Global Warming: Man-Made or Natural?

[robosmith]

15 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

What a  fool...I've been.

ftfy...

[robosmith]

16 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I dispute there exists an issue. So the temps rose a bit. Longer growing seasons. All good.

Your dispute was not worth the time it took you to type ^this due to your near complete IGNRANCE about the science and EVIDENCE.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

What a  fool...

I dispute there exists an issue. So the temps rose a bit. Longer growing seasons. All good.

Yes well, provide the indisputable evidence this being the case for peer review and you will find yourself the recipient of a Nobel Peace prize, millions in cash rewards and you'll be buried under a pile of underwear that would make Steven Tyler blush.

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yes well, provide the indisputable evidence this being the case for peer review and you will find yourself the recipient of a Nobel Peace prize, millions in cash rewards and you'll be buried under a pile of underwear that would make Steven Tyler blush.

I dont have to. Im not claiming the climate is a problem worthy of creating inflation. That would be...you.

You wanna continue this imposition on the very base of the global economy...justify it.

[eyeball]

24 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I dont have to. Im not claiming the climate is a problem worthy of creating inflation. That would be...you.

AGW has been contributing to inflation for some time and will increasingly do so in the future.

Yes, that's how far out to lunch and behind the times your perspective is.

[eyeball]

38 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I dont have to. Im not claiming the climate is a problem worthy of creating inflation.

Okay fùck that then. What about creating personal fame...the Nobel the money the panties? C'mon man show a little conviction and initiative...sheesh.

[Nationalist]

29 minutes ago, eyeball said:

AGW has been contributing to inflation for some time and will increasingly do so in the future.

Yes, that's how far out to lunch and behind the times your perspective is.

Except...our 2 North American  countries are changing their tune now. If the Conservatives can gain power here, the positive impact will be even better.

 

[Nationalist]

34 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Okay fùck that then. What about creating personal fame...the Nobel the money the panties? C'mon man show a little conviction and initiative...sheesh.

Lol...yes fck that. You can't prove climate change is all man made, let alone a major problem. Yet you're all in on financial imposition and inflation to enforce your unprovable theories.

Gee...that sounds rather...authoritarian. 

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You can't prove climate change is all man made, let alone a major problem. Yet you're all in on financial imposition and inflation to enforce your unprovable theories.

Gee...that sounds rather...authoritarian

And apparently you can prove it's not an issue and save everyone the imposition and inflation but you don't.

That sounds like chickenshit.

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I dont have to. Im not claiming the climate is a problem worthy of creating inflation. That would be...you.

You wanna continue this imposition on the very base of the global economy...justify it.

You've got it bass ackwards. When complete disaster is looming over your head, the smart move is to spend a little NOW to avoid a major catastrophe which costs much more. 

But you never were very smart... since you took that short term advantage, cause money was more important to you than KNOWLEGE and WISDOM or learning HOW TO THINK.

You keep demonstrating that HERE by CLINGING to ideas you decided LONG AGO instead of keeping up with NEW EVIDENCE that is decidedly AGAINST YOUR CONCLUSIONS.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Except...our 2 North American  countries are changing their tune now. If the Conservatives can gain power here, the positive impact will be even better.

You're JUST ASSuming without EVIDENCE it will be positive and ONLY BECAUSER it will be a lighter hit on  your pocketbook IN THE SHORT TERM. Just like when you DROPPED OUT.

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...yes fck that. You can't prove climate change is all man made, let alone a major problem. Yet you're all in on financial imposition and inflation to enforce your unprovable theories.

Gee...that sounds rather...authoritarian. 

OTHERS PROVED IT and YOUR IGNORANCE does NOT make that EVIDENCE GO AWAY.

Edited August 26, 2025 by robosmith

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

And apparently you can prove it's not an issue and save everyone the imposition and inflation but you don't.

That sounds like chickenshit.

It is Dunning-Kruger in action. gnat girl imagines she is smarter than most ALL of the climate scientists even though she's never cracked a climate science journal.

Just give her an economics consultant and that's all that matters.

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

And apparently you can prove it's not an issue and save everyone the imposition and inflation but you don't.

That sounds like chickenshit.

If I accuse you of being pedophile, do you have to prove your innocence? Or do I have to prove you're "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt".

And there is plenty of reasonable doubt. Including one glaring source of doubt.

@robosmith has followed your post with 3 successive posts. 2 directly to me and one to you...with  desperation. Im a girl...I'm uneducated and so on.

This looks bad for you because...as I'm sure you've noticed...robo is generally wrong about everything.

Edited August 26, 2025 by Nationalist

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

If I accuse you of being pedophile, do you have to prove your innocence?

Yes I do if you've provided evidence.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

If I accuse you of being pedophile, do you have to prove your innocence? Or do I have to prove you're "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt".

And there is plenty of reasonable doubt. Including one glaring source of doubt.

@robosmith has followed your post with 3 successive posts. 2 directly to me and one to you...with  desperation. Im a girl...I'm uneducated and so on.

This looks bad for you because...as I'm sure you've noticed...robo is generally wrong about everything.

Too bad you have NO REAL ARGUMENTS with which to dispute what I post and have ONLY RESORT to ^ad hominems.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Yes I do if you've provided evidence.

That's not entirely correct.

[eyeball]

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

That's not entirely correct.

Care to explain how or why - you just get to leave your accusations and denials hanging out there without any requirement to account for them?

[Deluge]

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

Marxism is the future. Do not resist it. 

ftfy...

[Nationalist]

30 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Care to explain how or why - you just get to leave your accusations and denials hanging out there without any requirement to account for them?

"Innocent until POVEN guilty."

If you can't prove guilt, no defense is necessary.

For instance...wanna bet trump's conviction for fraud in NY gets overturned? It will eventually because nobody can prove he's guilty of anything. Hell there's not even a victim.

Edited August 26, 2025 by Nationalist

[Michael Hardner]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"Innocent until POVEN guilty."

If you can't prove guilt, no defense is necessary.

I think I see where you are going but 'proof' isn't required to act against a perceived risk or threat.

Safety, as an example, comes to mind as an analogy: you don't need proof that an accident is going to happen to take safety measures.

Another angle is that large complex phenomenon can't be 'proved' in the way a mathematical theorem is.  You can't 'prove' smoking causes lung cancer, for example

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said:

I think I see where you are going but 'proof' isn't required to act against a perceived risk or threat.

Safety, as an example, comes to mind as an analogy: you don't need proof that an accident is going to happen to take safety measures.

Another angle is that large complex phenomenon can't be 'proved' in the way a mathematical theorem is.  You can't 'prove' smoking causes lung cancer, for example

Except when you grossly overestimate the threat and the risk...

Which, as we've already discovered...

You have.

[robosmith]

42 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"Innocent until POVEN guilty."

If you can't prove guilt, no defense is necessary.

For instance...wanna bet trump's conviction for fraud in NY gets overturned? It will eventually because nobody can prove he's guilty of anything. Hell there's not even a victim.

A victim is not required for the violation of banking laws REQUIRING truthful answers when applying for credit.

Do believe you get to set the standard for a foreign nation's laws against FRAUD? LMAO

40 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Except when you grossly overestimate the threat and the risk...

Which, as we've already discovered...

You have.

You mean YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE. But YOUR IGNORANCE about the MATTER has been PROVEN BY YOU.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

1. Except when you grossly overestimate the threat and the risk...

2. Which, as we've already discovered... You have.

1. Well the assessment has to take into account how real the claims are.

2. I haven't discussed this with you at all.  I don't think I have discussed on here very much, at least not in recent years.

[Nationalist]

45 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Well the assessment has to take into account how real the claims are.

2. I haven't discussed this with you at all.  I don't think I have discussed on here very much, at least not in recent years.

1. Oh the claims are real...the conclusions are a miss though.

2. Mike we discussed this not more than 2 days ago. 

[eyeball]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Innocent until POVEN guilty

We're talking about AGW and instead of evidence you seem to think reasonable doubt can be based on things like your feelings about Trump or some compulsive need to slander people.

Your doubts are unreasonable to the point of being ridiculous.

As I've pointed out before, in your case in particular, you will happily fry the planet simply for the shits and giggles you get from the opportunity it gives you to stick it to libbies.