Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Quote

As I said from the outset, I never broke the law, and I never would. I would never put any personal benefit above my solemn responsibility as your mayor. It is worth repeating the facts because many sensational and false claims have been made. So let me be clear, I never asked anyone to break the law on my behalf or on behalf of my campaign, never. And I absolutely never traded my power as an elected official for any personal benefit. 

https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/079-25/transcript-mayor-eric-adams-delivers-address-new-yorkers#/0

Isn't it weird? The Democrat wrongfully accused the black man and the Republican fixed it.

The Banana Republic died this year.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
58 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Isn't it weird? The Democrat wrongfully accused the black man and the Republican fixed it.

The Banana Republic died this year.

You're FOS. Adams sucked up to Trump and agreed to help his MASS DEPORTATION plans and cut NYC sanctuary practice, so Trump paid him back with a very corrupt order to his DoJ to drop the charges. 🤮

Of course, it is without prejudice to make sure Adams keeps his word. 

Apparently you missed the part where the order is NOT based on the merit of the case while the DoJ explanation struggled mightily to make very lame excuses which are as transparently corrupt as can be.

  • Haha 1
  • gatomontes99 changed the title to Mayor Adams of NYC (wrongly charged by Joe Biden's DOJ) Has Charges Dropped By Trump's More Fair DOJ
Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Isn't it weird? The Democrat wrongfully accused the black man and the Republican fixed it.

The Banana Republic died this year.

Not so weird. Libbies have no morals or honor. Conservatives do.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You're FOS. Adams sucked up to Trump and agreed to help his MASS DEPORTATION plans and cut NYC sanctuary practice, so Trump paid him back with a very corrupt order to his DoJ to drop the charges. 🤮

Of course, it is without prejudice to make sure Adams keeps his word. 

Apparently you missed the part where the order is NOT based on the merit of the case while the DoJ explanation struggled mightily to make very lame excuses which are as transparently corrupt as can be.

Actually, the dismissal was based on the lack of merit on the case.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Morals and honor don't defend FRAUD like YOU DO. LMAO

You must be thinking of Brandon and his crime ridden family.

Morals and honor win elections, close borders, cut id1otic spending, negotiate peace and have hostages and Americans held abroad, brought home.

None of which your limp heros can accomplish. 

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You must be thinking of Brandon and his crime ridden family.

Morals and honor win elections, close borders, cut id1otic spending, negotiate peace and have hostages and Americans held abroad, brought home.

None of which your limp heros can accomplish. 

You defend EVERY FRAUD that Trump commits.

Your definition of morals and honor is BANKRUPT just like your definition of "slavery," and certainly not practiced by YOU.

Edited by robosmith
  • Sad 1
Posted

Lmao.

Trump takes it easy on a Black Democrat from the biggest city in the country AND LIBS WANT TO THROW THE BLACK MAN IN JAIL JUST BECAUSE TRUMP SAID NO.

I haven't seen the Democrats this mad since we freed the slaves.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
45 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao.

Trump takes it easy on a Black Democrat from the biggest city in the country AND LIBS WANT TO THROW THE BLACK MAN IN JAIL JUST BECAUSE TRUMP SAID NO.

I haven't seen the Democrats this mad since we freed the slaves.

YOU'RE WRONG as USUAL. The EVIDENCE against Adams is strong, which is why the Emil Bove didn't even look at it, let alone justify dropping the charges with it.

Posted (edited)

There's a simple word for it: "corruption". Yes, it has arrived. Now in America.

Edited by myata

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

Isn't this just delightfully typical of the Libbies? Adam's was a darling to these freaks. Now...he's a traitor to them.

snake-eating-itself-drawing-16.jpg

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
8 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Note that the charges have been dismissed without prejudice and can be refiled at any time if Adams displeases his benefactor. 

A judge has to dismiss with prejudice. This was just the DOJ dropping charges.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
15 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Isn't it weird? The Democrat wrongfully accused the black man and the Republican fixed it.

The Banana Republic died this year.

12 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao.

Trump takes it easy on a Black Democrat from the biggest city in the country AND LIBS WANT TO THROW THE BLACK MAN IN JAIL JUST BECAUSE TRUMP SAID NO.

I haven't seen the Democrats this mad since we freed the slaves.

It's a good thing you and I both know you don't believe any of this because actually doing so would make you a massive rube and mark.

It doesn't get much more banana republic than comically corrupt politician getting a lengthy list of charges dropped by another notoriously corrupt politician as part of a explicit quid pro quo.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's a good thing you and I both know you don't believe any of this because actually doing so would make you a massive rube and mark.

It doesn't get much more banana republic than comically corrupt politician getting a lengthy list of charges dropped by another notoriously corrupt politician as part of a explicit quid pro quo.

The search function is gone, for now. But I have started at least two threads about how Biden's handlers coerced Mayor Adams into following the party platform by bringing frivolous charges against him and his campaign manager. It is no coincidence that after Adams said illegal immigration was killing his city that he got called to DC and on that same day they raided his campaign manager. That was a signal. Then, when Adams said they were running out of money because of illegal immigration, they raided Adams's house.

When Trump was elected, everyone involved with the Adam's case quit. They worked in NY. They worked FOR NY. But they quit.

Adams was coerced into accepting illegal immigration and not criticizing the admin for what they were doing.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's a good thing you and I both know you don't believe any of this because actually doing so would make you a massive rube and mark.

It doesn't get much more banana republic than comically corrupt politician getting a lengthy list of charges dropped by another notoriously corrupt politician as part of a explicit quid pro quo.

LOL...so delightful to watch you freaks helplessly flail about with your defence of the indefensible.

I knew I'd enjoy this Trump admin. But man...the sheer pleasure of watching you fcked-up silly b@stards squirm is worth every second realistic folks waited for this.

Please...do continue.

I'm loving it.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The search function is gone, for now. But I have started at least two threads about how Biden's handlers coerced Mayor Adams into following the party platform by bringing frivolous charges against him and his campaign manager. It is no coincidence that after Adams said illegal immigration was killing his city that he got called to DC and on that same day they raided his campaign manager. That was a signal. Then, when Adams said they were running out of money because of illegal immigration, they raided Adams's house.

When Trump was elected, everyone involved with the Adam's case quit. They worked in NY. They worked FOR NY. But they quit.

Adams was coerced into accepting illegal immigration and not criticizing the admin for what they were doing.

Oh so you are a rube? Ok that's what I thought, serves me right for giving a MAGAtard the benefit of the doubt.

Adams is crooked. Everyone knows he's crooked. He's not particularly sophisticated about hiding how crooked he is.

And now he's getting let off by another crook so that he'll do Trump's bidding. This is mafia state shit.

Edited by Black Dog
Posted
15 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're FOS. Adams sucked up to Trump and agreed to help his MASS DEPORTATION plans and cut NYC sanctuary practice, so Trump paid him back with a very corrupt order to his DoJ to drop the charges. 🤮

Of course, it is without prejudice to make sure Adams keeps his word. 

Apparently you missed the part where the order is NOT based on the merit of the case while the DoJ explanation struggled mightily to make very lame excuses which are as transparently corrupt as can be.

Adams himself stated that NYC was getting overwhelmed with something like 10 thousand illegals per month. Not long after that, he finds himself in the crosshairs of the then controlled DOJ.

The moral of the story is, even Democrats are not allowed to speak out against the obvious pitfalls of unrestricted mass immigration.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh so you are a rube? Ok that's what I thought, serves me right for giving a MAGAtard the benefit of the doubt.

Adams is crooked. Everyone knows he's crooked. He's not particularly sophisticated about hiding how crooked he is.

And now he's getting let off by another crook so that he'll do Trump's bidding. This is mafia state shit.

You love using rules 2 and 8, don't you? This time you added a little bit of 7.

Calling me names doesn't refute anything I said. All the evidence supports what I am saying. You have an administration that used law fare against others with prosecutors that have been proven to be void of morals. You have all these "coincidences" (that i laid out avove) followed by a 180 degree attitude change. Now you have a DOJ throwing out the law fare. Everything points to Biden's handlers coercing Adams.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You love using rules 2 and 8, don't you? This time you added a little bit of 7.

I do not give a shit.

Quote

Calling me names doesn't refute anything I said. All the evidence supports what I am saying.

The evidence supports Adams being a crook.

Quote

You have an administration that used law fare against others with prosecutors that have been proven to be void of morals. You have all these "coincidences" (that i laid out avove) followed by a 180 degree attitude change.

I'll admit I hadn't heard your particular conspiracy theory around this but I must say "Biden invents fake corruption charges dating back a decade against Adams because of immigration" is a lot more far-fetched than "corrupt politician who is a product of a notoriously corrupt political machine is actually corrupt" and depends on ignoring some rather important facts, like the part where the investigation against Adams started in 2021 when he was still Brooklyn Borough president and before he criticized Biden. Oops.

Quote

Now you have a DOJ throwing out the law fare. Everything points to Biden's handlers coercing Adams.

Everything points to Trump dropping charges to get Adams to play ball, which is rank corruption. 

Edited by Black Dog
  • Thanks 1
Posted

lol incredible

Quote

As if to answer the question raised by how all this looks, Bove wrote in a footnote that the government “is not offering to exchange dismissal of a criminal case for Adams’s assistance on immigration enforcement.”

GKk-QmxWIAAnj9T.jpg

Posted
14 hours ago, herbie said:

Gather enough evidence to face a charge and Trump will let you off! Justice MAGA style.

The FBI is so shitty at gathering evidence that after a 3-yr-long witch hunt they had to make their own 😉

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
9 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

As in the Robert Menendez case, a corrupt Democrat was prosecuted. The only difference here is that Adams has thrown his lot in with Trump. The quid pro quo could not be more transparent. 

So you can already see a qpq here but you still don't see the one between Joe Biden and Zlochevsky? The part where Zloch gifted Joe's son a $1M/yr job and Joe fired the prosecutor who seized Zloch's assets?

Even if it is a qpq over here, for Trump's part he's only receiving help to further the American people's agenda, not $1M/yr for his son, and all he's asking of Adams is that he does his f'ing job properly

It's a pretty sad state of affairs if the only way that you can get a Dem politician to actually do his job is to bribe him... 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...