Danielle Smith Address to Albertans

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, taxme said:

It sure is a waste of precious time to have to try and put some common sense and logic into those lieberal brain dead heads. They are beyond help. I personally believe that just maybe those liberals that come on here are out to breakup Canada because they sure are not trying to help fix and save Canada.

Those meat head lieberals here that voted for Corney have to be all in for destroying this once great white English speaking country and they are hoping to eventually turn Canada into a WEF globalist fascist third world hell hole. That is the only conclusion that i can come up with. Just saying. 

I don't think they really believe Alberta will go and I don't think they understand how important it would be if they did. They've always been able to put their thumb on Alberta and get what they want. Why would it be different now they would ask

[SpankyMcFarland]

I don’t think Smith has anything the political skills required to lead Alberta out of Canada. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

I don’t think Smith has anything the political skills required to lead Alberta out of Canada. 

I'm not sure that she would be the one to do that. It would be interesting to see how that would work.

[Benz]

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

That is absolutely untrue.

The constitution does not make the federal government higher than the provincial governments at all. In no way shape or form is the federal government sovereign to the provinces. The constitution treats them as equals and does not give one precedent over the other

It is true to say that the Canadian Constitution does not have an exit clause. There is nothing in there that would allow a province to break that commitment. However as you know the UN absolutely does and I doubt very much that ontario would be interested in a civil war over the matter.

I'm more interesting question is what about the first nations? If it is fair to say that Alberta has the power to leave confederation because the will of the people, then it must also be true that the first nations have the right to leave alberta.  But that kind of gets messy. 

The provinces gave the federal that power. It was as obvious in 1867. Ottawa can play in the provinces' compentencies without their permission. Ottawa is doing it all the time by the way. That is why the provinces wanted modifications in 1981 until they gave up everything on november 5th. So no, it's not equal. However, maybe you misunderstand me. That sovereignty is not absolute. Ottawa can change the constitution only if it gets 7 provinces and 50% of the population. 

Almost 100% of the countries that got their independence were from countries that had no exit clause.

Most of the F.N.'s treaties are signed with the Crown and several of them are priori the creation of Canada. Alberta has a major problem because they have no treaties with the natives (unless I am missing something), so if it seperates, it has a serious problem. However, Québec did anticipated the issue and there treaties signed between Québec and first nations on its territory. 

[CdnFox]

55 minutes ago, Benz said:

The provinces gave the federal that power.

The province has no power to give any authority to the feds at all. Power is derived from the constitution cannot be changed without an amendment to the constitution. So no the provinces certainly did not give the feds that power

But sure, give me an example of the feds playing in the provincial responsibility areas In contravention of the constitution.

 

Quote

Most of the F.N.'s treaties are signed with the Crown and several of them are priori the creation of Canada.

You probably meant  a priori.  But the current treaties were mostly signed after the creation of canada and would not necessarily be binding on a legally seperate entity. And treaties signed before would have no weight. That's why the crown made it a requirement that canada's formation include accepting those treaties.  Canada may very well find itself still responsible to deliver the money and other things promised in those treaties. But a separate Alberta may not either way.

But they should be more concerned about is what if the first nations hold a vote and they decide to separate from Alberta? If Alberta can separate from Canada then first nations can separate from Alberta. Then we get into dispute as to whose land is what and that potentially could be an issue

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I don't really think of you as an affliction. But I could certainly see why you would think others would think of you that way. Like a rash or something    

I am real sorry for your afflictions...comprehension being one of them, but there are many more.

One of the other is your inability to accept that you are being addressed and you seem to be unable to grasp that. Trying to turn it into something about me is failing but, why would I think you could get anything straight because you are such a LOSER LOL

There is help for your affliction

13 hours ago, taxme said:

Yup, we are once again stuck with another corrupt, thieving, cheating and lying WEF globalist dictator in Ottawa who plans to make Canada even worse than what the other arse hole did already to Canada. I will never understand as to why a stoopid mf imbecile like you would ever think that now having a new sheriff in town is going to make everything goody-goody again has to be the real loser here. Lieberals like you are mentally ill and need to be put down for your own good and for the rest of the country's good. Lieberals commies like you only know how to destroy all things normal and decent and moral. You living in a communist country would work out well for you, commie.  

Even you will end up being a loser in the end because what will effect me will also effect you, stunned. If you think that the WEF globalists fascists ilk care about you and your well being, then you must really be bloody stoopid alright. When your not needed any longer, they will get rid of you. And that would sure work out well for me to see you go first, commie.🤣

Suck it up buttercup. He is the new sheriff in town and will be there till the next election.

I suppose I can take pleasure watching you squirm and whine and wallow in sorrow for the next 4+ years

[Nationalist]

16 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

The one who is PRIME MINISTER for the next 4 to 5 years...Nope, He is a WINNER

Here is a LOSER

And then there is confux... he has always been a LOSER. Ya seem to wanna join him ? LOL

 

Flyer...if you have a problem with @CdnFox that's your issue.

The facts...which you continue to avoid...speak for themselves. 

You been had.

[ExFlyer]

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Flyer...if you have a problem with @CdnFox that's your issue.

The facts...which you continue to avoid...speak for themselves. 

You been had.

What facts??

Be specific. List them...with sources and evidence.

Oh and, I have no problem with confux, he is an easy target that fails to understand when he has lost his way, when he tries to play in a league way beyond his ability.  LOL

[Nationalist]

28 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

What facts??

Be specific. List them...with sources and evidence.

Oh and, I have no problem with confux, he is an easy target that fails to understand when he has lost his way, when he tries to play in a league way beyond his ability.  LOL

Well aren't we full of ourselves...meh...

Quote

Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing renewed questions over his past role with the Bilderberg Group, a secretive annual meeting of global elites that has long sparked theories about hidden agendas controlling world events. 

Carney, who joined the Bilderberg Meetings’ steering committee in 2011, attended sessions with figures like Henry Kissinger and Jared Kushner, including the 2019 gathering in Montreux, Switzerland. 

https://www.westernstandard.news/news/revealed-carneys-involvement-with-elite-cabal-under-scrutiny-fear-grows-over-globalist-connections/63478

Quote

Canadian investment firm Brookfield, formerly chaired by Liberal leader Mark Carney has close business ties to the Trump family.

In 2018, Brookfield agreed to lease a New York City property from Jared Kushner, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law. The lease was for a 99-year billion-dollar agreement, which saw the company forking over the full USD $1.1 billion upfront, instead of paying it off annually.

https://www.junonews.com/p/carneys-ex-company-brookfield-has

As I have said many times now...you been had.

Elbows Up...lol

[WestCanMan]

12 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

I don’t think Smith has anything the political skills required to lead Alberta out of Canada. 

She's not leading that. 

She's standing on a surfboard by the coast: she can move perpendicular to the wave action if she wants, but she's headed inland. 

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

The one who is PRIME MINISTER for the next 4 to 5 years...Nope, He is a WINNER

Xi is the winner of that election. Trump is also the winner of that election. 

The two countries that we're in trade wars with pushed hard for Carney to win that election, and to keep Canada on the path that Trudeau started us on. 

It's Canada that lost the last 4 elections in a row, not Harper, Poilievre, etc. WE lost all of those elections and that's why we have so much homelessness and despair. 

Would you want Canadians to be as healthy and happy as we were in 2014 or not? Did things get worse or better? 

 

There's honestly no better measure of the relative success of a leader than "How many of his followers are dying of exposure and hunger." That was true of tribal chiefs, monarchs, and politicians throughout all of history. It's even true of alpha wolves.

FYI Canadians aren't homeless because there was a food shortage, or our oil wells dried up, or our nuclear reactors went offline, or our rivers dried up leaving our hydro plants sitting lifeless, or any other factor beyond our gov't's control. Canadians aren't unable to buy homes for any of those reasons either. 

Canadians are homeless and/or hopeless because our government has made a litany of terrible decisions, and CBC waved the pom-poms for all of them. You're their useful idjit. 

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Xi is the winner of that election. Trump is also the winner of that election. 

The two countries that we're in trade wars with pushed hard for Carney to win that election, and to keep Canada on the path that Trudeau started us on. 

It's Canada that lost the last 4 elections in a row, not Harper, Poilievre, etc. WE lost all of those elections and that's why we have so much homelessness and despair. 

Would you want Canadians to be as healthy and happy as we were in 2014 or not? Did things get worse or better? 

 

There's honestly no better measure of the relative success of a leader than "How many of his followers are dying of exposure and hunger." That was true of tribal chiefs, monarchs, and politicians throughout all of history. It's even true of alpha wolves.

FYI Canadians aren't homeless because there was a food shortage, or our oil wells dried up, or our nuclear reactors went offline, or our rivers dried up leaving our hydro plants sitting lifeless, or any other factor beyond our gov't's control. Canadians aren't unable to buy homes for any of those reasons either. 

Canadians are homeless and/or hopeless because our government has made a litany of terrible decisions, and CBC waved the pom-poms for all of them. You're their useful idjit. 

Have no idea what you are trying to compare? A Chinese "election" compared to ours?

The Conservatives in Canada lost the last 4 elections because of poor leadership in the party. Not Canadians. Canadians voted and chose the Party and Leader they saw as a better leader than the Conservatives had. 4 times.

You can make all the excuses you want but with Harper, the same situations were there.

Like it or not, Carney is the Prime Minister of Canada and Polievre is not. Canada has spoken.

[CdnFox]

3 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Have no idea what you are trying to compare? A Chinese "election" compared to ours?

Thanks to the liberals ours was a Chinese election

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Thanks to the liberals ours was a Chinese election

Hey. News Flash!!!!

The Liberals won the election. 

The Conservative lost

Carney is the Prime Minister.

Polievere is not.

4+ years of Liberal Rule

4+ more years of PP the fool

Sucks to be you LOSER LOL

 

 

 

Edited Friday at 05:43 PM by ExFlyer

[taxme]

16 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

I don’t think Smith has anything the political skills required to lead Alberta out of Canada. 

Only a dummy lieberal like you would say such a stupid thing like that. It is lieberal ilk like you that have pretty much destroyed this once great country and you still keep trying to make Canada even worse, thanks to fools like you voting in the leiberals once again. Are people like you that daft? Indeed, it sure looks like it. Smith is fighting for Alberta, Corney is trying to destroy Alberta. Get lost with your leiberal bull chit. 😛

[taxme]

6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

I am real sorry for your afflictions...comprehension being one of them, but there are many more.

One of the other is your inability to accept that you are being addressed and you seem to be unable to grasp that. Trying to turn it into something about me is failing but, why would I think you could get anything straight because you are such a LOSER LOL

There is help for your affliction

Suck it up buttercup. He is the new sheriff in town and will be there till the next election.

I suppose I can take pleasure watching you squirm and whine and wallow in sorrow for the next 4+ years

The new sheriff in town will be just as corrupt as the last Marxist dictator sheriff and you will be also suffering under his corruption, stunned. I am still amazed s to just how stupid lieberals like you can still be. You never seem to learn about just how stupid lieberals like you really are. 

Hey twinkle toes, Alberta could be long gone within another four more years. Then i can be sure that it would be you that would be squirming, whining and wallowing in your own lieberal stew. I like that. 🤡🤣

 

[ExFlyer]

16 minutes ago, taxme said:

The new sheriff in town will be just as corrupt as the last Marxist dictator sheriff and you will be also suffering under his corruption, stunned. I am still amazed s to just how stupid lieberals like you can still be. You never seem to learn about just how stupid lieberals like you really are. 

Hey twinkle toes, Alberta could be long gone within another four more years. Then i can be sure that it would be you that would be squirming, whining and wallowing in your own lieberal stew. I like that. 🤡🤣

 

Ha Ha Ha.

Don't let your disappointment and bitterness ruin your life LOL

Accept the fact there is absolutely nothing you can do and that the Liberals are governing Canada.

If PP wins the by election he can continue to criticize and do nothing like he had been doing for the past 10 years.

Alberta will be here...along with the Liberals LOL

[taxme]

16 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Ha Ha Ha.

Don't let your disappointment and bitterness ruin your life LOL

Accept the fact there is absolutely nothing you can do and that the Liberals are governing Canada.

If PP wins the by election he can continue to criticize and do nothing like he had been doing for the past 10 years.

Alberta will be here...along with the Liberals LOL

I am disappointed in the fact that commie lieberals like you won the WEF globalist election and went and put in another corrupt Marxist dictator for Canada. Lieberals like you never seem to ever notice as to just how WEF globalist Marxist you are at heart and that you do not believe in freedom of speech. All we are going to get for the next four more years is more taxes, more government, and less freedom. We will become more woke and more broke thanks to commies like you.

PP phkd it up. PP should have been more like Trump rather than like the last bunch of so called gutless federal "progressive" conservative leaders. All of them were meek and mild. Gloat all you want for now but you may be surprised about Alberta being very serious this time about separation. A referendum will happen next year. We can only wait and see what happens. All i can say is GO,ALBERTA,GO. Goodbye Marxist globalist Canada. Works for me. 🤪  

 

[ExFlyer]

43 minutes ago, taxme said:

I am disappointed in the fact that commie lieberals like you won the WEF globalist election and went and put in another corrupt Marxist dictator for Canada. Lieberals like you never seem to ever notice as to just how WEF globalist Marxist you are at heart and that you do not believe in freedom of speech. All we are going to get for the next four more years is more taxes, more government, and less freedom. We will become more woke and more broke thanks to commies like you.

PP phkd it up. PP should have been more like Trump rather than like the last bunch of so called gutless federal "progressive" conservative leaders. All of them were meek and mild. Gloat all you want for now but you may be surprised about Alberta being very serious this time about separation. A referendum will happen next year. We can only wait and see what happens. All i can say is GO,ALBERTA,GO. Goodbye Marxist globalist Canada. Works for me. 🤪  

 

Try as you might, you lost and there ain't anything you can do about it

I repeat "Don't let your disappointment and bitterness ruin your life LOL

Accept the fact there is absolutely nothing you can do and that the Liberals are governing Canada.

If PP wins the by election he can continue to criticize and do nothing like he had been doing for the past 10 years.

Alberta will be here...along with the Liberals LOL"

[Nefarious Banana]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Try as you might, you lost and there ain't anything you can do about it

I repeat "Don't let your disappointment and bitterness ruin your life LOL

Accept the fact there is absolutely nothing you can do and that the Liberals are governing Canada.

If PP wins the by election he can continue to criticize and do nothing like he had been doing for the past 10 years.

Alberta will be here...along with the Liberals LOL"

Most voting Canadians accept that the Liberals are government.  What a great many voting Canadians do not accept is the way the Liberals remain to be government, and wonder why, with the record they have, voters like you and your ilk/spawn support them.  It begs the question:  Are Liberal voters stupid?

[ExFlyer]

23 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Most voting Canadians accept that the Liberals are government.  What a great many voting Canadians do not accept is the way the Liberals remain to be government, and wonder why, with the record they have, voters like you and your ilk/spawn support them.  It begs the question:  Are Liberal voters stupid?

Say what you want but, most Canadians are happy with their choice.

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Say what you want but, most Canadians are happy with their choice.

No, the liberals got less than 50% of the vote by far.

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Have no idea what you are trying to compare? A Chinese "election" compared to ours?

Lol.

1. the difference is smaller than you think
2. I'm not comparing their elections to ours. I'm saying that Xi's dog won this race. Did you not know that Xi was supporting Carney?

Quote

The Conservatives in Canada lost the last 4 elections because of poor leadership in the party. 

Our elections are broken.

The LPOC gives MSM outlets hundreds of millions of dollars before each election, and then orgs like CBC lie for them and cover up their scandals. 

If you don't fully understand that CBC lies, slanders, omits and fabricates for the LPOC by now then you're a complete id10t.

[cougar]

On 5/8/2025 at 11:24 AM, suds said:

 I noticed that one of your interests was 'fighting economic growth', yet you claim we can grow in all kinds of other directions. An explanation perhaps?

Meaning growing the manufacturing sector at the expense of the resource industries, so overall achieve NET ZERO growth.

I believe in population decrease as well as reducing our footprint on the Earth.   Now don't blame me for trying to kill someone.  I have not said that.

[ExFlyer]

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, the liberals got less than 50% of the vote by far.

And the conservatives got even less LOL

So...the Liberals won and you lost LOL 

Carney was ahead in the polls over PP for those that thought who would be a better PM form the very beginning...that should tell you something. LOL

LOSER