TreeBeard Posted April 24 Author Report Posted April 24 3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said: PP struggling in his own riding Is PP going to have to find a job? Does he have any marketable skills? Maybe EI could pay for some retraining, given he has never held a job besides being a politician. The implosion of the Cons will be quite something to watch if they lose this election. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 2 hours ago, TreeBeard said: Is PP going to have to find a job? Does he have any marketable skills? Maybe EI could pay for some retraining, given he has never held a job besides being a politician. The implosion of the Cons will be quite something to watch if they lose this election. I'm sure that your hatred and bigotry driven spite is reveling at the very thought But there will be no implication even if they lose. At the end of the day poilievre's numbers are better than almost any other conservative numbers or liberal numbers for that matter for quite a while. Harper won a majority with those numbers. So Poilievre will still have a job unless he's a complete ass about it And Carney will go back to stealing tax money and ripping people off for a living Sector instead of the prime minister seat if he loses 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: But there will be no implication even if they lose. At the end of the day poilievre's numbers are better than almost any other conservative numbers or liberal numbers for that matter for quite a while. Harper won a majority with those numbers Meaning this election is rigged? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 3 minutes ago, eyeball said: Meaning this election is rigged? ??????????? Everyday I think you're as dumb as you could possibly get, and every day you prove that I just don't have enough faith in you Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
eyeball Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 20 minutes ago, CdnFox said: ??????????? Everyday I think you're as dumb as you could possibly get, and every day you prove that I just don't have enough faith in you Yawn....you say this about everyone... everyday. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
CdnFox Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 7 minutes ago, eyeball said: Yawn....you say this about everyone... everyday. I have never said that about anybody before. And as usual faced with the truth all You can you can do is lie Yawn indeed Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
SpankyMcFarland Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 Another Globe story about another rift with a PC premier. There are a lot of allegations in here, some featuring Jenni Byrne. Quote The current rift started in early November, when Mr. Houston was asked during a campaign event whether Mr. Poilievre would be helping on his campaign for re-election. Mr. Houston replied, “No, because … I’m not a member of any federal party.“ He said the federal party is a different party with a different leader, and he did not mention Mr. Poilievre by name. The same day that a news story about the exchange was published, Ms. Byrne sent text messages to Mr. Houston’s chief of staff, Nicole LaFosse Parker, according to the three sources, including one who saw the exchanges. Ms. Byrne called Mr. Houston’s comments an insult. Ms. Byrne then followed up with another text telling Ms. Parker that she would remember the incident, the sources said. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-poilievres-nova-scotia-campaign-stop-highlights-growing-rift-between/ 1 Quote
eyeball Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 5 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said: Another Globe story about another rift with a PC premier. There are a lot of allegations in here, some featuring Jenni Byrne. Poilievre just isn't right wing enough. It sure didn't take long for him to go the way of other conservatives that are left behind on the endless path real right wingers are embarked on. It's the journey not the destination. Mulroney,David Frum, the Cheney's...I mean, who saw that coming - Marxists, seriously? Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
WestCanMan Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said: Another Globe story about another rift with a PC premier. There are a lot of allegations in here, some featuring Jenni Byrne. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-poilievres-nova-scotia-campaign-stop-highlights-growing-rift-between/ Conservatives don't run in lock-step like leftists. You'll almost always see Dems or Libs vote 100% as a bloc, and you'll almost never see conservatives do that. The wrong Ford brother died. The one that smoked the crack was actually the better one. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
CdnFox Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 34 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Conservatives don't run in lock-step like leftists. You'll almost always see Dems or Libs vote 100% as a bloc, and you'll almost never see conservatives do that. The wrong Ford brother died. The one that smoked the crack was actually the better one. The left tends to destroy anyone that's not left enough or isn't the right left 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 (edited) 42 minutes ago, CdnFox said: The left tends to destroy anyone that's not left enough or isn't the right left It's like they get "the message" from their handlers and they think that they, and only they, are pure enough to receive the divine message, but then they see that the other cultists have already carved it into their forearm and they get offended, so they try to out-tard each other with next-level BS that's so outlandish that no one else will follow. dbag 1: "I think that a woman should be allowed to terminate a healthy pregnancy at 7 months. A fetus is basically trash until a woman decides to let it out of her snatch." dbag 2: "Well that makes you a misogynist, because a woman should be allowed to terminate a healthy pregnancy at 8 months. You can even just put a snake in your vagina to eat it if you want to." dbag 3: "You're both misogynists, because a woman should be allowed to terminate a healthy pregnancy 1 second before it crowns. She can even just feed it to pigs after it comes out if she wants to." Their best one is: You have to call me xhe and xhey, because he/she offends me. Also, you're not allowed to say mom or mother anymore, because those words offend me. "So what if the words xhe and xhey offend me? Do I still have to say them?" "Of course, because I'm in a special rights group. I'm more offendeder than you. I get 'triggered'. FYI that means I am snotty and everyone has to care." The nice thing about being a conservative is that when other conservatives say stupid shit like "If a 12 yr old girl gets pregnant from being raped she should have to carry the baby to term" you can just say "STFU ret4rd", you don't have to pretend that their argument has any merit. Edited April 25 by WestCanMan Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
TreeBeard Posted April 29 Author Report Posted April 29 338Canada poll aggregator was within the margins of error with their models. The polls were correct. Quote
CdnFox Posted April 29 Report Posted April 29 38 minutes ago, TreeBeard said: 338Canada poll aggregator was within the margins of error with their models. The polls were correct. The polls have the party 12 points until just a couple days ago. The poles lied Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
TreeBeard Posted Wednesday at 03:43 AM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 03:43 AM On 4/11/2025 at 8:19 PM, Army Guy said: spending 5 % is a pipe dream This didn’t age well. Canada will be at 2% next year and is targeting 5% in the future. @Army Guy, Why isn’t Carney your hero? Quote
CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 04:46 AM Report Posted Wednesday at 04:46 AM 1 hour ago, TreeBeard said: This didn’t age well. Canada will be at 2% next year and is targeting 5% in the future. @Army Guy, Why isn’t Carney your hero? That's not true. The only way we hit 2% next year is rolling things like the two billion dollar existing budget for the coast guard into the military. And what carney has promised is 3.5% military spending and .1.5% infrastructure, which is still to be defined, And that's just a promise. We haven't seen any indication of a plan or budget as to how that's going to work. The liberals have promised targets for Kyoto and never come close, they promised targets at paris and never came close. They're doing the same thing now Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted Wednesday at 02:58 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:58 PM 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: That's not true. ..... The liberals have promised targets for Kyoto and never come close, they promised targets at paris and never came close. They're doing the same thing now Harper pulled out of Kyoto. Harper had 5 Environment ministers and they did nothing to help Here is Harpers environmental record. From beginning to end. Dismal at best. https://thenarwhal.ca/harper-s-timeline-canada-climate-change-2006-2014/ 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell others what theirs should be.
Legato Posted Wednesday at 03:11 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 03:11 PM 12 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Harper pulled out of Kyoto. Harper had 5 Environment ministers and they did nothing to help Here is Harpers environmental record. From beginning to end. Dismal at best. https://thenarwhal.ca/harper-s-timeline-canada-climate-change-2006-2014/ What's 5% of climate change? Quote
ExFlyer Posted Wednesday at 03:18 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 03:18 PM 5 minutes ago, Legato said: What's 5% of climate change? Huh??? 5%??? I said Harper had 5 environment ministers in his term. 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell others what theirs should be.
CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 05:11 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:11 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Harper pulled out of Kyoto. No, harper just killed the commitment when it was obvious that it would not be humanly possible to meet it. The liberals killed Kyoto. They killed it with decade of Doing absolutely nothing. By the time harper took over it was physically impossible to meet the commitment so he just stopped lying about it The liberals also didn't keep their parents commitments. We're not going to make them either Chretien famously was caught saying that when it comes to climate change you always go and you always make the promises but you never do anything. The liberals, who the left say are the environmental saviors of Canada, have the worst track record when it comes to the environment. Emissions went up higher under them and the conservatives and they made the most promises and broke them all. Sorry, not a conservative problem. This is all on the libs Edited Wednesday at 05:12 PM by CdnFox 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted Wednesday at 05:29 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:29 PM (edited) 18 minutes ago, CdnFox said: No, harper just killed the commitment when it was obvious that it would not be humanly possible to meet it. The liberals killed Kyoto. The liberals also didn't keep their parents commitments. We're not going to make them either Chretien famously was caught saying that when it comes to climate change you always go and you always make the promises but you never do anything. ... Sorry, not a conservative problem. This is all on the libs What a dolt you are. Cannot even admit it was your conservative party that pulled out of Kyoto LOL What a LOSER in every aspect Ha Ha Ha Here are some facts..... "The Canadian environment minister, Peter Kent, said Canada was invoking its legal right to withdraw. Kyoto did not represent the way forward for Canada or the world, he said." https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/dec/13/canada-pulls-out-kyoto-protocol The Liberals were not in power...Harper was and by the time Harper was forced to quit, the damage was done. 5 environment ministers during Harpers tenure...LOL Prove what you claim Chretien said....once again you will deflect and backpedal LOL Oh yeah, it is a conservative problem. 5 environmental ministers and none could do the job and when Harper was punted out...there was no climate program. l Epic FAIL. Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq is the fifth minister in that portfolio in eight years to promise regulations aimed at curbing climate-warming emissions. 2013 was supposed to be the year, but nope. By year’s end, Harper confirmed we’ll have to wait a few more years. Meanwhile, the Conservatives continued to approve the expansion of the tar sands without any plan to reduce climate pollution. This will add to the 250 million litres of liquid toxic waste currently created by the tar sands every day. https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2014/01/04/13-Fails-For-Harper-2013/ An environmental group on Friday gave the Harper government a series of failing grades on its approach to the environment in general, and climate change in particular. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/harper-government-given-failing-grade-on-climate-change-1.606465 ulie Gelfand, the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, said a climate change audit found current federal measures will have little effect on emissions by 2020, the year Canada committed under the Copenhagen Accord to reduce domestic greenhouse gas emissions 17 per cent below 2005 levels. https://thenarwhal.ca/no-overall-vision-scathing-new-audit-environment-commissioner-exposes-canada-s-utter-climate-failure/ Edited Wednesday at 05:30 PM by ExFlyer 1 Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell others what theirs should be.
CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 05:58 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 05:58 PM 25 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: What a dolt you are. Cannot even admit it was your conservative party that pulled out of Kyoto LOL Didn't say he didn't pull out. I said he wasn't the one that killed it and I'm right What a twat you are that you can't admit that for 15 years the liberals didn't do anything on Kyoto Remember when Dion and Iggy were on stage debating during the leadership race and Iggy said of climate change and Kyoto "we didn't get it done" and Dion Said "Do you think it's easy to set priorities?" Sorry kiddo. Kyoto was dead before harper ever showed up. And the same thing with paris now, trudeau didn't do a single thing to actually try and achieve his paris targets and we're never going to make it. Carney is not doing anything either.. But I'm sure that if Poilievre gets in next year in a snap election and then points out it's not possible to hit paris you'll say it's all his fault. Gretchen was a failure and Justin was a failure and Martin was a failure although a short-lived one. Still adds up to about a quarter century of liberal failures on climate change But as usual you want to blame all the liberal failures on harper which is blatantly not true 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 06:27 PM (edited) 28 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Didn't say he didn't pull out. I said he wasn't the one that killed it and I'm right ... But as usual you want to blame all the liberal failures on harper which is blatantly not true You said "No, harper just killed the commitment when it was obvious that it would not be humanly possible to meet it. The liberals killed Kyoto." As usual...you are wrong LOL Once again " "The Canadian environment minister, Peter Kent, said Canada was invoking its legal right to withdraw. Kyoto did not represent the way forward for Canada or the world, he said." https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/dec/13/canada-pulls-out-kyoto-protocol" As I said....backpedalling is what you do best LOL Oh and deflecting is what you do too. Edited Wednesday at 06:29 PM by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell others what theirs should be.
CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 06:55 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 06:55 PM 27 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: You said "No, harper just killed the commitment when it was obvious that it would not be humanly possible to meet it. The liberals killed Kyoto." That's literally what I said I said Me - I say blue You- NOOOOO NO NO NOOOO!!! WHAT YOU SAID WAAAAAS BLUE!!!!!!!!!!!! Yeah ok kid. Harper shut it down the libs killed it. Simple enough. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
ExFlyer Posted Wednesday at 07:45 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 07:45 PM 41 minutes ago, CdnFox said: That's literally Harper shut it down Phuck...you cannot even read, let alone comprehend. "In 2011, Canada, under Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government, officially withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol. This decision was the culmination of years of the Conservative party's opposition to the treaty, which they viewed as ineffective and economically damaging. While Canada had signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, the Conservative government, taking office in 2006, actively worked against its implementation and eventually withdrew. Harper KILLED the accord you dolt. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell others what theirs should be.
CdnFox Posted Wednesday at 07:59 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 07:59 PM (edited) 14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Phuck...you cannot even read, let alone comprehend Kid you're literally repeating what I said, so i'm comprehending fine. The problem is you. Your brain is so dense that I am genuinely concerned you're about to collapse into your own black hole Edited Wednesday at 07:59 PM by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.