If Canada votes for a majority Liberal government, could it lead to a fiscal collapse of our economy?

[Moonbox]

4 hours ago, Army Guy said:

It does not matter what i say or post in regards to this topic, you've already made up your mind....Had you done your own research on the man you to would be questioning his integrity to be our next PM....

It's funny that you say that.  You're technically right, of course.  Nothing you're saying here matters.  I'd be more inclined to listen to someone who knew nothing about this topic before I listened to Army Guy, who knows less than nothing but has strong opinions anyway. 

4 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Yes , it would make me at least check out the validity of the source and story....

That's how we know that you have no freaking clue what you're talking about, and that your "research" is nothing more than grasping for folks saying what you've already decided you want to hear.  That's why you offered Liz Truss as a source.  She was saying what you wanted to hear, and the fact that she's a disgraced clown that was laughed out of office didn't even register.  You probably didn't even know who she was.  

Edited March 24 by Moonbox

[Legato]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But that's his strategy!! He'll fight trump and the tariffs by ignoring them completely as if they don't exist no matter what and flying to france for cheeze and wine at the taxpayer's expense. 

If trump doesn't learn his lesson then next week he'll fly to the bahamas, and this will continue until trump caves under the pressure. 

I wonder how far down the list Beijing for flied lice will be. Not a word about the Chinese tariffs.

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Legato said:

I wonder how far down the list Beijing for flied lice will be. Not a word about the Chinese tariffs.

Well it'll take the airlines a while to fill that 500,000 dollar food order for the trip. 

[Legato]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

Well it'll take the airlines a while to fill that 500,000 dollar food order for the trip. 

Ha yes "Flyed Lice"

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Ha yes "Flyed Lice"

Now now,  

Flyed Lice au truffles young man. Nothing but the very best and tastiest racism and airline food for our pm!  

[Army Guy]

21 hours ago, Moonbox said:

It's funny that you say that.  You're technically right, of course.  Nothing you're saying here matters.  I'd be more inclined to listen to someone who knew nothing about this topic before I listened to Army Guy, who knows less than nothing but has strong opinions anyway. 

That's how we know that you have no freaking clue what you're talking about, and that your "research" is nothing more than grasping for folks saying what you've already decided you want to hear.  That's why you offered Liz Truss as a source.  She was saying what you wanted to hear, and the fact that she's a disgraced clown that was laughed out of office didn't even register.  You probably didn't even know who she was.  

Sure, you always go on the attack when you have nothing of value to say..which is most of the time...

Well i guess the british people have no idea what they are doing, i mean she had risen to the office of PM, she must have something going for her, but hey what is it you do again, have you risen to the office of anything other than the janitors office..., what is it you base your opinions on........oh i forgot your just another poster with an opinion....you can brush off her opinion, i did however give you another two on top of hers...and you contributed jack sh!t as always to the conversation except you're opinion...and somehow we are suppose to bow down to that, your going to have to step up your game moonpie.

[Moonbox]

On 3/25/2025 at 3:11 PM, Army Guy said:

Sure, you always go on the attack when you have nothing of value to say..which is most of the time...

If you want to mouth off and rant your deeply uninformed opinions here, they're going to get challenged.  If they're particularly dumb, they're going to get mocked.  You can be a big boy and calmly reason out and defend those opinions, or your can cry like a little girl about the fight you keep running straight into swinging.  

On 3/25/2025 at 3:11 PM, Army Guy said:

Well i guess the british people have no idea what they are doing, i mean she had risen to the office of PM, she must have something going for her,

If Liz Truss falling into the PM's chair without being elected to it and lasting 49 days before being laughed out of office counts for something, what does that say about Trudeau getting elected 3 times and lasting ~10 years?  

What does that say about Carney, who was recruited as the first non-brit in 300 years to run the Bank of England?

You do know that logic works both ways, right?   FFS.  

On 3/25/2025 at 3:11 PM, Army Guy said:

you can brush off her opinion, i did however give you another two on top of hers...and you contributed jack sh!t

You seem to be under the goofy illusion that dredging the interweb for people saying what you want to hear somehow forms your argument for you.  The fact that you quoted Liz Truss with a straight face proves that you didn't do anything but Google "Carneyman bad" and then thoughtlessly drop the links into this thread. 

Thanks for your "contribution".  👌

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Moonbox said:

If you want to mouth off and rant your deeply uninformed opinions here, they're going to get challenged.  If they're particularly dumb, they're going to get mocked.  You can be a big boy and calmly reason out and defend those opinions, or your can cry like a little girl about the fight you keep running straight into swinging.  

If Liz Truss falling into the PM's chair without being elected to it and lasting 49 days before being laughed out of office counts for something, what does that say about Trudeau getting elected 3 times and lasting ~10 years?  

What does that say about Carney, who was recruited as the first non-brit in 300 years to run the Bank of England?

You do know that logic works both ways, right?   FFS.  

You seem to be under the goofy illusion that dredging the interweb for people saying what you want to hear somehow forms your argument for you.  The fact that you quoted Liz Truss with a straight face proves that you didn't do anything but Google "Carneyman bad" and then thoughtlessly drop the links into this thread. 

Thanks for your "contribution".  👌

As usual, when confronted with facts you can't address you become belligerent.

The fact is that nobody has anything nice to say about carney. Efforts have been made to try and solicit opinions from people who should know and nobody is coming back saying that he was any good.

And everybody who was in Canada when he was here a great he did absolutely nothing to deal with the financial crisis and has zero credibility on that front.

Carney is a useless twit who managed to worm his way into some higher up positions but unfortunately hasn't got the skill to back it up.

Go check out the gaffe thread . The guy thinks we sell the us half of it's semi conductors. He doesn't understand our industries, he doesn't get our problems, he doesn't know how to fix anything

[Moonbox]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

As usual, when confronted with facts you can't address you become belligerent.

Coming from the guy saying the economics doctorate isn't an economist, I'm pretty comfortable where I land in comparison to you on what the word "facts" means. 

Thanks for the laugh about belligerence though.  Your projection is showing again.  How many internet fights are you getting yourself into today?  🤡

Edited March 27 by Moonbox

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Coming from the guy saying the economics doctorate isn't an economist, I'm pretty comfortable where I land in comparison to you on what the word "facts" means. 

 

So what you're saying is you're very comfortable making up something I never said and then arguing against that because you can't cope with the truth. Fair enough I understand.

And considering that you are the guy who spent 10 pages arguing that 100% - 50% isn't 50% I dare say that economies and economics are beyond your skill set  

And once again you can't actually address the points of the issue. and become belligerent    Gee you're not proving my point or anything are you   

 

Quote

Thanks for the laugh about belligerence though.  Your projection is showing again.  How many internet fights are you getting yourself into today?  🤡

This from the guy who does nothing but follow me around on this forum and try and pick fights at random and then loses them  

but I can certainly understand why you want to try and change the subject. Perhaps you'd care to blame my post size, or how frequently I post? Those are the usual reasons you give for why you said something stupid

 

[Army Guy]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

If you want to mouth off and rant your deeply uninformed opinions here, they're going to get challenged.  If they're particularly dumb, they're going to get mocked.  You can be a big boy and calmly reason out and defend those opinions, or your can cry like a little girl about the fight you keep running straight into swinging.  

If Liz Truss falling into the PM's chair without being elected to it and lasting 49 days before being laughed out of office counts for something, what does that say about Trudeau getting elected 3 times and lasting ~10 years?  

What does that say about Carney, who was recruited as the first non-brit in 300 years to run the Bank of England?

You do know that logic works both ways, right?   FFS.  

You seem to be under the goofy illusion that dredging the interweb for people saying what you want to hear somehow forms your argument for you.  The fact that you quoted Liz Truss with a straight face proves that you didn't do anything but Google "Carneyman bad" and then thoughtlessly drop the links into this thread. 

Thanks for your "contribution".  👌

Like i said you have nothing of any value to say, ...but go ahead beat your chest act like your someone viewing the peasants from your tower of superiority...Your just another guy with a chip on his shoulder that spends most of his time adding nothing of any importance to any conversation...and when someone questions you or says something you don't like you attack...

it is who you are, your here to troll nothing more....Your contributions consist of pages upon pages of worthless chirping , complaining, whining, and just being a d!ckhead.... we really could do with less of you to be honest...🖕

Edited March 27 by Army Guy

[Moonbox]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

So what you're saying is you're very comfortable making up something I never said and then arguing against that because you can't cope with the truth. Fair enough I understand.

Here's a list of your quotes, in the part of this thread where you spent a whole page arguing how Carney wasn't an economist:

"Banker yes, economist no."

"It means you have a Doctorate. Which means you've been educated on the subject. But unless you've actually done it it's a bit of a stretch to say you're an economist."

"Carney worked for a bank, and never as an economist.  I would call him a banker because that's what he did, never as an economist"

If I said anything as stupid as you did here, I'd want to pretend I didn't as well, but it's easy to prove you're lying, as you normally do.  

 

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

Here's a list of your quotes, in the part of this thread where you spent a whole page arguing how Carney wasn't an economist:

"Banker yes, economist no."

"It means you have a Doctorate. Which means you've been educated on the subject. But unless you've actually done it it's a bit of a stretch to say you're an economist."

"Carney worked for a bank, and never as an economist.  I would call him a banker because that's what he did, never as an economist"

 

 

Sooooo you just proved you lied.  I never said someone who has a doctorate isn't an economist.  I said  it's a stretch to call them an economist if they never used their degree, and then i said if someone works for a bank, they're a banker and  that carney never worked as an economist. All of which is true. 

As always you lie and then try to backtrack.  Having said that i'm quite correct in what i said, if you've been educated as an economist but never ever worked as one, calling you an 'economist' is a stretch. If i had my drivers license but never drove a cab i don't think anyone would refer to me as a cabbie, and if i'd taken accounting in university but never worked in an accounting job ever i doubt people would refer to me as an accountant.   

Quote

If I said anything as stupid as you did here, I'd want to pretend I didn't as well, but it's easy to prove you're lying, as you normally do.  

You say stuff far stupider but yes, you very frequently then try to pretend you didn't   Almost as much as you try to pretend i DID say things i never did 

[Moonbox]

1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

Like i said you have nothing of any value to say, ...but go ahead beat your chest act like your someone viewing the peasants from your tower of superiority

...and yet, I'm the only one still debating the other person's points, while you've descended into your usual sulking and ad-hominem.  

1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

it is who you are, your here to troll nothing more....Your contributions consist of pages upon pages of worthless chirping , complaining, whining, and just being a d!ckhead.... we really could do with less of you to be honest...🖕

For someone who could do with less of me, wtf do you keep quoting me and dragging me into debates with you?  There are two easy options here.  You could either just not quote me and not engage, or you could put me on ignore.  I'd be more than fine with not hearing from you.  🙃

Instead, you persist in this pathetic routine of picking fights, subsequently crying and b*tching about them as if you didn't dive in head-first, and then coming back for more and repeating it over and over again.  What sort of weak babyshit is this?  

Edited March 27 by Moonbox

[Moonbox]

57 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sooooo you just proved you lied.  I never said someone who has a doctorate isn't an economist.  I said  it's a stretch to call them an economist if they never used their degree, and then i said if someone works for a bank, they're a banker and  that carney never worked as an economist. All of which is true. 

Nope, because Mark Carney has an economics doctorate from a prestigious economics program, and you're trying to tell us he's not an economist somehow, or that he's never used his degree?  

Either statement you're making is categorically retarded, especially considering monetary policy itself is an important part of macroeconomics....something they teach in...economics.  🤡👌

Keep digging your heel in on this one though.  You're only making yourself look like more of a loser.  

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

Nope, because Mark Carney has an economics doctorate from a prestigious economics program, and you're trying to tell us he's not an economist somehow, or that he's never used his degree?  

Yep because he's never worked as an economist. That means he trained in economics but that doesn't mean he's an economist. 

But hey, you can clear this up no problem. tell me when he was ever hired as an "economist'?  Not a banker or an investor but an economist. Maybe i missed that.  Obviously you can't be an economist without ever having been an economist but sure, tell me where his job title was 'economist' and we'll both agree he was an economist. 

Quote

Either statement you're making is categorically retarded, especially considering monetary policy itself is an important part of macroeconomics....something they teach in...economics.  🤡👌

I've already provided plenty of quotes from official sources to say you're wrong. 

Monetary policy is separate from fiscal policy.  Bankers worry about monetary policy and economists worry about fiscal policy.  That is quoted above. 

So your lame assed attempt to try to conflate it with some sort of "big picture" is stupid and we both know it.  Economists are not bankers, bankers are not economists. They are two different jobs. 

So what you're saying is you never taken courses in....  economics   

Edited March 27 by CdnFox

[Army Guy]

20 hours ago, Moonbox said:

...and yet, I'm the only one still debating the other person's points, while you've descended into your usual sulking and ad-hominem.  

For someone who could do with less of me, wtf do you keep quoting me and dragging me into debates with you?  There are two easy options here.  You could either just not quote me and not engage, or you could put me on ignore.  I'd be more than fine with not hearing from you.  🙃

Instead, you persist in this pathetic routine of picking fights, subsequently crying and b*tching about them as if you didn't dive in head-first, and then coming back for more and repeating it over and over again.  What sort of weak babyshit is this?  

All those words and you really said nothing that means anything...nothing more than trolling, in order to get a response your looking for....which is your sole purpose here...you don't debate because your a troll....

[Legato]

20 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Nope, because Mark Carney has an economics doctorate from a prestigious economics program, and you're trying to tell us he's not an economist somehow, or that he's never used his degree?  

Either statement you're making is categorically retarded, especially considering monetary policy itself is an important part of macroeconomics....something they teach in...economics.  🤡👌

Keep digging your heel in on this one though.  You're only making yourself look like more of a loser.  

 

Those with PhD's in secondary subjects make good first order cooks.

Heh you wanna buy some steel, that which Carney the PhDiddy dum diddy dum says no one buy's?

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=875041601254298

[CdnFox]

20 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Nope, because Mark Carney has an economics doctorate from a prestigious economics program, and you're trying to tell us he's not an economist somehow, or that he's never used his degree?  

 

Looks like he got that degree dishonestly

EXCLUSIVE: Carney faces plagiarism accusations for 1995 PhD thesis | National Post

Thats why we don't consider TRAINING to be the same as someone who's DONE something. Which he hasn't. 

So you're a two time loser   you were wrong that only going to school for something means you're the same as someone who's done it, AND the guy you thought went to school for something cheated is way through it. 

Wa wa waaaaaaahhh.  LOL

Edited Friday at 05:47 PM by CdnFox

[Moonbox]

1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

All those words and you really said nothing that means anything...nothing more than trolling, in order to get a response your looking for....which is your sole purpose here...you don't debate because your a troll....

You keep quoting me and dragging me into these "debates", and then you keep whining and crying when you don't like where it goes.  Pretty goofy shit.  🤡

Edited Friday at 07:16 PM by Moonbox

[WestCanMan]

On 3/23/2025 at 12:11 PM, Goddess said:

I don't know, I didn't watch it.

I just know that if anyone else posts anything from a TikTok or Facebook source, you dismiss it and mock them and you also are against anyone using opinion pieces, so I was surprisednotsurprised to see you post a TikTok as proof of anything.

To be fair, TikTok is a step up from their usual sources: CBC, Xinhua, CNN, Al Jazeera, NYT...

[WestCanMan]

On 3/24/2025 at 10:22 AM, Gaétan said:

The two parties to which the media are paying all their attention are promising us money that they will take from our pockets or that we will have to pay back to the rich. They both promise tax cuts for the middle class, not for the poor because they don't go to vote. According to the media, the poor do not pay taxes, but it is the homeless in Canada who pay the most taxes compared to their income, for example, by buying a pack of cigarettes, they pay exorbitant taxes. They purposely don't know how to count.

Please tell us what party you're voting for... I just gotta know.

I honestly thought that a pro-genocide, 'river to the sea' guy like yourself would be an LPOC toady. When did you guys switch?

[Gaétan]

6 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Please tell us what party you're voting for... I just gotta know.

I honestly thought that a pro-genocide, 'river to the sea' guy like yourself would be an LPOC toady. When did you guys switch?

Israel is the great prostitute of the apocalypse whose Europeans have invaded the country, they do not deserve to live there. I vote Green.

[Goddess]

A Liberal gov't could lead to more than financial collapse for Canada.

This Liberal candidate just publicly called for people to claim the $1 million bounty China has on Conservative candidate, Joe Tay, by turning him in to the Chinese Consulate.

This guy, Paul Chaing, was a former cop in Ontario, he should know better.  He is apologizing for it now but he should be removed by the Liberal party.  I doubt he will, though.  I think if the Libs get in again, being turned in for bounties for China will be the least of any opposing party's worries.

GTA Liberal candidate apologizes for suggesting people claim China's bounty on Conservative

[Goddess]

 

 

Quote

GTA Liberal candidate apologizes for suggesting people claim China's bounty on Conservative

This is Paul Chaing's statement on the incident:

He apologizes, then reiterates his allegiance to Hong Kong.

The Liberal Party is entirely beholden to China.