of your social programs getting cut....or maybe we look to tech to find solutions, or some place else.......you guys on the left are to quick to quit and give up....we run a rail line across the country without any modern tools and we can't figure out how to inspect containers in a timely manner... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted September 24, 2025 Report Posted September 24, 2025 1 hour ago, Army Guy said: Having the manpower and resources to just check 1 % of all containers coming into the country and zero % of rail cars, Says it all, It's not about manpower. The bad guys control the ports and that's not changing soon. 1 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 (edited) 1 hour ago, Army Guy said: So it becomes the largest department in the federal government, what are you worried about some of your social programs getting cut... No, I'm worried about how retarded the right will get when it becomes the biggest dept in the federal government on top of all the rest. Cut social programs? Surely you jest.... ...cut social programs...LMAO! Edited September 25, 2025 by eyeball Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
LinkSoul60 Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 5 hours ago, Army Guy said: Having the manpower and resources to just check 1 % of all containers coming into the country and zero % of rail cars, Says it all, and when you combine all of that with reports made up from Border services there is a huge red flag......i mean it could get worse we could not be checking anything at all, you could by those numbers smuggle in a main battle tank on a open flat car and odds are nobody would even see it or investigate it...At 1 % i would have thought a G-7 nation would at least be able to hit the 50 % mark....But some how YOU think we should be able to do better, but it is not an emergency....And trump did not have to rub our noses in that, we has a sovereign nation and a G-7 nation should have had the leadership and knowledge to fix that on our own....But we would rather skip all those responsibilities of having a sovereign nation like our entire security apparatus and use those funds on social projects that are nice to have, That's liberal thinking....As for tariffs you said Carney has all that in hand, that the reason he got voted in for right....so why are you worried about tariffs... Whatever with the 1% and tanks and combats vehicles but yeah, more containers need to be inspected. Trump isn't rubbing it in our faces, you are. What's the stuff about the Trudeau years. Rearview mirror now and can only fix or improve unless there's any other options.... 1 Quote
I am Groot Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 17 hours ago, Army Guy said: So i guess we say F*ck it , lets save some dollars and not check anything That seems to pretty much be the belief of our refugee determination system... 2 1 Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
Army Guy Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said: Whatever with the 1% and tanks and combats vehicles but yeah, more containers need to be inspected. Trump isn't rubbing it in our faces, you are. What's the stuff about the Trudeau years. Rearview mirror now and can only fix or improve unless there's any other options.... I think the 1 % remark says it all, i know your not good at math but that means 99 % go unchecked, free to enter the country regardless of what is in these containers...and still no red flag on your side... This was Carneys chance to fix it....and his decisive decision was 1.3 bil.... which according to border services has not even arrived yet, there are NO new recruits being hired with this new funding....what did happen was the liberals rented 4 Blackhawk helos....I wonder what message that sends to trump....it's the big middle finger.... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Army Guy Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 17 hours ago, eyeball said: No, I'm worried about how retarded the right will get when it becomes the biggest dept in the federal government on top of all the rest. Cut social programs? Surely you jest.... ...cut social programs...LMAO! Yes the moon will fall Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 51 minutes ago, Army Guy said: I think the 1 % remark says it all, i know your not good at math but that means 99 % go unchecked, free to enter the country regardless of what is in these containers...and still no red flag on your side... This was Carneys chance to fix it....and his decisive decision was 1.3 bil.... which according to border services has not even arrived yet, there are NO new recruits being hired with this new funding....what did happen was the liberals rented 4 Blackhawk helos....I wonder what message that sends to trump....it's the big middle finger.... Again, you are 100% wrong. You have no idea what you're talking about and you're blathering like the kind of uneducated person who says we can replace all of our military with drones because he read a story about drones.. The bad guys control our ports entirely. They entirely control the unions, every worker, and many of the 'inspectors' and such. You think NOBODY has thought about adding more searches over the years? The unions are 100 percent in the control of the gangs and criminal orgs, and even the 1 percent of searches happen where and when the dock people allow it. to deal with this you'd have to cancel the unions and disband al the workers and start fresh and that would be a political nightmare of biblical proportions and goes WAAAAY beyond just adding a few more bucks to allow for more searches. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
LinkSoul60 Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 3 hours ago, Army Guy said: I think the 1 % remark says it all, i know your not good at math but that means 99 % go unchecked, free to enter the country regardless of what is in these containers...and still no red flag on your side... This was Carneys chance to fix it....and his decisive decision was 1.3 bil.... which according to border services has not even arrived yet, there are NO new recruits being hired with this new funding....what did happen was the liberals rented 4 Blackhawk helos....I wonder what message that sends to trump....it's the big middle finger.... If you're going to debate, at least get your facts aligned first. The Trudeau government announced the 1.3B border security spend in December. That was before Carney was on the scene. And good on Carney for flipping Trump the bird. Flip him both for good measure. Quote
Army Guy Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: Again, you are 100% wrong. You have no idea what you're talking about and you're blathering like the kind of uneducated person who says we can replace all of our military with drones because he read a story about drones.. The bad guys control our ports entirely. They entirely control the unions, every worker, and many of the 'inspectors' and such. You think NOBODY has thought about adding more searches over the years? The unions are 100 percent in the control of the gangs and criminal orgs, and even the 1 percent of searches happen where and when the dock people allow it. to deal with this you'd have to cancel the unions and disband al the workers and start fresh and that would be a political nightmare of biblical proportions and goes WAAAAY beyond just adding a few more bucks to allow for more searches. Not sure why your going off like some liberal with his hair on fire....The facts i mentioned are not mine , but come from CBSA, if you got something different that says other wise then produce it , or put your hair out at least...Not even sure of what to make of the drone comment.......What i pointed out was only searching or scanning 1% of containers and zero rail cars is "unacceptable" might as well be zero for all the good it does, and save bils in doing so.............that's not security that's leaving the door open and hoping nothing really bad gets through our borders.. I guess your telling me to believe that some guy on the intra net tells me our nations port facilities are in the hands of criminal elements....and they control ALL commerce coming in and out of the country...I think that if the government wanted to put the time and resources into it yes i think they could search as many containers as they wished...Has anyone thought of doing more search's , i don't know the liberals do a lot of thinking but lack any will for action....Again you making statements with no sources... Well that does not say much for our countries sovereignty does it. Who actual runs the country, when we have criminal groups dictating what is allowed in or out of the country....kind of makes CBSA pointless does it not...along with most of the other security apparatus... You make it sound like it could never be done...like they are the ones actually in charge of the nation.......that some how these organizations dictate the actions of our elected officials...That's some story there skippy, i can't wait to read all about it... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Army Guy Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: If you're going to debate, at least get your facts aligned first. The Trudeau government announced the 1.3B border security spend in December. That was before Carney was on the scene. And good on Carney for flipping Trump the bird. Flip him both for good measure. Quote Anandasangaree said the new bill, dubbed the Strong Borders Act, builds upon the $1.3-billion border security package announced last December that saw the appointment of a fentanyl czar and new equipment for the RCMP at the border, among other measures. Your right Justin did approve the increase in funding....for the same reasons as i stated, to placate Trump....And this is sad to say but Justin has done more for the border than Carney...Which really was peanuts As for the new recruits promised https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/readouts/2025/01/22/prime-minister-justin-trudeau-speaks-premiers-canada-us-relationship-and#:~:text=The Government of Canada is,increased law enforcement co-ordination. Carneys promise to hire on more CBSA and RCMP to combat crime, CBSA reports not a single CBSA recruit has been hired... https://liberal.ca/mark-carneys-liberals-release-plan-to-fight-crime-protect-canadians-and-build-safer-communities/ https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1922856338275987 "watch the Conservative MP where he asks liberals the question how many CBSA officers have been hired...." Not covered by any media outlets.... Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
CdnFox Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 8 minutes ago, Army Guy said: Not sure why your going off like some liberal with his hair on fire.... Not sure why you're repeating nonsense like a trudeau era appointee Quote The facts i mentioned are not mine , but come from CBSA, Your comment was that carney missed an opportunity and that didn't come from cbsa. What I'm advising you is that the problem isn't what you think it is. And while the statistics you quoted may be accurate they're not demonstrating the problem that needs to be resolved and you're making statements that are ridiculous in light of the actual challenges. "MOAR SERCHES' isn't the issue. It wouldn't help. You don't need to believe me tho, go read laura palmer's work. I was just listening to her talk in person the other day and this came up again specifically. And that girl knows more than the cops do about gangs and the criminal underworld, she is one of the foremost experts in Canada on this stuff. Not that it's any great secret. You could have found all this stuff out if you'd actually gone looking yourself fairly quickly. But you have a real problem with accepting facts or truth that you don't like. And you have an even bigger problem doing your own research. Maybe stop whining and go actually read about this stuff. Our ports are firmly and completely in control of the criminal underground and if you try and do anything to change that they will shut the ports down and cost billions of dollars a day in business losses and fight tooth and nail. And they've got the laws on their sides because they've got the unions on their side. There is a reason why there are no police at those facilities despite it being a federal responsibility. And it's not lack of funding You well know that there's not many times I miss an opportunity to criticize carney. But in this case it has nothing to do with what you're talking about Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
LinkSoul60 Posted September 25, 2025 Report Posted September 25, 2025 13 minutes ago, Army Guy said: Your right Justin did approve the increase in funding....for the same reasons as i stated, to placate Trump....And this is sad to say but Justin has done more for the border than Carney...Which really was peanuts As for the new recruits promised https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/readouts/2025/01/22/prime-minister-justin-trudeau-speaks-premiers-canada-us-relationship-and#:~:text=The Government of Canada is,increased law enforcement co-ordination. Carneys promise to hire on more CBSA and RCMP to combat crime, CBSA reports not a single CBSA recruit has been hired... https://liberal.ca/mark-carneys-liberals-release-plan-to-fight-crime-protect-canadians-and-build-safer-communities/ https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1922856338275987 "watch the Conservative MP where he asks liberals the question how many CBSA officers have been hired...." Not covered by any media outlets.... Wrong, Trudeau agreed to this while Biden was in office. Regardless... https://www.canada.ca/en/services/defence/securingborder/strengthen-border-security/securing-canada-us-border-to-date.html Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.