Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What Canadains need to do 1st is clean house. I just don't understand how people think they deserve 4 mores yrs.  The pretty well admitted they have been wrong for 10 yrs, then say they can fix it. And to think that the Cons will be worse. It's embarrassing .

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted
5 hours ago, Barquentine said:

That's what usually happens on Canada. We don't vote for a new gov't, we vote against a gov't that's been in power for 2 or 3 terms.

That's actually not accurate.  It's often said but demonstrably not rue. Thats usually just how long we take to give up on a gov't :)  But even then not always and if there's no alternative that looks better people don't move.  

But there have been many examples of provincial gov'ts lasting much longer times. Most of the time tho another party makes a good pitch and people are willing to try, 

Or they don't, look at Ford who's about to win another term. The voters biatch about him all the time but they don't like the other choices and so he keeps getting reelected.  The libs before him were in power for almost 2 decades. 

Generally speaking people need to have something to move to that they perceive as better. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Legato said:

squeak squeak (oil not needed) squeak squeak.

Squaek squeak invest billions of $ and years of effort so you can buy $75 oil instead of spending nothing to get $60 oil.
You'd fail in a week running a business.

Posted
36 minutes ago, herbie said:

Squaek squeak invest billions of $ and years of effort so you can buy $75 oil instead of spending nothing to get $60 oil.
You'd fail in a week running a business.

Ran two successful businesses for over 25 years so once again failure is your strong point.

Is that a squeak I hear.....

  • Haha 2
Posted
On 2/26/2025 at 11:20 AM, blackbird said:

So says the Marxist.  NO ,   I will stay and oppose you Marxists as long as possible.

.

Please be my guest, but  stay close to the oil sands, drink water from local sources and enjoy the black smoke from the mining equipment.

If you follow this,  soon your chirping will end and we will be wondering which way you flew.

Posted
9 hours ago, Legato said:

Ran two successful businesses for over 25 years so once again failure is your strong point.

Is that a squeak I hear.....

I can bet my money neither of you posting here is a successful businessman of 25 years.

Nice try

Posted
7 hours ago, cougar said:

I can bet my money neither of you posting here is a successful businessman of 25 years.

Nice try

Then you would lose.

Posted
3 hours ago, Legato said:

Then you would lose.

that's not very nice.  You rub the fact he'll lose in the man's face without even BOTHERING to take the time to compliment him on his consistency.  Consistency is hard to find in kids today  you know! 

Posted (edited)
22 hours ago, Legato said:

Ran two successful businesses for over 25 years so once again failure is your strong point.

Is that a squeak I hear.....

Yet the fact you deny the basic business concept of best ROI indicates otherwise.

23 hours ago, herbie said:

invest billions of $ and years of effort so you can buy $75 oil instead of spending nothing to get $60 oil.

Getting sick of nothing but m0rons and outright liars posting shit to simply be contrarian. As mentally challenged as your President promoting Keystone XL at the same time as imposing tariffs on the oil it would carry!

And Canadians with the same idea... why in hell do you think a pipeline east is not already built?
A- Because Alberta got world pricing for it's oil in the 1980s. Why the hell would any oil company build an extremely expensive pipeline when there was no cost saving.
B- Because we threw out the govt that would even think of investing public money in such a project and privatized the corporation PetroCanada that did shit like that for a govt that was business oriented and believed in point A)......

Want a 'forced eastern pipeline' that a govt, Tory or not? Then get behind a shorter one that reroutes the existing one in Tory Ontario so it doesn't have a chokepoint in Michigan where hostile State or US politicians can't threaten us with it!

Edited by herbie
Posted
2 minutes ago, herbie said:

Yet the fact you deny the basic business concept of best ROI indicates otherwise.

He actually didn't. That may have been the voices in your head again

Posted
1 minute ago, herbie said:

Oh the class dimwit objects again shouting black is really white. The very personification of sheer contrarianism himself.......

LOL talking to yourself again?  never a good sign :) 

Posted
23 minutes ago, herbie said:

Yet the fact you deny the basic business concept of best ROI indicates otherwise.

 

I did? You must be getting the squeaks mixed up. Try some Sea Foam Deep Creep.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Legato said:

I did?

You were replying to something other than the main content of the quote? Or just picking out a couple words simply to have something to reply to? Like CDNFaux does when he's compulsed to reply within 3.2 seconds?

Posted
16 minutes ago, herbie said:

You were replying to something other than the main content of the quote? Or just picking out a couple words simply to have something to reply to? Like CDNFaux does when he's compulsed to reply within 3.2 seconds?

I was? Hayzeus man oil that squeak.

Posted
On 2/26/2025 at 4:46 PM, blackbird said:

If you are supporting what Trump is threatening to do to Canada and his insane comments about a 51st state, you have no understanding of what this means.

a godless atheist socialist authoritarian Post National State which persecutes Christians,

is set upon by a Caesar intending to overthrow it,

the wrath of an Old Testament Lord visited upon false idolatry, it seems

Nec Aspera Terrent ; No Fears On Earth

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

godless atheist socialist authoritarian Post National State which persecutes Christians,

Well, we have many countries like that don't we?  Canada is also a democratic country with freedom of religion to a large extent.  It is nobody else's business to try to force their own ideology or world view on Canada.  What one believes is an individual thing, not state ordained.

It is not within the power or rights of some dictator or his country to violate the sovereignty of other countries.  Everyone has the freedom to choose what they believe in democratic nations.  Canada is a democratic nation.

 

Posted
On 2/26/2025 at 8:56 PM, blackbird said:

  Disrespecting Canada's sovereignty. 

Canada, where you are overwhelmingly condemned simply for having any faith in the Nazarene at all

as opposed to Red State America,

where you would be welcomed with open arms as just another pilgrim on the road to Calvary

Canada is not even Loyalist to the British Crown anymore,

Canadians are already de facto American republicans at this juncture, they are simply Democrats therein

so what is it that you would even be defending here now ?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Canada is not even Loyalist to the British Crown anymore,

Canadians are already de facto American republicans at this juncture, they are simply Democrats therein

so what is it that you would even be defending here now ?

Nonsense.  Canadians are loyal to Canada and our system, which happens to be the a Constitutional Monarchy with Charles III as King and a Governor General as his representative.  Canada is a sovereign country and prefer it to remain the way it is.  You're wasting your time spouting Trump's nonsense on here.

Posted
9 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Well, we have many countries like that don't we?  Canada is also a democratic country with freedom of religion to a large extent.

Canada is merely a Dominion, to include the republican nationalists in Quebec,

my nation is only the House of Hanover upon the Plains of Abraham therein,

a Scots German Empire seeking a Northwest Passage ;  at the cost of many men,

Victoria Regina Imperatrix - Pro Patria

Posted
4 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Nonsense.  Canadians are loyal to Canada and our system, which happens to be the a Constitutional Monarchy with Charles III as King and a Governor General as his representative.

I doubt that.

anyone whom is a Loyalist is declaimed as a "traitor" here now,

this is not British North America anymore,

that has been usurped by a de facto American People's Republic,

obviously the American Fenians have noticed by now ;

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,889
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Lillian
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...