myata Posted February 25 Author Report Posted February 25 This shame and disgrace will stick for a long, long time. How can one wash it off, I've no idea. Belorusia. North Korea. Nicaragua. A bunch of African dictatorships. And the United States .. of what? Shame. Disgrace. 2 1 Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Nationalist Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 5 minutes ago, myata said: This shame and disgrace will stick for a long, long time. How can one wash it off, I've no idea. Belorusia. North Korea. Nicaragua. A bunch of African dictatorships. And the United States .. of what? Shame. Disgrace. Ya...you are quite the disgrace. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Aristides Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 Trump is worse than Chamberlain, he is not only appeasing aggression, he is supporting it. 1 1 Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 8 hours ago, myata said: On the 236th year of its history, the United States voted with the aggressor on the matter of his aggression. Supported the aggressor, in fact and by deed. That's it, the record in history for as long as it will exist. To be studied by students and professors, with all details and names. Nothing can change the fact of record now. No such lying twisting words exist. even since the end of the Second World War it is not uncommon for America to support the far right against the internationalist left to include American support for French imperialism in Indochina America supporting fascist dictatorships from Franco to Pinochet America supporting the Apartheid regime in South Africa even South Korea was a far right military dictatorship up until the 1990's it is in fact the Western Europeans who have switched sides, as they have become de facto Marxist Leninist regimes imposing totalitarianism upon their own populations even the United Kingdom has become INGSOC under the rule of Sir Keir Stalin Quote
User Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 18 minutes ago, Aristides said: Trump is worse than Chamberlain, he is not only appeasing aggression, he is supporting it. This is just an outright lie. Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Aristides said: Trump is worse than Chamberlain, he is not only appeasing aggression, he is supporting it. pay no attention to the fact that both Winston Churchill & Franklin Roosevelt sided with Josef Stalin even after Josef Stalin has sided with Adolf Hitler first, Stalin the aggressor in Poland as well pay no attention to the fact that America made peace with Communist China even while America was fighting the Communists in South Vietnam pay no attention to the fact that America had Detente with the Soviets even at the height of the Cold War on the brink of World War Three pay no attention to the fact that the Neocons said that Vladimir Putin was a trusted partner, inviting him into the "G8", relying on Putin in order to conduct operations in Afghanistan America can do business with China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, even Iran & Venezuela, but not Russia ? that makes no geopolitical sense Edited February 25 by Dougie93 Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 (edited) 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Such a situation. This war is over. Those of you who still want the slaughter to continue, are nothing more than sore losers. I would think you're starting to get used to losing by now. the problem for Ukraine is that it became the cause celebre of the Woke Progressive lunatic leftist cultural revolution now that said revolution is imploding, Ukraine is simply being dragged down into that vortex the moral of the story being ; make yourselves the enemy of the American right, at your own peril Canada is learning the hard way as well the first act of the Republican Party was to make war against Americans mass murdering over 300,000 Americans in a total war of annihilation foreigners declaring war against the Republican Party might have considered just whom they were messing with beforehand looking at you, Justin Trudeau Edited February 25 by Dougie93 1 Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 (edited) 3 hours ago, myata said: This shame and disgrace will stick for a long, long time. How can one wash it off, I've no idea. Belorusia. North Korea. Nicaragua. A bunch of African dictatorships. And the United States .. of what? Shame. Disgrace. since when has the internationalist left been against Communist regimes in Africa & Latin America ? Nicaragua ? good grief, the Sandinistas were the leftist heroes against that "imperialist" Ronald Reagan seems like Donald Trump has simply stolen the Democrats Peace Now Detente platform of the 1970s Edited February 25 by Dougie93 Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 (edited) 52 minutes ago, User said: This is just an outright lie. isn't it amusing how the leftist Peaceniks have become the Imperialist Warmonger parties the Democrats & Liberals espousing views to the right of even Barry Goldwater now it's like Tulsi Gabbard is a Democrat straight out of 1976, she could have worked for Jimmy Carter but now she's a "Russian asset" simply for pursuing Detente as a policy the Red Scare of the 1950's is back, ironically coming from a McCarthyist left now Edited February 25 by Dougie93 1 Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 17 hours ago, herbie said: Not at all. You just have to understand the Bronze Bozo and his MAGAtts have no sense of shame. None whatsoever. Proud Boys where lying, backstabbing, betrayal, and collusion with the enemy are redeeming qualities. there's no shame in America declaring that it no longer has any interest in a proxy war against Russia while stating that if the Europeans are determined to fight that war, America will keep its options open therein that's actually the historic American position vis a vis imperial wars in Europe, right back to George Washington Quote
myata Posted February 25 Author Report Posted February 25 1 hour ago, Dougie93 said: as they have become de facto Marxist Leninist regimes imposing totalitarianism upon their own populations And the crazy drumming is going on and on. "War is Peace" who needs f-g prophesies anymore? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
Dougie93 Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 12 minutes ago, myata said: And the crazy drumming is going on and on. "War is Peace" who needs f-g prophesies anymore? Woke Progressives are not liberals Woke Progressives are totalitarian Marxist Leninists the Communists are in London & Brussels now, not the Kremlin Quote
robosmith Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: Such a situation. This war is over. Those of you who still want the slaughter to continue, are nothing more than sore losers. I would think you're starting to get used to losing by now. I KNOW that you will eventually understand that the entire free world LOST, but probably you will never admit it to yourself. 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Ya...you are quite the disgrace. It is you surrender monkeys who are the disgrace. And ^this is your necessary deflection because deep down you know that. 1 Quote
User Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: I KNOW that you will eventually understand that the entire free world LOST, but probably you will never admit it to yourself. What was lost? What are you talking about? 16 minutes ago, robosmith said: It is you surrender monkeys who are the disgrace. And ^this is your necessary deflection because deep down you know that. Who has surrendered? What are you talking about? Quote
herbie Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 5 hours ago, myata said: This shame and disgrace will stick for a long, long time. How can one wash it off, I've no idea. Wasted on people with no shame at all. The criminal President could press the launch button and they'll all testify their support of him in Hell. 1 1 Quote
myata Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 12 hours ago, Aristides said: he is not only appeasing aggression, he is supporting it. "We must join with Sauron". Can one really invent anything new in this history? Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
myata Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 (edited) 9 hours ago, herbie said: and they'll all testify their support of him in Hell. Well, that's what they did any number of the last times. Find one difference. Yes, it has landed "in the land of the free" (way ago) and "leader of the free world" (formerly), etc. America's new club and let's recite it once again, for the history: - Belarus: totalitarian dictatorship - Burkina Faco: military junta - Burundi: coup, military junta - Central African Republic: coup, military junta - Democratic PR of Korea (North Korea): totalitarian dictatorship - Equatorial Guinea: vote for a peanut - Eritrea: dictatorship - Haiti: total chaos - Hungary: authoritarian ruler - Israel: 100% pure opportunistic, no principles - Nicaragua: dictatorship - Niger: military junta - Palau: vote for a peanut - Russian Federation: Vlad Putin's totalitarian dictatorship - and the United States of America: former leader of the free world, currently in the third world on the way to the fourth. Edited February 26 by myata Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
myata Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 (edited) And so, to recall the recent discussion on "U.S. will be friends only with those who share the Beloved Idol's values"? Can we put it side by side with the General Assembly vote? And for the completeness of the picture, certain images from the dumbest "Gaza 2026" promo? Is it only a random coincidence? Can it be? Certain as the night the slimy, corrupting and rotting by the minute Republican goo have seen and understood what it is even with their decomposing brains devoid of any remnants of integrity, honesty and decency. Note how some pathetic, miserable folk here claiming to be ex-army, having honor and principles is reduced to sending coy smiles having nothing to say about where this disgusting progression leads? Yes, right. There's no, cannot be any rational explanations or justification for this grotesque travesty that's been unfolding before our eyes in any sane version of our universe. Edited February 26 by myata Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
gatomontes99 Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 What would this bill have done? Real world. If this bill had passed. What would it have done? Because if it was just words with no mechanisms for change, what does it matter how we vote other than the feels that come from it? America has strongly condemned Russia's actions. How would it help to do that again? It didn't change anything in the past. Maybe this time we try to get the war ended and move on. Yes, that means Russia bullied their way into some of what they wanted. But it also means innocent civilians in Ukraine aren't being killed. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
myata Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 (edited) Hear hear. They care about Ukraine now.. except forgot to ask Ukrainians themselves. No factually, they voted against the resolution that Ukraine drafted with Russia, North Korea and Nicaragua. This is what stands in the eyes of the world. This is the true meaning of it now. This is what's written in the history now, for generations. And who cares about stinky lying words? Any stinky liar will come up with sh*tloads of those. Edited February 26 by myata Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
User Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 7 hours ago, myata said: And so, to recall the recent discussion on "U.S. will be friends only with those who share the Beloved Idol's values"? It helps, if you actually read or listen to what Vance says instead of the lies posted about him. Maybe you just done care. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: What would this bill have done? Real world. If this bill had passed. What would it have done? Because if it was just words with no mechanisms for change, what does it matter how we vote other than the feels that come from it? America has strongly condemned Russia's actions. How would it help to do that again? It didn't change anything in the past. Maybe this time we try to get the war ended and move on. Yes, that means Russia bullied their way into some of what they wanted. But it also means innocent civilians in Ukraine aren't being killed. From a practical point of view it would have done nothing, a surprisingly huge amount of the bills in the uNR symbolic or making statements rather than actually effective or practical But it would send a message as to whose side you are on so to speak. What your position is going to be as a nation with regards to settlement or commitment to continue the war if necessary. Absolutely in the past America has condemned the invasion. Refusing to do so this time signals that there is a strong change in position and that America is moving to a much stronger pro-russian point of view. Voting in favor of the resolution this time would have sent the signal that their policies hadn't changed even if they were seeking a solution. Voting against it signals they are anti ukraine and pro-russian. I think the wiser thing for trump to do would have been to signal neutrality by abstaining. If he's going to be the peacemaker that would have been a better choice, saying that Russia has some valid points and Ukraine has some valid points and can we all come together and figure this out. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
myata Posted February 26 Author Report Posted February 26 (edited) This is the reality, now. In the eyes of the whole world. C'mon try to change it. America's new club. Edited February 26 by myata Quote If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant
User Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 33 minutes ago, myata said: This is the reality, now. In the eyes of the whole world. C'mon try to change it. America's new club. So... when Ukraine voted with Russia, Iran, and North Korea against Israel? Does this make your head explode: "Israeli officials were especially incensed by Ukraine supporting November 2022 resolutions calling for a Middle East free of nuclear weapons, and another for an international conference on Israeli-Palestinian peace in Moscow, as it was battling Russian troops in its own territory." https://www.timesofisrael.com/ukraines-backing-of-90-of-un-anti-israel-votes-could-hurt-support-israeli-envoy/ Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 26 Report Posted February 26 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: From a practical point of view it would have done nothing, a surprisingly huge amount of the bills in the uNR symbolic or making statements rather than actually effective or practical But it would send a message as to whose side you are on so to speak. What your position is going to be as a nation with regards to settlement or commitment to continue the war if necessary. Absolutely in the past America has condemned the invasion. Refusing to do so this time signals that there is a strong change in position and that America is moving to a much stronger pro-russian point of view. Voting in favor of the resolution this time would have sent the signal that their policies hadn't changed even if they were seeking a solution. Voting against it signals they are anti ukraine and pro-russian. I think the wiser thing for trump to do would have been to signal neutrality by abstaining. If he's going to be the peacemaker that would have been a better choice, saying that Russia has some valid points and Ukraine has some valid points and can we all come together and figure this out. I think abstaining would have been prudent. But Trump might have been signaling his opposition to the UN as well. That corrupt crap hole funds terrorism and lines the pockets of the ruler class. It might be time to leave. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.